Economics of elective coronary revascularization. Comparison of costs and charges for conventional angioplasty, directional atherectomy, stenting and bypass surgery

Outpatient care concept and potential inpatient cost savings associated with the administration of dalbavancin - A real-world data and retrospective cost analysis

BACKGROUND

The treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) usually involves intravenous (i.v.) antibiotics requiring hospitalisation and increasing hospital costs. Since 2014, dalbavancin is approved for ABSSSIs treatment. However, evidence of its health economic impact on the German healthcare system is still limited.

METHODS

Diagnosis-related groups (DRG) based cost analysis was used to evaluate real-world data (RWD) from a German tertiary care center. All patients treated with i.v. antibiotics in the Department of Dermatology and Venereology at the University Hospital of Cologne were included to detect potential cost savings from a payer perspective. Thus, for the inpatient care German diagnosis-related groups (G-DRG) tariffs, length of stay (LOS), main- and secondary DRG-diagnoses and for the outpatient setting 'Einheitlicher Bewertungsmaßstab' (EBM) codes were evaluated.

RESULTS

This retrospective study identified 480 inpatient cases treated for ABSSSI between January 2016 until December 2020. Complete cost data were available for 433 cases and the detection of long-hospital-stay patients based on surcharges for exceeding the upper limit LOS led to 125 cases (29%) including 67 females (54%) and 58 males (46%) with an overall mean age of 63.6 years; all treated for International Classification of Diseases (ICD -10th revision) code A46 'erysipelas'. A sub-analysis focussed on DRG J64B with a total of 92 cases exceeding the upper limit LOS by a median of 3 days resulted in a median surcharge of €636 (mean value €749; SD €589; IQR €459-€785) per case. In comparison, we calculated outpatient treatment costs of approximately €55 per case. Thus, further treatment of these patients in an outpatient setting before exceeding the upper limit LOS might result in a cost-saving potential of approximately €581 per case.

CONCLUSION

Dalbavancin appears a cost-efficient option to reduce inpatient treatment costs by transitioning to an outpatient setting of patients with ABSSSI potentially exceeding the upper limit LOS.

Office-based vs. operating room-performed laryngopharyngeal surgery: a review of cost differences

Purpose

Office-based transnasal flexible endoscopic surgery under topical anesthesia has recently been developed as an alternative for transoral laryngopharyngeal surgery under general anesthesia. The aim of this study was to evaluate differences in health care costs between the two surgical settings.

Methods

PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library were searched for studies reporting on costs of laryngopharyngeal procedures that could either be performed in the office or operating room (i.e., laser surgery, biopsies, vocal fold injection, or hypopharyngeal or esophageal dilation). Quality assessment of the included references was performed.

Results

Of 2953 identified studies, 13 were included. Quality assessment revealed that methodology differed significantly among the included studies. All studies reported lower costs for procedures performed in the office compared to those performed in the operating room. The variation within reported hospital and physician charges was substantial.

Conclusion

Office-based laryngopharyngeal procedures under topical anesthesia result in lower costs compared to similar procedures performed under general anesthesia.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00405-019-05617-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

A systematic review of cost-effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention vs. surgery for the treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease in the drug-eluting stent era

Aims

The suitability of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), compared with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), for patients with complex multivessel coronary artery disease (MVCAD) remains a contentious topic. While the body of evidence regarding the clinical effectiveness of these revascularization strategies is growing, there is limited evidence concerning their long-term cost-effectiveness. We aim to critically appraise the body of literature investigating the cost-effectiveness of CABG compared with PCI using stents, and to assess the quality of the economic evidence available.

Methods and results

A systematic review was performed across six electronic databases; Medline, Embase, the NHS Economic Evaluation Database, the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, the health technology assessment database, and the Cochrane Library. All studies comparing economic attractiveness of CABG vs. PCI using bare-metal stents (BMS) or drug-eluting stents (DES) in balanced groups of patients were considered. Sixteen studies were included. These comprised studies of conventional CABG vs. BMS (n = 8), or DES (n = 4); off-pump CABG vs. BMS (n = 2), or DES (n = 1); and minimally invasive direct CABG vs. BMS (n = 2). The majority adopted a healthcare payer perspective (n = 14). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) reported across studies varied widely according to perspective and time horizon. Favourable lifetime ICERs were reported for CABG in three trials. For patients with left main coronary artery disease, however, DES was reported as the dominant (more effective and cost-saving) strategy in one study.

Conclusion

Overall, CABG rather than PCI was the favoured cost-effective treatment for complex MVCAD in the long term. While the evidence base for the cost-effectiveness of DES compared with CABG is growing, there is a need for more evaluations adopting a societal perspective, and time horizons of a lifetime or 10 or more years.

Simulation modeling for stratified breast cancer screening - a systematic review of cost and quality of life assumptions

BACKGROUND

The economic evaluation of stratified breast cancer screening gains momentum, but produces also very diverse results. Systematic reviews so far focused on modeling techniques and epidemiologic assumptions. However, cost and utility parameters received only little attention. This systematic review assesses simulation models for stratified breast cancer screening based on their cost and utility parameters in each phase of breast cancer screening and care.

METHODS

A literature review was conducted to compare economic evaluations with simulation models of personalized breast cancer screening. Study quality was assessed using reporting guidelines. Cost and utility inputs were extracted, standardized and structured using a care delivery framework. Studies were then clustered according to their study aim and parameters were compared within the clusters.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies were identified within three study clusters. Reporting quality was very diverse in all three clusters. Only two studies in cluster 1, four studies in cluster 2 and one study in cluster 3 scored high in the quality appraisal. In addition to the quality appraisal, this review assessed if the simulation models were consistent in integrating all relevant phases of care, if utility parameters were consistent and methodological sound and if cost were compatible and consistent in the actual parameters used for screening, diagnostic work up and treatment. Of 18 studies, only three studies did not show signs of potential bias.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review shows that a closer look into the cost and utility parameter can help to identify potential bias. Future simulation models should focus on integrating all relevant phases of care, using methodologically sound utility parameters and avoiding inconsistent cost parameters.

Cost comparison of Transcatheter and Operative Pulmonary Valve Replacement (from the Pediatric Health Information Systems Database)

Outcomes for transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement (TC-PVR) and operative pulmonary valve replacement (S-PVR) are excellent. Thus, their respective cost is a relevant clinical outcome. We performed a retrospective cohort study of children and adults who underwent PVR at age ≥ 8 years from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2013, at 35 centers contributing data to the Pediatric Health Information Systems database to address this question. A propensity score-adjusted multivariable analysis was performed to adjust for known confounders. Secondary analyses of department-level charges, risk of re-admission, and associated costs were performed. A total of 2,108 PVR procedures were performed in 2,096 subjects (14% transcatheter and 86% operative). The observed cost of S-PVR and TC-PVR was not significantly different (2013US $50,030 vs 2013US $51,297; p = 0.85). In multivariate analysis, total costs of S-PVR and TC-PVR were not significantly different (p = 0.52). Length of stay was shorter after TC-PVR (p <0.0001). Clinical and supply charges were greater for TC-PVR (p <0.0001), whereas laboratory, pharmacy, and other charges (all p <0.0001) were greater for S-PVR. Risks of both 7- and 30-day readmission were not significantly different. In conclusion, short-term costs of TC-PVR and S-PVR are not significantly different after adjustment.

