Comparison of endocardial and epicardial programmed stimulation for the induction of ventricular tachycardia

Programmed Ventricular Stimulation: Risk Stratification and Guiding Antiarrhythmic Therapies

Electrophysiologic testing with programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) has been utilized to induce ventricular tachycardia (VT), thereby improving risk stratification for patients with ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathies and determining the effectiveness of antiarrhythmic therapies, especially catheter ablation. A variety of procedural aspects can be modified during PVS in order to alter the sensitivity and specificity of the test including the addition of multiple baseline pacing cycle lengths, extrastimuli, and pacing locations. The definition of a positive result is also critically important, which has varied from exclusively sustained monomorphic VT (>30 seconds) to any ventricular arrhythmia regardless of morphology. In this review, we discuss the history of PVS and evaluate its role in sudden cardiac death risk stratification in a variety of patient populations. We propose an approach to future investigations that will capitalize on the unique ability to vary the sensitivity and specificity of this test. We then discuss the application of PVS during and following catheter ablation. The strategies that have been utilized to improve the efficacy of intraprocedural PVS are highlighted during a discussion of the limitations of this probabilistic strategy. The role of noninvasive programmed stimulation is also reviewed in predicting recurrent VT and informing management decisions including repeat ablations, modifications in antiarrhythmic drugs, and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming. Based on the available evidence and guidelines, we propose an approach to future investigations that will allow clinicians to optimize the use of PVS for risk stratification and assessment of therapeutic efficacy.

Role of abnormal repolarization in the mechanism of cardiac arrhythmia

In cardiac patients, life-threatening tachyarrhythmia is often precipitated by abnormal changes in ventricular repolarization and refractoriness. Repolarization abnormalities typically evolve as a consequence of impaired function of outward K⁺ currents in cardiac myocytes, which may be caused by genetic defects or result from various acquired pathophysiological conditions, including electrical remodelling in cardiac disease, ion channel modulation by clinically used pharmacological agents, and systemic electrolyte disorders seen in heart failure, such as hypokalaemia. Cardiac electrical instability attributed to abnormal repolarization relies on the complex interplay between a provocative arrhythmic trigger and vulnerable arrhythmic substrate, with a central role played by the excessive prolongation of ventricular action potential duration, impaired intracellular Ca²⁺ handling, and slowed impulse conduction. This review outlines the electrical activity of ventricular myocytes in normal conditions and cardiac disease, describes classical electrophysiological mechanisms of cardiac arrhythmia, and provides an update on repolarization-related surrogates currently used to assess arrhythmic propensity, including spatial dispersion of repolarization, activation-repolarization coupling, electrical restitution, TRIaD (triangulation, reverse use dependence, instability, and dispersion), and the electromechanical window. This is followed by a discussion of the mechanisms that account for the dependence of arrhythmic vulnerability on the location of the ventricular pacing site. Finally, the review clarifies the electrophysiological basis for cardiac arrhythmia produced by hypokalaemia, and gives insight into the clinical importance and pathophysiology of drug-induced arrhythmia, with particular focus on class Ia (quinidine, procainamide) and Ic (flecainide) Na⁺ channel blockers, and class III antiarrhythmic agents that block the delayed rectifier K⁺ channel (dofetilide).

Chronic Intermittent Low-Level Stimulation of Tragus Reduces Cardiac Autonomic Remodeling and Ventricular Arrhythmia Inducibility in a Post-Infarction Canine Model

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated whether chronic low-level tragus stimulation (LL-TS) inhibits cardiac sympathetic remodeling and reduces ventricular arrhythmia inducibility in a post-infarction canine model.

BACKGROUND

Low-level vagal stimulation has been shown to suppress cardiac sympathetic activity, which plays an important role in ventricular arrhythmia after myocardial infarction (MI). Our previous studies reported a noninvasive approach to deliver vagal stimulation by transcutaneous stimulation at the tragus, where the auricular branch of the vagus nerve is located.

METHODS

Twenty-two beagles were randomized to the normal control (n = 6), MI (left anterior descending coronary artery ligation without LL-TS [n = 8]), and TS (MI plus LL-TS [n = 8]) groups. LL-TS was delivered 2 h each day at 80% below the threshold which slowed sinus rate.

