Sequential combination thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: results of the Pro-Urokinase and t-PA Enhancement of Thrombolysis (PATENT) Trial

In silico study of combination thrombolytic therapy with alteplase and mutant pro-urokinase for fibrinolysis in ischemic stroke

The synergistic advantage of combining tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) with pro-urokinase (proUK) for thrombolysis has been demonstrated in several in vitro experiments, and a single site proUK mutant (m-proUK) has been developed for better stability in plasma. Based on these studies, combination thrombolytic therapy with intravenous tPA and m-proUK has been suggested as a promising treatment for patients with ischemic stroke. This paper evaluates the efficacy and safety of the dual therapy by computational simulations of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics coupled with a local fibrinolysis model. Seven dose regimens are simulated and compared with the standard intravenous tPA monotherapy. Our simulation results provide more insights into the complementary reaction mechanisms of tPA and m-proUK during clot lysis and demonstrate that the dual therapy can achieve a similar recanalization time (about 50 min) to tPA monotherapy, while keeping the circulating fibrinogen level within a normal range. Specifically, our results show that for all dual therapies with a 5 mg tPA bolus, the plasma concentration of fibrinogen remains stable at around 7.5 μM after a slow depletion over 50 min, whereas a rapid depletion of circulating fibrinogen (to 5 μM) is observed with the standard tPA therapy, indicating the potential advantage of dual therapy in reducing the risk of intracranial hemorrhage. Through simulations of varying dose combinations, it has been found that increasing tPA bolus can significantly affect fibrinogen level but only moderately improves recanalization time. Conversely, m-proUK doses and infusion duration exhibit a mild impact on fibrinogen level but significantly affect recanalization time. Therefore, future optimization of dose regimen should focus on limiting the tPA bolus while adjusting m-proUK dosage and infusion rate. Such adjustments could potentially maximize the therapeutic advantages of this combination therapy for ischemic stroke treatment.

Safety and Efficacy of Dual Thrombolytic Therapy With Mutant Prourokinase and Small Bolus Alteplase for Ischemic Stroke: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Dual thrombolytic treatment with small bolus alteplase and mutant prourokinase has the potential to be a safer and more efficacious treatment for ischemic stroke than alteplase alone because mutant prourokinase is designed to act only on degraded fibrin without affecting circulating fibrinogen.

Objective

To assess the safety and efficacy of this dual thrombolytic treatment compared with alteplase.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This controlled, open-label randomized clinical trial with a blinded end point was conducted from August 10, 2019, to March 26, 2022, with a total follow-up of 30 days. Adult patients with ischemic stroke from 4 stroke centers in the Netherlands were enrolled.

Interventions

Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive a bolus of 5 mg of intravenous alteplase and 40 mg of an intravenous infusion of mutant prourokinase (intervention) or usual care with 0.9 mg/kg of intravenous alteplase (control).

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) on neuroimaging at 24 hours. Secondary outcomes included functional outcome at 30 days, symptomatic ICH, and fibrinogen levels within 24 hours. Analyses were by intention to treat. Treatment effects were adjusted for baseline prognostic factors.

Results

A total of 268 patients were randomized, and 238 (median [IQR] age, 69 [59-77] years; 147 [61.8%] male) provided deferred consent and were included in the intention-to-treat population (121 in the intervention group and 117 in the control group). The median baseline score on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale was 3 (IQR, 2-5). Any ICH occurred in 16 of 121 patients (13.2%) in the intervention group and 16 of 117 patients (13.7%) in the control group (adjusted odds ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.46-2.12). Mutant prourokinase led to a nonsignificant shift toward better modified Rankin Scale scores (adjusted common odds ratio, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.74-1.84). Symptomatic ICH occurred in none of the patients in the intervention group and 3 of 117 patients (2.6%) in the control group. Plasma fibrinogen levels at 1 hour remained constant in the intervention group but decreased in the control group (β = 65 mg/dL; 95% CI, 26-105 mg/dL).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this trial, dual thrombolytic treatment with small bolus alteplase and mutant prourokinase was found to be safe and did not result in fibrinogen depletion. Further evaluation of thrombolytic treatment with mutant prourokinase in larger trials to improve outcomes in patients with larger ischemic strokes is needed. Overall, in patients with minor ischemic stroke who met indications for treatment with intravenous thrombolytics but were not eligible for treatment with endovascular therapy, dual thrombolytic therapy with intravenous mutant prourokinase was not superior to treatment with intravenous alteplase alone.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04256473.