Hospital costs by cost center of inpatient hospitalization for medicare patients undergoing major abdominal surgery

BACKGROUND

This study aims to describe the magnitude of hospital costs among patients undergoing elective colectomy, cholecystectomy, and pancreatectomy, determine whether these costs relate as expected to duration of care, patient case-mix severity and comorbidities, and whether risk-adjusted costs vary significantly by hospital. Correctly estimating the cost of production of surgical care may help decision makers design mechanisms to improve the efficiency of surgical care.

STUDY DESIGN

Patient data from 202 hospitals in the ACS-NSQIP were linked to Medicare inpatient claims. Patient charges were mapped to cost center cost-to-charge ratios in the Medicare cost reports to estimate costs. The association of patient case-mix severity and comorbidities with cost was analyzed using mixed effects multivariate regression. Cost variation among hospitals was quantified by estimating risk-adjusted hospital cost ratios and 95% confidence intervals from the mixed effects multivariate regression.

RESULTS

There were 21,923 patients from 202 hospitals who underwent an elective colectomy (n = 13,945), cholecystectomy (n = 5,569), or pancreatectomy (n = 2,409). Median cost was lowest for cholecystectomy ($15,651) and highest for pancreatectomy ($37,745). Room and board costs accounted for the largest proportion (49%) of costs and were correlated with length of stay, R = 0.89, p < 0.001. The patient case-mix severity and comorbidity variables most associated with cost were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class IV (estimate 1.72, 95% CI 1.57 to 1.87) and fully dependent functional status (estimate 1.63, 95% CI 1.53 to 1.74). After risk-adjustment, 66 hospitals had significantly lower costs than the average hospital and 57 hospitals had significantly higher costs.

CONCLUSIONS

The hospital costs estimates appear to be consistent with clinical expectations of hospital resource use and differ significantly among 202 hospitals after risk-adjustment for preoperative patient characteristics and procedure type.

The performance and publication of cost-utility analyses in plastic surgery: Making our specialty relevant

Increased spending and reduced funding for health care is forcing decision makers to prioritize procedures and redistribute funds. Decision making is based on reliable data regarding the costs and benefits of medical and surgical procedures; such a study design is known as an economic evaluation. The onus is on the plastic surgery community to produce high-quality economic evaluations that support the cost effectiveness of the procedures that are performed. The present review focuses on the cost-utility analysis and its role in deciding whether a novel technique/procedure/technology should be accepted over one that is prevalent. Additionally, the five steps in undertaking a cost-utility (effectiveness) analysis are outlined.

Economic evaluation of Chagas disease screening of pregnant Latin American women and of their infants in a non endemic area

Migration is a channel through which Chagas disease is imported, and vertical transmission is a channel through which the disease is spread in non-endemic countries. This study presents the economic evaluation of Chagas disease screening in pregnant women from Latin America and in their newborns in a non endemic area such as Spain. The economic impact of Chagas disease screening is tested through two decision models, one for the newborn and one for the mother, against the alternative hypothesis of no screening for either the newborn or the mother. Results show that the option "no test" is dominated by the option "test". The cost effectiveness ratio in the "newborn model" was 22€/QALYs gained in the case of screening and 125€/QALYs gained in the case of no screening. The cost effectiveness ratio in the "mother model" was 96€/QALYs gained in the case of screening and 1675€/QALYs gained in the case of no screening. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis highlighted the reduction of uncertainty in the screening option. Threshold analysis assessed that even with a drop in Chagas prevalence from 3.4% to 0.9%, a drop in the probability of vertical transmission from 7.3% to 2.24% and with an increase of screening costs up to €37.5, "test" option would still be preferred to "no test". The current study proved Chagas screening of all Latin American women giving birth in Spain and of their infants to be the best strategy compared to the non-screening option and provides useful information for health policy makers in their decision making process.

Cost analysis of sirolimus-eluting stents in the Japanese health insurance system

The cost-effectiveness of drug-eluting stents (DES) has been evaluated in the United States and Europe, however, there is little information from Japan. The present study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) in Japan. In-hospital and follow-up costs of 25 consecutive patients undergoing SES implantation in a de novo lesion were evaluated. A control group for comparison was composed of 25 consecutive patients undergoing bare metal stent (BMS) implantation in a de novo lesion before the introduction of SES. There was no significant difference in resource use between the SES and BMS groups. Procedural cost (yen1,049,200 +/- 208,793 versus yen896,590 +/- 117,984, P = 0.01) was higher in the SES group than in the BMS group because of the higher reimbursement price of SES (yen378,000 versus yen258,000). In-hospital cost (yen1,202,891 +/- 208,793 versus yen1,050,280 +/- 177,984, P < 0.01) was higher in patients treated with SES. Less target lesion revascularization (4% versus 20%, P = 0.2) in patients with SES reduced the difference; aggregate 1-year cost was not significantly different (yen1,479,481 +/- 284,343 versus yen1,463,640 +/- 495,803, P = 0.9). It is concluded that SES may be cost-effective even in Japan.

The impact of using different costing methods on the results of an economic evaluation of cardiac care: microcosting vs gross-costing approaches

BACKGROUND

Published guidelines on the conduct of economic evaluations provide little guidance regarding the use and potential bias of the different costing methods.

OBJECTIVES

Using microcosting and two gross-costing methods, we (1) compared the cost estimates within and across subjects, and (2) determined the impact on the results of an economic evaluation.

METHODS

Microcosting estimates were obtained from the local health region and gross-costing estimates were obtained from two government bodies (one provincial and one national). Total inpatient costs were described for each method. Using an economic evaluation of sirolimus-eluting stents, we compared the incremental cost-utility ratios that resulted from applying each method.

RESULTS

Microcosting, Case-Mix-Grouper (CMG) gross-costing, and Refined-Diagnosis-Related grouper (rDRG) gross-costing resulted in 4-year mean cost estimates of $16,684, $16,232, and $10,474, respectively. Using Monte Carlo simulation, the cost per QALY gained was $41,764 (95% CI: $41,182-$42 346), $42,538 (95% CI: $42 167-$42 907), and $36,566 (95% CI: $36,172-$36,960) for microcosting, rDRG-derived and CMG-derived estimates, respectively (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Within subject, the three costing methods produced markedly different cost estimates. The difference in cost-utility values produced by each method is modest but of a magnitude that could influence a decision to fund a new intervention.

