Use of an ultrashort-acting beta-receptor blocker (esmolol) in patients with acute myocardial ischemia and relative contraindications to beta-blockade therapy

Arrhythmic complications of acute coronary syndromes

Cardiac arrhythmias routinely manifest during or following an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Although the incidence of arrhythmia is directly related to the type of ACS the patient is experiencing, the clinician needs to be cautious with all patients in these categories. As an example, nearly 90% of patients who experience acute myocardial infarction (AMI) develop some cardiac rhythm abnormality and 25% have a cardiac conduction disturbance within 24 hours of infarct onset. In this patient population, the incidence of serious arrhythmias, such as ventricular fibrillation (4.5%) ,is greatest in the first hour of an AMI and declines rapidly thereafter. This article addresses the identification and treatment of arrhythmias and conduction disturbances that complicate the course of patients who have ACS, particularly AMI and thrombolysis. Emphasis is placed on mechanisms and therapeutic strategies.

Esmolol in acute ischemic syndromes

BACKGROUND

beta-Blockers have been shown to reduce both morbidity and mortality rates in patients with acute coronary syndromes. However, because of potential side effects, their use is limited in patients who might benefit the most from such therapy. It was thought that the use of an ultra-short-acting intravenous beta-blocker might produce similar results with fewer complications in those patients with relative contraindications to beta-blocker therapy.

METHODS

Accordingly, we evaluated the use of esmolol in patients with acute coronary syndromes and relative contraindication to beta-blocker therapy in a prospective randomized trial. One hundred eight patients at 21 sites received an infusion of intravenous esmolol or standard therapy on admission and were followed for 6 weeks from the day of admission. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite event consisting of any of the following that occurred during the index hospitalization: death, myocardial (re)infarction, recurrent ischemia, or arrhythmia as well as silent myocardial ischemia assessed by ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring. Safety end points including hypotension, bradyarrhythmias, new or worsening congestive heart failure, and bronchospasm were also recorded.

RESULTS

Event rates for primary end points were similar in the 2 groups: death (2% in the standard care group vs 4% in the group receiving esmolol), myocardial (re)infarction (4% standard vs 7% esmolol), ischemia (12% vs 13%), arrhythmias (4% vs 2%), and silent ischemia (13% vs 15%). There was a higher incidence of transient hypotension in the group receiving esmolol (2% vs 16%), but all such events were noted to resolve after discontinuation of the esmolol infusion. There were no additional differences in safety end points: bradycardia (2% for those receiving standard care vs 9% receiving esmolol), new congestive heart failure (10% vs 16%), bronchospasm (0% vs 7%), and heart block (2% vs 2%).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of an ultra-short-acting beta-blocker such as esmolol might offer an alternative to patients with contraindications to standard beta-blocker therapy. Although this trial had limited power to detect safety and efficacy differences between the 2 therapies, it was observed that safety end points, which occurred during esmolol administration, resolved readily when the infusions were decreased or discontinued. Additional testing is needed to substantiate these findings.

Life-threatening brain failure and agitation in the intensive care unit

The modern intensive care unit (ICU) has evolved into an area where mortality and morbidity can be reduced by identification of unexpected hemodynamic and ventilatory decompensations before long-term problems result. Because intensive care physicians are caring for an increasingly heterogeneous population of patients, the indications for aggressive monitoring and close titration of care have expanded. Agitated patients are proving difficult to deal with in nonmonitored environments because of the unpredictable consequences of the agitated state on organ systems. The severe agitation state that is associated with ethanol withdrawal and delirium tremens (DT) is examined as a model for evaluating the efficacy of the ICU environment to ensure consistent stabilization of potentially life-threatening agitation and delirium.

Arrhythmias associated with acute myocardial infarction and thrombolysis

Ninety percent of patients with acute myocardial infarction have some cardiac rhythm abnormality, and approximately twenty-five percent have cardiac conduction disturbance within 24 hours following infarct onset. Almost any rhythm disturbance can be associated with acute myocardial infarction, including bradyarrhythmias, supraventricular tachyarrhythmias, ventricular arrhythmias, and atrioventricular block. With the advent of thrombolytic therapy, it was found that some rhythm disturbances in patients with acute myocardial infarction may be related to successful coronary artery reperfusion. This article addresses the role and treatment of arrhythmias and conduction disturbances that complicate the course of patients with acute infarction and thrombolysis.

