Pharmacokinetics and biotransformation of orally administered oestrone sulphate and oestradiol valerate in post-menopausal women

Hormone therapy in the postmenopausal years: considering benefits and risks in clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Menopausal symptoms can be very distressing and considerably affect a woman's personal and social life. It is becoming more and more evident that leaving bothersome symptoms untreated in midlife may lead to altered quality of life, reduced work productivity and, possibly, overall impaired health. Hormone therapy (HT) for the relief of menopausal symptoms has been the object of much controversy over the past two decades. At the beginning of the century, a shadow was cast on the use of HT owing to the concern for cardiovascular and cerebrovascular risks, and breast cancer, arising following publication of a large randomized placebo-controlled trial. Findings of a subanalysis of the trial data and extended follow-up studies, along with other more modern clinical trials and observational studies, have provided new evidence on the effects of HT.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

The goal of the following paper is to appraise the most significant clinical literature on the effects of hormones in postmenopausal women, and to report the benefits and risks of HT for the relief of menopausal symptoms.

SEARCH METHODS

A Pubmed search of clinical trials was performed using the following terms: estrogens, progestogens, bazedoxifene, tibolone, selective estrogen receptor modulators, tissue-selective estrogen complex, androgens, and menopause.

OUTCOMES

HT is an effective treatment for bothersome menopausal vasomotor symptoms, genitourinary syndrome, and prevention of osteoporotic fractures. Women should be made aware that there is a small increased risk of stroke that tends to persist over the years as well as breast cancer risk with long-term estrogen-progestin use. However, healthy women who begin HT soon after menopause will probably earn more benefit than harm from the treatment. HT can improve bothersome symptoms, all the while conferring offset benefits such as cardiovascular risk reduction, an increase in bone mineral density and a reduction in bone fracture risk. Moreover, a decrease in colorectal cancer risk is obtainable in women treated with estrogen-progestin therapy, and an overall but nonsignificant reduction in mortality has been observed in women treated with conjugated equine estrogens alone or combined with estrogen-progestin therapy. Where possible, transdermal routes of HT administration should be preferred as they have the least impact on coagulation. With combined treatment, natural progesterone should be favored as it is devoid of the antiapoptotic properties of other progestogens on breast cells. When beginning HT, low doses should be used and increased gradually until effective control of symptoms is achieved. Unless contraindications develop, patients may choose to continue HT as long as the benefits outweigh the risks. Regular reassessment of the woman's health status is mandatory. Women with premature menopause who begin HT before 50 years of age seem to have the most significant advantage in terms of longevity.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

In women with bothersome menopausal symptoms, HT should be considered one of the mainstays of treatment. Clinical practitioners should tailor HT based on patient history, physical characteristics, and current health status so that benefits outweigh the risks.

Improving clinical outcomes through attention to sex and hormones in research

Biological sex, fluctuations in sex steroid hormones throughout life and gender as a social construct all influence every aspect of health and disease. Yet, for decades, most basic and clinical studies have included only male individuals. As modern health care moves towards personalized medicine, it is clear that considering sex and hormonal status in basic and clinical studies will bring precision to the development of novel therapeutics and treatment paradigms. To this end, funding, regulatory and policy agencies now require inclusion of female animals and women in basic and clinical studies. However, inclusion of female animals and women often does not mean that information regarding potential hormonal interactions with pharmacological treatments or clinical outcomes is available. All sex steroid hormones can interact with receptors for drug targets, metabolism and transport. Genetic variation in receptors or in enzymatic function might contribute to sex differences in therapeutic efficacy and adverse drug reactions. Outcomes from clinical trials are often not reported by sex, and, if the data are available, they are not translated into clinical practice guidelines. This Review will provide a historical perspective for the current state of research related to hormone trials and provide concrete strategies that, if implemented, will improve the health of all people.