Dual thrombolytic therapy with mutant pro-urokinase and small bolus alteplase for ischemic stroke (DUMAS): study protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled phase II trial

Background

The effectiveness of alteplase for ischemic stroke treatment is limited, partly due to the occurrence of intracranial and extracranial hemorrhage. Mutant pro-urokinase (m-proUK) does not deplete fibrinogen and lyses fibrin only after induction with alteplase. Therefore, this treatment has the potential to be safer and more efficacious than treatment with alteplase alone. The aim of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of thrombolytic treatment consisting of a small bolus alteplase followed by m-proUK compared with standard thrombolytic treatment with alteplase in patients presenting with ischemic stroke.

Methods

DUMAS is a multicenter, phase II trial with a prospective randomized open-label blinded end-point (PROBE) design, and an adaptive design for dose optimization. Patients with ischemic stroke, who meet the criteria for treatment with intravenous (IV) alteplase can be included. Patients eligible for endovascular thrombectomy are excluded. Patients are randomly assigned (1:1) to receive a bolus of IV alteplase (5mg) followed by a continuous IV infusion of m-proUK (40 mg/h during 60 min) or usual care with alteplase (0.9 mg/kg). Depending on the results of interim analyses, the dose of m-proUK may be revised to a lower dose (30 mg/h during 60 min) or a higher dose (50 mg/h during 60 min). We aim to include 200 patients with a final diagnosis of ischemic stroke. The primary outcome is any post-intervention intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) on neuroimaging at 24 h according to the Heidelberg Bleeding Classification, analyzed with binary logistic regression. Efficacy outcomes include stroke severity measured with the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at 24 h and 5–7 days, score on the modified Rankin scale (mRS) assessed at 30 days, change (pre-treatment vs. post-treatment) in abnormal perfusion volume, and blood biomarkers of thrombolysis at 24 h. Secondary safety endpoints include symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, death, and major extracranial hemorrhage. This trial will use a deferred consent procedure.

Discussion

When dual thrombolytic therapy with a small bolus alteplase and m-proUK shows the anticipated effect on the outcome, this will lead to a 13% absolute reduction in the occurrence of ICH in patients with ischemic stroke.

Trial registration

NL7409 (November 26, 2018)/NCT04256473 (February 5, 2020)

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06596-z.

Fibrinolysis: a Misunderstood Natural Defense Whose Therapeutic Potential Is Unknown

Ever since tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) was approved for therapeutic fibrinolysis in 1987, it has been the fibrinolytic of choice. At the same time, it is also recognized that tPA never lived up to its clinical expectations and has more recently been replaced by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) as the treatment of choice for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). For other occlusive vascular diseases and for patients in remote areas, tPA remains an essential option. In view of the continued importance of fibrinolysis, it is disappointing that fibrinolysis never evolved beyond what it was when tPA replaced streptokinase (SK) 32 years ago. The endovascular procedure replacement for AMI treatment suffers from being technically demanding, time-consuming, and costly. An untested alternative fibrinolytic paradigm is that of the endogenous, physiological system, which is initiated by tPA but then is followed by the other natural plasminogen activator, urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA). In this combination, it is uPA rather than tPA that has the dominant function. This is also evident from gene knockout studies where deletion of uPA that it has the dominant effect. The fibrinolytic properties of tPA and uPA are complementary so that their combined effect is synergistic, especially when they are administered sequentially starting with tPA. Endogenous fibrinolysis functions without bleeding side effects and is ongoing. This is evidenced by the invariable presence in blood of the fibrin degradation product, D-dimer (normal concentration 110-250 ng/ml). This activator combination, consisting of a mini bolus of tPA followed by a 90-min proUK infusion, was once used to treat 101 AMI patients. Compared with the best of the tPA mega trials, this regimen resulted in an almost a doubling of the infarct artery patency rate and reduced mortality sixfold. To date, a second trial has not yet been done.