Impact of age and procedure on resource use for patients with ischemic heart disease

OBJECTIVES

Impact of age on healthcare expenditures should be assessed by targeting on specific diseases and controlling for procedures and severity of illness. Relationship between age and resource use in patients receiving acute care medicine for ischemic heart disease (IHD) was examined.

METHODS

We analyzed 19,874 IHD patients treated in 82 academic and 92 community hospitals. Length of stay (LOS), total charges (TC), and high outliers of LOS and TC were analyzed for every age group (under 65 years, 65-74 years, 75 years or older). Independent effects of age on LOS, TC, and high outliers of LOS and TC were determined using multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

7863 (39.6%) patients were under 65 years, 7181 (36.1%) between 65 years and 74 years, and 4830 (24.3%) aged 75 years or older. Proportion of angina or non-medical treatment was significantly different among three age categories (angina 72%, 75%, 71.4%; non-medical 37.3%, 40.9%, 38.9%, respectively). Significant association with LOS or TC was identified in patients receiving coronary artery bypass graft surgery with percutaneous intracoronary intervention, who were most associated with TC high outlier.

CONCLUSIONS

Age had a modest impact on resource use, as compared with procedures. Policy makers need to acknowledge the impact of procedures on healthcare spending.

The economic burden of complications during percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

Technological advances have enabled percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to be applied with expanding indications. However, escalating costs are of concern. This study assessed the incremental medical costs of major in-hospital procedural complications incurred by patients undergoing PCI.

METHODS

We considered all patients undergoing elective, urgent, or emergent PCI at Mayo Clinic Rochester between 3/1/1998-3/31/2003 in analyses. Clinical, angiographic, and outcome data were derived from the Mayo Clinic PCI Registry. In-hospital PCI complications included major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and bleeding of clinical significance. Administrative data were used to estimate total costs in standardised, year 2004, constant-US dollars. We used generalised linear modeling to estimate costs associated with complications adjusting for baseline and procedural characteristics.

RESULTS

1071 (13.2%) of patients experienced complications during hospitalisation. Patients experiencing complications were older, more likely to present with emergent PCI, recent or prior myocardial infarction, multi-vessel disease, and comorbid conditions than patients who did not experience these events. Unadjusted total costs were, on average, $27,865+/-$39,424 for complicated patient episodes compared to $12,279+/-$6796 for episodes that were complication free (p<0.0001). Adjusted mean costs were $6984 higher for complicated PCIs compared with uncomplicated PCI episodes (95% CI of cost difference: $5801, $8168). Incremental costs associated with isolated bleeding events, MACCE, or for both bleeding and MACCE events were $5883, $5086, and $15,437, respectively (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

This high-volume study highlights the significant economic burden associated with procedural complications. Resources and systems approaches to minimising clinical and economic complications in PCI are warranted.

Drug-Eluting Stents

The introduction of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty has revolutionized the field of cardiology by providing patients with coronary artery disease immediate and effective therapy. Overshadowing the early success of angioplasty was the high rate of angiographic restenosis and recurrent symptoms at 6 months. The use of stents reduced the incidence of restenosis; however, the rise in the number of patients undergoing percutaneous interventions produced a new problem of restenosis occurring within the stent: in-stent restenosis (ISR). Mechanical approaches, including directional and rotational atherectomy and systemic pharmacotherapy, have failed to demonstrate a reduction in ISR in randomized clinical trials. Intravascular brachytherapy is currently the only approved therapy for ISR, although this treatment has numerous unresolved questions and is not effective in a large percent of patients. Drug-eluting stents have reduced the incidence of restenosis by providing localized therapy to the targeted lesion without systemic toxicity. The purpose of this review is to synthesize data from major clinical trials involving the 2 most successful agents used in the prevention of restenosis: sirolimus and paclitaxel. The cellular and molecular mechanisms of both ISR and restenosis postangioplasty derived from animal models will be introduced. Second, an overview of 3 alternate interventions that attempt to reduce the rates of restenosis is presented. Finally, the major randomized, controlled trials involving sirolimus and paclitaxel are described, and their clinical implications and use as a possible solution in the prevention of restenosis is discussed.

A review of health care models for coronary heart disease interventions

This article reviews models for the treatment of coronary heart disease (CHD). Whereas most of the models described were developed to assess the cost effectiveness of different treatment strategies, other models have also been used to extrapolate clinical trials, for capacity and resource planning, or to predict the future population with heart disease. In this paper we investigate the use of modelling techniques in relation to different types of health intervention, and we discuss the assumptions and limitations of these approaches. Many of the models reviewed in this paper use decision tree models for acute or short term interventions, and Markov or state transition models for chronic or long term interventions. Discrete event simulation has, however, been used for more complex whole system models, and for modelling resource-constrained interventions and operational planning. Nearly all of the studies in our review used cohort-based models rather than population based models, and therefore few models could estimate the likely total costs and benefits for a population group. Most studies used de novo purpose built models consisting of only a small number of health states. Models of the whole disease system were less common. The model descriptions were often incomplete. We recommend that the reporting of model structure, assumptions and input parameters is more explicit, to reduce the risk of biased reporting and ensure greater confidence in the model results.

Economic evaluation in critical care medicine

Scarce resources are a reality in all health care systems. There is a constant challenge to maximize health benefits within the resources available. This is particularly relevant when caring for critically ill patients, given the resource-intensive technologies and medicines used and the highly specialized professionals required. Moreover, given the high acuity of illness, decision makers and health care providers in critical care units must constantly assess the value derived from therapies and resources used. Economic evaluation is the comparative analysis of alternative health care interventions in their relative costs (resource use) and effectiveness (health effects). Economic evaluations have been increasingly published in critical care journals and read by clinicians. This article illustrates how the basic principles of health economics can be applied to health care decision making through the use of economic evaluation. We demonstrate how economic evaluation can link medical outcomes, quality of life, and costs in a common index, even for therapies for different medical conditions and with different health outcomes. This article highlights the need for randomized clinical trials and economic evaluations of therapies in critical care medicine for which the effect of the therapy on health outcomes and/or costs are unknown.

Accuracy of economic studies on surgical site infection

Estimating the cost of hospital infection has become a matter of increasing interest in terms of health economics. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of economic studies on hospital infections, using surgical site infection (SSI) as an example. A search was performed for original articles reporting the cost of SSI, published in the English language between 1996 and 2005. For the critical review, the period of cost tracking, classification of costs and cost counting methods were noted. Fifteen articles met the inclusion criteria. The costs of SSI vary according to surgical procedures, country, publication year, study design and accounting method. Only two studies estimated the additional cost of SSI after discharge. All 15 studies included healthcare costs and none measured patient/family resources. In 10 studies, the costs were calculated based on accounting. Three studies used estimated costs from the ratio of costs to charges and two studies used charge data in place of cost data. It will become increasingly important for future studies to perform multi-centre prospective surveys, establish a standard method for cost accounting, include the cost of healthcare services following hospitalization and consider the morbidity cost to patients themselves from a societal perspective.