Pharmacotherapeutic options for the treatment of menopausal symptoms

Introduction: Menopausal symptoms can be very overwhelming for women. Over the years, many pharmacotherapeutic options have been tested, and others are still being developed. Hormone therapy (HT) is the most efficient therapy for managing vasomotor symptoms and related disturbances. The term HT comprises estrogens and progestogens, androgens, tibolone, the tissue-selective estrogen complex (TSEC), a combination of bazedoxifene and conjugated estrogens, and the selective estrogen receptor modulators, such as ospemifene. Estrogens and progestogens and androgens may differ significantly for chemical structure and can be delivered through different routes, thereby displaying various pharmacological and clinical properties. Tibolone, TSEC and SERM also exhibit unique pharmacodynamics that can be exploited to obtain distinctive therapeutic effects. Non-hormonal options fall mainly into the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) and selective noradrenergic reuptake inhibitor (SNRI), GABA-analogue drug classes.Areas covered: Herein, the authors describe the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of hormonal (androgens, estrogens, progestogens, tibolone, TSEC, SERMs) and non-hormonal (SSRIs, SNRIs, Gabapentin, Pregabalin, Oxybutynin, Neurokinin antagonists) treatments for menopausal symptoms and report essential clinical trial data in humans.Expert opinion: Patient tailoring of treatment is key to managing symptoms of menopause. Physicians must have in-depth knowledge of the pharmacology of compounds to tailor therapy to the individual patient's characteristics and needs.

Serum estradiol level according to dose and formulation of oral estrogens in postmenopausal women

This study was performed to evaluate serum estradiol level in postmenopausal women using oral menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) with different doses and formulations of estrogens. A total of 344 postmenopausal women who received oral MHT was included in this cross-sectional study. Serum estradiol level was compared according to formulation (estradiol hemihydrate [EH] or valerate [EV], conjugated estrogen [CE]) and dose (estradiol 1 or 2 mg, CE 0.45 or 0.625 mg) of the estrogens. Mean age and years since menopause were 56.9 and 7.9 years, respectively. Mean duration of MHT was 27.4 months. Since serum estradiol levels were not significantly different at either dose, EH and EV at the same dose were combined for comparisons: estradiol 1 mg and 2 mg. The serum estradiol level with estradiol 2 mg (107.6 pg/mL) was significantly higher by 60% than with estradiol 1 mg (65.8 pg/mL) or CE 0.45 mg (60.1 pg/mL), and it was also significantly higher than with CE 0.625 mg (76.8 pg/mL). Our findings suggest that serum estradiol level is not directly proportional to estrogen dose. In terms of serum concentration, CE 0.45 mg is equivalent to estradiol 1 mg.

Differential effects of hormone therapy on serotonin, vascular function and mood in the KEEPS

BACKGROUND

Serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) is modulated by sex steroid hormones and affects vascular function and mood. In the Kronos Early Estrogen Prevention Cognitive and Affective Ancillary Study (KEEPS-Cog), women randomized to oral conjugated equine estrogens (oCEE) showed greater benefit on affective mood states than women randomized to transdermal 17β-estradiol (tE2) or placebo (PL). This study examined the effect of these treatments on the platelet content of 5-HT as a surrogate measure of 5-HT synthesis and uptake in the brain.

METHODS

The following were measured in a subset (n = 79) of women enrolled in KEEPS-Cog: 5-HT by ELISA, carotid intima-medial thickness (CIMT) by ultrasound, endothelial function by reactive hyperemic index (RHI), and self-reported symptoms of affective mood states by the Profile of Mood States (POMS) questionnaire.

RESULTS

Mean platelet content of 5-HT increased by 107.0%, 84.5% and 39.8%, in tE2, oCEE and PL groups, respectively. Platelet 5-HT positively correlated with estrone in the oCEE group and with 17β- estradiol in the tE2 group. Platelet 5-HT showed a positive association with RHI, but not CIMT, in the PL and oCEE groups. Reduction in mood scores for depression-dejection and anger-hostility was associated with elevations in platelet 5-HT only in the oCEE group (r = -0.5, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Effects of oCEE compared to tE2 on RHI and mood may be related to mechanisms involving platelet, and perhaps neuronal, uptake and release of 5-HT and reflect conversion of estrone to bioavailable 17β-estradiol in platelets and the brain.

Pharmacology of estrogens and progestogens: influence of different routes of administration

This review comprises the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of natural and synthetic estrogens and progestogens used in contraception and therapy, with special consideration of hormone replacement therapy. The paper describes the mechanisms of action, the relation between structure and hormonal activity, differences in hormonal pattern and potency, peculiarities in the properties of certain steroids, tissue-specific effects, and the metabolism of the available estrogens and progestogens. The influence of the route of administration on pharmacokinetics, hormonal activity and metabolism is presented, and the effects of oral and transdermal treatment with estrogens on tissues, clinical and serum parameters are compared. The effects of oral, transdermal (patch and gel), intranasal, sublingual, buccal, vaginal, subcutaneous and intramuscular administration of estrogens, as well as of oral, vaginal, transdermal, intranasal, buccal, intramuscular and intrauterine application of progestogens are discussed. The various types of progestogens, their receptor interaction, hormonal pattern and the hormonal activity of certain metabolites are described in detail. The structural formulae, serum concentrations, binding affinities to steroid receptors and serum binding globulins, and the relative potencies of the available estrogens and progestins are presented. Differences in the tissue-specific effects of the various compounds and regimens and their potential implications with the risks and benefits of hormone replacement therapy are discussed.

