Characterization of the tRNA(Trp) genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

The intron of tRNA-TrpCCA is dispensable for growth and translation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

A part of eukaryotic tRNA genes harbor an intron at one nucleotide 3' to the anticodon, so that removal of the intron is an essential processing step for tRNA maturation. While some tRNA introns have important roles in modification of certain nucleotides, essentiality of the tRNA intron in eukaryotes has not been tested extensively. This is partly because most of the eukaryotic genomes have multiple genes encoding an isoacceptor tRNA. Here, we examined whether the intron of tRNA-Trp(CCA) genes, six copies of which are scattered on the genome of yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is essential for growth or translation of the yeast in vivo. We devised a procedure to remove all of the tRNA introns from the yeast genome iteratively with marker cassettes containing both positive and negative markers. Using this procedure, we removed all the introns from the six tRNA-Trp(CCA) genes, and found that the intronless strain grew normally and expressed tRNA-Trp(CCA) in an amount similar to that of the wild-type genes. Neither incorporation of (35)S-labeled amino acids into a TCA-insoluble fraction nor the major protein pattern on SDS-PAGE/2D gel were affected by complete removal of the intron, while expression levels of some proteins were marginally affected. Therefore, the tRNA-Trp(CCA) intron is dispensable for growth and bulk translation of the yeast. This raises the possibility that some mechanism other than selective pressure from translational efficiency maintains the tRNA intron on the yeast genome.

Functional differences among the six Saccharomyces cerevisiae tRNATrp genes

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae haploid genome includes six copies of the gene encoding tRNATrp which are scattered on five chromosomes. Other, non-functional tDNATrp fragments also occur in the genome. The segments of all six genes which encode the 72-nucleotide mature tRNATrp, as well as a 34-nucleotide intervening sequence, are identical. However, the 5' and 3' flanking sequences diverge virtually at the boundaries of the coding region. We have used an assay based on suppression of UGA mutations by multi-copy clones of tDNATrp to search for functional differences among these genes. Previous studies with one tDNATrp had demonstrated that moderate suppression of a UGA mutation, leu2-2, resulted from introduction of a multi-copy clone of the gene. Attempts to use this assay to select tDNATrp clones from a yeast genomic library yielded only four of the six different clones. The other two genes were amplified by PCR and cloned in pRS202, a 2 mu vector also used for the genomic library. Plasmids bearing the six tRNA genes were transformed into S. cerevisiae strain JG369.3B and scored for their ability to suppress the leu2-2 mutation as well as his4-260, another UGA marker. Two of the six tRNATrp clones were unable to suppress either marker, two evidenced weak suppression of the Leu auxotrophy, and two were able to suppress both markers. Growth rates in liquid media requiring suppression were measured for cell lines carrying each of the clones. Differences greater than 50-fold were observed in media lacking histidine. An evolutionary tree based on 5'-flanking sequence corresponds reasonably well with suppressor activity, while a similar analysis of 3'-flanking sequence does not. This suggests that the functional differences are based on divergence in the 5'-flanking sequences of the tRNATrp genes.

The functional analysis of nonsense suppressors derived from in vitro engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae tRNA(Trp) genes

Nonsense suppressors derived from Saccharomyces cerevisiae tRNA(Trp) genes have not been identified by classical genetic screens, although one can construct efficient amber (am) suppressors from them by making the appropriate anticodon mutation in vitro. Herein, a series of in vitro constructed putative suppressor genes was produced to test if pre-tRNA(Trp) processing difficulties could help to explain the lack of classical tRNA(Trp)-based suppressors. It is clear that inefficient processing of introns from precursor tRNA(Trp), or inaccurate overall processing, may explain why some of these constructs fail to promote nonsense suppression in vivo. However, deficient processing must be only one of the reasons why classical tRNA(Trp)-based suppressors have not been characterized, as suppression may still be extremely weak or absent in instances where the in vitro construct can lead to an accumulation of mature tRNA(Trp). Furthermore, suppression is also very weak in strains transformed with an intronless derivative of a putative tRNA(Trp) ochre (oc) suppressor gene, wherein intron removal cannot pose a problem.