Relationship of growth and psychoneurologic status of 2-year-old children of birthweight 500-999 g

Postnatal growth in preterm infants and later health outcomes: a systematic review

In preterm infants, poor postnatal growth is associated with adverse neurocognitive outcomes; conversely, rapid postnatal growth is supposedly harmful for future development of metabolic diseases.

CONCLUSION

In this systematic review, observational studies reported consistent positive associations between postnatal weight or head growth and neurocognitive outcomes; however, there was limited evidence from the few intervention studies. Evidence linking postnatal weight gain to later adiposity and other cardiovascular disease risk factors in preterm infants was also limited.

Methods to quantify soft tissue-based cranial growth and treatment outcomes in children: a systematic review

Context

Longitudinal assessment of cranial dimensions of growing children provides healthcare professionals with information about normal and deviating growth as well as treatment outcome.

Objective

To give an overview of soft tissue–based methods for quantitative longitudinal assessment of cranial dimensions in children until age 6 years and to assess the reliability of these methods in studies with good methodological quality.

Data source

PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, and CINAHL were searched. A manual search was performed to check for additional relevant studies.

Study selection

Primary publications on facial growth and treatment outcomes in children younger than age 6 years were included.

Data extraction

Independent data extraction was performed by two observers. A quality assessment instrument was used to determine methodological quality. Methods used in studies with good methodological quality were assessed for reliability expressed as the magnitude of the measurement error and the correlation coefficient between repeated measurements.

Results

In total, 165 studies were included, forming three groups of methods: head circumference anthropometry, direct anthropometry, and 2D photography and 3D imaging techniques (surface laser scanning and stereophotogrammetry). In general, the measurement error was below 2 mm, and correlation coefficients were very good.

Conclusion

Various methods for measuring cranial dimensions have shown to be reliable. Stereophotogrammetry is the most versatile method for quantitative longitudinal assessment of cranial dimensions and shapes in children. However, direct anthropometry continues to be the best method for routine clinical assessments of linear cranial dimensions in growing children until age 6 years.

Outcome of infants born preterm, with special emphasis on extremely low birthweight infants

The outcome of extremely low birthweight (ELBW) infants has been reviewed from published articles and up-to-date data from Japan. The mortality rate of these infants declined significantly from over 90% to below 50% after the introduction of intensive care in the 1970s, but the incidence of major neurological sequelae remained steady at around 20%. Similarly, the incidence of major neurological sequelae did not increase along with the decrement of birthweight, although the mortality rate increased significantly. Long-term follow-up of ELBW children until school age has revealed poor school performance in spite of the absence of major neurological sequelae and the attainment of average intelligence quotient scores. Physical growth is retarded initially but generally catches up by the age of 8-9 years. In Japan, the neonatal mortality rate of ELBW infants declined from 56% in 1981 to 25% in 1989 with an increased birth rate of ELBW infants. In ELBW infants cared for at Tokyo Women's Medical College during 1984-90, the survival rate was 112 out of 134 (84%) and the incidence of major neurological sequelae was 15 out of 87 (17%) at 1-8 years old. The viability limit of ELBW infants has been discussed based on recent data. As a result of the rapid progress of medical care of ELBW infants, their viability limit as defined in the Eugenic Protection Law in Japan was amended from 24 completed weeks of gestation to 22 completed weeks in 1991.

The good body: when big is better

An important cultural question is, "What is a 'good'--desirable, beautiful, impressive--body?" The answers are legion; here I examine why bigger bodies represent survival skill, and how this power symbolism is embodied by behaviors that guide larger persons toward the top of the social hierarchy. bigness is a complex concept comprising tallness, boniness, muscularity and fattiness. Data show that most people worldwide want to be big--both tall and fat. Those who achieve the ideal are disproportionately among the society's most socially powerful. In the food-secure West, fascination with power and the body has not waned, but has been redefined such that thinness is desired. This apparent anomaly is resolved by realizing that thinness in the midst of abundance--as long as one is also tall and muscular--still projects the traditional message of power, and brings such social boons as upward mobility.

Growth and very low birth weight

Information on the likelihood of catch up growth in poorly grown very low birthweight children is sparse. The centiles for weight, height, and head circumference were recorded at both 2 and 5 years of age for 135 very low birthweight children and 42 normal birthweight children. At both ages significantly more children of very low birth weight were under the 10th centile for weight and height. Children of birth weight under 1000 g were more often under the 10th centile for weight at 5 years compared with those of birth weight 1000-1500 g. Mean incremental weight gain between 2 and 5 years was significantly less for very low birthweight children. Mean increment in weight from 2 to 5 years was less for very low birthweight children who had been under the 10th centile for weight at 2 years; children who had been under the 10th centile for height also had lower mean height increments. The growth centiles achieved by 2 years of age were useful predictors of poor growth at 5 years, with perinatal data of marginal importance. Only six of 43 (14%) children with a weight at 5 years of age under the 10th centile were small for gestational age at birth. Very low birthweight children who had a weight or height under the 10th centile at 2 years of age usually remained in this category at 5 years with no evidence of catch up growth.

Five-year follow-up study of extremely low-birthweight infants

This study investigated whether extremely low-birthweight (ELBW) babies, who at two years had no major handicaps, were at higher risk for intellectual and socio-emotional problems at five years than a control group of children with normal birthweights. There were statistically significant differences between the two groups. The ELBW children were language-delayed, and more active and more intense in their behaviour. There was a tendency for the ELBW children to be lighter and shorter than the controls, but their mean head-circumference was significantly smaller. In general, however, if no serious neurological, neurosensory or cognitive impairment is found among ELBW children at two years, later cognitive and socio-emotional development is likely to be within the normal range.