High dose estrogen treatment increases bone mineral density in male-to-female transsexuals receiving gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist in the absence of testosterone

OBJECTIVE

To study the effect of estrogen (E) on the male skeleton in the absence of testosterone (T).

DESIGN

Retrospective analyses of 40 middle-aged transsexuals treated with subcutaneous injections of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist every 4 weeks and oral 17-beta-estradiol-valerat 6 mg/day over two years until reassignment surgery.

METHODS

The bone mineral density (BMD) in the femoral neck and lumbar spine (L2-L4) was measured with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry at the beginning of cross-sex hormone treatment, after 12 and 24 months, and serum T, E, sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), calcitonin (CAL), osteocalcin (OSC), and urinary free deoxypyridinoline (DPD) were measured.

RESULTS

After 12 months, a significant increase in BMD in the lumbar spine from 1.2 to 1.234 g/cm2 and after 24 months to 1.274 g/cm2 was observed. There was a significant increase in BMD in the femoral neck area from 1.068 to 1.109 g/cm(2) after 24 months. There was a significant decrease in serum T levels from 18.65 to 0.57 nmol/l after 12 months, and to 0.62 nmol/l after 24 months, a significant increase in SHBG levels from 50.09 to 125 nmol/l after 12 months, and to 130 nmol/l after 24 months, and a significant increase in serum E levels from 73.42 to 881.6 pmol/l after 12 months, and to 923.62 pmol/l after 24 months of cross-sex hormone treatment. Serum levels of CAL, OSC and urinary DPD were unchanged.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that high dose E treatment is able to increase BMD significantly in the femoral neck and lumbar spine independently of serum T levels in middle-aged men. There is no risk of osteoporosis developing in male-to-female transsexuals receiving GnRHa when there is an adequate E substitution.

A predictive model for exemestane pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics incorporating the effect of food and formulation

AIMS

Exemestane (Aromasin) is an irreversible aromatase inactivator used for the treatment of postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of formulation comparing a sugar-coated tablet (SCT) with a suspension and food on the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) with respect to plasma estrone sulphate (E1S) concentrations of exemestane, using a PK/PD approach.

METHODS

This was an open, three-period, randomized, crossover study. Twelve healthy postmenopausal women received single oral doses of 25 mg exemestane as a SCT after fasting or food and as a suspension after fasting. Exemestane and E1S concentrations were determined before and up to 14 days after drug administration. Population analysis was performed in two steps: (i) a compartmental PK model was selected incorporating the effect of food and formulation; (ii) conditional on the PK model, a PD model was developed employing indirect response models. Model selection was performed using standard statistical tests. Validation and assessment of the predictive capability of the selected model was performed using real test data sets obtained from the literature.

RESULTS

A three-compartment model with first-order elimination rate best described exemestane disposition (k12 0.454, k21 0.158, k13 0.174, k31 0.016 and k 0.738 h(-1)). Absorption was described by a mono-exponential function [ka 2.3 (SCT after fasting), 1.1 (SCT after food) and 7.6 h(-1) (suspension); lag time 0.2 h]. The PD model assumed that E1S plasma concentrations are determined by a zero-order synthesis rate (6.5 pg ml(-1) h(-1)) and a first-order elimination constant (0.032 h(-1)). Exemestane inhibited E1S synthesis with a C50 value of 22.1 pg ml(-1). The mean population estimates were used to simulate the administration of different doses of the drug (0.5, 1, 2.5, 5 and 25 mg day(-1)). The model predictions were in agreement with historical data.

CONCLUSIONS

Exemestane absorption is influenced by the formulation of the drug and by food, but its disposition is independent of both. PK differences do no translate into clinically important differences in the PD. The PK/PD model developed was able to predict successfully the response to different doses and administration schedules with respect to oestrogen suppression.