Hospital resources consumed in treating complications associated with percutaneous coronary interventions

Nearly 9.5% of all Medicare beneficiaries who undergo a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedure develop > or =1 of 7 acute complications. This study used 2 approaches (regression analysis and propensity-matched samples) to estimate the cost of selected complications, based on administrative data from 335,477 Medicare beneficiaries who underwent PCI during a hospitalization in fiscal year 2002. Selected complications included hospital mortality, emergency/urgent coronary artery bypass surgery, postoperative stroke, acute renal failure, vascular complications, septicemia, and adult respiratory distress syndrome. The observed average cost of a PCI hospitalization for patients who did not develop complications was 13,861 dollars +/- 9,635 dollars, with an average length of stay of 3.0 +/- 3.2 days, compared with 26,807 dollars +/- 27,596 dollars and 8.0 +/- 8.9 days for patients who did develop complications. Estimates of the adjusted incremental hospital cost of treating any acute complication except death varied from a high of 33,030 dollars for patients who developed septicemia to a low of 4,278 dollars for those who developed vascular complications, whereas estimates of the incremental length of stay ranged from a high of 12.3 days for patients who had septicemia to a low of 1.8 days for patients who had vascular complications. In conclusion, we found that the incremental hospital resources that are consumed to treat patients with acute PCI complications are large compared with the cost of an uncomplicated PCI hospitalization.

Direct coronary stenting compared with stenting after predilatation is feasible, safe, and more cost-effective in selected patients: evidence to date indicating similar late outcomes

OBJECTIVES

To review the currently available data from studies assessing feasibility, safety, clinical outcome and cost-effectiveness of direct stenting.

BACKGROUND

With technical advances of stent designs and their delivery systems a new strategy has become increasingly popular: direct stent implantation without prior balloon dilatation.

METHODS

The Medline database was searched from January 1996 to March 2001 for clinical trials investigating direct stenting using the index terms direct stenting, coronary intervention, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), PCI, angioplasty and ischemic heart disease. Studies were chosen based on the number of patients involved and endpoints mentioned. Data not yet published but presented at recent international meetings were also included. A comparison between direct stenting and stenting with predilatation was performed using for the latter results of the randomized trials supplemented with Benestent II data.

RESULTS

At least 26 studies have investigated direct stenting, showing high primary and final success rates with few complications. Direct stenting provides a way to reduce costs, shorten procedural and fluoroscopy times and lower material consumption. Immediate and long-term clinical outcomes appear to be similar to stenting with predilatation. Preliminary results of large randomized trials with angiographic follow-up indicate that restenosis rates are similar to those of conventional stenting strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

Direct stenting compared with stenting with predilatation is feasible, safe, faster and more cost-effective. The evidence to date shows similar late outcomes.

Impact of change in the price of percutaneous coronary intervention devices on medical expenses

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) devices are much more expensive in Japan than in the United States, but their prices were reduced in April 2002. This study evaluated the impact of that change in the price of PCI devices on medical expenses. In-hospital costs of 22 consecutive patients who underwent elective single-vessel PCI without a debulking procedure before April 2002 were collected and the in-hospital cost of each patient was recalculated by applying the current prices of the PCI devices and those in the USA. For patients treated with PCI before April 2002, the in-hospital cost was 1,456,375+/-358,781 yen, but when the current price is used, the in-hospital cost is estimated to be 1,355,812 +/-313,237 yen (7% reduction). If the prices of the devices were reduced to those in USA, there would be a 53% reduction (689,417 +/-99,139 yen). Although the change in the price of PCI devices in April 2002 has reduced in-hospital costs, the devices are still much more expensive in Japan than in the USA. Further reduction of the price is required to make PCI more cost-effective.

Cost Analyses in Assistive Technology Research

Economic evaluation has become one of the principal methodologies in outcomes research within the health care field in general and specifically in assistive technology. Efforts to define and develop a consistent methodology for assistive technology economic evaluations have been hampered by lack of familiarity with the various terms and concepts associated with cost analysis, an essential aspect of economic evaluations. Adapting these concepts, which were constructed to suit a medical model, to the needs of the assistive technology field has been a challenge as well. This article outlines terms and concepts basic to cost analysis. The authors then consider five studies that relate costs to outcomes in order to illustrate the challenges, choices, and trade-offs researchers make when adapting this methodology to assistive technology. The article concludes by seeking to stimulate further discussion of the complexity inherent in assessing costs in assistive technology outcomes research and calling for the development of a standardized and consistent economic evaluation methodology.

A randomized comparison of a percutaneous suture device versus manual compression for femoral artery hemostasis after PTCA

BACKGROUND

The prolonged bed rest following femoral sheath removal after PTCA is a source of discomfort for the patient. We designed a randomized study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an arterial suture device developed to percutaneously close the vascular access site after PTCA, allowing immediate sheath removal and early ambulation, compared to manual compression.

METHODS

After successful PTCA, patients were randomized to manual compression or immediate femoral percutaneous closure. Exclusion criteria were arteritis, age > 80 years and > 3 previous femoral punctures on the same side. The two-needle device was used for the 6F sheath removal and the four-needle device for the 8F sheath. Ambulation was allowed 4 hours after the arterial suture.

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty-seven patients (59 +/- 10 years, 81% males) were randomized to suture device (n = 91) or to manual compression (n = 76). The two groups were similar in terms of age, sex, size of sheath, number of patients with stent implantation (62 vs 61%), procedural anticoagulation. Procedural duration was 8 +/- 6 minutes with percutaneous suture versus 25 +/- 11 minutes with manual compression (P < 0.0001). Procedural success with percutaneous suture was 93% whereas six technical failures were treated with prolonged manual compression. Nonsurgical hematoma occurred in five patients (5%) with the suture device and in two (3%) with manual compression with no need for blood transfusion (P = NS). Uneventful blood oozing occurred in 11 patients (12%) with percutaneous suture and in only 2 (3%) with manual compression (P < 0.06). The tolerance of the hemostasis procedure and the length of post-procedure hospital stay (40 +/- 32 hours) were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous suture of the femoral artery, allows immediate closure of femoral puncture sites after PTCA, without increasing the incidence of vascular complications. The use of this device should allow earlier discharge and subsequent cost savings.

Comparative economic analyses of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to assess the degree to which published cost comparisons of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass through a thoracotomy versus conventional coronary artery bypass grafting, off-pump bypass surgery through a sternotomy, or angioplasty with or without stenting adhered to existing guidelines for performing economic analyses.

METHODS

We used minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB), off-pump bypass surgery, cost-effectiveness, economic analysis, and related keywords to search MEDLINE, other literature databases and article reference lists for English-language economic analyses of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass procedures versus other procedures that were published from 1990 to February 2002. We critically appraised article adherence to a 10-item methodologic checklist modified to address issues particularly relevant to minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass evaluations. Assessment discordance was reconciled by consensus.

