1
|
Andrianova NV, Buyan MI, Zorova LD, Pevzner IB, Popkov VA, Babenko VA, Silachev DN, Plotnikov EY, Zorov DB. Kidney Cells Regeneration: Dedifferentiation of Tubular Epithelium, Resident Stem Cells and Possible Niches for Renal Progenitors. Int J Mol Sci 2019; 20:ijms20246326. [PMID: 31847447 PMCID: PMC6941132 DOI: 10.3390/ijms20246326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2019] [Revised: 12/10/2019] [Accepted: 12/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
A kidney is an organ with relatively low basal cellular regenerative potential. However, renal cells have a pronounced ability to proliferate after injury, which undermines that the kidney cells are able to regenerate under induced conditions. The majority of studies explain yielded regeneration either by the dedifferentiation of the mature tubular epithelium or by the presence of a resident pool of progenitor cells in the kidney tissue. Whether cells responsible for the regeneration of the kidney initially have progenitor properties or if they obtain a “progenitor phenotype” during dedifferentiation after an injury, still stays the open question. The major stumbling block in resolving the issue is the lack of specific methods for distinguishing between dedifferentiated cells and resident progenitor cells. Transgenic animals, single-cell transcriptomics, and other recent approaches could be powerful tools to solve this problem. This review examines the main mechanisms of kidney regeneration: dedifferentiation of epithelial cells and activation of progenitor cells with special attention to potential niches of kidney progenitor cells. We attempted to give a detailed description of the most controversial topics in this field and ways to resolve these issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadezda V. Andrianova
- Faculty of Bioengineering and Bioinformatics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119992 Moscow, Russia
- A.N. Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119992 Moscow, Russia
| | - Marina I. Buyan
- Faculty of Bioengineering and Bioinformatics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119992 Moscow, Russia
| | - Ljubava D. Zorova
- A.N. Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119992 Moscow, Russia
- V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, 117997 Moscow, Russia
| | - Irina B. Pevzner
- A.N. Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119992 Moscow, Russia
- V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, 117997 Moscow, Russia
| | - Vasily A. Popkov
- A.N. Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119992 Moscow, Russia
- V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, 117997 Moscow, Russia
| | - Valentina A. Babenko
- A.N. Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119992 Moscow, Russia
- V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, 117997 Moscow, Russia
| | - Denis N. Silachev
- A.N. Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119992 Moscow, Russia
- V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, 117997 Moscow, Russia
| | - Egor Y. Plotnikov
- A.N. Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119992 Moscow, Russia
- V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, 117997 Moscow, Russia
- Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Institute of Molecular Medicine, 119991 Moscow, Russia
- Correspondence: (E.Y.P.); (D.B.Z.); Tel.: +7-495-939-5944 (E.Y.P.)
| | - Dmitry B. Zorov
- A.N. Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, 119992 Moscow, Russia
- V.I. Kulakov National Medical Research Center of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Perinatology, 117997 Moscow, Russia
- Correspondence: (E.Y.P.); (D.B.Z.); Tel.: +7-495-939-5944 (E.Y.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND The potential of a mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) therapy to accelerate the repair of ischemically damaged human kidneys during 24 hours of warm perfusion was evaluated. The hypothesis was that by administering MSC directly to the renal tissue, there would be an improved opportunity for cellular repair mediated by intrarenal paracrine effects. METHODS Studies were performed using the exsanguinous metabolic support (EMS) tissue-engineering platform. Five pairs of human kidney allografts from donation after circulatory death donors were studied. One human kidney was EMS perfused for 24 hours (control), whereas its paired kidney was EMS perfused with MSC (1 × 10). The kidneys were evaluated for DNA synthesis, cytokine/chemokine synthesis, cytoskeletal regeneration, and mitosis. RESULTS Treatment with MSC resulted in reduced inflammatory cytokines synthesized by the kidneys. Mesenchymal stem cell treatment led to a significant increase in the synthesis of adenosine triphosphate and growth factors resulting in normalization of metabolism and the cytoskeleton. Toluidine Blue staining of MSC-treated kidneys demonstrated a significant increase in the number of renal cells undergoing mitosis (26%) compared with EMS perfusion alone. CONCLUSIONS To our knowledge, our work is the first to have demonstrated actual renal regeneration while ischemically damaged human kidneys are perfused ex vivo for 24 hours. The observed regeneration entails: increased synthesis of adenosine triphosphate, a reduced inflammatory response, increased synthesis of growth factors, normalization of the cytoskeleton and mitosis. The ability to regenerate renal tissue ex vivo sufficiently to result in immediate function could revolutionize transplantation by solving the chronic organ shortage.