Revascularization for Coronary Artery Disease: Principle and Challenges

Coronary revascularization is the most important strategy for coronary artery disease. This review summarizes the current most prevalent approaches for coronary revascularization and discusses the evidence on the mechanisms, indications, techniques, and outcomes of these approaches. Targeting coronary thrombus, fibrinolysis is indicated for patients with diagnosed myocardial infarction and without high risk of severe hemorrhage. The development of fibrinolytic agents has improved the outcomes of ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Percutaneous coronary intervention has become the most frequently performed procedure for coronary artery disease. The evolution of stents plays an important role in the result of the procedure. Coronary artery bypass grafting is the most effective revascularization approach for stenotic coronary arteries. The choice of conduits and surgical techniques are important determinants of patient outcomes. Multidisciplinary decision-making should analyze current evidence, considering the clinical condition of patients, and determine the safety and necessity for coronary revascularization with either PCI or CABG. For coronary artery disease with more complex lesions like left main disease and multivessel disease, CABG results in more complete revascularization than PCI. Furthermore, comorbidities, such as heart failure and diabetes, are always correlated with adverse clinical events, and a routine invasive strategy should be recommended. For patients under revascularization, secondary prevention therapies are also of important value for the prevention of subsequent adverse events.

Urokinase Plasminogen Activator: A Potential Thrombolytic Agent for Ischaemic Stroke

Stroke continues to be one of the leading causes of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Restoration of cerebral blood flow by recombinant plasminogen activator (rtPA) with or without mechanical thrombectomy is considered the most effective therapy for rescuing brain tissue from ischaemic damage, but this requires advanced facilities and highly skilled professionals, entailing high costs, thus in resource-limited contexts urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) is commonly used as an alternative. This literature review summarises the existing studies relating to the potential clinical application of uPA in ischaemic stroke patients. In translational studies of ischaemic stroke, uPA has been shown to promote nerve regeneration and reduce infarct volume and neurological deficits. Clinical trials employing uPA as a thrombolytic agent have replicated these favourable outcomes and reported consistent increases in recanalisation, functional improvement and cerebral haemorrhage rates, similar to those observed with rtPA. Single-chain zymogen pro-urokinase (pro-uPA) and rtPA appear to be complementary and synergistic in their action, suggesting that their co-administration may improve the efficacy of thrombolysis without affecting the overall risk of haemorrhage. Large clinical trials examining the efficacy of uPA or the combination of pro-uPA and rtPA are desperately required to unravel whether either therapeutic approach may be a safe first-line treatment option for patients with ischaemic stroke. In light of the existing limited data, thrombolysis with uPA appears to be a potential alternative to rtPA-mediated reperfusive treatment due to its beneficial effects on the promotion of revascularisation and nerve regeneration.

Fibrin-specific and effective clot lysis requires both plasminogen activators and for them to be in a sequential rather than simultaneous combination

Thrombolysis with tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) has been a disappointment and has now been replaced by an endovascular procedure whenever possible. Nevertheless, thrombolysis remains the only means by which circulation in a thrombosed artery can be restored rapidly. In contrast to tPA monotherapy, endogenous fibrinolysis uses both tPA and urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA), whose native form is a proenzyme, prouPA. This combination is remarkably effective as evidenced by the fibrin degradation product, D-dimer, which is invariably present in plasma. The two activators have complementary mechanisms of plasminogen activation and are synergistic in combination. Since tPA initiates fibrinolysis when released from the vessel wall and prouPA is in the blood, they induce fibrinolysis sequentially. It was postulated that this may be more effective and fibrin-specific. The hypothesis was tested in a model of clot lysis in plasma in which a clot was first exposed to tPA for 5 min, washed and incubated with prouPA. Lysis was compared with that of clots incubated with both activators simultaneously. The sequential combination was almost twice as effective and caused less fibrinogenolysis than the simultaneous combination (p < 0.0001) despite having significantly less tPA, as a result of the wash. A mechanism is described by which this phenomenon can be explained. The findings are believed to have significant therapeutic implications.

