Technetium-99m sestamibi tomography in patients with spontaneous chest pain

Duration of abnormal SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging following resolution of acute ischemia: an angioplasty model

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to determine how long nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) remains abnormal following transient myocardial ischemia.

BACKGROUND

Acute rest MPI identifies myocardial ischemia with a high sensitivity when the radionuclide is injected during chest pain. However, the sensitivity of this technique is uncertain when the radionuclide is injected following the resolution of symptoms.

METHODS

Forty patients undergoing successful coronary angioplasty were randomized into four equal groups. Tc-99m sestamibi was injected intravenously during the last balloon inflation (acute MPI) in 30 patients and then reinjected 1, 2, or 3 h later (delayed MPI). In a fourth group, the radiopharmaceutical was injected at 15 min following balloon deflation (delayed MPI). A final injection was performed at 24 to 48 h (late MPI) in 37 patients (93%).

RESULTS

A perfusion defect was detected in all 30 acute MPI studies; in 7/10 patients (70%) injected at 15 min; in 11/30 patients (37%) injected at 1, 2, or 3 h; and in 7/37 patients (19%) injected at 24 to 48 h. Perfusion scores were 13.0 +/- 9.2 on acute MPI, 5.1 +/- 2.8 at 15 min (p < 0.001 vs. acute MPI); 2.6 +/- 3.0 at 1, 2, and 3 h (p < 0.001 vs. acute MPI); and 1.3 +/- 2.4 at 24 to 48 h (p < 0.001 vs. acute MPI; p < 0.03 vs. delayed MPI).

CONCLUSIONS

Myocardial perfusion imaging may remain abnormal for several hours following transient myocardial ischemia even when normal flow is restored in the epicardial coronary artery.

Beyond the twelve-lead electrocardiogram: diagnostic tests in the evaluation for suspected acute myocardial infarction in the emergency department, part I

On a daily basis the emergency physician is faced with the difficult task of determining whether or not a patient with acute chest pain is sustaining an acute myocardial infarction. In most cases, this is not a straightforward decision. Although observation units are being used more often for chest pain evaluations, many emergency physicians currently admit such patients to an intensive care setting. Because fewer than one-third of emergency department chest pain patients actually suffer an acute myocardial infarction, expensive resources are, in retrospect, used unnecessarily. Conversely, patients who are infarcting, and are inadvertently discharged home from the emergency department, have a worse prognosis than those admitted. This two-part series reviews the newer modalities available that may help the emergency physician arrive at a more accurate diagnosis. The current article, Part I, examines the use of myocardial imaging, computer assisted diagnostic protocols, and newer uses of the electrocardiogram. Part II reviews the use of biochemical assays of cardiac proteins and the Chest Pain Observation Unit.