A Comparative Pharmacokinetic Study of Micronized Estradiol Valerate Administered Alone and in Combination with Medroxyprogesterone Acetate in Postmenopausal Women

The objective of this study was to evaluate a possible pharmacokinetic interaction between 17beta-estradiol (E2) and medroxyprogesterone (MP) when administered together in a combined tablet because both hormones have common metabolic routes of biotransformation. The study assessed the mean pharmacokinetics parameters of E2 found after 1-dose administration of 2 different tablets containing E2, 1 containing 2 mg of micronized 17beta-estradiol valerate (E2V) and the other, administered after 2 weeks, 2 mg of E2V in combination with 5 mg of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA). The subjects were 15 healthy postmenopausal women with normal laboratory and clinic tests. The study was randomized, double blind, crossover, with 2 periods and 2 sequences. The blood samples were obtained at 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 24 hours after each administration. The E2 serum concentrations were determined by electrochemoluminiscence assay. From these data, the following pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated for E2 alone and E2 in combination with MPA (E2V/MPA): Cmax = 104.89 +/- 26.96, 103.27 +/- 44.40; AUC0-24 =1900.30 +/- 392.23, 1783.70 +/- 756.39; AUC0-infinity = 5576.06 +/- 4065.87, 5317.89 +/- 3702.54; ka = 1.06 +/- 0.31, 1.09 +/- 0.13; t1/2 = 35.65 +/- 20.62, 36.12 +/- 18.04; MRT = 16.29 +/- 8.77, 16.27 +/- 4.88; V/F = 16.29 +/- 8.76, 16.27 +/- 4.88. No significant differences between the pharmacokinetic parameters of E2 and E2/MPA were found, which led us to conclude that there is no pharmacokinetic interaction.

Comparative bioequivalence studies with Estradot® and Menorest® transdermal systems

OBJECTIVES

To compare the relative bioavailability of Estradot, a small size, new generation estradiol transdermal system (ETS) to Menorest, in healthy postmenopausal women.

METHODS

In two open-label, single center, randomized, crossover, bioequivalence studies, healthy postmenopausal women aged 40-65 years received treatment with all the test regimens. In Study 1 (single-dose study), patients wore 5 cm(2) (50 microg/day), 10 cm(2) (100 microg/day) Estradot and 29 cm(2) (100 microg/day) Menorest for 84 h. In Study 2 (multiple-dose study), patients wore a regimen of four consecutive treatments with a 5 cm(2) (50 microg/day) new generation patch, Estradot and a 14.5 cm(2) (50 microg/day) patch, Menorest. Blood samples were drawn at various time-points in both studies. Estradiol and estrone serum levels were determined by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry or radioimmunoassay methods. Skin irritation (erythema and edema), patch adherence and local skin reaction were assessed following patch removal.

RESULTS

In Study 1, baseline-uncorrected C(max) for estradiol for Estradot 50 and 100 microg/day and Menorest 100 microg/day was 54.8, 106.2 and 101.6 pg/ml, respectively, and C(max) for estrone was 75.6, 97.0 and 98.3 pg/ml, respectively. In Study 2, the baseline-uncorrected mean maximum serum concentration (C(max)) for estradiol for Estradot 50 microg/day and Menorest 50 microg/day patches was 56.7 and 52.7 pg/ml, respectively, and C(max) for estrone was 41.7 and 41.3 pg/ml, respectively. No significant skin irritation was observed in either study, but Estradot caused less skin irritation than Menorest.

CONCLUSIONS

Estradot produced comparable serum concentrations of estradiol and estrone and caused less skin irritation than Menorest.

The effect of ketoconazole and diltiazem on oestrogen metabolism in postmenopausal women after single dose oestradiol treatment

AIMS

The effect of the CYP3A4 inhibitors ketoconazole and diltiazem on the pharmacokinetics of oestrone was studied in six healthy postmenopausal women after treatment with a single oral dose of oestradiol.

METHODS

Plasma oestrone concentrations were measured following the administration of 1) oestradiol, 2) oestradiol and ketoconazole and 3) oestradiol and diltiazem.

RESULTS

Treatment with ketoconazole increased the AUC of oestrone (+ 4029 nmol l-1 h; 95% CI on the difference: 1588, 6471) and its Cmax (+ 306 nmol l-1; 95% CI on the difference: 117, 496). The AUC and Cmax of oestrone tended to increase on treatment with diltiazem although this did not reach the level of statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

The small increase in the plasma concentrations of oestrone formed from 17beta-oestradiol during co-administration with ketoconazole is unlikely to be clinically significant.

Evaluation of irritation and sensitisation of two 50 microg/day oestrogen patches

OBJECTIVES

To comparatively assess the irritation and sensitisation of the Estradot transdermal oestrogen patch, in healthy postmenopausal women, using the Menorest transdermal oestrogen patch, as a comparator.