Esmolol for the management of pediatric hypertension after cardiac operations

OBJECTIVE

Hypertension frequently occurs during the immediate postoperative period in children after repair of aortic coarctation but may also occur after repair of other congenital heart defects. Nitroprusside has often been used to control blood pressure in this setting. Because hypertension after coarctation repair is frequently associated with elevations in catecholamines, esmolol, a short-acting beta-blocking agent, may be an effective alternative. Therefore we undertook the first systematic investigation to determine the efficacy and disposition of esmolol in pediatric patients with acute hypertension after cardiac operations.

METHODS

Twenty patients aged 1 month to 12 years (median 25.6 months) with acute hypertension after cardiac operations received esmolol in an opened-labeled trial. Esmolol was titrated to a blood pressure less than or equal to the 90th percentile for age.

RESULTS

Ten patients had coarctation repair and the remaining patients underwent repair of other congenital heart defects. On final esmolol dose (mean +/- standard deviation dosage 700 +/- 232 microg/kg/min) there was a significant percent decrease in heart rate and systolic and diastolic blood pressures from postoperative values. Esmolol dose was significantly associated with percent reduction in systolic blood pressure. Final esmolol dose and total body clearance were significantly higher in patients after coarctation repair. There were significant associations between esmolol dose and esmolol blood concentrations at steady state.

CONCLUSIONS

The dosage required to control hypertension in patients after repair of aortic coarctation was higher than patients who underwent repair of other congenital heart defects. Esmolol was effective in controlling blood pressure in 19 of 20 patients without adverse effects.

Symptomatic and hemodynamic recovery following dobutamine stress echo: benefit of low-dose esmolol administration

OBJECTIVES

We studied the use of esmolol in patients experiencing minor side effects of palpitations, anxiety, nervousness, and tremors associated with dobutamine stress echocardiography.

BACKGROUND

Dobutamine stress echocardiography is frequently used in the assessment of coronary artery disease. Esmolol administration may enhance patient comfort.

METHODS

Sixty consecutive patients who experienced minor side-effects during dobutamine stress echocardiography were given 0.3 mg/kg esmolol intravenously in the recovery period and compared retrospectively to sixty consecutive controls who underwent dobutamine stress echocardiography, who did not receive esmolol, during the same time period. Both groups were matched for age, ejection fraction, and peak dose of dobutamine. Heart rate and blood pressure were assessed during and after dobutamine administration.

RESULTS

Both groups had similar baseline blood pressure (mmHg) (142 +/- 19/72 +/- 14 vs 139 +/- 20/72 +/- 14) and heart rate (beats per minute) (75 +/- 14 vs 75 +/- 17) (esmolol and control respectively, p = ns), but peak heart rate was higher in the esmolol group (126 +/- 14 vs. 116 +/- 14, p < 0.01). In the group who received esmolol, symptomatic relief paralleled the statistically significant decrease in heart rate which occurred within 1 minute of esmolol administration (99.7 +/- 15.3 vs 108.5 +/- 13.1 p < 0.0001); the heart rate in the esmolol group remained significantly lower than the control group for 5 minutes following esmolol administration (92.0 +/- 10.3 vs 96.7 +/- 11.8 p < 0.05). As a percentage of peak heart rate the esmolol group remained significantly lower than the control for 7 minutes (74% vs 80% p < 0.05). Esmolol induced a significant reversal of dobutamine-induced diastolic hypotension (diastolic blood pressure at peak 66 +/- 17 vs 8 min recovery 70 +/- 12, p < 0.03) that was not seen in controls (diastolic blood pressure at peak 64 +/- 18 vs 8 min recovery 65 +/- 14, p = ns). Systolic blood pressure and heart rate remained elevated in both groups 8 min into recovery compared to baseline, suggesting persistent dobutamine effect beyond the expected 2 min pharmacologic half-life of dobutamine. No side-effects from esmolol were seen despite it being used in 9 patients with EF < 35%.

CONCLUSIONS

Esmolol is effective and well tolerated for the management of dobutamine-related minor side-effects. The mechanism of benefit, in addition to heart rate reduction, may involve a reversal of dobutamine-induced diastolic hypotension. Blood pressure and heart rate recovery are slower than expected from previously published pharmacokinetic data.