RESULTS

Ten articles published from June 1997 to March 2001 compared costs and (generally) outcomes of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass with those of other procedures. All were nonrandomized comparisons, generally of concurrent intrainstitutional clinical series. Stated results generally favored minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass, angioplasty, or off-pump bypass surgery through a sternotomy relative to conventional coronary artery bypass grafting. Studies adequately addressed an average of only 24% of applicable checklist items (range 0%-67%). Few studies adequately ensured the comparability of treatment groups, clearly performed intent-to-treat analyses, comprehensively and credibly measured costs that were considered, or clearly addressed costs and results of preprocedural angiography or postprocedural imaging. Only 1 study compared success of revascularization between minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass and competing alternatives. No studies specified the cost-analysis perspective or included costs of physician or physician assistant care.

CONCLUSIONS

Most published comparative economic analyses of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass have failed to adequately address issues crucial to such evaluations. Future studies should more closely follow well-described principles of clinical epidemiology and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Comparison of costs and safety of a suture-mediated closure device with conventional manual compression after coronary artery interventions

The aim of this study was to assess costs and safety of immediate femoral sheath removal and closure with a suture-mediated closure device (Perclose, Menlo Park, CA) in patients undergoing elective (PCI). A total of 193 patients was prospectively randomized to immediate arterial sheath removal and access site closure with a suture-mediated closure device (SMC; n = 96) or sheath removal 4 hr after PCI followed by manual compression (MC; n = 97). In the SMC group, patients were ambulated 4 hr after elective PCI if hemostasis was achieved. In the MC group, patients were ambulated the day after the procedure. In addition to safety, total direct costs including physician and nursing time, infrastructure, and the device were assessed in both groups. Total direct costs were significantly (all P < 0.001) lower in the SMC group. Successful hemostasis without major complication was achieved in all patients. The time to achieve hemostasis was significantly shorter in the SMC group (7.1 +/- 3.4 vs. 22.9 +/- 14.0 min; P < 0.01) and 85% of SMC patients were ambulated on the day of intervention. Suture-mediated closure allows a reduction in hospitalization time, leading to significant cost savings due to decreased personnel and infrastructural demands. In addition, the use of SMC is safe and convenient to the patients.

A practical cost analysis of bivalirudin

Despite advances in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) techniques and adjunctive therapies, the risks of ischemic and bleeding complications with PCI remain significant. These complications are associated with significant morbidity and mortality, as well as substantially higher costs. Bivalirudin is the only antithrombotic agent that has been shown to reduce both ischemic and hemorrhagic complications associated with PCI. Cost models drawn from the results of three clinical trials of bivalirudin have estimated its potential impact on total medical costs. In addition, the number needed to treat to avoid a bleeding complication has been calculated based on patients shown to have a heightened risk of bleeding in the Bivalirudin Angioplasty Trial. In all models assessed, the use of bivalirudin offset most of its own cost through reductions in bleeding and ischemic complications.

Achieving optimal results with standard balloon angioplasty: can baseline and angiographic variables predict stent-like outcomes?

OBJECTIVES

To predict which patients might not require stent implantation, we identified clinical and angiographic characteristics associated with repeat revascularization after standard balloon angioplasty.

BACKGROUND

Stents reduce the risk of repeat revascularization but are costly and may lead to in-stent restenosis, which remains difficult to treat. Identification of patients at low risk for repeat revascularization may allow clinicians to reserve stents for patients most likely to benefit.

METHODS

Data from five interventional trials (5,146 patients) were pooled for analysis. We identified patients with optimal angiographic results (final diameter stenosis < or =30% and no dissection) after balloon angioplasty and determined the multivariable predictors of repeat revascularization.

RESULTS

Optimal angiographic results were achieved in 18% of patients after angioplasty. The repeat revascularization rate at six months was lower for patients with optimal results (20% vs. 26%, p < 0.001) but still higher than observed in stent trials. Independent predictors of repeat revascularization were female gender (odds ratio [OR] 1.67, p = 0.01), lesion length > or =10 mm (OR 1.62, p = 0.03) and proximal left anterior descending coronary artery lesions (OR 1.62, p = 0.03). For the 8% of patients with optimal angiographic results and none of these risk factors, the repeat revascularization and target vessel revascularization rates were 14% and 8% respectively, similar to rates after stent implantation. Cost analysis estimated that $78 million per year might be saved in the U.S. with a provisional stenting strategy using these criteria compared with elective stenting.

CONCLUSIONS

A combination of baseline characteristics and angiographic results can be used to identify a small group of patients at very low risk for repeat revascularization after balloon angioplasty. Provisional stenting for these low risk patients could substantially reduce costs without compromising clinical outcomes.

Comparison of direct coronary stenting with and without balloon predilatation in patients with stable angina pectoris. BET (Benefit Evaluation of Direct Coronary Stenting) Study Group

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of stent placement with and without balloon predilatation on duration of the procedure, reduction of procedure-related costs, and clinical outcomes. Although preliminary trials of direct coronary stenting have demonstrated promising results, the lack of randomized studies with long-term follow-up has limited the critical evaluation of the role of direct stenting in the treatment of obstructive coronary artery disease. Between January and September 1999, 338 patients were randomly assigned to either direct stent implantation (DS+; 173 patients) or standard stent implantation with balloon predilatation (DS-; 165 patients). Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were similar in the 2 groups. Procedural success was achieved in 98.3% of patients assigned to DS+ and 97.5% of patients assigned to DS- (p = NS), with a crossover rate of 13.9%. Compared with DS-, DS+ conferred a dramatic reduction in procedure-related cost ($956.4 +/- $352.2 vs $1,164.6 +/- $383.9, p <0.0001) and duration of the procedure (424.2 +/- 412.1 vs 634.5 +/- 390.1 seconds, p < 0.0001). At 6-month follow-up, the incidence of major adverse cardiac events including death, angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, repeat angioplasty, or coronary artery bypass graft surgery was 5.3% in DS+ and 11.4% in DS- (p = NS). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that major adverse cardiac events rates were related to stent length of 10 mm (relative risk [RR] 3.25, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.36 to 7.78; p = 0.008), stent diameter of 3 mm (RR 2.69, 95% CI 1.03 to 7.06; p = 0.043), and complex lesion type C (RR 2.83, 95% CI 1.02 to 7.85; p = 0.045). Thus, in selected patients, this prospective randomized study shows the feasibility of DS+ with reduction in procedural cost and length, and without an increase in in-hospital clinical events and major adverse cardiac events at 6-month follow-up.