Therapeutic Fibrinolysis: How Efficacy and Safety Can Be Improved

Therapeutic fibrinolysis has been dominated by the experience with tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA), which proved little better than streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction. In contrast, endogenous fibrinolysis, using one-thousandth of the t-PA concentration, is regularly lysing fibrin and induced Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction flow grade 3 patency in 15% of patients with acute myocardial infarction. This efficacy is due to the effects of t-PA and urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA). They are complementary in fibrinolysis so that in combination, their effect is synergistic. Lysis of intact fibrin is initiated by t-PA, and uPA activates the remaining plasminogens. Knockout of the uPA gene, but not the t-PA gene, inhibited fibrinolysis. In the clinic, a minibolus of t-PA followed by an infusion of uPA was administered to 101 patients with acute myocardial infarction; superior infarct artery patency, no reocclusions, and 1% mortality resulted. Endogenous fibrinolysis may provide a paradigm that is relevant for therapeutic fibrinolysis.

Endoluminal Recanalization in a Patient with Phlegmasia Cerulea Dolens Using a Multimodality Approach

Phlegmasia cerulea dolens is a limb-threatening form of deep venous thrombosis and should be treated aggressively. The authors report a patient who presented with iliocaval and femoral deep venous thrombosis and posed an additional therapeutic challenge based on a recent history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia. Catheter-directed pharmacologic thrombolysis and balloon venoplasty were applied in treatment. The direct thrombin inhibitor argatroban was used in place of heparin for concurrent anticoagulation. This multimodality endovascular approach (chemical and mechanical interventions) was successful in relieving the venous occlusion and salvaging the limb, while maintaining appropriate treatment for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

Thrombolysis: A Critical First-Line Therapy with an Unfulfilled Potential

A blood clot or thrombus triggers the onset of most vascular diseases, like stroke or heart attack. Thrombolysis is the only treatment that can restore blood flow rapidly and easily. Unfortunately, the standard thrombolytic, tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), has proven inadequate and is being replaced by invasive endovascular procedures, which are time consuming and limited in their availability in relation to the scope of the problem. Historically, when tPA clinical trials began, it was not recognized sufficiently that without the other natural plasminogen activator, prourokinase (proUK), thrombolysis by tPA was seriously compromised. The reason is that the 2 activators have complementary mechanisms of action in fibrinolysis, making their combination a requirement for optimal efficacy and synergy. Biological fibrinolysis also uses both activators, explaining why such low endogenous concentrations are sufficient. A low-dose sequential combination of tPA and proUK was tested in acute myocardial infarction, where it was exceptionally effective and safe. Because native proUK at pharmacological doses was vulnerable to spontaneous conversion to urokinase, jeopardizing safety, a site-directed mutant was developed that improved proUK's plasma stability fivefold without interfering with its mode of action. Mini-bolus tPA followed by low-dose proUK infusion is a simple, safe, effective, and promising first-line treatment of acute thrombotic disorders.

Highly effective fibrinolysis by a sequential synergistic combination of mini-dose tPA plus low-dose mutant proUK

Results of thrombolysis by monotherapy with either tPA or proUK have not lived up to expectations. Since these natural activators are inherently complementary, this property can be utilized to a synergistic advantage; and yet, this has undergone little evaluation. ProUK is no longer available because at pharmacological concentrations it converts to UK in plasma. Therefore, a single site proUK mutant, M5, was developed to address this problem and was used in this study. Fibrinolysis was measured using preformed fluoresceinated 24 h old clots in a plasma milieu rather than by the standard automated method, because proUK/M5 is sensitive to inactivation by thrombin and activation by plasmin. The shortest 50% clot lysis time that could be achieved by tPA or M5 alone was determined: mean times were 55 and 48 minutes respectively. These bench marks were matched by 6% of the tPA monotherapy dose combined with 40% that of M5: mean lysis time 47 minutes with less associated fibrinogenolysis. Results showed that the tPA effect was limited to initiating fibrinolysis which was completed by M5 and then tcM5. Plasma C1-inhibitor inhibited fibrinogenolysis by M5, providing protection from side effects not available for proUK. In conclusion, by utilizing the complementary properties and sequential modes of action of each activator, more efficient fibrinolysis with less non-specific effects can be achieved than with traditional monotherapy. In vivo validation is needed, but in a previous clinical trial using a similar combination of tPA and proUK (5% and 50% monotherapy doses) very promising results have already been obtained.

