Ofloxacin, a new broad-spectrum fluoroquinolone. Results from a Multicenter, National Comparative Activity Surveillance Study. The Ofloxacin Surveillance Group

[Evolution of susceptibility of aerobic gram-negative aerobic bacilli to quinolones and fluoroquinolones in a university hospital (1992-2000)]

Susceptibility to quinolones of aerobic gram-negative bacilli was assessed in a 2000-bed university hospital from 1992 to 2000. There was a significant downward trend in the rate of susceptibility to nalidixic acid (Nal) for Enterobacteriaceae as a whole from 1992 to 2000 (86% vs 82%), and E. coli (92% vs 84%), and an upward trend for K. pneumoniae (74% vs 82%), the latter being related to the control of the spread of epidemic ESBL producing strains. The overall susceptibility of Enterobacteriaceae to ciprofloxacin (Cip) paralleled the susceptibility to Nal: decreased susceptibility for Enterobacteriaceae as a whole (96% vs 89%) and E. coli (99% vs 91%). A clear decrease in the level of susceptibility to Cip occurred during the study period among the Nal-resistant strains as demonstrated by the decrease in the median zone diameter (D) observed among the Nal-resistant strains of E. coli (26 mm in 1992 vs 19 mm in 1998-2000). The zone diameter distribution pattern changed from an unimodal distribution in 1992 to a trimodal distribution in 2000 secondary to the occurrence of a population of resistant strains (D = 13 mm) and of a highly resistant population (D = 6 mm). Finally, the susceptibility to Cip of P. aeruginosa strains remained stable around 62% throughout the study period.

Trends in quinolone susceptibility of Enterobacteriaceae among inpatients of a large university hospital: 1992-98

OBJECTIVES

To assess trends in quinolone susceptibility of Enterobacteriaceae isolated in a large university hospital.

METHODS

Between 1992 and 1998, bacterial isolates were collected each year during a 3-month period to evaluate annual changes in susceptibility. In addition, the activities of fluoroquinolones (pefloxacin, norfloxacin, ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin) against nalidixic acid-resistant strains were determined by disk diffusion and MIC methodologies during the first and last year of the study.

RESULTS

The susceptibility of Enterobacteriaceae to nalidixic acid was unchanged between 1992 and 1998 (86% versus 85%). However, at the species level, the susceptibility rates to nalidixic acid decreased for Escherichia coli from 92% to 89%, and for Enterobacter cloacae from 87% to 82%. In contrast, there was a 10% increase in the nalidixic acid susceptibility rates for Klebsiella pneumoniae (74% versus 83%), which was thought to be due to the control of the spread of epidemic extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing strains. The overall susceptibility of the Enterobacteriaceae to the fluoroquinolones remained high during the study period, greater than 90% in the case of ciprofloxacin. However, nalidixic acid-resistant Escherichia coli showed decreased susceptibility to ciprofloxacin between 1992 and 1998, as reflected by a decrease in median zone diameter (26 mm to 19 mm), an increase in MIC(50) (0.25 mg/L to 1 mg/L) and a shift in MIC distribution (unimodal in 1992 to bimodal in 1998). This has resulted in the reduced susceptibility of Escherichia coli to fluoroquinolones between 1992 and 1998 (pefloxacin, 95-90%; ciprofloxacin, 99-95%).

CONCLUSIONS

The susceptibility of Escherichia coli to quinolones has decreased, and the level of susceptibility of the resistant strains has increased over the 7-year study period.

Once-daily oral gatifloxacin versus oral levofloxacin in treatment of uncomplicated skin and soft tissue infections: double-blind, multicenter, randomized study

