Use of rib belts in acute rib fractures

Effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions for pain and physical function in adults with rib fractures: a systematic review protocol

REVIEW QUESTION/OBJECTIVES

The review question is: what are the effects of non-pharmacological therapeutic interventions on pain and physical function in adults with rib fractures?The objectives of this systematic review are to determine.

The surgical stabilization of multiple rib fractures using titanium elastic nail in blunt chest trauma with acute respiratory failure

BACKGROUND

Blunt chest injuries are usually combined with multiple rib fractures and severe lung contusions. This can occasionally induce acute respiratory failure and prolong ventilations. In order to reduce the periods of ventilator dependency, we propose a less invasive method of fixing multiple rib fractures.

METHODS

Since October 2009, we have developed a new method to fix fractured ribs caused by blunt trauma. Rib fixations were performed using 2.0- or 2.5-mm intramedullary titanium elastic nails (TEN), with the help of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and minimal thoracic incisions. All the patients' demographics and postoperative data were collected.

RESULTS

From January 2010 to December 2012, a total of 65 patients presenting with multiple rib fractures resulting in acute respiratory failure were included in the study. Twelve patients received the new surgical fixation. Rib fixations were performed at an average of 4 days after trauma. Patients were successfully weaned off ventilators after an average of 3 days. The average length of stay in the hospital and the intensive care unit (ICU) was shorter for the patients with fixation than for nonsurgical patients. All twelve patients returned to normal daily activities and work.

CONCLUSIONS

In the reconstruction of an injured chest wall, the VATS with TENs fixation in multiple rib fractures is feasible. This method is also effective in decreasing the length of the surgical wound. Because the structure of the chest cage is protected, the period of mechanical ventilation is shortened and the length of stay in the hospital and the ICU can be reduced.

Management of the crushed chest

Thoracic injuries are very common among trauma victims. This article reviews the current literature on the management of multiple aspects of the care of the patient with severe chest injury. The mechanics of chest injury are complex and varied. Chest wall injuries are the most common and noticeable manifestation of thoracic trauma. Overall morbidity and mortality are primarily determined by associated injuries. New ventilatory strategies permit oxygenation of the severely hypoxic patient. Acute pain management modalities offer the potential of decreasing associated pulmonary complications. Surgical chest wall fixation is clearly indicated in extreme cases of pulmonary herniation and chest wall disruption. There are potential benefits of surgical fixation in other settings, although further trials are needed.

Article Commentary: Rib Fracture Fixation: Controversies and Technical Challenges

Rib fractures are a common injury affecting more than 350,000 people each year in the United States and are associated with respiratory complications, prolonged hospitalization, prolonged pain, long-term disability, and mortality. The social and economic costs that rib fractures contribute to the health care burden of the United States are therefore significant. But despite this measurable impact on patients’ quality of life, current treatment of the majority of patients in the United States with rib fracture syndromes is supportive only. Even the most severe of chest wall injuries have historically been treated non-operatively. Recently, however, several reports from American centers support an increased application of operative fixation. With this resurgent interest of American surgeons in mind, we review the clinical presentations, potential indications, controversies, and technical challenges unique to rib fracture fixation.

Rib fracture pain and disability: can we do better?

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the magnitude and duration of pain and disability in patients with rib fractures treated using current standard therapy. This was a prospective case series.

METHODS

Injured patients with a chest radiographic diagnosis of one or more rib fractures between June 1, 2001, and October 31, 2001, were asked to participate. Pain levels were assessed at days 1, 5, 30, and 120 after injury using a visual pain scale (0-10). Disability at 30 days was assessed using the SF-36 Health Status Survey, and the total number of days lost from work/usual activity was recorded at day 120. The setting was a university-based Level I trauma center.

RESULTS

Forty patients with a mean of 2.7 +/- 1.6 rib fractures were enrolled. Twenty-three patients had isolated rib fractures and 17 patients had associated extrathoracic injuries. Mean rib fracture pain was 3.5 +/- 2.1 at 30 days and 1.0 +/- 1.4 at 120 days. For patients with associated extrathoracic injuries, rib pain was equivalent to pain in the rest of the body at all intervals. When compared with the chronically ill reference population of the RAND Medical Outcomes Study, our patients as a group were more disabled at 30 days (p < 0.001) in all categories except emotional stability, where they showed equivalent disability, and in their perception of general health, where they were significantly less disabled (p < 0.001). The total mean days lost from work/usual activity was 70 +/- 41. Patients with isolated rib fractures went back to work/usual activity at a mean of 51 +/- 39 days compared with 91 +/- 33 days in patients with associated extrathoracic injuries (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Rib fractures are a significant cause of pain and disability in patients with isolated thoracic injury and in patients with associated extrathoracic injuries. Developing new therapies to accelerate pain relief and healing would substantially improve the outcome of patients with rib fractures.