Meta-analysis of intravenous dipyridamole-thallium-201 imaging (1985 to 1994) and dobutamine echocardiography (1991 to 1994) for risk stratification before vascular surgery

Preoperative evaluation profile of patients undergoing arterial vascular surgery in a tertiary hospital

BACKGROUND

Patients with peripheral arterial disease have an increased risk of developing cardiovascular complications in the postoperative period of arterial surgeries known as Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE), which includes acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, malignant arrhythmias, and stroke. The preoperative evaluation aims to reduce mortality and the risk of MACE. However, there is no standardized approach to performing them. The aim of this study was to compare the preoperative evaluation conducted by general practitioners with those performed by cardiologists.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of medical records of patients who underwent elective arterial surgeries from January 2016 to December 2020 at a tertiary hospital in São Paulo, Brazil. The authors compared the preoperative evaluation of these patients according to the initial evaluator (general practitioners vs. cardiologists), assessing patients' clinical factors, mortality, postoperative MACE incidence, rate of requested non-invasive stratification tests, length of hospital stay, among others.

RESULTS

281 patients were evaluated: 169 assessed by cardiologists and 112 by general practitioners. Cardiologists requested more non-invasive stratification tests (40.8%) compared to general practitioners (9%) (p < 0.001), with no impact on mortality (8.8% versus 10.7%; p = 0.609) and postoperative MACE incidence (10.6% versus 6.2%; p = 0.209). The total length of hospital stay was longer in the cardiologist group (17.27 versus 11.79 days; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The increased request for exams didn't have a significant impact on mortality and postoperative MACE incidence, but prolonged the total length of hospital stay. Health managers should consider these findings and ensure appropriate utilization of human and financial resources.

Noninvasive cardiovascular imaging for myocardial necrosis, viability, stunning and hibernation: evidence from an umbrella review encompassing 12 systematic reviews, 286 studies, and 201,680 patients

INTRODUCTION

The concomitant presence of myocardial necrosis with myocardial ischemia, stunning or hibernation may complicates appraisal of left ventricular (LV) function and patient management. Several imaging modalities have been proposed for the accurate assessment of myocardial necrosis, viability, stunning and hibernation, with mixed results. We aimed to review the evidence base on myocardial necrosis, stunning and hibernation by conducting an umbrella review (i.e. overview of systematic reviews).

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We searched PubMed and The Cochrane Library for meta-analyses focusing on the diagnostic, prognostic, or management appraisal of myocardial necrosis, viability, stunning and hibernation. Diagnostic test accuracy, prognostic yield, and clinical outcomes were systematically abstracted from shortlisted reviews.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

From an initial set of 6069 citations, 12 systematic reviews were finally included, encompassing 286 studies and 201,680 patients. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) had favorable results in 4 reviews that focused on the diagnosis of myocardial stunning or hibernation in patients followed for 6±4 months after coronary revascularization (sensitivity 96% and specificity 91%). Positron emission tomography (PET), single photon emission tomography (SPECT) and CMR in 6 meta-analyses had each a significant and independent prognostic role for the prediction of fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular events in patients with follow-up of 2.8±1.7 years. Finally, 2 reviews with 2.3±1.1 years of follow-up showed moderate quality evidence in favor of coronary revascularization in patients with objective signs of myocardial viability.

CONCLUSIONS

The appraisal of myocardial necrosis and residual viability remains a cornerstone of the modern management of patients with CAD. Current imaging modalities (echocardiography, PET, SPECT and CMR) are widely used. Further trials using contemporary methods are warranted to further clarify the impact of viability assessment on patient management, and the cumulative risk of morbidity and mortality.

Pre-operative stress testing in the evaluation of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Pre-operative stress testing is widely used to evaluate patients for non-cardiac surgeries. However, its value in predicting peri-operative mortality is uncertain. The objective of this study is to assess the type and quality of available evidence in a comprehensive and statistically rigorous evaluation regarding the effectiveness of pre-operative stress testing in reducing 30-day post -operative mortality following non -cardiac surgery.