This was a double-blind, multicenter study in which 410 adults (> or =18 years of age) with uncomplicated skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) were randomized to receive either 400 mg of gatifloxacin orally once daily or 500 mg of levofloxacin orally once daily for 7 to 10 days. The study protocol called for four assessments-before and during treatment, at the end of treatment, and posttreatment. Efficacy evaluations included clinical response and bacterial eradication rates. Of 407 treated patients, 202 (108 women, 94 men) received gatifloxacin and 205 (111 women, 94 men) received levofloxacin. For clinically evaluable patients, the cure rates were 91% for gatifloxacin and 84% for levofloxacin (95% confidence interval [CI] for the difference, -2.0 to 15.2%). Clinical cure rates for microbiologically evaluable patients were 93% for gatifloxacin and 88% for levofloxacin (95% CI for the difference, -6.5 to 16.8%). The bacterial eradication rate was 92% for each group, with gatifloxacin eradicating 93% of the methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus isolates and levofloxacin eradicating 91% of them. Both drugs were well tolerated. Most of the adverse events were mild to moderate, and nausea was the most common adverse event in each treatment arm. Once-daily oral gatifloxacin (400 mg) is clinically efficacious and well tolerated compared with once-daily levofloxacin (500 mg) for the treatment of patients with uncomplicated SSTIs.

Antimicrobial resistance in Staphylococcus aureus

Recognized since 1883 as a common cause of infection, Staphylococcus aureus' preantimicrobial-era bacteremia mortality rate was 82%. The mortality of that era threatens to return as evidence of growing vancomycin resistance undermines the utility of vancomycin therapy. Successful treatment of S. aureus infections requires knowledge of its antimicrobial resistance capacity.

Assessment of the potential for microbial resistance to topical use of multiple antimicrobial agents

The goal of this study was to reduce the likelihood of the generation and/or persistence of bacterial resistance to some antimicrobial components contained in a topical antimicrobial mixture (neomycin, polymyxin B, mupirocin and ciprofloxacin) for use with cultured skin grafts, by substitution of alternative antimicrobials, specifically fusidic acid for mupirocin and ofloxacin for ciprofloxacin. The alternative agents failed to serve that purpose. However, with the exception of specific genera of bacteria, Proteus sp. and Providencia stuartii, 90% or more of all other bacteria tested were susceptible to the action of one or more of the individual antimicrobial agents contained in the original mixture. This was true when bacteria were highly susceptible to the antimicrobials, generally, or when bacteria resistant to specific antimicrobials such as penicillin-class antibiotics and ciprofloxacin, were tested. These results suggest that the redundancy of antimicrobials contained in this mixture reduces the chance that resistant bacteria generated by the use of this mixture or already present on wounds would persist when the mixture is used clinically.

Sparfloxacin versus cefaclor in the treatment of patients with community-acquired pneumonia: a randomized, double-masked, comparative, multicenter study

Community-acquired pneumonia remains an important infectious disease problem, with more than 4 million cases occurring in the United States annually. Although Streptococcus pneumoniae remains the most commonly identified organism, a variety of bacterial and nonbacterial pathogens may be involved. Hospitalization is unnecessary in most cases, and oral antibiotic therapy is common. In the majority of cases, the etiology of pneumonia is unknown at the time of presentation, necessitating the use of empiric therapy. Quinolones have not been utilized in this setting in the past because of their inconsistent coverage of S pneumoniae. Sparfloxacin (RP 64206) is a broad-spectrum fluoroquinolone with excellent activity in vitro against the majority of bacteria involved in community-acquired pneumonia, including pneumococcus. We therefore studied the efficacy and safety of sparfloxacin compared with the second-generation cephalosporin cefaclor as empiric therapy for patients with community-acquired pneumonia in a double-masked, double-dummy, multicenter trial. Three hundred thirty patients aged 18 years or older with community-acquired pneumonia suspected of being bacterial in etiology were enrolled at 74 centers in the United States from June 1, 1992, to March 4, 1995. Patients meeting the inclusion criteria were randomized to receive 10 days of either sparfloxacin 400 mg orally once followed by sparfloxacin 200 mg orally daily (n = 168), or cefaclor 500 mg orally every 8 hours (n = 162). There were no significant differences between groups with regard to baseline characteristics. Patients were followed up serially at 4 +/- 1 days, 20 +/- 3 days, and 38 +/- 7 days after the beginning of therapy. Patients were evaluated for clinical response, clinical recurrence of infection, and eradication of baseline pathogens. The primary efficacy variable was the clinical response (cured or improved) in the subgroup of patients meeting the definition of clinically assessable. Responses were also evaluated in the intent-to-treat population. In the intent-to-treat population, 35.7% of patients receiving sparfloxacin were clinically cured, compared with 32.1% of patients receiving cefaclor. Clinical successes (patients clinically cured plus improved) were also comparable (72.6% of patients in the sparfloxacin group and 71.0% of patients in the cefaclor group). Similar clinical success rates were noted using only the clinically assessable population (primary efficacy variable). Forty-four percent of patients receiving sparfloxacin and 39.1% of patients receiving cefaclor were clinically cured. In the sparfloxacin group, 86.6% of patients were clinical successes, compared with 84.4% of patients in the cefaclor group. Microbiologic cures were comparable in both groups. There was no difference in the incidence of recurrence of infection or superinfection. Adverse events thought to be due to study drug occurred equally in both groups (14.3% in the sparfloxacin group vs 14.8% in the cefaclor group). Results show that sparfloxacin is a safe and effective empiric therapy for patients with community-acquired pneumonia and is comparable to cefaclor.