Esmolol. A review of its therapeutic efficacy and pharmacokinetic characteristics

Esmolol is an ultra short-acting intravenous cardioselective beta-antagonist. It has an extremely short elimination half-life (mean: 9 minutes; range: 4 to 16 minutes) and a total body clearance [285 ml/min/kg (17.1 L/h/kg)] approaching 3 times cardiac output and 14 times hepatic blood flow. The alpha-distribution half-life is approximately 2 minutes. When esmolol is administered as a bolus followed by a continuous infusion, onset of activity occurs within 2 minutes, with 90% of steady-state beta-blockade occurring within 5 minutes. Full recovery from beta-blockade is observed 18 to 30 minutes after terminating the infusion. Esmolol blood concentrations are undetectable 20 to 30 minutes postinfusion. The elimination of esmolol is independent of renal or hepatic function as it is metabolised by red blood cell cytosol esterases to an acid metabolite and methanol. The acid metabolite, which is renally eliminated, has 1500-fold less activity than esmolol. Methanol concentrations remain within the range of normal endogenous levels. Clinically, esmolol is used for the following: (i) situations where a brief duration of adrenergic blockade is required, such as tracheal intubation and stressful surgical stimuli; and (ii) critically ill or unstable patients in whom the dosage of esmolol is easily titrated to response and adverse effects are rapidly managed by termination of the infusion. In adults, bolus doses of 100 to 200mg are effective in attenuating the adrenergic responses associated with tracheal intubation and surgical stimuli. For the control of supraventricular arrhythmias, acute postoperative hypertension and acute ischaemic heart disease, doses of < 300 micrograms/kg/min, administered by continuous intravenous infusion, are used. The principal adverse effect of esmolol is hypotension (incidence of 0 to 50%), which is frequently accompanied with diaphoresis. The incidence of hypotension appears to increase with doses exceeding 150 micrograms/kg/min and in patients with low baseline blood pressure. Hypotension infrequently requires any intervention other than decreasing the dose or discontinuing the infusion. Symptoms generally resolve within 30 minutes after discontinuing the drug. In surgical and critical care settings where clinical conditions are rapidly changing, the pharmacokinetic profile of esmolol allows the drug to provide rapid pharmacological control and minimises the potential for serious adverse effects.

Coronary artery operation supported by the Hemopump: an experimental study on pig

Twelve pigs undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting had the Hemopump to decompress the heart and as circulatory support. The pigs also were given a short-acting beta-blocker, esmolol, to make the heart flaccid. Extracorporeal circulation was not used. During Hemopump support, a bolus dose of 0.5 to 5 mg/kg of esmolol was given before incremental titration steps from 100 to 600 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 over 15 to 20 minutes. The internal thoracic artery was sutured to the distal part of the left anterior descending artery. The Hemopump was withdrawn to the aorta after a weaning period of 20 to 30 minutes. Seven of 12 pigs went through the whole procedure and the Hemopump was weaned off without complications. Five animals died due to right ventricular failure in association with esmolol administration. There was a big interindividual difference in esmolol dose-response curves in the surviving animals. No significant differences in the hemodynamic variables were observed during the experiment. The Hemopump in combination with a short-acting beta-blocker could be an alternate way of performing coronary artery bypass grafting in selected patients.

Esmolol and intraoperative myocardial ischemia: a double-blind study

Forty patients scheduled to undergo elective myocardial revascularization were included in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate any influence of esmolol on the incidence of myocardial ischemia. Calibrated recordings of ECG leads II and V5 were continuously monitored with the QMED Monitor One TC (Qmed Inc, Clark, NJ) from the time of arrival in the operating room holding area through the induction of anesthesia, using a high-dose opioid technique, and until the initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass. One group received a bolus of esmolol, 1.0 mg/kg, followed by a continuous infusion of 100 micrograms/kg/min. The other group received a bolus and infusion of saline placebo of equal volume. The incidence of myocardial ischemia was not significantly different between the groups on arrival in the holding area, or at any study point. Heart rate, mean arterial pressure, and the number of patients developing myocardial ischemia during the course of the study also did not differ significantly between the groups. There were significant decreases in heart rate and mean arterial pressure compared with the awake baseline values in both groups during multiple study points. It is concluded that esmolol was ineffective at treating preexisting or new-onset myocardial ischemia at this dosage in this clinical setting.

Safety of esmolol in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolytic therapy who had relative contraindications to beta-blocker therapy

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted to evaluate the safety of esmolol in 114 patients treated with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction who also had relative contraindications to beta-blockade, and the predictive value of patient tolerance to esmolol and subsequent patient tolerance of oral beta-blocker therapy.

PATIENTS

One hundred and fourteen patients with myocardial infarction documented by enzyme concentrations and electrocardiographic changes who also had relative contraindications to beta-blockade.

