1
|
|
2
|
Briggs RO, Reinig BA, de Vreede GJ. Meeting Satisfaction for Technology-Supported Groups. SMALL GROUP RESEARCH 2016. [DOI: 10.1177/1046496406294320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Research shows that people who feel dissatisfied with a technology-supported meeting may discontinue use of such technology, even if it provides demonstrable benefits. It is therefore important to derive theoretical understandings of the satisfaction phenomenon. This article validates an instrument that measures the constructs of a goal-attainment model of meeting satisfaction. It then tests the model among 237 working professionals in 19 groups in the field. Results support the propositions that satisfaction with meeting process and satisfaction with meeting outcome are both a function of an individual's perceived net goal attainment with respect to the meeting. The results also support a proposed link between satisfaction with meeting outcome and satisfaction with meeting process. The authors discuss the implications of these findings for research and practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert O. Briggs
- University of Nebraska at Omaha Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands University of Alaska Fairbanks
| | | | - Gert-Jan de Vreede
- University of Nebraska at Omaha Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lam SS. The Effects of Group Decision Support Systems and Task Structures on Group Communication and Decision Quality. J MANAGE INFORM SYST 2015. [DOI: 10.1080/07421222.1997.11518148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
4
|
Davison R, Jordan E. Group Support Systems: Barriers to Adoption in a Cross-Cultural Setting. JOURNAL OF GLOBAL INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT 2014. [DOI: 10.1080/1097198x.1998.10856229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
5
|
Caya O, Mortensen M, Pinsonneault A. Virtual Teams Demystified. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF E-COLLABORATION 2013. [DOI: 10.4018/jec.2013040101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Virtual teams have been researched intensely in the last ten years and there is a growing body of literature on the topic. At this point, the authors need an integrative theory-driven framework through which they can conceptualize the notion of virtual teams and organize and make sense of prior research. This can help them better understand what drives virtual team dynamics and ultimately effectiveness and can guide future research on the topic. Drawing on models of team effectiveness and emergent processes and states, the authors developed a framework for understanding virtual team dynamics. They then use this framework to review and synthesize one hundred and twenty-one empirical studies of virtual teams published since 1990. The authors analyzed the direct and indirect antecedents of virtual team effectiveness and identify key gaps in both their knowledge of, and approach to studying, virtual teams. They outlined areas for future research and discuss, the implications for the authors’ paper for practice and for the study of virtual and traditional teams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivier Caya
- Faculté d’Administration, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | | | - Alain Pinsonneault
- Desautels Faculty of Management, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
|
7
|
Chidambaram L, Tung LL. Is Out of Sight, Out of Mind? An Empirical Study of Social Loafing in Technology-Supported Groups. INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH 2005. [DOI: 10.1287/isre.1050.0051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 164] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
8
|
Limayem M, DeSanctis G. Providing Decisional Guidance for Multicriteria Decision Making in Groups. INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH 2000. [DOI: 10.1287/isre.11.4.386.11874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
9
|
Jain BA, Solomon JS. The effect of task complexity and conflict handling styles on computer-supported negotiations. INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT 2000. [DOI: 10.1016/s0378-7206(99)00049-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
10
|
Zigurs I, Buckland BK, Connolly JR, Wilson EV. A test of task-technology fit theory for group support systems. DATA BASE FOR ADVANCES IN INFORMATION SYSTEMS 1999. [DOI: 10.1145/344241.344244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Group support systems (GSS) provide both promise and puzzlement. Experimental studies of different systems over the years have resulted in conflicting findings --- sometimes enhancing group performance, at other times having no effect, and occasionally even resulting in worse performance for GSS-supported groups than for traditional groups. Researchers have speculated that the mixed results are due to a poor fit of the GSS with the group's task. A recent model of task-technology fit has provided a theoretical perspective from which to test this issue. In this paper, a theory of task-technology fit is tested by applying it to a selected set of published GSS experiments. Key constructs in the theory are operationalized via coding instruments, and the application of the coding scheme provides support for the theory.
Collapse
|
11
|
Marsden J, Mathiyalakan S. A multisession comparative study of group size and group performance in an electronic meeting system environment. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 1999. [DOI: 10.1109/5326.760562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
|
12
|
|
13
|
Aiken M, Kim D, Hwang C, Lu LC. A Korean group decision support system. INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT 1995. [DOI: 10.1016/0378-7206(95)00003-f] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|