Ofloxacin: Why the Increased Popularity?

Objective:

To provide a rationale for the increasing use of ofloxacin as a substitute for ciprofloxacin, and to review the appropriate use of these agents.

Data Source:

A MEDLINE search was conducted to identify relevant literature. References in those articles were reviewed for additional published information.

Study Selection:

Published review articles and clinical trials on ofloxacin were reviewed, with particular emphasis on pharmacoeconomics, pharmacodynamics, and studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of ofloxacin.

Data Synthesis:

Ofloxacin is a broad-spectrum antimicrobial agent that has in vitro activity similar to that of ciprofloxacin. Ciprofloxacin exhibits lower minimum inhibitory concentrations for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and ofloxacin is more active against Chlamydia trachomatis and gram-positive aerobic organisms. Both agents have limited anaerobic activity. Unlike ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin is 100% bioavailable, exhibits a greater area under the concentration curve, contributing to its bactericidal activity, and is eliminated primarily by the kidney. Both ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin have long half-lives, allowing twice-daily dosing. However, because a decrease in renal function often accompanies increasing age, ofloxacin can be administered once daily in the elderly. Both agents have a large volume of distribution and exhibit excellent tissue and cell penetration. Several clinical studies have demonstrated ofloxacin's effectiveness in treating a variety of systemic infections caused by susceptible organisms, including P. aeruginosa. Adverse effects are infrequent with both fluoroquinolones, and if they occur such effects are usually gastrointestinal in nature. Ofloxacin has a much lower incidence of drug interactions, in particular with theophylline and caffeine. Ofloxacin is less expensive than ciprofloxacin.

Conclusions:

Overall, the activity of ofloxacin is similar to that of ciprofloxacin and the two agents are therapeutically equivalent. The data presented warrant routine therapeutic substitution of ofloxacin for ciprofloxacin. Ciprofloxacin should be reserved for instances in which specific prescribing criteria are met.

Epidemiology of quinolone resistance: Europe and North and South America

After nearly 10 years of fluoroquinolone usage for a wide range of bacterial infections, a striking difference has been observed in the incidence of bacterial resistance to fluoroquinolones between bacteria responsible for community- and hospital-acquired infections, respectively. Resistance is only rarely encountered among common pathogens. In most studies, 97 to 100% of all pathogens are fully susceptible to fluoroquinolones. In contrast, resistance to fluoroquinolones has emerged and increased among bacteria responsible for nosocomial infections. The incidence of resistance to fluoroquinolones varies between bacterial species, clinical settings and countries, and is related to local epidemic spread of a few clones. The highest incidence of resistance is observed in Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter spp., Serratia marcescens and, particularly, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): some investigators have reported 95 to 100% fluoroquinolone resistance among MRSA. Follow-up of trends in the resistance to fluoroquinolones based upon surveillance programmes are needed.

Multicenter in vitro comparative study of fluoroquinolones against 25,129 gram-positive and gram-negative clinical isolates

In vitro activities of fleroxacin, ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, and lomefloxacin were evaluated against 25,129 fresh bacterial isolates from 51 US hospital or medical center laboratories, beginning in October of 1990. Susceptibility rates were > or = 85% against most species of Gram-negative bacteria. Notable exceptions were Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, Xanthomonas, and Providencia. The study drugs displayed similar activity against most Gram-negative species. At least 90% of oxacillin-susceptible staphylococci were susceptible but, of oxacillin-resistant strains, only approximately 60% of Staphylococcus epidermidis and 25% of Staphylococcus aureus were susceptible to the quinolones tested. Staphylococcus saprophyticus strains were less susceptible to fleroxacin (42%) than to the other compounds (79%-97%). Ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin were more active against streptococci, and none of the compounds demonstrated appreciable activity against enterococci. Thus, the spectra of activity of fluoroquinolones illustrate that they remain effective agents for the treatment of many types of infections caused by Gram-negative pathogens.

Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of bacterial isolates at the American University Medical Center in Lebanon

In Lebanon, knowledge of the prevailing pattern of bacterial resistance to antimicrobial agents has been limited, particularly because of 15 years of civil strife. Thus, the current study was conducted to determine the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of nonselected bacterial isolates recovered from recent clinical specimens, using the standardized disk agar diffusion technique. A total of 5216 isolates (1443 Gram positive and 3773 Gram negative) were examined. Over 92% of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) were resistant to penicillins. Methicillin resistance was more frequently noted among CNS (28%) compared with S. aureus (18%). For the pneumococci, 27% of the isolates were resistant to penicillin G. High but variable rates of multidrug resistance were encountered among Acinetobacter spp., Pseudomonas spp., Serratia spp., Citrobacter spp., and Enterobacter spp. Ampicillin resistance was detected in 65% of Escherichia coli and in 20% of Haemophilus influenzae isolates. Although one resistant Salmonella typhi strain was observed, 17% of other Salmonella spp. and 60% of Shigella spp. proved to be resistant to ampicillin, chloramphenicol, and cotrimoxazole. Among Vibrio cholerae isolates, high resistance to tetracycline (71%) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (94%) was observed. The overall antimicrobial resistance rates in Lebanon seem to fall between figures reported from the Arabian Gulf countries (higher) and those from medical centers in the United States (lower).

Prevalence of important pathogens and antimicrobial activity of parenteral drugs at numerous medical centers in the United States, I. Study on the threat of emerging resistances: real or perceived? Fluoroquinolone Resistance Surveillance Group

Forty-three medical centers participated in a national (United States) surveillance study of parenteral antimicrobial agents as empiric therapy of pathogens isolated from blood, skin wounds, respiratory tract, and urine (> 8500 strains, 200 per laboratory). All laboratories tested each organism by the same reagent disks and/or Etest (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden) strips. Quality control results validated all laboratories for analyses. The most common isolates were Escherichia coli (1648), Staphylococcus aureus (1408), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (1003), Klebsiella species (792), and the enterococci (684). Among the tested drugs the percent susceptible rates observed were ofloxacin (83.4%), ciprofloxacin (82.0%), and cefuroxime (62.9%) tested against all organisms; cefazolin (54.7%) and ceftazidime (76.7%) tested against all nonfastidious aerobes; gentamicin (91.2%), imipenem (95.3%), ticarcillin-clavulanate (78.2%), and ceftriaxone (66.2%) tested against Gram-negative organisms only; and vancomycin (97.9%) and erythromycin (49.2%) tested against Gram-positive aerobes. Several drug-resistant species appear to be emerging or increasing in the United States: (a) vancomycin-resistant enterococci (7.9%, mostly Enterococcus faecium); (b) oxacillin-resistant S. aureus (21.0%); (c) third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, including E. coli and Klebsiella species with extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (approximately 1.3%-8.6%); (d) penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae (17.8%); and (e) ciprofloxacin-resistant P. aeruginosa (14.9%). Fluoroquinolone resistance among the enteric bacilli was confirmed in 60 of 66 referred strains (0.8% of total strains), and cross-resistance was high among ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, lomefloxacin, fleroxacin, and norfloxacin (98.3%-100%). Seventeen strains of fluoroquinolone-resistant enteric bacilli (0.2% of total) also harbored an ESBL and resistance to aminoglycosides. Clonal spread within medical centers was observed with the ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. This national clinical isolate data base continues to demonstrate broad fluoroquinolone efficacy (ofloxacin > ciprofloxacin) against hospital-based pathogens and many strains of emerging resistant bacteria. Continued US surveillance studies are urged to monitor emerging antimicrobial resistance and to guide interventions to minimize its occurrence.

