Magnetic resonance angiography in transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic stenting: comparison with contrast hepatic and portal venography

MR portal venography: preliminary results of fast acquisition without contrast material or breath holding

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The authors performed this study to evaluate the feasibility of using the steady-state free precession (SSFP) sequence to perform magnetic resonance (MR) venography of the portal venous system without the use of contrast material or breath holding.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eleven patients underwent MR venography with the SSFP technique. Coronal three-dimensional images were obtained with respiratory triggering. Contrast material and respiratory suspension were not used. All patients had recently undergone at least one other imaging study (conventional angiography, transhepatic portal venography, ultrasound, or contrast-enhanced computed tomography), and these findings were correlated with those from MR venography. The structures evaluated were the main portal vein, right portal vein, left portal vein, superior mesenteric vein, and splenic vein.

RESULTS

MR venography with SSFP accurately depicted the status of these veins in all cases except one. In this patient, MR venography depicted portal vein thrombus but could not indicate that it was tumor thrombus.

CONCLUSION

MR venography with SSFP accurately depicted the portal venous system in 10 of 11 patients without the use of respiratory suspension or contrast material.

MR angiography of the mesenteric vasculature

MRA has evolved from a research tool to a robust clinical diagnostic modality. In many centers worldwide, it is the technique of choice for evaluating patients with suspected CMI, assessing operability of patients with pancreatic cancer, and investigating the portal system. Evolving indications include the assessment of liver transplant patients before and after transplant and of living related liver transplant donors. The search for the bleeding source in patients with gastrointestinal hemorrhage may be an indication in the future, once intravascular contrast agents become available.

Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance venography of the portal venous system prior to transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts and liver transplantation. Original investigation

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The accuracy of gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance venography (GdMRV) in identifying visceral venous abnormalities was assessed in patients before they underwent transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) or orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT).

METHODS

Twenty-seven patients with portal hypertension underwent GdMRV and transcatheter venography prior to OLT or TIPS. The gadolinium dose was 0.5 mL/kg (0.25 mmol/kg), administered by rapid hand injection. Coronal 3D spoiled gradient-echo GdMRV was performed in a single breath-hold. Four blinded reviewers retrospectively evaluated coronal maximum intensity projection (MIP) images, while two reviewers evaluated the MIPs and multiplanar reconstructions. Abnormalities that could affect transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt or transplantation were noted and compared with the results of corresponding catheter venograms read by a separate blinded reviewer.

RESULTS

Abnormalities were identified by GdMRV with a sensitivity and specificity of 83% and 97% for the right hepatic vein, 86% and 100% for the main portal vein (MPV), 42% and 99% for the right portal vein, 54% and 94% for the left portal vein, 61% and 96% for the superior mesenteric vein, and 74% and 91% for the splenic vein. Varices and shunts were correctly identified with a sensitivity of 96%. Multiplanar reconstruction increased MPV sensitivity to 100%.

CONCLUSION

Vascular abnormalities that affect TIPS and OLT can be identified by GdMRV. Multiplanar reconstruction increased the accuracy to 100% for the MPV.