RESULTS

At 2-month follow-up, LL-TS was found to significantly reduce ventricular arrhythmia inducibility (arrhythmia score: 1.8 ± 0.8 vs. 3.6 ± 0.7, p < 0.01, compared to the MI group), decreased left stellate ganglion (LSG) activity (frequency: 32 ± 15 vs. 112 ± 29 impulses/s; and amplitude: 0.15 ± 0.12 mV vs. 0.38 ± 0.12 mV, compared to MI group), and attenuated cardiac sympathetic remodeling induced by chronic MI. The nerve growth factor (NGF) protein was down-regulated, whereas the small conductance calcium-activated potassium channel type2 (SK2) protein was up-regulated in the LSG by chronic LL-TS.

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic LL-TS could reduce the ventricular arrhythmia inducibility, LSG neural activity and sympathetic neural remodeling in a post-infarction canine model. Down-regulation of NGF protein and up-regulation of SK2 protein in the LSG contribute to the salutary effects of LL-TS.

Electrophysiologic characteristics at initiation of ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation in a canine infarct model

Local ventricular activation time and the conduction time during sinus rhythm at the induction of ventricular tachycardia (VT) and ventricular fibrillation (VF) were investigated using a canine model of chronic myocardial infarction. Of 26 dogs studied, 15 had inducible VT, 10 had inducible VF, and 1 had no inducible arrhythmias. Bipolar local ventricular electrograms were recorded during sinus rhythm from 136 sites in 10 dogs with VT and 164 sites in 11 dogs with VF. Mean activation time in dogs with inducible VT was significantly longer than in dogs with inducible VF. Furthermore, simultaneous local ventricular electrograms were recorded during the induction of VT (74 episodes) or VF (38 episodes) from the infarct border zone at the endocardium (B-EN), the epicardium (B-EP), and normal sites (N-EN, N-EP). During VT induction, the activation time at N-EN and N-EP was significantly longer than during VF induction (N-EN: 94 +/- 21, 70 +/- 19 ms; N-EP: 83 +/- 21, 64 +/- 10 ms; p < 0.05). Conduction time was measured at the initiation of VT or VF induced by orthodromic or antidromic pacing. The conduction times of the last paced beat between N-EN and B-EP (35 +/- 11, 62 +/- 24 ms), N-EN and N-EP (35 +/- 12, 14 +/- 13 ms), B-EN and B-EP (16 +/- 10, 38 +/- 25 ms), and B-EP and N-EP (77 +/- 27, 44 +/- 12 ms) were significantly different in dogs with inducible VT (p < 0.05), but not in dogs with VF.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Comparison of epicardial and endocardial programmed stimulation in patients at risk for ventricular arrhythmias after cardiac surgery

Programmed ventricular stimulation was performed on 36 patients after recent cardiac surgery using implanted right ventricular epicardial temporary wires and with catheters positioned percutaneously at two right ventricular endocardial sites. Patients were followed for a mean of 18.5 months (range 3 to 36 months). Epicardial wires were nonfunctional in 10 patients (28%) due to excessively high pacing thresholds. Overall, 22 patients (61%) had inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia; epicardial wires were functional in 15 (68%) of these patients. Six patients without inducible ventricular tachycardia with epicardial stimulation were inducible using endocardial stimulation. Of the 24 patients in whom epicardial and endocardial ventricular stimulation could be performed, concordant results were obtained in only 17 (71%), despite similar epicardial and endocardial ventricular effective and functional refractory periods. A total of 14 arrhythmic events occurred during the follow-up period. Of the 22 patients with an inducible sustained ventricular tachycardia, 12 (64%) had subsequent arrhythmic events. Only 2 of the 14 noninducible patients had follow-up arrhythmic events, one of which was caused by medication proarrhythmia. Endocardial ventricular stimulation had a superior sensitivity (83% versus 30%, P < 0.0001) and an improved negative predictive value (86% versus 61%, P < 0.05) compared with epicardial ventricular stimulation. These results indicate that noninducibility using epicardial programmed ventricular stimulation does not reliably portend a low risk for recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Epicardial programmed stimulation, used alone, may be inadequate for postoperative electrophysiological evaluation of patients at risk for ventricular arrhythmias.