Non-histone chromatin proteins that recognize specific sequences of DNA

Dynamic interaction of HMGA1a proteins with chromatin

High-mobility-group proteins A1 (HMGA1; previously named HMGI/Y) function as architectural chromatin-binding proteins and are involved in the transcriptional regulation of several genes. We have used cells expressing proteins fused to green fluorescent protein (GFP) and fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) to analyze the distribution and dynamics of HMGA1a in vivo. HMGA1-GFP proteins localize preferentially to heterochromatin and remain bound to chromosomes during mitosis. FRAP experiments showed that they are highly mobile components of euchromatin, heterochromatin and of mitotic chromosomes, although with different resident times. For a more-detailed investigation on the interaction of HMGA1a with chromatin, the contribution of the AT-hook DNA-binding motifs was analyzed using point-mutated HMGA1a-GFP proteins. Furthermore, by inhibiting kinase or histone deacetylase activities, and with the help of fusion proteins lacking specific phosphorylation sites, we analyzed the effect of reversible modifications of HMGA1a on chromatin binding. Collectively our data show that the kinetic properties of HMGA1a proteins are governed by the number of functional AT-hooks and are regulated by specific phosphorylation patterns. The higher residence time in heterochromatin and chromosomes, compared with euchromatic regions, correlates with an increased phosphorylation level of HMGA1a. The regulated dynamic properties of HMGA1a fusion proteins indicate that HMGA1 proteins are mechanistically involved in local and global changes in chromatin structure.

Biospecific interactions: their quantitative characterization and use for solute purification

Biospecificity is due largely to the formation and dissociation of non-covalent complexes between small molecules and macromolecules, or between two macromolecules. The first part of this review is concerned with the use of such biospecificity in the fractionation and identification of solutes. Major emphasis is given to affinity chromatography, especially in regard to the practical considerations inherent in an experimental situation and to the wide range of specific interactions that can be utilized. The second part of the review considers the quantitative characterization of biospecific complex formation. The merits of frontal gel chromatography, electrophoretic methods and affinity chromatography are discussed, and special consideration is given to the effects of ligand and/or acceptor multivalency because of its relevance to many biospecific interactions. Finally attention is drawn to the feasibility of employing quantitative affinity chromatographic theory for the determination of association constants for antigen-antibody systems by radioimmunoassay and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay techniques.