Supercritical fluid extraction as a sample preparation technique for the direct isolation of drugs from plasma prior to analysis

Supercritical fluid extraction of 13-cis retinoic acid and its photoisomers from selected pharmaceutical dosage forms

13-Cis retinoic acid (Accutane) was extracted from a cream, gel, capsule and beadlet dosage from using supercritical carbon dioxide modified with 5% methanol as the mobile phase. The pump pressure and the extraction chamber and restrictor temperature were experimentally optimized at 325 atm and 45 degrees C, respectively. A 2.5-min static and 5-min dynamic extraction time were used. The supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) eluent was trapped in methanol, injected into the high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) system, and quantitated by ultraviolet detection at 360 nm. Application of the SFE method to spiked placebo dosage forms gave 13-cis retinoic acid recoveries of 98.8, 98.9, 98.8 and 100% for the cream, gel, capsule and beadlet, respectively, with R.S.D.s in the range 0.6-0.9% (n = 4). Inter-day percent error and precision of the extraction were 1.1-2.0 and 0.2-2.4% (n = 3), respectively, and intra-day percent error and precision were 1.0-3.0 and 0.3-2.1% (n = 8), respectively. Percent error and precision data for spiked celite samples in the 0.05-1.0 microgram ml-1 range were 0.59-4.75 and 1.8-2.1% (n = 3), respectively. The extraction method was applied to commercial 13-cis retinoic acid dosage forms and the results compared to unextracted samples. Linear regression analysis of concentration versus peak height gave a correlation coefficient of 0.9991 with a slope of 7.468 and a y-intercept of 0.1923. The percent error and precision data were 1.3-5.3 and 0.2-1.5% (n = 4), respectively. The photoisomers of 13-cis retinoic acid were also extracted with the method and recoveries of 90.4-92.4% with R.S.D.s of 1.5-3.4% were obtained (n = 4).

Extraction of pharmaceuticals using pressurised carbon dioxide

This paper reviews the applications of super- and sub-critical carbon dioxide for the extraction of pharmaceuticals from various matrices. The matrices covered are divided into the following types: animal feed, formulations, biological and miscellaneous, with various sub-divisions as appropriate. The polar nature of most pharmaceuticals often precludes the use of carbon dioxide only, so it is common to find the addition of a more polar solvent, as modifier. As the majority of sample types covered are solid, little if any pre-treatment is required, with the exception of grinding, prior to insertion in the sample extraction cell. For liquid-type matrices, sample pre-treatment is the normal. Often this may involve adsorption on an inert support e.g. Celite or diatomaceous earth, or immobilisation on a functionalised silica surface, e.g. C18. The later may take the form of a solid phase extraction cartridge or disk. An attempt has also been made to sample from liquid matrices directly using a modified extraction cell. The variety of sample types, matrices and analyte polarity places stringent requirements on the use of pressurised carbon dioxide. Its potential for effective recovery is examined in this review.

Supercritical fluid extraction of selected pharmaceuticals from water and serum

Selected drugs from benzodiazepine, anabolic agent and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) therapeutic classes were extracted from water and serum using a supercritical CO2 mobile phase. The samples were extracted at a pump pressure of 329 MPa, an extraction chamber temperature of 45 degrees C, and a restrictor temperature of 60 degrees C. The static extraction time for all samples was 2.5 min and the dynamic extraction time ranged from 5 to 20 min. The analytes were collected in appropriate solvent traps and assayed by modified literature HPLC procedures. Analyte recoveries were calculated based on peak height measurements of extracted vs. unextracted analyte. The recovery of the benzodiazepines ranged from 80 to 98% in water and from 75 to 94% in serum. Anabolic drug recoveries from water and serum ranged from 67 to 100% and 70 to 100%, respectively. The NSAIDs were recovered from water in the 76 to 97% range and in the 76 to 100% range from serum. Accuracy, precision and endogenous peak interference, if any, were determined for blank and spiked serum extractions and compared with classical sample preparation techniques of liquid-liquid and solid-phase extraction reported in the literature. For the benzodiazepines, accuracy and precision for supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) ranged from 1.95 to 3.31 and 0.57 to 1.25%, respectively (n = 3). The SFE accuracy and precision data for the anabolic agents ranged from 4.03 to 7.84 and 0.66 to 2.78%, respectively (n = 3). The accuracy and precision data reported for the SFE of the NSAIDs ranged from 2.79 to 3.79 and 0.33 to 1.27%, respectively (n = 3). The precision of the SFE method from serum was shown to be comparable to the precision obtained with other classical preparation techniques.