Collapse
|
3
|
McCampbell KK, Wingert RA. New tides: using zebrafish to study renal regeneration. Transl Res 2014; 163:109-22. [PMID: 24183931 PMCID: PMC3946610 DOI: 10.1016/j.trsl.2013.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2013] [Revised: 09/24/2013] [Accepted: 10/08/2013] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Over the past several decades, the zebrafish has become one of the major vertebrate model organisms used in biomedical research. In this arena, the zebrafish has emerged as an applicable system for the study of kidney diseases and renal regeneration. The relevance of the zebrafish model for nephrology research has been increasingly appreciated as the understanding of zebrafish kidney structure, ontogeny, and the response to damage has steadily expanded. Recent studies have documented the amazing regenerative characteristics of the zebrafish kidney, which include the ability to replace epithelial populations after acute injury and to grow new renal functional units, termed nephrons. Here we discuss how nephron composition is conserved between zebrafish and mammals, and highlight how recent findings from zebrafish studies utilizing transgenic technologies and chemical genetics can complement traditional murine approaches in the effort to dissect how the kidney responds to acute damage and identify therapeutics that enhance human renal regeneration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rebecca A Wingert
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Ind.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
The kidney is widely regarded as an organ without regenerative abilities. However, in recent years this dogma has been challenged on the basis of observations of kidney recovery following acute injury, and the identification of renal populations that demonstrate stem cell characteristics in various species. It is currently speculated that the human kidney can regenerate in some contexts, but the mechanisms of renal regeneration remain poorly understood. Numerous controversies surround the potency, behaviour and origins of the cell types that are proposed to perform kidney regeneration. The present review explores the current understanding of renal stem cells and kidney regeneration events, and examines the future challenges in using these insights to create new clinical treatments for kidney disease.
Collapse
|
5
|
Oliver JA, Klinakis A, Cheema FH, Friedlander J, Sampogna RV, Martens TP, Liu C, Efstratiadis A, Al-Awqati Q. Proliferation and migration of label-retaining cells of the kidney papilla. J Am Soc Nephrol 2009; 20:2315-27. [PMID: 19762493 DOI: 10.1681/asn.2008111203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The kidney papilla contains a population of cells with several characteristics of adult stem cells, including the retention of proliferation markers during long chase periods (i.e., they are label-retaining cells [LRCs]). To determine whether the papillary LRCs generate new cells in the normal adult kidney, we examined cell proliferation throughout the kidney and found that the upper papilla is a site of enhanced cell cycling. Using genetically modified mice that conditionally expressed green fluorescence protein fused to histone 2B, we observed that the LRCs of the papilla proliferated only in its upper part, where they associate with "chains" of cycling cells. The papillary LRCs decreased in number with age, suggesting that the cells migrated to the upper papilla before entering the cell cycle. To test this directly, we marked papillary cells with vital dyes in vivo and found that some cells in the kidney papilla, including LRCs, migrated toward other parts of the kidney. Acute kidney injury enhanced both cell migration and proliferation. These results suggest that during normal homeostasis, LRCs of the kidney papilla (or their immediate progeny) migrate to the upper papilla and form a compartment of rapidly proliferating cells, which may play a role in repair after ischemic injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan A Oliver
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Borghoff SJ, Youtsey NL, Swenberg JA. A comparison of European High Test gasoline and PS-6 unleaded gasoline in their abilities to induce alpha 2u-globulin nephropathy and renal cell proliferation. Toxicol Lett 1992; 63:21-33. [PMID: 1384172 DOI: 10.1016/0378-4274(92)90104-r] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
Male Fischer-344 rats were administered European High Test gasoline (EHT) (50-500 mg/kg), PS-6 unleaded gasoline (UG) (16-500 mg/kg) or 2,2,4-trimethylpentane (TMP) (0.95-30 mg/kg) by gavage for ten consecutive days. To measure cell replication, rats were exposed to [3H]thymidine continuously over the last 7 days of the exposure period. Twenty-four hours after the final dose, protein droplet (PD) accumulation, alpha 2u-globulin (alpha 2u) concentration and the nuclear labeling index (LI), as a measure of cell replication, were measured in the kidneys of control and treated rats. Dose-related increases in PD, alpha 2u and cell replication were detected in the kidneys of rats treated with either gasoline mixture or TMP. The accumulation of PD and the increase in alpha 2u was greater in the kidneys of UG- and TMP-treated rats than in the kidneys of rats treated with EHT. These differences were attributed to the higher composition of branched hydrocarbons in UG, which have been shown to be the biologically active components for these endpoints. The extent of renal cell proliferation was similar in both EHT-, UG- and TMP-treated rats. This suggests that other components besides the branched hydrocarbons are responsible for the increased renal cell replication in EHT-treated rats.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S J Borghoff
- Chemical Industry Institute of Toxicology, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
| | | | | |
Collapse
|