Mutant prourokinase with adjunctive C1-inhibitor is an effective and safer alternative to tPA in rat stroke

A single-site mutant (M5) of native urokinase plasminogen activator (prouPA) induces effective thrombolysis in dogs with venous or arterial thrombosis with a reduction in bleeding complications compared to tPA. This effect, related to inhibition of two-chain M5 (tcM5) by plasma C1-inhibitor (C1I), thereby preventing non-specific plasmin generation, was augmented by the addition of exogenous C1I to plasma in vitro. In the present study, tPA, M5 or placebo +/- C1I were administered in two rat stroke models. In Part-I, permanent MCA occlusion was used to evaluate intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) by the thrombolytic regimens. In Part II, thromboembolic occlusion was used with thrombolysis administered 2 h later. Infarct and edema volumes, and ICH were determined at 24 h, and neuroscore pre (2 h) and post (24 h) treatment. In Part I, fatal ICH occurred in 57% of tPA and 75% of M5 rats. Adjunctive C1I reduced this to 25% and 17% respectively. Similarly, semiquantitation of ICH by neuropathological examination showed significantly less ICH in rats given adjunctive C1I compared with tPA or M5 alone. In Part-II, tPA, M5, and M5+C1I induced comparable ischemic volume reductions (>55%) compared with the saline or C1I controls, indicating the three treatments had a similar fibrinolytic effect. ICH was seen in 40% of tPA and 50% of M5 rats, with 1 death in the latter. Only 17% of the M5+C1I rats showed ICH, and the bleeding score in this group was significantly less than that in either the tPA or M5 group. The M5+C1I group had the best Benefit Index, calculated by dividing percent brain salvaged by the ICH visual score in each group. In conclusion, adjunctive C1I inhibited bleeding by M5, induced significant neuroscore improvement and had the best Benefit Index. The C1I did not compromise fibrinolysis by M5 in contrast with tPA, consistent with previous in vitro findings.

The pathogenesis of pleural space loculation and fibrosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Organization of parapneumonic effusions may complicate pneumonia, and, annually, thousands of patients require procedures to treat intrapleural loculation and fibrosis. Surgical procedures are often used for the treatment, as fibrinolytic therapy is now not a routine and is undergoing reassessment. Investigation of mechanisms that underlie intrapleural loculation and fibrosis is therefore timely, as are studies on new strategies to medically address these problems with improved efficacy and safety.

RECENT FINDINGS

Contributions made over the past year include basic and translational studies unified by their broad focus on mechanisms by which the pleural compartment undergoes repair. Intrapleural single-chain urokinase was reported to effectively reverse intrapleural loculation when compared with commercially available agents in rabbits with tetracycline-induced pleurodesis. The ability of exogenous sclerosants to produce intrapleural loculation and fibrosis was compared. Overexpression of transforming growth factor beta in the pleural mesothelium promoted subpleural fibrosis, implicating the mesothelial cell in the pathogenesis of this lesion. A new model of pleurodesis in mice was reported, which could facilitate the use of transgenic animals to study the pathogenesis of pleural injury.

SUMMARY

New findings consolidate and extend the view that common mechanisms by which intrapleural organization occurs can be exploited to either generate pleurodesis or effectively reverse intrapleural loculation and fibrosis.

Thrombolysis vs. bleeding from hemostatic sites by a prourokinase mutant compared with tissue plasminogen activator

BACKGROUND

A single site mutant (M5) of prourokinase (proUK) was developed to make proUK less vulnerable to spontaneous activation in plasma. This was a problem that seriously compromised proUK in clinical trials, as it precluded proUK-mediated fibrinolysis at therapeutic concentrations.

METHODS AND RESULTS

After completing dose-finding studies, 12 anesthetized dogs with femoral artery thrombosis were given either M5 (2.0 mg kg(-1)) or tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) (1.4 mg kg(-1)) by i.v. infusion over 60 min (20% administered as a bolus). Two pairs of standardized injuries were inflicted at which hemostasis was completed prior to drug administration. Blood loss was quantified by measuring the hemoglobin in blood absorbed from these sites. Thrombolysis was evaluated at 90 min and was comparably effective by both activators. Rethrombosis developed in one t-PA dog. The principal difference found was that blood loss was 10-fold higher with t-PA (mean approximately 40 mL) than with M5 (mean approximately 4 mL) (P = 0.026) and occurred at more multiple sites (mean 2.7 vs. 1.2). This effect was postulated to be related to differences in the mechanism of plasminogen activation by t-PA and M5 in which the latter is promoted by degraded rather than intact (hemostatic) fibrin. In addition, two-chain M5 was efficiently inactivated by plasma C1 inactivator, an exceptional property which helped contain its non-specific proteolytic effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravascular thrombolysis by M5 was accompanied by significantly less bleeding from hemostatic sites than by t-PA. This was attributed to the proUK paradigm of fibrinolysis being retained at therapeutic concentrations by the mutation.