METHODS

In an open-label, single-centre, randomised, active-treatment, within-patient controlled study, 208 healthy postmenopausal women, age range 40-70 years, received and completed simultaneous treatment with a 5 cm(2) (50 microg/day) oestradiol patch (Estradot) and a 14.5 cm(2) (50 microg/day) oestradiol patch (Menorest). The treatment was given for 72 h, then 96 h, for eight successive applications during an induction phase, and for 72 h during a challenge phase. There was a 14-day resting period between phases. Skin irritation (measured by erythema on a scale of 0-4), topical sensitisation, patch adherence and local skin reaction, were assessed and recorded immediately before or after removal of each patch, as appropriate.

RESULTS

Most patients experienced a significant difference in irritation with Menorest than with Estradot (P < 0.0001) at the end of the induction phase. Patch loss was also significantly higher for Menorest as compared to Estradot (P = 0.0253) at the end of the induction phase. Most incidences of erythema were classified as slight (score of 1), and there was no significant difference in the percentage of topical sensitisation, or in the incidence of local skin reactions between Estradot and Menorest. Patch loss was low for both systems.

CONCLUSIONS

Estradot demonstrates reduced skin irritation, superior adhesion and a lower rate of patch loss compared to Menorest.

17beta-estradiol matrixpatch removal and reapplication in postmenopausal women: experimental results

This study compares the pharmacokinetic performance of a matrix system for transdermal 17-beta-estradiol (E(2)) delivery using multiple consecutive dosing with a first application in postmenopausal women undergoing hormone replacement therapy. A clinical study (SI) was conducted over a treatment period of 11 days in 16 postmenopausal women receiving three consecutively applied matrix patches for the delivery of E(2). The first patch was worn for 4 days, the second for 3 days, and the third patch for 4 days. The E(2) plasma profiles determined during the third application were compared with results obtained by a published clinical study (SII) using the same patch in the same group of postmenopausal women without E(2) pretreatment. Additionally, the 24 h plasma profiles of E(2) and estrone were determined before and on day 4 during patch application of the third patch. Comparison of the mean pharmacokinetic parameters from the two studies showed no significant difference in E(2) plasma levels: AUC(0-->96h) [pg/mL h] SI: 4342 +/- 1513 and SII: 4512 +/- 1229; C(max)[pg/mL] SI: 51.3 +/- 28.8 and SII: 54.2 +/- 22.3; C(average) [pg/mL] SI: 45.0 +/- 13.2 and SII: 47.0 +/- 9.4; C(min) [pg/mL] SI: 31.4 +/- 5.9 and SII: 32.2 +/- 8.1. Over 96 h, fluctuation, f, defined as (C(max) - C(min)) / C(average), was 0.44 in SI and 0.47 in SII. Individual comparison of E(2)-C(max), -AUC, and -C(min) revealed that more than 87.5% of all patients showed a variation between SI and SII of less than 10%. The mean of the individual AUC(0-->96h) variation between the first and the third patch was only 4.7%. There was no significant drop in E(2) plasma values after patch removal and reapplication, and accumulation of E(2) did not occur after several patches were applied consecutively. Plasma E(2) showed a circadian rhythm that was lower in the morning and higher in the evening. No circadian rhythm was observed in untreated basal plasma E(2) in the group of postmenopausal women. The transdermal matrix system yielded sustained E(2) plasma levels in postmenopausal women in the initial application period. In long-term dosing there was no accumulation of E(2) in plasma and no significant drop after patch removal. It is presently not known why the circadian variation in the experimentally obtained E(2) plasma values exists.

17beta-estradiol matrixpatch removal and reapplication in postmenopausal women: theoretical predictions with an oscillating diffusion coefficient model