Methods

The databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases (from inception to January 27, 2016) were searched for all studies in English. We included studies with pre-operative stress testing prior to 10 different non-cardiac surgery among adults and excluded studies with sample size<15. The data on study characteristics, methodology and outcomes were extracted independently by two observers and checked by two other observers. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. We performed random effects meta-analysis to estimate relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) in two-group comparison and pooled the rates for stress test alone. Heterogeneity was assessed using I² and methodological quality of studies using Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale. The predefined protocol was registered in PROSPERO #CRD42016049212.

Results

From 1807 abstracts, 79 studies were eligible (297,534 patients): 40 had information on 30-day mortality, of which 6 studies compared stress test versus no stress test. The risk of 30-day mortality was not significant in the comparison of stress testing versus none (RR: 0.79, 95% CI = 0.35–1.80) along with weak evidence for heterogeneity. For the studies that evaluated stress testing without a comparison group, the pooled rates are 1.98% (95% CI = 1.25–2.85) with a high heterogeneity. There was evidence of potential publication bias and small study effects.

Conclusions

Despite substantial interest and research over the past 40 years to predict 30-day mortality risk among patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery, the current body of evidence is insufficient to derive a definitive conclusion as to whether stress testing leads to reduced peri-operative mortality.

[The Clinical use of Stress Echocardiography in Ischemic Heart Disease Cardiovascular Ultrasound (2017)15:7. Translation authors: Arystan A.Zh., Fettser D.V.]

Stress echocardiography is an established technique for the assessment of extent and severity of coronary artery disease. The combination of echocardiography with a physical, pharmacological or electrical stress allows detecting myocardial ischemia with an excellent accuracy. A transient worsening of regional function during stress is the hallmark of inducible ischemia. Stress echocardiography provides similar diagnostic and prognostic accuracy as radionuclide stress perfusion imaging or magnetic resonance, but at a substantially lower cost, without environmental impact, and with no biohazards for the patient and the physician. The evidence on its clinical impact has been collected over 35 years, based on solid experimental, pathophysiological, technological and clinical foundations. There is the need to implement the combination of wall motion and coronary flow reserve, assessed in the left anterior descending artery, into a single test. The improvement of technology and in imaging quality will make this approach more and more feasible. The future issues in stress echo will be the possibility of obtaining quantitative information translating the current qualitative assessment of regional wall motion into a number. The next challenge for stress echocardiography is to overcome its main weaknesses: dependence on operator expertise, the lack of outcome data (a widespread problem in clinical imaging) to document the improvement of patient outcomes. This paper summarizes the main indications for the clinical applications of stress echocardiography to ischemic heart disease.

Actual impact of screening for myocardial ischemia with single-photon emission tomography among patients undergoing peripheral vascular interventions

The present study provides actual data with regard to the prevalence of myocardial ischemia among patients under contemporary cardiovascular prevention strategies undergoing peripheral vascular interventions. We included a total of 200 consecutive patients who underwent gated single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion study between January 2012 and January 2014 as preoperative evaluation for peripheral vascular interventions at our institution. The baseline medical treatment comprised aspirin (81%), statins (79%), and β-blockers (54%). Thirty-two (16%) patients underwent carotid revascularization; 69 (34.5%) patients underwent lower limb revascularization, and 99 patients underwent aortic interventions. Twenty-six (13%) patients showed evidence of myocardial ischemia, with an extensive ischemic burden identified in seven (3.5%) patients. Within the group of patients with peripheral vasculopathy, those with lower limb arteriopathy had a higher prevalence of ischemia. According to the results of the myocardial perfusion study, the cardiology in charge indicated invasive coronary angiography in 11/26 (42%) patients with evidence of myocardial ischemia. Seven of the 11 (64%) patients who had coronary angiography were revascularized. After a mean follow-up of 24 months, no cardiovascular adverse events were detected.