Rescue localized intra-arterial thrombolysis for hyperacute MCA ischemic stroke patients after early non-responsive intravenous tissue plasminogen activator therapy

The outcome of patients who show no early response to intravenous (i.v.) tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) therapy is poor. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of rescue localized intra-arterial thrombolysis (LIT) therapy for acute ischemic stroke patients after an early non-responsive i.v. tPA therapy. Patients with proximal MCA occlusions who were treated by LIT (n = 10) after failure of early response [no improvement or improvement of National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores of < or = 3] to i.v. tPA therapy (0.9 mg/kg-10% bolus and 90% i.v. infusion over 60 min) were selected. The recanalization rates, incidence of post-thrombolysis hemorrhage and clinical outcomes [baseline and discharge NIHSS scores, mortality, 3 months Barthel index (BI) and modified Rankin score (mRS)] were evaluated. Rescue LIT therapy was performed on ten MCA occlusion patients (male:female = 3:7, mean age 71 years). The mean time between the initiation of i.v. tPA therapy and the initiation of intra-arterial urokinase (i.a. UK) was 117+/-25.0 min [time to i.v. tPA 137+/-32 min; time to digital subtraction angiography (DSA) 221+/-42 min; time to i.a. UK 260+/-46 min]. The baseline NIHSS scores showed significant improvement at discharge (median from 18 to 6). Symptomatic hemorrhage and, consequent, mortality were noted in 2/10 (20%) patients. Three months good outcome was noted in 4/10 (40%, mRS 0-2) and 3/10 (30%, BI > or = 95). In conclusion, rescue LIT therapy can be considered as a treatment option for patients not showing early response to full dose i.v. tPA therapy. Larger scale studies for further validation of this protocol may be necessary.

Fibrinolysis: an unfinished agenda

There has been a recent decline in interest in fibrinolysis, suggesting that its physiological basis is sufficiently understood and that therapeutic thrombolysis has reached its limit. The importance of the subject has not diminished since cardiovascular disease is now a leading health problem even in developing countries. Certain highlights and inconsistencies are reviewed. The clinical trials of tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) revealed a major discrepancy between its fibrinolytic efficacy and its clinical benefit (the 't-PA paradox') that is unexplained. Dose-finding studies also showed that the fibrinolytic efficacy of t-PA required significant nonspecific plasminogen activation. Furthermore, the longstanding belief that t-PA is responsible for physiological fibrinolysis and urokinase-type PA (u-PA) for pericellular plasminogen activation is belied by extensive experimental animal data, but these findings have had little impact on traditional thinking. As a result, the mechanisms responsible for the u-PA paradigm of fibrinolysis have received little attention. Clinical experience with pro-u-PA remains limited and most clinical trials have used infusion rates at which pro-u-PA is largely converted systemically to urokinase. This is due to the unanticipated instability of pro-u-PA in plasma at pharmacological concentrations. Insufficient understanding of basic mechanisms of fibrinolysis has handicapped the design of chimeric or mutant activators. It is submitted that physiological fibrinolysis remains to be better defined, and that it is premature to conclude that therapeutic thrombolysis will be inevitably accompanied by side effects that undermine this method of inducing reperfusion.

New thrombolytic strategy: bolus administration of tPA and urokinase-fibrinogen conjugate

Increased efficacy of thrombolytic therapy requires a comprehensive search for new and novel therapeutic strategies. Many new modified forms of plasminogen activators have been obtained by means of chemical and biological synthesis. However, clinical findings demonstrate that the reperfusion level achieved during thrombolysis remains the same for various thrombolytic agents, irrespective of an extensive search for an "ideal" thrombolytic. Thrombolytic therapy may be complicated by treatment delays, cumbersome schemes of preparation and administration, and hemorrhagic and rethrombotic events. These limitations may be overcome, at least in part, by applying combined thrombolysis with plasminogen activators exhibiting complementary actions and different pharmacokinetic profiles. The combined action of native thrombolytics allows the use of lower doses and simplified schemes of administration, yielding encouraging results in experimental models. Long-acting forms of plasminogen activators are being developed and tested in combination with tissue-type plasminogen activator as a trigger of thrombolysis. The combination of short- and long-acting plasminogen activators appears promising and potentially eligible for bolus administration to patients. On the basis of our own experimental results and data in the literature, we suggest a new thrombolytic strategy connected with the single injection of a combination of complementary and pharmacokinetically different plasminogen activators.