North American (United States and Canada) comparative susceptibility of two fluoroquinolones: ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin. A 53-medical-center sample of spectra of activity. North American Ofloxacin Study Group

Ofloxacin, a newer broad-spectrum fluoroquinolone, was evaluated against > 12,000 clinical isolates in a multicenter surveillance trial in the United States and Canada using the standardized disk diffusion method. A total of 53 geographically diverse clinical microbiology laboratories contributed zone diameter results for ofloxacin, ciprofloxacin, and norfloxacin for urinary tract infection (UTI) isolates; and ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin for respiratory tract infection (RTI) isolates, skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI) isolates, and genital tract pathogen isolates. In both the USA and Canada, ofloxacin was shown to have the wide spectrum of activity as follows: RTI isolates, ofloxacin (92.2%-93.8% susceptible) > ciprofloxacin (89.5%-90.4%); SSTI isolates, ofloxacin (87.1%-93.6%) > ciprofloxacin (78.8%-90.4%); UTI isolates, ofloxacin (91.6%-92.5%) > norfloxacin (87.3%-91.7%) > ciprofloxacin (86.4%-89.7%); and genital tract isolates, ofloxacin (94.0%) > ciprofloxacin (85.4%) (Canada only). US strains resistant to ofloxacin were confirmed by reference laboratory tests. Confirmed ofloxacin resistance, other than among staphylococci or nonenteric bacilli, was rare. The species most often found to be resistant to both ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin were methicillin-resistant staphylococci, Acinetobacter spp., and Enterococcus spp. From these contributing US and Canadian laboratory studies, ofloxacin appears to have a balanced spectrum of potential clinical use (91.8% susceptible aerobic isolates), particularly against Gram-positive pathogens and some species resistant to ciprofloxacin. The combined overall isolate (12,241 isolates) rates of susceptibility for ciprofloxacin (four infection sites) and norfloxacin (UTI only) were 87.3% and 88.8%, respectively. Monitoring for increasing fluoroquinolone resistance should be considered, however, as greater use of drugs in this class develops.

The North American component (the United States and Canada) of an International Comparative MIC trial monitoring ofloxacin resistance

Common lots of reference MIC (minimum inhibitory concentration) method reagents were used to monitor ofloxacin, a newer fluoroquinolone, and 13 other drugs against 3200 recent clinical isolates in February-April 1992. Five medical centers in the United States and Canada contributed 640 strains per facility as follows: Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative staphylococci, Klebsiella spp., and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (100 strains each); Streptococcus pneumoniae (40 strains); and Enterobacter cloacae, Serratia marcescens, Salmonella spp., Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis (20 strains each). Quality-control strains were processed concurrently, MICs recorded, and data processed at a common location. Selected ofloxacin-resistant isolates were retested at a reference laboratory to confirm resistances and determine cross-resistant patterns. Results indicate the following (a) fluoroquinolones were superior in usable spectrum of activity to other orally administered drugs (for example, cefaclor, cefixime, ampicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, minocycline, oxacillin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole); (b) ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin were generally equal to gentamicin and cefotaxime against commonly isolated Gram-negative pathogens; (c) fluoroquinolone resistance was rare among enteric bacilli, pneumococci (ciprofloxacin > ofloxacin), H. influenzae, and M. catarrhalis, but more common among oxacillin-resistant staphylococci and P. aeruginosa; (d) cross resistance was generally observed between ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin but was species or genus dependent; and (e) a new fluoroquinolone, levofloxacin, demonstrated promising activity against contemporary pathogens.

The epidemiology of bacterial resistance to quinolones

The new fluoroquinolones have been in use for nearly 10 years in the treatment of community- and nosocomially-acquired infections. Resistant clones may be selected during therapy and disseminate if favourable epidemiological conditions prevail. Resistance to the fluoroquinolones is still rare in common pathogens with 97 to 100% of strains remaining susceptible. Resistance has been reported in methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus, Campylobacter jejuni/coli, Salmonella, Shigella and Escherichia coli. Among nosocomial pathogens, the incidence of fluoroquinolone resistance varies between bacterial species, countries and periods of study, and is dependent on local epidemiological factors and antibiotic policies. The highest incidence of resistance is observed in Serratia and Acinetobacter spp., and particularly in methicillin-resistant S. aureus. Surveillance programmes are needed to follow up trends in resistance to the fluoroquinolones and their possible association with clinical failures.