The intermediate CCU admission: a preliminary study

In the current health care era, increasing emphasis is being placed on cost reduction. Admitting only high-risk patients to coronary care units (CCU) may reduce hospital costs and charges without adverse clinical outcomes. Recently, guidelines published by the Agency for Healthcare Policy and Research (AHCPR) on suggest that intermediate-risk patients be admitted to an intermediate CCU (ICCU), but the safety and appropriateness of this approach has not been prospectively evaluated. The authors hypothesized that admitting intermediate-risk patients with to an ICCU would be cheaper than admitting to a CCU with comparable safety supporting AHCPR guidelines. To evaluate this, a retrospective cohort study was conducted. Two hundred forty-three intermediate-risk patients consecutively admitted to the CCU (n = 134) and admitted to the ICCU (n = 109) between June 1, 1992 and April 1, 1994 were compared using AHCPR definitions of intermediate risk and a previously published risk prediction model to exclude both very low- and high-risk patients. Extensive demographic, clinical, and diagnostic testing, and treatment, procedural, and outcome data were collected by a trained nurse data collector at the time of admission. Fifty-nine percent of all study patients had at least two coronary risk factors. Twenty-one percent had diabetes. Ninety-eight percent had at least one AHCPR intermediate risk factor for cardiac complications. The two groups (CCU versus ICCU) were quite similar in baseline characteristics: men (56 versus 55%), age (57 +/- 17 versus 60 +/- 17 years), diabetes (22 versus 20%), previous myocardial infarction (30 versus 36%), previous coronary artery surgery (21 versus 21%), and rest pain (78 versus 66%). The use of coronary angiography (44 versus 52%), angioplasty (24 versus 21%), and coronary artery surgery (13 versus 11%) were also similar. The incidence of myocardial infarction or death was similar (3 versus 5%), and length of stay was also similar between groups (6.7 +/- 4.2 versus 6.5 +/- 4.1 days), but cost was less for patients admitted to the ICCU ($13,481 +/- 9,450 versus $10,619 +/- 8,732, P < 0.015). These preliminary data suggest intermediate-risk patients, as identified by AHCPR guidelines, can be treated in an ICCU at lower cost than in a CCU, with reasonable safety. A small incidence of myocardial infarction in ICCU-admitted patients occurs, requiring availability of cardiac resuscitation and continued monitoring of electrocardiographic and enzymatic abnormalities. Admission to ICCU poses no barrier to recommended patient evaluation and management.

Provisional stenting strategies: systematic overview and implications for clinical decision-making

Coronary stents reduce the rates of abrupt closure, emergency coronary artery bypass graft surgery and restenosis, but do not prevent myocardial infarction or death at six months. The financial burden of increased stent use and the difficulty in managing in-stent restenosis have provided the impetus to develop provisional stenting strategies. Patients at low risk for restenosis after balloon angioplasty may not derive additional benefit from stent implantation and may be successfully managed with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) alone. Numerous patient, lesion and procedural predictors of restenosis have been identified. Postprocedural assessment using quantitative coronary angiography, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), coronary flow velocity reserve (CVR) or fractional flow reserve (FFR) may further enhance the ability to predict adverse outcomes after PTCA. Several studies have been performed to investigate the feasibility of provisional stenting strategies using various modalities to identify low risk patients who could be managed with PTCA alone. An optimal or "stent-like" angiographic result after PTCA is associated with favorable clinical outcomes. Preliminary results of studies using IVUS or CVR to guide provisional stenting appear promising. Angiography alone may be inadequate to identify truly low risk patients and may need to be combined with clinical factors, assessment of recoil, IVUS or physiologic indexes. Strategies that avoid unnecessary stenting in even a small proportion of patients may have large impacts on health care costs. Provisional stenting may potentially reduce costs and rates of in-stent restenosis without compromising the quality of health care delivery.

Economic impact of harmonizing medical practices: compliance with clinical practice guidelines in the follow-up of breast cancer in a French Comprehensive Cancer Center

PURPOSE

The introduction of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) and the increasing desire to harmonize clinical practices draw attention to the economic impact of these trends. In 1994, CPGs were introduced in a French Comprehensive Cancer Center (Centre Régional Léon Bérard, Lyon). We evaluated the application of these CPGs in addition to the consequences of harmonizing clinical practices with respect to the distribution of resources by specifically analyzing the posttherapeutic follow-up of patients with localized breast cancer.

METHODS

A before-and-after analysis of the records of patients who received posttherapeutic follow-up for localized breast cancer as of either 1993 or 1995 was performed. Two hundred records were chosen at random, 100 from 1993 and 100 from 1995. Follow-up was continued for as long as possible and CPG compliance was studied for each year of the follow-up periods.

RESULTS

Follow-up that was not CPG-compliant required a significantly greater amount of resources. This difference was due to neither consultations nor mammographies, but was due to other examinations that were systematically performed without any warning signs to justify them. Depending on the follow-up year, noncompliant follow-up cost the Social Security from 2.2 to 3.6 times more than compliant follow-up. A noticeable change in medical practices was observed after the introduction of CPGs in 1994. This was confirmed by a sharp decrease in mean Social Security expenditure per patient of more than one third between 1993 and 1995, regardless of the follow-up year considered.

CONCLUSION

In the follow-up of patients with localized breast cancer, a large decrease in costs has been observed along with the evolution of medical practices toward CPG compliance. This finding is probably generalizable to other settings, but there is nothing that proves that it is applicable to other treatment strategies.

Cost analysis between stent and conventional balloon angioplasty

The present study evaluated the cost of coronary stenting compared with conventional balloon angioplasty in Japan. Procedural cost was estimated as the sum of the procedural fee and the cost of devices such as angioplasty balloon and stent. The data such as the number of balloon catheters and stents used, and the rate of crossovers that was shown by the Stent Restenosis Study (STRESS) were applied to calculate the costs of stenting and conventional balloon angioplasty. For the estimation of hospital room and nursing costs, the length of the in-hospital stay was estimated at 7 days. The costs of procedures such as laboratory and radiological tests were determined based on routine coronary intervention at Chiba University Hospital. The rates of target lesion revascularization in the STRESS trial (conventional balloon angioplasty: 21%, stenting: 15%) were used to calculate the cost during follow up. The in-hospital costs of conventional balloon angioplasty and stenting were estimated to be Yens 982,300 and Yens 1,416,893, respectively. The overall costs, including follow-up cost, of conventional balloon angioplasty and stenting were estimated to be Yens 1,188,583 and Yens 1,564,238, respectively. The in-hospital cost of stenting is higher compared with conventional balloon angioplasty because of greater balloon use and direct stent cost. Lower target lesion revascularization reduces the cost difference between conventional balloon angioplasty and stenting, but the higher initial cost of stenting is not fully offset.