Practical guidance for the implementation of stress echocardiography

Exercise stress testing has been widely undertaken for the diagnosis of heart diseases. The accurate assessment of clinical conditions can be conducted by comparing the findings obtained from the results of stress echocardiography with the changes in the blood/heart rate and electrocardiograms. Numerous overseas studies have reported the utility of stress echocardiography in diagnosing myocardial ischemia; in Japan, the use of this modality for this purpose was included in the national health insurance reimbursable list in 2012. Nevertheless, stress echocardiography is far from being a widespread practice in Japan. This might be due to insufficient equipment (e.g., ergometers, space for test implementation) at each medical institution, shortage of technicians and sonographers who are well experienced and who are responsible for obtaining images during stress testing. The other possible reasons include the limited evidence available in Japan and the lack of a standardized testing protocol. Further dissemination of the practice of exercise stress echocardiography in this country is deemed necessary to establish satisfactory evidence for the use of stress echocardiography in the Japanese population. To this end, efforts are underway to develop a standardized protocol and report format to be adopted throughout Japan. We here present a guideline created by the Guideline Development Committee of the Japanese Society of Echocardiography that describes safe and effective stress echocardiography protocols and report formats. The readers are encouraged to perform exercise stress echocardiography using the proposed template for consensus document and report attached to this guideline.

Perioperative management of patients with coronary artery disease undergoing non-cardiac surgery: Summary from the French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine 2017 convention

This review summarises the specific stakes of preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative periods of patients with coronary artery disease undergoing non-cardiac surgery. All practitioners involved in the perioperative management of such high cardiac risk patients should be aware of the modern concepts expected to decrease major adverse cardiac events and improve short- and long-term outcomes. A multidisciplinary approach via a functional heart team including anaesthesiologists, cardiologists and surgeons must be encouraged. Rational and algorithm-guided management of those patients should be known and implemented from preoperative to postoperative period.

The clinical use of stress echocardiography in ischemic heart disease

Stress echocardiography is an established technique for the assessment of extent and severity of coronary artery disease. The combination of echocardiography with a physical, pharmacological or electrical stress allows to detect myocardial ischemia with an excellent accuracy. A transient worsening of regional function during stress is the hallmark of inducible ischemia. Stress echocardiography provides similar diagnostic and prognostic accuracy as radionuclide stress perfusion imaging or magnetic resonance, but at a substantially lower cost, without environmental impact, and with no biohazards for the patient and the physician.

The evidence on its clinical impact has been collected over 35 years, based on solid experimental, pathophysiological, technological and clinical foundations. There is the need to implement the combination of wall motion and coronary flow reserve, assessed in the left anterior descending artery, into a single test. The improvement of technology and in imaging quality will make this approach more and more feasible. The future issues in stress echo will be the possibility of obtaining quantitative information translating the current qualitative assessment of regional wall motion into a number. The next challenge for stress echocardiography is to overcome its main weaknesses: dependance on operator expertise, the lack of outcome data (a widesperad problem in clinical imaging) to document the improvement of patient outcomes. This paper summarizes the main indications for the clinical applications of stress echocardiography to ischemic heart disease.

Impact of subclinical coronary artery disease on the clinical outcomes of carotid endarterectomy

OBJECTIVE Controversy persists regarding the optimal management of subclinical coronary artery disease (CAD) prior to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and the impact of CAD on clinical outcomes after CEA. This study aimed to evaluate the short-term surgical risks and long-term outcomes of patients with subclinical CAD who underwent CEA. METHODS The authors performed a retrospective study of data from a prospective CEA registry. They analyzed a total of 702 cases involving patients without a history of CAD who received preoperative cardiac risk assessment by radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and underwent CEA over a 10-year period. The management strategy (the necessity, sequence, and treatment modality of coronary revascularization and optimal perioperative medical treatment) was determined according to the presence, severity, and extent of CAD as determined by preoperative MPI and additional coronary computed tomography angiography and/or coronary angiography. Perioperative cardiac damage was defined on the basis of postoperative elevation of the blood level of cardiac troponin I (0.05-0.5 ng/ml) in the absence of myocardial ischemia. The primary endpoint was the composite of any stroke, myocardial infarction, or death during the perioperative period and all-cause mortality within 4 years of CEA. The associations between clinical outcomes after CEA and subclinical CAD were analyzed. RESULTS Concomitant subclinical CAD was observed in 81 patients (11.5%). These patients did have a higher incidence of perioperative cardiac damage (13.6% vs 0.5%, p < 0.01), but they had similar primary endpoint incidences during the perioperative period (2.5% vs.1.8%, p = 0.65) and similar estimated 4-year primary endpoint rates (13.6% vs 12.4%, p = 0.76) as the patients without subclinical CAD. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the 2 groups had similar rates of overall survival (p = 0.75). CONCLUSIONS Patients with subclinical CAD can undergo CEA with acceptable short- and long-term outcomes provided they receive selective coronary revascularization and optimal perioperative medical treatment.

