In vitro binding of lithium using the cation exchange resin sodium polystyrene sulfonate

An in vitro study of metformin adsorption to activated charcoal

INTRODUCTION

Metformin is a biguanide used to manage patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, metabolic acidosis with an elevated lactate concentration and death caused by metformin overdoses are toxicological concerns. Although activated charcoal has been widely used for gastrointestinal decontamination in cases of acute poisoning, there is no evidence regarding its efficacy in treating metformin overdoses. We therefore evaluated the adsorptive capacity of activated charcoal for metformin in vitro.

METHODS

Activated charcoal (specific surface area: 1,080 m2/g) mixed with various concentrations of metformin solution was dissolved in simulated gastric and intestinal fluids at 37° Celsius. The suspension was then filtered and the metformin concentration in the filtrate was determined using high-performance liquid chromatography. The maximum adsorptive capacity for metformin was calculated using the Langmuir adsorption isotherm equation.

RESULTS

The amount of metformin adsorbed per gram of activated charcoal ranged from 0.7 to 8.1 mg/g at pH 1.2, and from 8.4 to 48.2 mg/g at pH 6.8. The corresponding maximum adsorptive capacities were 10.6 mg/g and 55.9 mg/g respectively.

DISCUSSION

The maximum adsorptive capacity of activated charcoal for metformin was similar to that of its capacity for other poorly adsorbed substances. This is likely because metformin is water-soluble and has high polarity-factors that correlate with poor adsorption on activated charcoal.

CONCLUSIONS

The maximum adsorption of metformin by activated charcoal was low. Therefore, activated charcoal may not be effective for treating patients with metformin overdose.

Systematic review on the use of activated charcoal for gastrointestinal decontamination following acute oral overdose

INTRODUCTION

The use of activated charcoal in poisoning remains both a pillar of modern toxicology and a source of debate. Following the publication of the joint position statements on the use of single-dose and multiple-dose activated charcoal by the American Academy of Clinical Toxicology and the European Association of Poison Centres and Clinical Toxicologists, the routine use of activated charcoal declined. Over subsequent years, many new pharmaceuticals became available in modified or alternative-release formulations and additional data on gastric emptying time in poisoning was published, challenging previous assumptions about absorption kinetics. The American Academy of Clinical Toxicology, the European Association of Poison Centres and Clinical Toxicologists and the Asia Pacific Association of Medical Toxicology founded the Clinical Toxicology Recommendations Collaborative to create a framework for evidence-based recommendations for the management of poisoned patients. The activated charcoal workgroup of the Clinical Toxicology Recommendations Collaborative was tasked with reviewing systematically the evidence pertaining to the use of activated charcoal in poisoning in order to update the previous recommendations.

OBJECTIVES

The main objective was: Does oral activated charcoal given to adults or children prevent toxicity or improve clinical outcome and survival of poisoned patients compared to those who do not receive charcoal?  Secondary objectives were to evaluate pharmacokinetic outcomes, the role of cathartics, and adverse events to charcoal administration. This systematic review summarizes the available evidence on the efficacy of activated charcoal.

METHODS

A medical librarian created a systematic search strategy for Medline (Ovid), subsequently translated for Embase (via Ovid), CINAHL (via EBSCO), BIOSIS Previews (via Ovid), Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library/DARE. All databases were searched from inception to December 31, 2019. There were no language limitations.  One author screened all citations identified in the search based on predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Excluded citations were confirmed by an additional author and remaining articles were obtained in full text and evaluated by at least two authors for inclusion. All authors cross-referenced full-text articles to identify articles missed in the searches. Data from included articles were extracted by the authors on a standardized spreadsheet and two authors used the GRADE methodology to independently assess the quality and risk of bias of each included study.