The pharmacokinetic performance of a matrix system for transdermal beta-estradiol (E(2)) delivery after multiple consecutive dosing in postmenopausal women undergoing hormone replacement therapy was investigated. The E(2) plasma profiles determined during the third application in 16 postmenopausal women were compared with results obtained in a published clinical study using the same patch in 24 postmenopausal women without E(2) pretreatment; they were compared with a theoretical diffusion/pharmacokinetic model. A conventional theoretical model with constant model parameter (CPM) obtained from in vitro mass balance experiments in a Franz cell type set up described successfully the transdermal E(2) bioavailability parameter AUC(0-96h) (4341.9 +/- 1513.1; calculated 4250.8) and C(average) (45.0 +/- 13.2; calculated 41.2). Also, experimentally, there was no significant drop in E(2) plasma values after patch removal and reapplication; this was corroborated by calculations. Accumulation of E(2) did not occur when several patches were applied consecutively over a period of 3 weeks. Steady state was achieved following application of the first patch. However, the differences between recorded E(2) plasma profiles and theoretical results detected at specific measurement points cannot be explained by the CPM model. Experimentally obtained plasma profiles were always lower in the morning and higher in the evening than predicted on the basis of the model. Measurements of in vivo skin temperature in the postmenopausal women showed oscillating temperature profiles in the form of a cosinor function: The temperature mesor of untreated postmenopausal women was 34.8 degrees C with an acrophase at 17.0 o'clock (95% CI: 14.30-19.30) and an amplitude of +/- 0.4 degrees C (p = 0.1). During the application of the patch the average temperature next to a patch rose 0.3 degrees C, which was statistically significant (p = 0.1). In the skin under the application of the matrix patch a mesor temperature was detected as 35.6 degrees C with an amplitude of +/- 0.5 degrees C with an acrophase at 17.51 o'clock (95% CI: 14.30-21.00) (p = 0.05). The temperature period was 24 h for all measurements and the maximum temperature was observed at about 16.30 h, and a minimum at about 5.00 h. A linear dependency was detected in in vitro experiments between the log of E(2) permeability and the temperature for stripped skin, epidermis/dermis layer, as well as for the matrix. Modeling of E(2) plasma profiles with oscillating diffusion coefficients (ODM1) with a sine wave function results in this equation: D(1) = D(0x) + Da(x).sin(k.t). D(0x) is the diffusion coefficient determined at 35.6 degrees C, k is 1/24 h, D(a) is the diffusion coefficient of the temperature amplitude, h is hour, and x stands for the respective diffusion layer. It was shown that the experimental E(2) plasma profile variations are more pronounced than can simply be explained by skin temperature variations alone (ODM1 model). A simplex fit with an oscillating diffusion coefficient in the form of a sine wave function for the stratum corneum (ODM2 model) resulted in a temperature amplitude of 1.1 degrees C, about twice as high as was determined in the in vivo measurements (ODM2 model). Therefore, other circadian parameterlike blood flow might superimpose the temperature profile. The improvement in data analysis by incorporating oscillating diffusion coefficients (ODM1 and 2) over CPM was judged from a comparison of experimental data with the calculated plasma profiles with the AIC, Akaikes model selection criterion, which allows ranking between models because it is independent of the scaling of the data points. ODM1 and ODM2 improved the data analysis over CPM by allowing better calculation of experimental C(max), t(max), the time to reach to C(max), and the fluctuation, f. No difference between CPM, ODM1, or ODM2 was found for the bioavailability parameter C(average) and AUC(0-96h).

Markedly elevated levels of estrone sulfate after long-term oral, but not transdermal, administration of estradiol in postmenopausal women

OBJECTIVE

To compare serum estrone sulfate (E1S) levels in postmenopausal women during long-term treatment with commonly prescribed doses of oral and transdermal estradiol (E2).

DESIGN

A retrospective study performed in a University setting in the United States involving 33 healthy postmenopausal women. Two groups of postmenopausal women were studied: group 1 (n = 10) received 1 mg oral micronized E2 daily for 16 months; blood was drawn at 0, 7, and 15 months. Group 2 (n = 23) was randomized into three subgroups. Two of the subgroups (n = 8; n = 7) received E2 delivered at a rate of 0.05 mg/day and 0.1 mg/day, respectively, by transdermal patch, changed twice weekly; the third subgroup received a placebo (without E2) patch for 9 continuous months. Blood samples were drawn at 0, 6, and 9 months. Serum E1S and E2 were quantified by specific radioimmunoassays. Statistical analysis was performed by analysis of variance.

RESULTS

After oral E2 treatment, E1S levels increased significantly (p < 0.01) from baseline, reaching an average level of 38.8 ng/mL at 15 months. After transdermal E2 treatment, E1S levels increased significantly, yet to a much lesser extent, reaching levels of 1.8 ng/mL and 3.2 ng/mL after 9 months of treatment with the 0.05 mg/day and 0.1 mg/day patches, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Markedly elevated levels of E1S were found after long-term oral estrogen treatment. In comparison to the increase in E1S levels after long-term oral estrogen treatment, there was only a small increase in E1S levels after transdermal E2 therapy. This difference may be attributed to the higher dosage of oral E2 that is required because of the low bioavailability compared with the transdermal dosages.