Long-Term (>10 Years) Prognostic Value of Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography in a High-Risk Cohort

The prognostic value of dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) at >10-year follow-up is unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the very long-term prognostic value of DSE in a high-risk cohort of patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. This prospective, single-center study included 3,381 patients who underwent DSE from January 1990 to January 2003. Two-dimensional echocardiographic images were acquired at rest, during dobutamine stress, and during recovery. Follow-up events were collected and included overall mortality, cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and revascularization. The incremental value of DSE in the prediction of selected end points was evaluated using multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis. During a mean follow-up of 13 ± 3.2 years (range 7.3 to 20.5 years), there were 1,725 deaths (51%), of which 1,128 (33%) were attributed to cardiac causes. Patients with an abnormal DSE had a higher mortality rate (44% vs 35% at 15-year follow-up, p <0.001) than those with a normal DSE. When comparing echocardiographic variables at rest to variables at maximum dose dobutamine, the chi-square of the test improved from 842 to 870 (p <0.0001) and from 684 to 740 (p <0.0001) for all-cause mortality and cardiac death, respectively. DSE provided incremental value in predicting all-cause mortality, cardiac death, and hard cardiac events. There seems, however, to be a "warranty period" of approximately 7 years, when the survival curves of a normal and abnormal DSE no longer diverge.

Prognostic value of cardiac tests in potential kidney transplant recipients: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Whether abnormal myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS), dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) or coronary angiography, performed during preoperative evaluation for potential kidney transplant recipients, predicts future cardiovascular morbidity is unclear. We assessed test performance for predicting all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality and major adverse cardiac events (MACE).

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE (to February 2014), appraised studies, and calculated risk differences and relative risk ratios (RRR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) using random effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Fifty-two studies (7401 participants) contributed data to the meta-analysis. Among the different tests, similar numbers of patients experienced MACE after an abnormal test result compared with a normal result (risk difference: MPS 20 per 100 patients tested [95% CI, 0.11-0.29], DSE 24 [95% CI, 0.10-0.38], and coronary angiography 20 [95% CI, 0.08-0.32; P = 0.91]). Although there was some evidence that coronary angiography was better at predicting all-cause mortality than MPS (RRR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.49-0.96; P = 0.03) and DSE (RRR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.50-1.02; P = 0.06), noninvasive tests were as good as coronary angiography at predicting cardiovascular mortality (RRR, MPS, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.38-2.10; P = 0.78; DSE, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.12-10.05; P = 0.93), and MACE (RRR: MPS, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.64-1.86; P = 0.74; DSE, 1.56; 95% CI, 0.71-3.45; P = 0.25).

CONCLUSIONS

Noninvasive tests are as good as coronary angiography at predicting future adverse cardiovascular events in advanced chronic kidney disease. However, a substantial number of people with negative test results go on to experience adverse cardiac events.

New insights from major prospective cohort studies with cardiac nuclear imaging

For more than two decades, radionuclide imaging has prevailed as a cornerstone in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with cardiac disease. From this experience, large cohort studies have emerged that demonstrate the prognostic value of cardiac radionuclide imaging in a variety of patient groups and conditions. Myocardial perfusion imaging has accrued the most robust evidence for accurate and independent risk stratification over traditional clinical variables. In a variety of patient populations, the presence of myocardial ischemia is a strong predictor of cardiac events on follow-up. In patients with heart failure, smaller observations have similarly established the prognostic value of viability imaging and imaging of cardiac sympathetic activity. The present review provides a summary of recent cohort studies with radionuclide imaging and a critical appraisal of their clinical implications. Its purpose is to put the available evidence into a clinical context, analyze its potential impact on patient management and identify gaps in knowledge and unanswered questions to be addressed in future randomized trials.