RESULTS

From 22,950 titles originally identified, the final data set consisted of 296 human studies, 118 animal studies, and 145 in vitro studies. Also included were 71 human and two animal studies that reported adverse events. The quality was judged to have a Low or Very Low GRADE in 469 (83%) of the studies. Ninety studies were judged to be of Moderate or High GRADE. The higher GRADE studies reported on the following drugs: paracetamol (acetaminophen), phenobarbital, carbamazepine, cardiac glycosides (digoxin and oleander), ethanol, iron, salicylates, theophylline, tricyclic antidepressants, and valproate. Data on newer pharmaceuticals not reviewed in the previous American Academy of Clinical Toxicology/European Association of Poison Centres and Clinical Toxicologists statements such as quetiapine, olanzapine, citalopram, and Factor Xa inhibitors were included. No studies on the optimal dosing for either single-dose or multiple-dose activated charcoal were found. In the reviewed clinical data, the time of administration of the first dose of charcoal was beyond one hour in 97% (n = 1006 individuals), beyond two hours in 36% (n = 491 individuals), and beyond 12 h in 4% (n = 43 individuals) whereas the timing of the first dose in controlled studies was within one hour of ingestion in 48% (n = 2359 individuals) and beyond two hours in 36% (n = 484) of individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review found heterogenous data. The higher GRADE data was focused on a few select poisonings, while studies that addressed patients with unknown and or mixed ingestions were hampered by low rates of clinically meaningful toxicity or death.  Despite these limitations, they reported a benefit of activated charcoal beyond one hour in many clinical scenarios.

Characterization of the cation-binding capacity of a potassium-adsorption filter used in red blood cell transfusion

A K(+) -adsorption filter was developed to exchange K(+) in the supernatant of stored irradiated red blood cells with Na(+) . To date, however, the filter's adsorption capacity for K(+) has not been fully evaluated. Therefore, we characterized the cation-binding capacity of this filter. Artificial solutions containing various cations were continuously passed through the filter in 30 mL of sodium polystyrene sulfonate at 10 mL/min using an infusion pump at room temperature. The cation concentrations were measured before and during filtration. When a single solution containing K(+) , Li(+) , H(+) , Mg(2+) , Ca(2+) , or Al(3+) was continuously passed through the filter, the filter adsorbed K(+) and the other cations in exchange for Na(+) in direct proportion to the valence number. The order of affinity for cation adsorption to the filter was Ca(2+) >Mg(2+) >K(+) >H(+) >Li(+) . In K(+) -saturated conditions, the filter also adsorbed Na(+) . After complete adsorption of these cations on the filter, their concentration in the effluent increased in a sigmoidal manner over time. Cations that were bound to the filter were released if a second cation was passed through the filter, despite the different affinities of the two cations. The ability of the filter to bind cations, especially K(+) , should be helpful when it is used for red blood cell transfusion at the bedside. The filter may also be useful to gain a better understanding of the pharmacological properties of sodium polystyrene sulfonate.

Gastrointestinal decontamination in the acutely poisoned patient

Objective

To define the role of gastrointestinal (GI) decontamination of the poisoned patient.

Data Sources

A computer-based PubMed/MEDLINE search of the literature on GI decontamination in the poisoned patient with cross referencing of sources.

Study Selection and Data Extraction

Clinical, animal and in vitro studies were reviewed for clinical relevance to GI decontamination of the poisoned patient.

Data Synthesis

The literature suggests that previously, widely used, aggressive approaches including the use of ipecac syrup, gastric lavage, and cathartics are now rarely recommended. Whole bowel irrigation is still often recommended for slow-release drugs, metals, and patients who "pack" or "stuff" foreign bodies filled with drugs of abuse, but with little quality data to support it. Activated charcoal (AC), single or multiple doses, was also a previous mainstay of GI decontamination, but the utility of AC is now recognized to be limited and more time dependent than previously practiced. These recommendations have resulted in several treatment guidelines that are mostly based on retrospective analysis, animal studies or small case series, and rarely based on randomized clinical trials.