17Beta-estradiol delivered by three different matrix patches 50 microg/day: a three way cross-over study in 21 postmenopausal women

The aim of this study was to investigate the systemic bioavailability and plasma profiles of 17beta-estradiol (E2) after the application of three matrix patches for the transdermal delivery of E2: Menorest, Tradelia, and Estraderm MX claiming to deliver a dosage of 50 microg E2/day. All three patches were each worn randomly by 21 postmenopausal women volunteers over a 4-day period (i.e. 96 h). Each of the three treatment periods were separated by an at least 7 day wash out period according to a randomized, 3-way crossover design. Blood samples were taken from the antecubital vein before and 3, 6, 9, 12, 24, 28, 33, 48, 57, 72, 81, and 96 h after application. E2 plasma values were determined by a specific direct radioimmunoassay method. The following pharmacokinetic parameters were evaluated: AUC0-96h, Cmax, Tmax, Cmin, C(average). The time to reach the maximal E2 value of 32 h was the only pharmacokinetic parameter which was identical for all three patches. Menorest produced the highest E2 bioavailability judged by the AUC0-96h = 3967.8 +/- 1651.8 pg/ml, C(average) = 41.3 +/- 21.3 pg/ml, Cmin = 36.8 +/- 8.6 pg/ml. Tradelia showed statistically not significantly smaller C(average) = 38.9 +/- 17.0 pg/ml, AUC0-96h = 3737.9 +/- 1637.6 pg/ml x per h, and Cmin = 33.8 +/- 26.7 than Menorest. Estraderm MX showed lowest E2 plasma profiles Cmax = 38.9 +/- 25.1 pg/ml, C(average) = 33.2 +/- 17.1 pg/ml, AUC0-96 = 3192.1 +/- 1646.0 pg/ml per x h. Menorest showed the smallest fluctuation over the entire test period, similar to Estraderm MX, while Tradelia showed the highest E2-fluctuation (P < 0.01): Tradelia exhibited the highest Cmax = 48.0 +/- 20.3 pg/ml. When E2 baseline levels, prior to patch application are subtracted individually from the produced E2 plasma level, Estraderm MX is not bioequivalent to Menorest (P < 0.05). A circadian curve pattern of the E2 plasma level was observed for all patches: in the evening higher E2 plasma level were always detected compared with the morning, however, less pronounced with Estraderm MX. Individual comparison of AUC0-96h of each patch exhibited a large interindividual variability of 2000-8000 pg/ml per h for all three patches but relatively small individual variability: women with high E2 bioavailability (high responders) maintained high bioavailability in all applied patches, women identified as low and medium responders remained the same regardless of the applied patch. Menorest produced in 2/3 of all postmenopausal women with the highest E2 bioavailability (AUC0-96h), Tradelia was found in less than 1/3 (28.6%), and Estraderm MX in only one postmenopausal woman. Menorest only produced the highest reduction in postmenopausal symptoms together with Tradelia. Estraderm MX produced a smaller reduction in postmenopausal symptoms compared to Menorest and Tradelia. The observed side-effects were approximately equal in all three patches, with a maximum value after 72 h. It can be concluded that the three patches for the transdermal delivery of E2 claiming to deliver 50 microg E2/day differed from each other in their pharmacokinetic performance, although statistically not significant: Menorest exhibited the highest C(average), AUC and Cmin, and the lowest fluctuation, followed by Tradelia and Estraderm MX.

Enterohepatic cycling and pharmacokinetics of oestradiol in postmenopausal women

The pharmacokinetics and enterohepatic cycling of oestradiol have been studied after three oral, single-dose administrations of equimolar doses of oestradiol alone, oestradiol plus desogestrel and oestradiol valerate, in a 3-way cross-over mode in 18 healthy postmenopausal women. Oestradiol was readily absorbed and metabolized to oestrone, which reached much higher serum concentrations (140pgmL(-1)) than its parent compound (35pgmL(-1)). All three formulations had the same kinetic profile and were bioequivalent on testing. Noticeable first and second absorption phases were apparent from the oestradiol and oestrone serum concentration-time curves for all oestradiol formulations. The mean serum concentration-time curves of the metabolite oestrone (corrected for endogenous oestrone) showed a second maximum at approximately 25h. By means of line feathering, serum concentration-time curves were constructed which belonged to the first, second and third phases of absorption. The maximum serum concentration, Cmax, of the second absorption or recirculation of oestrone was 20% that of the first, and the Cmax of the third circulation was 50% that of the second. The areas under the serum-concentration-time curves (AUC) for the second and third recirculations were similar-each comprised 12-13% of the total AUC. The oral clearance values of the recirculations were constant (590Lh(-1)). Enterohepatic recirculation of endogenous compounds is aimed at maintaining a steady-state serum concentration for immediate use and hydrolysis in the target organs. It is concluded that exogenously added oestradiol and its metabolites follow the recirculation pathways of the endogenous oestrogen pool.