Cardiac risk assessment before non-cardiac surgery

Cardiovascular events account for half of the deaths related to non-cardiac surgery. Identification of a patient's risk and perioperative management appropriate to that risk is important to optimize the clinical outcome of surgery. Key concepts of preoperative cardiac risk assessment are contained within American and European guidelines. Risk indices stratify patients according to clinical and surgery-specific predictors. The most widely used is the Lee index; however, all have limitations. Patients at intermediate and high risk following risk index stratification and assessment of functional capacity require further non-invasive assessment to detect myocardial ischaemia using, for instance, exercise electrocardiography, myocardial perfusion scintigraphy, or stress echocardiography. It can be difficult, however, to decide which technique and predictor is most effective and local practice differs. Invasive coronary angiography is not recommended unless it would be performed in the absence of surgery. Appropriate pain management should be considered in all patients and beta-blockade may improve the outcome in intermediate- and high-risk patients. Identifying patients with risk factors or previously undiagnosed coronary artery disease enables the preoperative cardiac risk assessment to guide long-term treatment.

Stress echocardiography vs nuclear stress imaging in clinical cardiology

Stress echocardiography and nuclear stress imaging are important non-invasive tools in clinical cardiology. This review discusses the uses, strengths and limitations of these imaging modalities and looks at whether stress echocardiography can actually replace nuclear stress imaging.

Correlation between clinical outcomes and appropriateness grading for referral to myocardial perfusion imaging for preoperative evaluation prior to non-cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

In a previous study, we have found that referral to myocardial perfusion imaging(MPI) for preoperative evaluation of patients before non-cardiac surgery was the most common cause of inappropriate referral based on AHA/ACC Appropriate Use Guidelines, though 40% of scans graded as inappropriate had abnormal MPI results. The aim of this study was to correlate appropriateness grading with (1) the outcome of MPI scans, and (2) the clinical outcome of patients after surgery, so as to determine if the predictive value of MPI was related to appropriateness grading.

METHODS

All consecutive patients referred to the MPI laboratory of our center from March 2009 to July 2009 for preoperative risk stratification were prospectively studied. Patients’ medical records and stress data were collected, and all imaging results were recorded. Based on appropriate use criteria (AUC), MPI studies were classified into appropriate, inappropriate, uncertain or unclassified. MPI studies were classified on the basis of their results into normal or abnormal scans. Primary clinical outcome measured was the occurrence of any major cardiac and cerebrovascular event during follow-up up to 90 days.

RESULTS

There were 176 referrals for preoperative evaluation. 39.8% (n 5 70) of these referrals were graded as inappropriate. Based on AUC, referrals for MPI in intermediate- and high-risk groups with poor functional class were graded as appropriate, while referrals for MPI in low-risk and intermediate risk groups with normal functional class were graded as inappropriate referrals. The overall event rate was 6.25%. Cumulative death rate at 90 days was 1.7%, non-fatal MI 4%, and occurrence of stroke occurred in 0.6%. The primary outcome was higher in the intermediate group with poor functional class (13%) and high-risk group (64%) than the low-risk and intermediate risk groups with good functional class (4%). In the high-risk group, an abnormal MPI scan was associated with an extremely high event rate (50%) that was significantly greater than the event rate in patients with a normal MPI result (14%) (P 5 .01). Although 40% of preoperative low-risk and intermediate risk patients had an abnormal MPI result, their over all event rates were low (0 and 4%, respectively), with no difference in the rate of events between patients with normal and abnormal MPI scans in the inappropriate group.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, in correlating the relationship between appropriateness grading by AUC with the outcome of MPI scans and subsequent event rates, we found that MPI results predicted outcome in appropriately tested patients, but not in patients whose tests were classified as inappropriate, in whom event rates were low, regardless of the results of testing. Our findings support the AUC recommendations for the selective role of testing in preoperative risk stratification,which use the type of surgery and functional class to determine the appropriateness of referral.