Conclusions

The current literature supports limited use of GI decontamination of the poisoned patient.

Successful treatment of lithium toxicity with sodium polystyrene sulfonate: a retrospective cohort study

CONTEXT

Lithium (Li) is a first-line treatment for bipolar disorder but has a narrow therapeutic index. Treatment of Li toxicity includes supportive measures and hemodialysis in severe cases, but this modality is not always immediately available. Sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS, Kayexalate), a cation exchanger, has been promising in animal models and human reports to reduce absorption and enhance elimination of Li.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted. All cases of chronic Li intoxication were reviewed in two adult-care hospitals from 2000 to 2009. A group comparison and a within-patient comparison were performed to compare the effect of SPS on the median Li half-life (T(1/2)). For this study, at least three serum Li levels were required for T(1/2) calculations.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients met inclusion requirements, 12 of whom had taken SPS. Median Li T(1/2) in the treated and control groups was 20.5 and 43.2 hours, respectively (p = 0.0006). In the 12 treated patients, Li T(1/2) during SPS was on average 48.9% shorter than without SPS. Furthermore, in one subject in whom urinary Li data were available, Li clearance with SPS was superior to Li renal clearance. Prolonged constipation was noted in one patient whereas mild hypokalemia was noted in six patients treated with SPS.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that SPS reduced Li T(1/2) and suggests that SPS is capable of promoting Li elimination in chronic intoxications. These results warrant a prospective trial looking at the use of SPS in the treatment of Li overdose as an adjunct to supportive measures and hemodialysis.

Evaluation of available treatment guidelines for the management of lithium intoxication

Intoxications with lithium carry considerable risk for long-term morbidity and even mortality. Consequently, any patient suspected of lithium intoxication requires immediate and appropriate care. The objectives of this study were to assess the completeness and the applicability of generally available treatment guidelines for the management of patients with a lithium intoxication and, hence, to provide general recommendations for improvement of existing treatment guidelines. Nineteen treatment guidelines originating from 7 different countries were gathered by searching the Internet, online databases, and textbooks and by contacting different poison information centers and university medical centers. A list of items was composed from the retrieved treatment guidelines and a further literature search. Most relevant items were present in the various guidelines. However, in some guidelines, essential information was missing or potentially hazardous information was provided. Clarity, presentation, and applicability of the guidelines, as assessed using parts of the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation instrument, were relatively poor. Regular updates of treatment guidelines should be performed to incorporate new essential information. To improve applicability of guidelines, unambiguous key recommendations, alternative treatments, and special care requirements should be provided and authors are recommended to test treatment guidelines using a panel of less experienced caregivers in a hypothetical case scenario.

Emergency hemodialysis in the management of intoxication

Management of intoxicated patients has many aspects in a wide spectrum, beginning with decontamination processes and basic supportive care. The most logical therapeutic approach is probably the specific antidotes, when available and/or applicable. On the other hand, many chemicals and drugs, can be removed from the body by means of hemodialysis or hemoperfusion while treating vital sign abnormalities and electrolyte and acid-base disturbances of the patient. In this paper, we describe 11 cases of intoxication, 6 with methyl alcohol, 3 with lithium, and 2 with salicylate, admitted to emergency department and treated with hemodialysis between January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2004. We review their medical charts and detailed demographic data, medical history, type of exposure, clinical and laboratory presentations, duration of hemodialysis performed, and the outcome.