Transradial coronary stenting: comparison with femoral access closed with an arterial suture device

The purpose of this study was to determine if closure of the femoral artery access site using a percutaneous arterial suture device (Perclose, Menlo Park, CA) in patients undergoing coronary stenting can result in the same benefits as seen with radial artery access. A total of 218 consecutive patients underwent coronary stenting (109 femoral, 109 radial) by investigators experienced with each technique. The two groups were matched in terms of sex, age, clinical presentation (50% acute), number of vessels and lesions stented, and lesion morphology. The relative costs of the femoral and radial procedures were examined using a decision analytic model and sensitivity analysis. The suture device was not used in 20/109 patients (18%) for anatomic reasons and failed to obtain hemostasis in 9/89 patients (10%). One radial patient had an occluded radial artery postprocedure, but this was recanalized at follow-up a month later. Primary success, procedural complications, postprocedure length of stay, and the percentage of patients discharged the same day were the same in both groups. Because of the added time to deploy Perclose, total procedure time was significantly longer in the femoral group (57 +/- 22 min femoral vs. 44 +/- 22 min radial, P < 0.01). Access site complications occurred only in the femoral group. More patients were ambulatory the same day of the procedure in the radial group (95% radial vs. 56% femoral, P < 0.01). The cost of the radial approach was substantially less than the femoral approach because of lower supply costs and fewer access complications. The transradial approach is a dominant strategy for coronary stenting, offering better outcomes at lower cost. Cathet. Cardiovasc. Intervent. 49:150-156, 2000.

Direct coronary stenting without predilation

OBJECTIVES

Coronary stenting is the primary therapeutic option for percutaneous treatment of many coronary lesions, after the risk of subacute stent thrombosis and bleeding complications has been reduced by improved antithrombotic regimens and high pressure stent expansion.

BACKGROUND

Direct stent implantation (without predilation) has been considered a promising new technique that may reduce the procedure time, radiation exposure time and cost.

METHODS

After having reviewed all cases of stent implantation from February to June 1998 (n = 585), 185 (32%) of these patients were retrospectively considered candidates for direct stent implantation without predilation, according to prespecified criteria (i.e., absence of severe coronary calcifications and/or tortuosity of the lesion or the segment proximal to the lesion). By operator preference, direct coronary stent implantation was actually attempted in 123 (21%) of the 585 patients (100 men, 60 +/- 10 years old) on 123 lesions. The impact of direct stenting in terms of cost, procedure time, radiation exposure time and amount of contrast dye used was assessed by comparing the two groups of patients who underwent single-vessel stenting without (n = 69) and with (n = 46) predilation.

RESULTS

Direct stenting was successful in 118 patients (96%). No acute or subacute complications occurred in these patients. Procedure time, radiation exposure time and cost were significantly lower in the group of patients who had single-vessel direct versus conventional stenting (45 +/- 31 vs. 64 +/- 46 min, 12 +/- 9 vs. 16 +/- 10 min and 1,305 +/- 363 vs. 2,210 +/- 803 Euro, respectively; p < 0.05 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

Direct stenting without predilation in selected lesions seems to be a safe and successful procedure that provides a way to contain cost and to shorten radiation exposure time.

Effect of transradial access on quality of life and cost of cardiac catheterization: A randomized comparison

BACKGROUND

Transradial access is a recently developed alternative for diagnostic cardiac catheterization. Its effects on quality of life after the procedure, patient preference, and cost are unknown.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed a randomized single-center trial in which 99 patients underwent transfemoral and 101 underwent transradial diagnostic cardiac catheterization. Quality of life was measured with the SF-36 and visual analog scales at baseline, 1 day, and 1 week. Patients were examined at 1 day and at 1 week after for complications. Costs were measured prospectively. One patient in the femoral group and 2 in the radial group crossed over to the alternative access site. There were no major access site complications. One patient in the transfemoral group had a minor stroke. Transradial catheterization significantly reduced median length of stay (3.6 vs 10.4 hours, P <.0001). Over the first day after the procedure, measures of bodily pain, back pain, and walking ability favored the transradial group (P <.05 for all comparisons). Over the week after the procedure, changes in role limitations caused by physical health, bodily pain, and back pain favored the transradial group (P <.05 for all comparisons). There was a strong patient preference for transradial catheterization as well (P <. 0001). Transradial catheterization led to significant reductions in bed, pharmacy, and total hospital costs ($2010 vs $2299, P <.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients undergoing diagnostic cardiac catheterization, transradial access leads to improved quality of life after the procedure, is strongly preferred by patients, and reduces hospital costs.

Determining costs of health care services for cost-effectiveness analyses: the case of cervical cancer prevention and treatment

OBJECTIVES

To estimate costs for the prevention and treatment of cervical cancer based on resource utilization and to compare those costs to published estimates and to local charges and reimbursements.

DESIGN

Cost estimates for cervical cancer prevention services were based on clinic staff time, use of specialized equipment and supplies, laboratory costs, and clinic overhead. Cost estimates for cervical cancer treatment were based on HMO expenditures for cervical cancer patients and control patients. These costs were adjusted for stage distribution and survival rates. Published cost estimates were obtained from a systematic review of the medical literature between 1990 and 1996.

SETTING

Three family planning clinics (for prevention costs) and a staff-model HMO (for treatment costs).

PATIENTS

For treatment costs: 98 cervical cancer patients and 133,058 female control patients, matched by age and chronic disease score.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Estimated costs for prevention and treatment of cervical cancer. Cost-to-charge and cost-to-reimbursement ratios.

RESULTS

Costs of cervical cancer prevention and treatment services have been determined using a variety of methods. We found substantial variation in these estimates, even for studies with similar methodologies. Detailed resource-based estimation suggests that prevention costs are generally lower than those previously published in the literature, whereas the costs of cervical cancer treatment are generally higher.

CONCLUSIONS

It is practical and desirable to employ resource use-based estimates of medical costs in cost-effectiveness analyses. Failure to do so for cervical cancer may affect policy recommendations by understating the relative benefits of prevention programs.

Acute and long-term cost implications of coronary stenting

OBJECTIVES

We compared the acute and one year medical costs and outcomes of coronary stenting with those for balloon angioplasty (percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty) in contemporary clinical practice.

BACKGROUND

While coronary stent implantation reduces the need for repeat revascularization, it has been associated with significantly higher acute costs compared with coronary angioplasty.

METHODS

We studied patients treated at Duke University between September 1995 and June 1996 who received either coronary stent (n = 384) or coronary angioplasty (n = 159) and met eligibility criteria. Detailed cost data were collected initially and up to one year following the procedure. Our primary analyses compared six and 12 month cumulative costs for coronary angioplasty- and stent-treated cohorts. We also compared treatment costs after excluding nontarget vessel interventions; after limiting analysis to those without prior revascularization; and after risk-adjusting cumulative cost estimates.