METHODS

Esmolol was initiated during acute myocardial infarction for myocardial ischemia (n = 88), hypertension (n = 13), or supraventricular tachycardia (n = 13). Relative contraindications to beta-blocker therapy included either active signs/symptoms of left ventricular dysfunction or a history of congestive heart failure (n = 40), a history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma (n = 31), bradycardia (HR < 60 beats/min; n = 18), peripheral vascular disease (n = 15), or hypotension (systolic BP < 100 mm Hg; n = 14).

RESULTS

During initial esmolol dose titration, 69 patients tolerated 300 micrograms/kg/min, 12 patients tolerated 200 micrograms/kg/min, 17 patients tolerated 100 micrograms/kg/min, and 16 patients tolerated 50 micrograms/kg/min. Twenty-eight patients (25 percent) developed dose-limiting adverse effects during esmolol maintenance infusions. Sixteen patients required esmolol dose reduction and 12 required esmolol discontinuation. Adverse effects reversed within 30-45 minutes following dose reduction or discontinuation. The 86 patients who tolerated esmolol infusions without dose reduction or drug discontinuation were subsequently treated with oral beta-blockers. Eleven of these patients (13 percent) developed adverse effects requiring oral beta-blocker discontinuation. Nine of these patients had tolerated only 50 micrograms/kg/min of esmolol, and the other 2 patients had tolerated only 100 micrograms/kg/min.

CONCLUSIONS

Esmolol can be used safely in most patients treated with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction who have relative contraindications to beta-blockers. Tolerance to higher maintenance doses of esmolol is a good predictor of subsequent outcome with oral beta-blocker therapy.

Anti-arrhythmic efficacy of beta-adrenergic blockade during acute ischemia in myocardium with scar

Ventricular arrhythmia production in the ischemic heart is considered to be influenced by prior infarction. Although beta-adrenergic blockade is known to have beneficial effects during acute ischemia, its anti-arrhythmic efficacy during post-infarction ischemia is not known. To explore this question, we have used a model with a relatively high incidence of ischemic arrhythmias. Mongrel dogs 2 to 3 years of age were studied intact under anesthesia. An irreversible injury of the infero-posterior myocardium was produced with an electrode catheter 1 week earlier. The arrhythmic response to acute ischemia was assessed using serial, transient 15-minute occlusions of the left-anterior descending coronary artery with a balloon catheter. During ischemia alone, the incidence of ventricular fibrillation in animals who underwent all phases of the study was 6 of 9; with atenolol (0.2 mg/kg intravenously) and ischemia, 1 of 9 (p < 0.05). To assess the role of the bradycardic response, the latter was repeated 1 week subsequently during atrial pacing at the heart rate that existed before ischemia. Fibrillation occurred in 8 of 9, a significant reversal of the therapeutic effect. To exclude the potential artifact of a fixed intervention protocol, a study was undertaken with the short-acting esmolol, in which three ischemic periods were alternated at 1-hour intervals: (A) ischemia without treatment, (B) ischemia with continuous infusion of 150 micrograms/kg/min esmolol, and (C) same as B except that heart rate was maintained by atrial pacing.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Noninvasive assessment of the direct action of oral nifedipine and nicardipine on left ventricular contractile state in patients with systemic hypertension: importance of reflex sympathetic responses

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to noninvasively assess the direct action of calcium channel blockers on left ventricular contractility in humans and to establish a framework for determining the importance of reflex sympathetic responses to any pharmacologic intervention.

BACKGROUND

Assessment of left ventricular contractility in patients taking calcium channel blockers by using traditional indexes of systolic performance is difficult because of the after-load-reducing and reflex sympathetic effects of the drugs.

METHODS

Fifteen hypertensive patients (mean blood pressure 127 +/- 15 mm Hg) were studied with Doppler echocardiography and calibrated subclavian pulse tracings while receiving placebo and 1 week after randomization to treatment with oral nifedipine (20 mg three times daily; n = 7) or nicardipine (30 mg three times daily; n = 8). Left ventricular circumferential end-systolic wall stress versus rate-corrected velocity of shortening (Vcfc) relations were generated over a range of loads using nitroprusside. Data were acquired before and during esmolol infusion, thereby allowing assessment of hemodynamic responses with the sympathetic nervous system functionally intact as well as ablated. The adequacy of sympathetic blockade was confirmed with isoproterenol challenges. In each case, left ventricular contractile state was measured relative to placebo and esmolol data as delta Vcfc at a common end-systolic wall stress. Increased and decreased contractility were defined as delta Vcfc > 0 and delta Vcfc < 0, respectively.