Bioavailability of orally administered sex steroids used in oral contraception and hormone replacement therapy

The concept of bioavailability is discussed with particular references to the sex steroids. Problems encountered in the measurement of bioavailability of these steroids and the various factors that may affect their bioavailability are briefly described. Information regarding the bioavailability of the estrogens and gestogens, some of which are prodrugs, used in oral contraception and hormone replacement therapy is summarized and the implications regarding the clinical use of these steroids are discussed.

Formation of ethinylestradiol in postmenopausal women during continuous treatment with a combination of estradiol, estriol and norethisterone acetate

Previous studies indicated that during treatment of postmenopausal women with preparations containing norethisterone, a small proportion of the progestogen is aromatized into ethinylestradiol. We therefore investigated the serum concentrations of estradiol, ethinylestradiol and norethisterone in 25 patients of a gynecological practice who were continuously treated for climacteric complaints with a combination of 2 mg estradiol, 1 mg estriol and 1 mg norethisterone acetate for a time period between 4 months and 6 years. Blood sampling occurred between 1 and 20 h after intake of the last tablet. The mean serum concentration of estradiol was 138 +/- 50 (53-279) pg/ml, of ethinylestradiol 18.1 +/- 13.5 (0-44) pg/ml, and of norethisterone 5.1 +/- 3.5 (0.7-11.6) ng/ml. The serum concentrations of estradiol showed a broad maximum between 1 and 14 h, and those of norethisterone a steep rise to maximum within 1-4 h after intake followed by a subsequent decline. Contrary to this, the ethinylestradiol levels were not related to the time after application indicating that the aromatization of norethisterone mainly occurs in peripheral tissue. There was no correlation between age, body mass index or duration of treatment and the ethinylestradiol levels. It is concluded that in the presence of the high estradiol concentrations the low conversion rate of norethisterone into ethinylestradiol is probably without clinical significance.

Long-term hormone replacement treatment in menopause: new choices, old apprehensions, recent findings

In recent years there has been an increase in the use of parenteral oestradiol as an alternative to the conventional oral preparations used in hormone replacement treatment (HRT) in menopause, such as conjugated equine oestrogens (CEE). The latter have been subject in the past to apprehensions, partly due to misunderstanding and oversimplification but also in relation to problems that have arisen during the history of HRT, for example the increase in endometrial cancer risk deriving from the use of non-progestogen-opposed treatment. However, confidence in long-term HRT comes from the epidemiological findings, which refer mainly to the use of oral CEE unopposed by progestogen: a reduced risk of osteoporotic fractures and of cardiovascular disease, and a very limited risk of breast cancer. Oral oestrogens produce marked hepatocellular effects. These effects are, on the whole, favourable from the point of view of cardiovascular risk. In addition, it cannot be excluded that some hepatocellular effects of oral oestrogen, for example increased sex hormone binding globulin levels and reduced circulating insulin-like growth factor I activity, offer protection to the breast. As progestogen supplementation is needed in non-hysterectomized women, priority should be given to preparations, such as progesterone or dydrogesterone, that feature good endometrial activity without opposing oestrogen hepatocellular effects.

Pharmacokinetics of oestrogens and progestogens

There are large inter- and intra-individual variations in the serum concentrations of natural and synthetic sex steroids irrespective of the route of administration. Oral ingestion of steroids has a stronger effect on hepatic metabolism than parenteral administration, as the local concentration in liver sinusoids are 4-5 times higher during the first liver passage. Oestradiol and oestrone are interconvertible, dependent on the local concentrations in liver and target organs, and oestrone sulphate serves as a large reservoir. The oestrone/oestradiol ratio has no physiological significance, as oestrone is only a weak oestrogen. Oestrone is both a precursor and a metabolite of oestradiol. Oestriol is extensively conjugated after oral administration. Therefore, the oestriol serum levels are similar after oral intake of 10 mg and after vaginal application of 0.5 mg oestriol resulting in similar systemic effectiveness. Conjugated oestrogens can easily enter the hepatocytes but are hormonally active only after hydrolyzation into the parent steroids. Ethinylestradiol which exerts strong effects on hepatic metabolism and inhibits metabolizing enzymes, should not be used for hormone replacement therapy. Among the progestogens, the progesterone derivatives have less effects on liver metabolism than the norethisterone derivatives (13-methyl-gonanes and 13-ethyl-gonanes). The highly potent 13-ethyl-gonanes are effective at very low doses, because of a slow inactivation and elimination rate due to the ethinyl group.