Perioperative cardiopulmonary exercise testing in the elderly

The elderly constitute an increasingly large segment of the population and of the patients requiring medical attention. Major surgery is associated with a substantial burden of postoperative morbidity and mortality. Advancing age is a particular risk factor for these outcomes. This article reviews the current literature on the value and practical applications of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) as a tool to evaluate risk and thereby improve the management of the elderly patient undergoing major surgery. There is a consistent association between CPET-derived variables and outcome following major surgery. Furthermore, CPET-derived variables have utility in perioperative risk prediction and identification of patients at high risk of adverse outcome following major surgery. This optimal predictor appears to differ between various surgery types and the incremental benefit of combining CPET with alternative methods of perioperative risk prediction remains poorly defined.

Screening value of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide as a predictor of perioperative cardiac events after noncardiac surgery

Preoperative cardiac risk assessment is the cornerstone of rationale perioperative management that guides invasive surgical interventions. In addition to clinical risk factors, a simple screening biomarker would be useful for identifying those surgical patients who might benefit from additional cardiac testing or therapeutic interventions. Preoperative plasma levels of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) are predictors of cardiac events after noncardiac surgery. NT–proBNP is synthesized in the ventricular myocardium in response to ventricular wall stress. To further increase the diagnostic accuracy of NT-proBNP for preoperative screening, it is important to identify confounding factors that influence NT-proBNP levels and their interaction with identifying risks for adverse cardiac events. Moreover, until now the available data from previous studies has been unable to consistently recognize the optimal discriminatory threshold for NT-proBNP. Currently, the ongoing DECREASE-VI study is conducted to evaluate whether current preoperative risk stratification can be improved by incorporating NT-proBNP measurements.

Cardiovascular risk assessment of the diabetic patient undergoing major noncardiac surgery

Noncardiac surgery is associated with an increased risk for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. It is important to stratify the risk of these patients for perioperative cardiac events. Diabetes, a presently rapidly expanding disease, is a major risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Importantly, silent ischemia is more common in diabetic patients than in the general population. When preoperative risk assessment identifies an increased risk, further cardiac testing is warranted. The most commonly used stress tests for detecting cardiac ischemia is treadmill or bicycle ergometry. However, patients undergoing noncardiac surgery frequently have limited exercise capacity due to co-morbidities. Pharmacologic testing, such as dobutamine stress echocardiography and dipyridamole myocardial perfusion scintigraphy can be performed in patients with limited exercise capacity. Non-invasive stress testing should be considered, especially in diabetic patients, to detect asymptomatic coronary artery disease. Furthermore, when an increased cardiac risk is assessed, two strategies could be used to reduce the incidence of perioperative cardiac events: 1) prophylactic coronary revascularization from which the value is still controversial, and 2) pharmacological treatment (with beta-blockers, statins and aspirin), associated with improved post-operative outcome.

Use of a nurse-led intervention to optimize beta-blockade for reducing cardiac events after major noncardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

Although guidelines recommend the use of beta-adrenoceptor blocking drugs to reduce cardiac events (CEs) after major noncardiac surgery, trial results have varied between showing benefit, ineffectiveness, and harm. We sought whether optimizing beta-blockade (BB) delivery could make them more effective.

METHODS

Intermediate risk patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery (n = 400) were randomized to 2 strategies of BB therapy: universal BB (UBB; n = 197) comprising an algorithm-based, nurse-led strategy to optimize dosing and adherence to bisoprolol titration over > or =1 week preoperatively versus usual care (UC; n = 203), whereby BB are continued in those already taking them or prescribed for patients identified as high risk based on ischemia (new or inducible wall motion abnormalities) at dobutamine echocardiography (DbE). Daily electrocardiogram and troponin levels were obtained on 3 postoperative days. The primary end point was a major CE (cardiac death or myocardial infarction) within 30 days.

RESULTS

There were 25 major CEs (6.3%), occurring in 13 (6.6%) of 197 UBB and 12 (5.9%) of 203 UC patients (OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.52-2.39). Independent predictors of CEs were baseline systolic blood pressure (beta 1.02, P = .005) and postoperative hypotension (beta 1.02, P = .03) but not treatment strategy. Those randomized to UBB had significantly better heart rate control perioperatively, at the cost of bradycardia and hypotension. The negative predictive value of DbE in this study was 95%.

CONCLUSIONS

These data confirm a persistent CE rate after major noncardiac surgery despite nurse-led dose titration of bisoprolol. Cardiac events were equivalent to a UC strategy based on DbE results.