RESULTS

Nifedipine and nicardipine equally decreased blood pressure and end-systolic wall stress and increased left ventricular percent fractional shortening and stroke volume. Neither drug alone consistently altered ventricular contractility compared with placebo. Ablation of reflex sympathetic tone with esmolol unmasked a negative inotropic effect for nifedipine (p = 0.03 vs. esmolol alone) but not nicardipine (p = 0.68 vs. esmolol alone). The difference between the contractility effects of nifedipine plus esmolol versus those of nicardipine plus esmolol approached statistical significance (p = 0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

Totally noninvasive techniques showed a differential effect on left ventricular contractility between nifedipine and nicardipine when alterations in afterload and reflex sympathetic responses were eliminated as confounding variables. This diagnostic approach, based on the use of pharmacologic probes, should have wide applicability for assessing the direct inotropic effect of any agent, even in the presence of complex primary and secondary physiologic modes of action.

Treatment of unstable angina pectoris

Unstable angina pectoris may be manifested as new-onset angina, a change in the anginal pattern, pain at rest with associated electrocardiographic (ECG) changes, or postinfarction angina. Of these, pain at rest with ischemic ECG changes is known to be associated with the poorest prognosis. The pathogenesis of unstable angina pectoris involves a combination of a fixed atherosclerotic obstruction and a dynamic component related to coronary vasoconstriction, thrombus formation, or both. Long-acting nitrates, inhibitors of platelet aggregation, beta blockers, and calcium antagonists are among the agents that have been shown to be effective in the medical management of unstable angina. A study now in progress is evaluating the routine use of thrombolytic therapy for this indication. Although alleviation of symptoms and prevention of death and myocardial infarction are important therapeutic goals, the overall efficacy of a particular medical therapy can best be assessed by objective evaluation of its ability to control ischemia, using such techniques as exercise scintigraphy and ambulatory ECG monitoring. Cardiac catheterization and revascularization are indicated for patients with unstable angina who continue to experience symptoms or who show evidence of silent ischemia despite medical therapy. A study is under way to determine the advisability of routine revascularization of such patients. Revascularization will provide symptomatic relief in most patients with unstable angina and may prolong survival and improve left ventricular function in certain subsets.

Influence of histamine receptors on basal left ventricular contractile tone in humans: Assessment using the H2receptor antagonist famotidine and the beta-adrenoceptor antagonist esmolol as pharmacologic probes

Histamine has a positive inotropic action in humans. Recent controversial data have suggested that histamine2 (H2) receptor blockade depresses overall left ventricular systolic performance in healthy volunteers. To explore the possibility that H2 receptors positively influence basal left ventricular contractile tone, 10 normal subjects were studied by using imaging and Doppler echocardiography and calibrated subclavian pulse data in a blinded, randomized, two-period crossover trial with measurements obtained at the end of each 7-day period. Oral drug administration consisted of either the potent H2 antagonist famotidine (40 mg/day) or placebo. Left ventricular circumferential end-systolic wall stress-rate-corrected velocity of fiber shortening (Vcfc) relations were generated over a range of loads with methoxamine. Contractility was assessed by using Vcfc at a common end-systolic wall stress. During each study, data were obtained before and during high dose intravenous esmolol administration to determine the contributions, if any, of sympathetic reflex responses. Famotidine did not alter blood pressure, left ventricular percent fractional shortening, circumferential end-systolic wall stress, stroke volume index, cardiac index, total vascular resistance or ventricular contractile state in comparison with placebo but did decrease heart rate by 3 beats/min (p less than 0.05). With beta-adrenergic blockade, no differences in contractility were evident between esmolol alone and famotidine plus esmolol. Thus, H2 receptor blockade with famotidine does not alter myocardial mechanics or cardiac sympathetic tone, suggesting that in humans basal left ventricular contractile state is not physiologically dependent on the H2-mediated effects of histamine.