New strategy of thrombolysis. Conjunctive effect of plasminogen activators with different pharmacokinetic profile

Combined actions of native and prolonged thrombolytics allow the use of lower doses and simplified schemes of administration, thus yielding significant results in experimental therapy regarding the efficacy and safety of thrombolysis. Development of prolonged forms of plasminogen activators and testing their effect in combination with the thrombolysis trigger are well founded and of current interest. Thrombolytic compositions on the basis of short- and long-term-acting plasminogen activators appear to be promising and potentially eligible for bolus administration.

[Optimization of thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarct: the role of new fibrinoselective drugs and their combination with new antithrombotics]

Although reperfusion therapy is well recognized as the mainstay of treatment of acute myocardial infarction, mortality of myocardial infarction is still high, thrombolytic treatment remains underutilized and, usually, applied too late. Additionally, most of the patients do not experience optimal reperfusion because of the suboptimal flow rate in the infarct-related artery, abnormal microvascular flow, and reocclusion of the infarct-related artery. Strategies to enhance the results of reperfusion therapy include, expanding the population of potential candidates, earlier treatment, and newer methods to improve infarct-related artery flow rates. In this sense, new thrombolytic agents, and combination therapies with or without addition of more potent and specific new antithrombotic agents are being extensively investigated. Also, it is important to promote studies of ancillary treatments to reduce reperfusion injury, which may be one cause of decreased microvascular flow. Although aspirin and heparin have been the conventionally used agents for inhibiting thrombin and platelet function, newer agents such as hirudin or hirulog and inhibitors of the platelet glycoprotein IIb-IIIa receptors are becoming available, and their clinical application will increase in the future.

An efficient system for production of recombinant urokinase-type plasminogen activator

A system was developed to produce recombinant urokinase-type plasminogen activator in Escherichia coli. The urokinase-type plasminogen activator was produced with a 6 x His-tag at the C-terminus which was shown to have the same activity, after refolding, as the wild-type protein. Purification of the recombinant protein to homogeneity (95%) was possible by one-step affinity chromatography under denaturing conditions. As a result, proteolysis by bacterial proteases during purification was avoided. A higher refolding efficiency (40%) and a higher total recovery yield (25%) of the recombinant protein were obtained by this method.

Stroke is an emergency

Stroke is an emergency. Ischemic stroke is similar to myocardial infarction in that the pathogenesis is loss of blood supply to the tissue, which can result in irreversible damage if blood flow is not restored quickly. Public education is needed to emphasize the warning signs of stroke. Patients should seek medical help immediately, using emergency transport systems. Therapy geared toward minimizing the damage from an acute stroke should be started without delay in the emergency room. This includes measures to protect brain tissue, support perfusion pressure, and minimize cerebral edema. Strategies for improving recovery should also begin immediately. All major medical centers need stroke teams and stroke units. Stroke prevention should be given high priority as a public health strategy. Risk factor management should be part of general health care and should begin in childhood, with emphasis on nutrition, exercise, weight control, and avoidance of tobacco. Health screening and early treatment of hypertension and hypercholesterolemia has decreased the incidence of stroke and heart disease, but these efforts need to be expanded to reach all segments of the population. Basic research has opened the door to new therapies aimed at re-establishing blood flow and limiting tissue damage. Clinical trials have already led to changes in stroke prevention, including studies of carotid endarterectomy and ticlopidine and warfarin therapy (for patients with atrial fibrillation). Trials in progress are testing the usefulness of ancrod, neuroprotective agents, antioxidant agents, anti-inflammatory agents, low-molecular-weight heparin, thrombolytic drugs, and angioplasty. Any delay starting therapy after an acute stroke will result in progressive, irreversible loss of brain tissue. Clinicians should remember that for a stroke patient, time is brain tissue.