Management of Lithium Toxicity

Lithium salts have been used in the prophylaxis and treatment of depression and bipolar disorder for >50 years. Lithium has a narrow therapeutic range, and several well characterised adverse effects limit the potential usefulness of higher doses. Acute ingestion in lithium-naive patients is generally associated with only short-lived exposure to high concentrations, due to extensive distribution of lithium throughout the total body water compartment. Conversely, chronic toxicity and acute-on-therapeutic ingestion are associated with prolonged exposure to higher tissue concentrations and, therefore, greater toxicity. Lithium toxicity may be life threatening, or result in persistent cognitive and neurological impairment. Therefore, enhanced lithium clearance has been explored as a means of minimising exposure to high tissue concentrations. Although haemodialysis is highly effective in removing circulating lithium, serum concentrations often rebound so repeated or prolonged treatment may be required. Continuous arteriovenous haemodiafiltration and continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration increase lithium clearance, albeit to a lesser extent than haemodialysis, and are more widely accessible. Haemodiafiltration sustained for >16 hours allows effective removal of total body lithium, thereby avoiding rebound effects. Enhanced elimination should be considered in patients at greatest risk of severe poisoning: namely those with chronic or acute-on-therapeutic toxicity, those with clinically significant features, and those with chronic toxicity whose serum lithium concentration is >2.5 mmol/L. The choice between haemodialysis and continuous haemodiafiltration techniques will depend on local accessibility and urgency of enhancing lithium elimination. Further research is required to establish the potential benefits of assisted elimination on clinical outcome in patients with lithium poisoning.

Potassium repletion fails to interfere with reduction of serum lithium by sodium polystyrene sulfonate in mice

OBJECTIVES

Previous studies have shown that oral sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS) lowers serum lithium concentrations after acute and chronic toxic lithium exposures. Because hypokalemia may represent a deterrent to the clinical use of SPS for lithium intoxication, this study was designed to determine whether potassium (K+) repletion interferes with the effect of SPS on serum lithium.

METHODS

168 male, CD-1 mice were given lithium chloride (LiCl) (250 mg/kg) by gavage at time 0. Half of the mice were then given SPS (5 g/kg/dose) and half an equivalent volume of water by gavage at times 20 and 40 minutes. Half of each of these subgroups was then given potassium chloride (KCl) (3 mmol/kg) intraperitoneally and half an equivalent volume of normal saline. The animals were then sacrificed at one, two, four, and eight hours after lithium administration and the sera were analyzed for lithium and K+ by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. The groups were compared with analysis of variance.

RESULTS

The SPS lowered both lithium and K+ concentrations (ps < or = 0.0001). The KCl treatment was associated with transiently increased K+ concentrations (p < 0.0001) and with mildly elevated lithium concentrations when compared with the results of the animals not treated with KCl (p = 0.0016). The KCl treatment-associated increase in lithium concentration occurred both in the animals treated with water and in those treated with SPS.

CONCLUSIONS

Potassium repletion did not interfere with the ability of SPS to lower serum lithium concentration in animals experimentally poisoned with lithium.

Efficacy of the cation exchange resin, sodium polystyrene sulfonate, to decrease iron absorption

BACKGROUND

Iron is not bound by charcoal; therefore, a method of binding iron in the gastrointestinal tract to prevent absorption in iron overdose is needed. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of sodium polystyrene sulfonate to prevent absorption of iron in human volunteers.

METHODS

Six adult volunteers completed this prospective crossover trial. Following an oral dose of elemental iron 10 mg/kg, each subject received sodium polystyrene sulfonate 30 g or water as control. Baseline and serial serum iron samples were drawn to determine pharmacokinetic parameters.

RESULTS

A trend toward increased time to peak following sodium polystyrene sulfonate compared to the control arm (5.7 vs 3.6 hours) was observed but was not statistically significant (p = 0.517). A trend toward smaller area-under-the-curve for the sodium polystyrene sulfonate was evident but was not statistically significant (p = 0.77). Iron concentration increased on average 298 mcg/dL and 370 mcg/dL above baseline in the treatment and control arms (p = 0.44). Sodium polystyrene sulfonate is not an effective method of decontamination for iron overdose.