Esmolol and ventilatory function in cardiac patients with COPD

To assess the effects of acute cardioselective beta blockade on ventilatory function in patients with COPD and active cardiac disorders, 50 patients were studied during intravenous infusion of esmolol. All patients had an obstructive ventilatory component on baseline pulmonary function testing, and 58 percent had a significant bronchodilator response to inhaled albuterol. Esmolol infusion (8 to 24 mg/min) produced large decreases in heart rate (84 +/- 2 to 69 +/- 2 beats/min, p less than 0.01) and SBP (124 +/- 3 to 106 +/- 3 mm Hg, p less than 0.01). Despite this marked hemodynamic response, there was no significant group effect of beta blockade on pulmonary function. No patient experienced dyspnea or wheezing with acute esmolol infusion; however, three patients (6 percent) developed asymptomatic decreases of FEV1. It is concluded that acute beta blockade with esmolol can be achieved in patients with COPD and cardiac disorders with little risk of bronchospasm.

Usefulness of esmolol in unstable angina pectoris. European Esmolol Study Group

Esmolol is a new cardioselective beta blocker with unique pharmacokinetic properties resulting in a half-life of only 9 minutes. The present multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled study examined the hemodynamic and antiischemic effects of this compound given as an adjunctive to conventional medical therapy in 113 patients with unstable angina. Fifty-nine patients received esmolol and 54 received matching placebo infusions. Esmolol was titrated in a step-wise manner at dosages of 2 to 24 mg/min until a 25% reduction in the double product was achieved; thereafter, esmolol was continuously infused for up to 72 hours. Esmolol caused a significant and persistent decline in heart rate and blood pressure throughout the entire study period. Clinical events, such as development of acute myocardial infarction or the need for urgent revascularization, occurred in 3 esmolol compared with 9 placebo patients (p = 0.06). There was also a trend toward reduction of silent ischemia as judged by Holter monitoring (mean [+/- standard deviation] duration/patient/24 hours, 21 +/- 81 minutes in the esmolol and 35 +/- 128 minutes in the placebo groups). Esmolol-related adverse effects were mostly cardiovascular in origin and could be managed promptly by downward dose titration or cessation of drug infusion. Thus, esmolol appears to be a safe and effective drug for patients with unstable angina because it permits a large degree of flexibility in adapting the desired level of beta blockade to the patient's changing clinical presentation.

Experience with esmolol for the treatment of cocaine-associated cardiovascular complications

The authors report their experience using esmolol, an ultra-short acting beta-adrenergic antagonist, for the treatment of seven patients with cocaine-associated cardiovascular complications. No consistent hemodynamic benefit was found with the use of this drug. Although there was a decline in mean heart rate of 23% (range 0% to 35%), they were unable to show a consistent antihypertensive response. Adverse effects occurred in three patients. This included one patient with a marked exacerbation of hypertension and one who became hypotensive. Another patient developed emesis and lethargy during esmolol therapy and required endotracheal intubation. They do not recommend the routine use of esmolol for cocaine cardiotoxicity.

Acute myocardial infarction: initial manifestations, management, and prognosis

In patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction (AMI), obtaining a thorough history is important for identifying both the cause of chest pain and any concurrent conditions that may complicate the management. Physical examination--including cardiac auscultation and determining the status of the peripheral vasculature--is important as a guide to immediate management and as a baseline for future comparison. The differential diagnosis of AMI is extensive, and various laboratory tests, such as electrocardiography, cardiac enzymes, radionuclide techniques, echocardiography, and cardiac catheterization, can aid in the diagnosis. The routine management of patients with AMI can include medical therapy with antithrombotic agents, nitrates, beta-adrenergic blockers, or calcium channel blocking agents. The major differences between Q-wave and non-Q-wave infarction are discussed. Some factors that affect early and late prognosis in patients with AMI are age of the patient, residual left ventricular function, residual myocardial ischemia, and substrates for sustained ventricular arrhythmias. Although much of the current enthusiasm in management of AMI is related to revascularization strategies, other important aspects of diagnosis and treatment should not be overlooked.

Nonthrombolytic intervention in acute myocardial infarction

Alternative interventions are available for patients in whom thrombolytic therapy is inappropriate after an acute myocardial infarction. Administration of a beta blocker within the first 24 hours of the patient's admission to the coronary care unit can reduce overall morbidity and mortality within the first 7 days by about 15%. Maintenance therapy with an oral beta blocker can reduce mortality within the succeeding 3 years by about 25%. Esmolol, a unique cardioselective beta 1-adrenergic receptor blocker with a half-life of 9 minutes, can enable some patients with relative contraindications to beta blockers to nevertheless benefit from early beta-blocking therapy. It also is useful in screening patients for subsequent therapy with beta blockers. Those who tolerate the esmolol infusion can be given a long-acting beta blocker. For patients who exhibit intolerance to esmolol, the infusion can be terminated with rapid return to baseline hemodynamics.