RESULTS

Baseline clinical characteristics were generally similar between the two treatment groups. The mean in-hospital cost for stent patients was $3,268 higher than for those receiving coronary angioplasty ($14,802 vs. $11,534, p < 0.001). However, stent patients were less likely to be rehospitalized (22% vs. 34%, p = 0.002) or to undergo repeat revascularization (9% vs. 26%, p = 0.001) than coronary angioplasty patients within six months of the procedure. As such, mean cumulative costs at 6 months ($19,598 vs. $19,820, p = 0.18) and one year ($22,140 vs. $22,571, p = 0.26) were similar for the two treatments. Adjusting for baseline predictors of cost and selectively examining target vessel revascularization, or those without prior coronary intervention yielded similar conclusions.

CONCLUSIONS

In contemporary practice, coronary stenting provides equivalent or better one-year patient outcomes without increasing cumulative health care costs.

Economic impact on physicians and hospitals of proposed changes in Medicare reimbursement for coronary interventions

BACKGROUND

The federal government is implementing changes in reimbursement for angioplasty and coronary stenting. These include reductions in physician reimbursement and a redesignation of intracoronary stents to a different diagnosis-related group than other methods of intracoronary intervention.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to examine the financial impact on physicians and hospitals of proposed federal reimbursement policies for percutaneous coronary revascularization procedures.

METHODS

We modeled the financial effects of 3 different stenting strategies: strategy I is the most conservative, with stents reserved for addressing lab complications; strategy II stents are used for suboptimal results after attempts at conventional percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA); strategy III is the most aggressive, with initial stenting of all accessible lesions. We used economic data on PTCA and stent costs from a 1996 dataset and made assumptions about PTCA and stent success rates and restenosis rates based on published data.

RESULTS

Under current reimbursement policies, physician revenues and profits are approximately equal under all 3 stenting strategies. After the proposed changes, there is a slight financial incentive for physicians to pursue the more aggressive strategy III, but the major financial effect is a substantial overall decline in revenues with any of the 3 strategies. For hospitals, the present situation strongly favors the more conservative strategies, but after the proposed changes the more aggressive stenting strategies will be more profitable, thus realigning physician and hospital incentives. Health care delivery organizations that combine physician and hospital income streams achieve the greatest financial stability.

CONCLUSIONS

Current reimbursement policies for angioplasty and stenting have created misaligned incentives between physicians and hospitals. Proposed changes do not present physicians with large economic incentives to pursue aggressive versus conservative stent strategies but substantially address the current disparity in hospital financial incentives.

The evolving costs of intracoronary stents

BACKGROUND

As stenting practice has evolved to include greater numbers of stents and adjunctive balloon catheters per case, concern has focused on the increasing costs of equipment for the delivery of stents.

METHODS AND RESULTS

To evaluate temporal changes in costs of intracoronary stenting, we examined total costs, catheterization laboratory equipment costs, equipment utilization, and nonlaboratory hospital costs for stent cases for two time periods: Period I (n = 46; 3 months in 1995 involving routine warfarin anticoagulation) and Period II (n = 129; 4 months during which warfarin was being abandoned). Overall costs declined from Period I ($11,293+/-$7672) to Period II ($9819+/-$3636) (p = 0.074). Catheterization laboratory equipment expenditures rose (Period I, $3823+/-$1394 vs Period II, $4278+/-$1533), whereas noncatheterization laboratory hospital costs declined significantly (Period I, $7281+/-$7179 vs Period II, $5560+/-$3420). The difference in costs was most notable when taking into account the deletion of warfarin anticoagulation. Costs declined by $2428 for patients in Period II in whom warfarin was not prescribed (p < 0.05 vs patients in Period I).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that despite the increasing costs for equipment of stent cases, our overall costs of providing stents declined as warfarin anticoagulation was abandoned.

Cost of cardiac care in the three years after coronary catheterization in a contained care system: critical determinants and implications

OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine the clinical, angiographic, treatment and outcome correlates of the intermediate-term cost of caring for patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD).

BACKGROUND

To adequately predict medical costs and to compare different treatment and cost reduction strategies, the determinants of cost must be understood. However, little is known about the correlates of costs of treatment of CAD in heterogeneous patient populations that typify clinical practice.

METHODS

From a consecutive series of 781 patients undergoing cardiac catheterization in 1992 to 1994, we analyzed 44 variables as potential correlates of total (direct and indirect) in-hospital, 12- and 36-month cardiac costs.

RESULTS

Mean (+/-SD) patient age was 65+/-10 years; 71% were men, and 45% had multiple vessel disease. The initial treatment strategy was medical therapy alone in 47% of patients, percutaneous intervention (PI) in 30% and coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) in 24%. The 36-month survival and event-free (death, infarction, CABG, PI) survival rates were 89.6+/-0.2% and 68.4+/-0.4%, respectively. Median hospital and 36-month costs were $8,301 and $28,054, respectively, but the interquartile ranges for both were wide and skewed. Models for log(e) costs were superior to those for actual costs. The variances accounted for by the all-inclusive models of in-hospital, 12- and 36-month costs were 57%, 60% and 71%, respectively. Baseline cardiac variables accounted for 38% of the explained in-hospital costs, whereas in-hospital treatment and complication variables accounted for 53% of the actual costs. Noncardiac variables accounted for only 9% of the explained costs. Over time, complications (e.g., late hospital admission, PI, CABG) and drug use to prevent complications of heart transplantation became more important, but many baseline cardiac variables retained their importance.

CONCLUSIONS

1) Variables readily available from a comprehensive cardiovascular database explained 57% to 71% of cardiac costs from a hospital perspective over 3 years of care; 2) the initial revascularization strategy was a key determinant of in-hospital costs, but over 3 years, the initial treatment become somewhat less important, and late complications became more important determinants of costs.

Abciximab therapy in percutaneous intervention: economic issues in the United States

Whether abciximab therapy should be the standard of care during percutaneous intervention in the United States depends on its efficacy, safety, and economics. In view of the EPIC, CAPTURE, and EPILOG data, few question the superior efficacy and relative safety of abciximab compared with conventional high-dose heparin therapy during percutaneous intervention. Economic considerations have been the major issue limiting its use. Review of the economic data demonstrates that the incremental direct medical care cost of abciximab therapy is $290 to $600 per patient treated in the EPIC and EPILOG populations. In the patients with acute myocardial infarction and unstable angina, abciximab appears to reduce direct medical costs (produce cost savings) at 6 months. Given abciximab's significant incremental effectiveness, its relatively small incremental cost yielded a highly cost-effective therapy in the EPIC and EPILOG patient populations. Additional economic issues relate to minimizing bleeding complications, indirect costs, reduced frequency of emergency procedures, and rationalizing provider/payor policies and incentives to produce the optimal individual patient and societal outcomes. The currently available data concerning the efficacy, safety, and cost provide a compelling argument for embracing abciximab therapy in the treatment of patient subsets where it will be a cost-saving or cost-neutral adjunct to percutaneous coronary intervention. In other subsets, the direct medical cost will likely not be fully recouped, but the incremental cost-effectiveness will compare favorably to other widely accepted therapies.