Use of sodium polystyrene sulfonate for reduction of plasma lithium concentrations after chronic lithium dosing in mice

OBJECTIVES

Previous studies have shown that oral sodium polystyrene sulfonate lowers plasma lithium concentrations after acutely administered oral doses of lithium chloride. However, a significant proportion of lithium overdose cases resulting in morbidity and mortality are those in which exposure to lithium is chronic. This study was designed to determine whether multiple oral doses of sodium polystyrene sulfonate are effective in reducing plasma lithium concentrations after chronic dosing.

DESIGN

Placebo-controlled animal study.

INTERVENTIONS

One hundred thirty mice were given 75 mM lithium chloride in their drinking water for a period of 14 days. At the end of that period, half of the animals were given orogastric sodium polystyrene sulfonate at 5 g/kg/dose 0, 60, 120, 180, and 360 minutes after the cessation of lithium chloride; the remaining half received orogastric water at equivalent times. Subgroups of each group were sacrificed at 90, 150, 330, 480, 1440, and 2880 minutes after lithium chloride cessation and plasma analyzed for lithium content. Lithium concentrations were compared by analysis of variance and single degree of freedom contrasts. Significance was set at an alpha level of 0.05.

RESULTS

Lithium concentration was lower overall in the animals treated with sodium polystyrene sulfonate (p < .0001) and specifically at 150, 330, and 480 minutes after lithium chloride cessation (p < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Repetitive oral doses of sodium polystyrene sulfonate effectively lowered plasma lithium concentrations. Further study may ultimately define a role for the use of sodium polystyrene sulfonate in the treatment of patients with chronic lithium toxicity.

Methods used to decrease lithium absorption or enhance elimination

OBJECTIVE

To review current methods, well documented and investigational, being used to decrease lithium absorption or enhance lithium elimination.

METHODS

The basic science and clinical literature on lithium were reviewed by a comprehensive Medline search from 1984 to 1996. Additional references were identified by reviewing the reference citations from the results of the Medline search.

RESULTS

Prevention of Absorption: Whole bowel irrigation has been demonstrated to be an effective means of enhancing lithium removal from the gastrointestinal tract. Sodium polystyrene sulfonate resin administration has been shown to be effective in binding lithium elimination in animal and human models. However, the lower limits of effective sodium polystyrene sulfonate dosing and the extent of potassium lowering in humans are questions that need to be answered before sodium polystyrene sulfonate resin can be recommended for routine, use. Enhancement of Elimination: Saline or forced diuresis is not effective in enhancing lithium elimination unless the patient is volume or sodium depleted. The use of continuous arteriovenous hemodiafiltration or low dose dopamine to enhance lithium elimination has only been documented in case reports. Intravenous aminophylline (theophylline) is not consistently effective and its risks outweigh possible benefits. The literature supports hemodialysis as a well documented and effective means of enhancing lithium elimination. Controversy exists over the appropriate indications for its initiation.

DISCUSSION

Given the wide interpatient variability in lithium pharmacokinetics, single case reports do not provide sufficient evidence of the effectiveness of a given method to enhance

Enhancement of lithium elimination by multiple-dose sodium polystyrene sulfonate

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether multiple doses of sodium polystyrene sulfonate (SPS) enhance the elimination of IV-administered lithium (Li).

METHODS

The study was a placebo-controlled, investigator-unblinded, murine trial of multiple doses of SPS on serum Li concentrations. Seventy-five male CD-1 mice were given IV pretreatment with LiCl (125 mg/ kg) followed by gavage treatments with SPS (5 g/kg/dose) 20, 40, 90, 150, and 210 minutes after LiCl (experimental group) or deionized water at equivalent times (control group). Subgroups of each treatment group were sacrificed at 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours after LiCl administration and blood was collected for Li analysis.

RESULTS

Statistical analyses indicated that the SPS group had lower serum Li concentrations overall than did the control animals. This difference was apparent at the 2-, 4-, and 6-hour time points.

CONCLUSION

In this murine model, repetitive doses of orogastric SPS enhanced the elimination of parenterally administered Li.