Ultrasonography in Japanese emergency departments

Comparison of quality and cost-effectiveness in the evaluation of symptomatic cholelithiasis with different approaches to ultrasound availability in the ED

Ultrasound is the imaging study of choice for the detection of gallstones, but ultrasound through medical imaging departments (MI Sono) is not readily available on an immediate basis in many emergency departments (EDs). Several studies have shown that emergency physicians can perform ultrasound themselves (ED Sono) to rule out gallstones with acceptable accuracy after relatively brief training periods, but there have been no studies to date specifically addressing the effect of ED Sono of the gallbladder on quality and cost-effectiveness in the ED. In this study, we investigated measures of quality and cost-effectiveness in evaluating patients with suspected symptomatic cholelithiasis during three different years with distinctly different approaches to ultrasound availability. The study retrospectively identified a total of 418 patients who were admitted for cholecystectomy or for a complication of cholelithiasis within 6 months of an ED visit for possible biliary colic. The percentage of patients who had gallstones documented at the first ED visit improved from 28% in 1993, when there was limited availability of ultrasound through the Medical Imaging Department (MI Sono), to 56% in 1995, when MI Sono was readily available, to 70% in 1997, when both MI Sono and ED Sono were readily available (P <.001). There were also significant differences over the 3 years in the mean number of days from the first ED visit to documentation of gallstones (19.7 in 1993, 10.7 in 1995, 7.4 in 1997, P <.001); the mean number of return visits for possible biliary colic before documentation of gallstones (1.67 in 1993, 1.24 in 1995, and 1.25 in 1997, P <.001); and the incidence of complications of cholelithiasis in the interval between the first ED visit for possible biliary colic and the date of documentation of cholelithiasis (6.8% in 1993, 5.9% in 1995, 1.5% in 1997, P =.049). The number of MI Sonos ordered by emergency physicians per case of symptomatic cholelithiasis identified increased from 1.7 in 1993 to 2.5 in 1995 and dropped back to 1.7 in 1997, when 4.2 ED Sonos per study case were also done. The cost of ED Sonos was more than offset by savings in avoiding calling in ultrasound technicians after regular Medical Imaging Department hours. The indeterminate rate for ED Sonos was 18%. Excluding indeterminates, the sensitivity of ED Sono for detection of gallstones was 88.6% (95% CI 83.1-92.8%), the specificity 98.2% (95% CI 96.0-99.3%), and the accuracy 94.8% (95% CI 92.5-96.5%). We conclude that greater availability of MI Sono in the ED was associated with improved quality in the evaluation of patients with suspected symptomatic cholelithiasis but also with increased ultrasound costs. The availability of ED Sono in addition to readily available MI Sono was associated with further improved quality and decreased costs. The indeterminate rate for ED Sono was relatively high, but excluding indeterminates, the accuracy of ED Sono was comparable with published reports of MI Sono.

Patient satisfaction and diagnostic accuracy with ultrasound by emergency physicians

In recent years, there has been considerable interest and controversy concerning the performance of ultrasound by emergency physicians (ED Sono), but patient satisfaction with ED Sono has not been well studied. The primary purpose of this investigation was to assess the level of patient satisfaction with ED Sono and to compare satisfaction with ED Sono with ultrasound by the Medical Imaging Department (MI Sono). A secondary objective was to assess the accuracy of ED Sono at our facility. During a 5-month period, which included the startup phase of a program for ED Sono, emergency physicians prospectively identified patients who were candidates for ultrasound as a part of their workup. Patients were contacted by telephone after their ED visit and asked to rate satisfaction on a 0 to 10 scale for various aspects of their care, including the ultrasound if one was done. The accuracy of ED Sono was determined by comparing ED ultrasound interpretations with surgical pathology, repeat imaging studies, or clinical follow-up. Two hundred forty patients were entered into the study, and 186 (78%) responded to the satisfaction survey. Satisfaction ratings were similarly high for ED Sono (mean, 8.9; 95% Cl, 8.6 to 9.2) and for MI Sono (mean, 8.8; 95% Cl, 8.2 to 9.4). Eighteen percent of ultrasounds performed by emergency physicians were indeterminate. Excluding indeterminate scans and scans for which confirmation was not possible, the accuracy of ED Sono was 99.1% (95% Cl, 95.1% to >99.9%). We conclude that during the startup phase of our ED Sono program, patient satisfaction was high, and the error rate was very low.

Abdominal ultrasonography

This article focuses on ultrasonographic examinations of the abdomen and important intra-abdominal pathology. The liver and biliary tree are discussed first, followed by the use of ultrasonography in diagnosing appendicitis, ascites, and bowel obstruction. Pyloric stenosis and intussusception, important pediatric intra-abdominal problems, are also discussed.

Emergency department ultrasound services by emergency physicians: model for gaining hospital approval

We anticipate that over the next few years, emergency physician use of emergency department ultrasound will become the standard of care. However, many EDs are hampered in their efforts to gain hospital approval for emergency physician use of ultrasound because of the lack of publicized information regarding the goals of such use, the scope of emergency physician ultrasound privileges, emergency physician ultrasound credentialing criteria, and ED ultrasound quality-improvement plans. In this article we address these issues and provide an example of a proposal used successfully to gain hospital approval for ED use of ultrasound by emergency physicians.

Psoas abscess: making an early diagnosis in the ED

The variable and nonspecific presentations of psoas abscess, as well as its infrequent incidence in the emergency department (ED), can result in delayed diagnosis or misdiagnosis. Previous reports have not discussed the diagnostic difficulties of psoas abscess from the viewpoint of emergency physicians (EPs), especially in light of the widespread use of ED ultrasonography. This report describes a 1-year experience between November 1993 and October 1994, during which 10 ED patients were diagnosed to have psoas abscess; in 7 cases, diagnoses were established in the ED. Patients' mean age was 64.6 years (range, 46 to 76). Pain was the most frequently encountered symptom (80%), with 5 patients (50%) complaining of flank pain. The triad of fever, flank pain, and limitation of hip movement, which is specific for psoas abscess, was present only in 3 patients (30%). The mean duration of symptoms was 10.6 days (range, 1 to 30 days). The mean time spent to establish the diagnosis was 1.7 days (range, 0 to 7 days). The diagnosis of psoas abscess was established by ultrasound in 6 patients, by computed tomography (CT) in 3 patients, and by surgery in 1 patient. Four patients who presented with either sepsis and nonspecific abdominal/flank pain or sepsis and thigh swelling were diagnosed to have psoas abscess by ultrasound performed by EPs. Only 3 patients were admitted to the ED with an initial diagnosis of psoas abscess. The remaining 7 had the following initial ED diagnoses: 2, fever of unknown origin; 2, septic shock; 1, shock; 1, sepsis; and 1, peritonitis. All but one had manifestations of sepsis. Two patients died of septic shock; these two patients had failed to be drained well. This report also includes a discussion of the role of EPs and ultrasonography in the diagnosis of psoas abscess. With their alertness and their expertise in ultrasonographic techniques, EPs can make an immediate diagnosis and arrange an early drainage procedure. For patients with sepsis of unknown origin, prolonged fever of unknown origin, and some specific manifestations suggestive of psoas abscess, the screening ultrasound should scan not only abdominal solid organs but also peritoneal cavity and retroperitoneal space. In addition, a flow chart is presented for facilitating the diagnosis of psoas abscess in the ED.