Gastric lavage

Iatrogenic water intoxication in two cats

OBJECTIVE

To describe 2 cats that developed acute iatrogenic water intoxication, one associated with a continuous infusion of water provided via an esophagostomy tube and one following SC administration of 5% dextrose in water (D5W).

CASE OR SERIES SUMMARY

A 10-year-old cat with squamous cell carcinoma was hospitalized for treatment of dehydration. Rehydration was provided with water via an esophagostomy tube at 5.7 mL/kg/h. After 30 hours of therapy, the cat was found dull and weak. Serum sodium was markedly decreased at 116 mmol/L (116 mEq/L). Supplemental water was stopped, and IV furosemide and mannitol were provided to eliminate free water. Hypertonic saline (1.5%) was administered IV to rapidly restore the sodium concentration. The serum sodium concentration corrected over 17 hours, and the cat was discharged without neurological complications. The second cat had previously received 300 mL D5W subcutaneously and represented 8 hours later with lethargy and paresis with a serum sodium level of 126 mmol/L (126 mEq/L). Intravenous fluid therapy was provided using 0.9% NaCl. Over the following day, the cat's mentation and paresis resolved and sodium concentrations normalized.

NEW OR UNIQUE INFORMATION PROVIDED

These 2 cases describe a presumed uncommon iatrogenic complication of severe hyponatremia due to water provided either via an esophagostomy tube or subcutaneously. While oral rehydration is often considered ideal, it may result in signs of water intoxication if not carefully monitored; additionally, D5W is never considered an acceptable fluid choice as a SC bolus. If promptly recognized, acute hyponatremia may be corrected rapidly with no lasting consequences.

Gastrointestinal decontamination of the poisoned patient

Gastrointestinal decontamination has been a historically accepted modality in the emergency management of oral intoxicants. Theoretically, gastric and whole-bowel emptying procedures hinder absorption, remove toxic substances, prevent clinical deterioration, and hasten recovery. This article presents a current overview of gastrointestinal decontamination. It challenges the accepted precepts of gut decontamination and assesses the utility of syrup of ipecac-induced emesis, orogastric lavage, single-dose-activated charcoal, cathartics, and whole-bowel irrigation.

Drug Poisoning and Overdose for the Health Professional: Review of Select Over-the-Counter (OTC) and Prescription Medications

Exposure to over-the-counter and prescription medications can pose significant therapeutic and health hazards to patients, and present health care professionals with scenarios that require proper assessment and treatment. Knowing when an exposure to or overdose of a drug requires emergency medical attention is equally as important as to knowing when such assistance is not necessary—that simple treatment measures performed at home will suffice. This current discussion is intended to highlight select principles and clinical information pertaining to common drug exposures and overdoses, but not replace the full spectrum of information that would be available to health care professionals (and the lay public) by contacting their nearest poison control center. Many of the basic principles and concerns that are encountered with exposures to chemicals (i.e., route of exposure, patient medical history, quantity of the substance involved, elapsed time since the initial exposure, etc.) apply equally well to drug exposures. Likewise, evaluating each of these variables will determine which type of treatment approaches are, and are not, considered in situations of drug (or chemical) exposure and overdose.

Gastrointestinal tract perforation with charcoal peritoneum complicating orogastric intubation and lavage

A rare complication of gastric decontamination occurred in a young woman undergoing treatment for tricyclic ingestion. After orogastric intubation and lavage, she developed an acute abdomen and underwent laparotomy. Charcoal was discovered throughout the peritoneum, but concurrent and subsequent efforts failed to localize a specific perforation site. Her hospital course was protracted and complicated by tenacious peritoneal charcoal deposition, persistent peritonitis, and adhesion and abscess formation. She underwent both percutaneous and open abscess drainage, oophorectomy, and small-bowel resection. She required total parenteral nutrition in addition to feeding jejunostomy. This present case constitutes the first report of the clinical consequences of charcoal peritoneum. Outright viscus perforation should be considered among potential complications of orogastric intubation and lavage in the poisoned patient. Methods to minimize risks of its occurrence are suggested.

Malposition of pediatric gastric lavage tubes demonstrated radiographically

Gastric lavage may be indicated in the initial treatment of toxic substance ingestion. We retrospectively surveyed the charts of 36 pediatric patients who underwent gastric lavage to evaluate the clinical and radiographic evidence indicating proper tube placement. Only 14 patients had a radiograph prior to lavage, and 50% of these documented malposition. The most common was excess tube insertion, stretching the stomach inferiorly towards the pelvis. The traditionally acceptable clinical test by auscultation of insufflated air was favorable in 100% of patients, thus failing to detect all of the malpositionings documented radiographically. We suggest that initial insertion of tube length be based on the patient's height or length using an adaptation of Strobel's previously published formula for esophageal pH probe placement: Tube Insertion Depth (TID), orogastric = 9.7 cm + (0.226 x length of patient in cm) and TID, nasogastric = 8 cm + (0.252 x length of patient in cm). These formulae have been displayed in graphic form for easy use. Diagnostic imaging remains the only certain means to document tube placement. Prospective studies to validate the formulae in clinical use are ongoing.