Distal cervical spine evaluation using swimmer's flexion-extension radiographs

Multiple cervical spinous process fractures in a novice golf player

Avulsion of spinous process, also called Clay-shoveler's fracture, is most prevalent among those engaged in hard physical labor. To the best of the author's knowledge, only one case of multiple spinous process fractures of the upper thoracic spine in a novice golfer has been reported. A 45-year-old female presented with intractable posterior neck pain. The patient experienced a sharp, sudden pain on the neck while swinging a golf club, immediately after the club head struck the ground. Dynamic cervical radiographic findings were C6 and C7 spinous process fractures. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed C6 and C7 spinous process fractures without spinal cord pathology. The patient was treated with pain medications and cervical bracing. The patient's pain gradually improved. The injury mechanism was speculated to be similar to Clay-shoveler's fracture. Lower cervical spinous process fractures can be associated with a golf swing. If the patient complains of long lasting neck pain and has a history of golf activity, further study should be conducted to rule out lower cervical spinous fracture.

Use of flexion-extension radiographs of the cervical spine in blunt trauma

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Flexion-extension (F/E) radiographs of the cervical spine are often used in patients with blunt trauma when the evaluating physician remains concerned about bony or ligamentous injuries despite negative or nondiagnostic standard radiographs. The use of this approach has never been addressed in a large prospective study. We sought to determine the clinical factors associated with ordering F/E views and the incidence of diagnostic F/E films in patients with a normal 3-view cervical spine series.

METHODS

Patients with blunt trauma selected for radiographic cervical spine imaging at 21 participating institutions in the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study project underwent standard 3-view (cross-table lateral, anteroposterior, and odontoid views) series, as well as any other imaging deemed necessary by their physicians. Injuries detected by means of screening radiography were then compared with final injury status for each patient, as determined by review of all radiographic studies. Patients who underwent F/E views were analyzed separately.

RESULTS

Of 818 patients ultimately found to have cervical spine injury, 86 (10.5%) underwent F/E testing. Two patients sustained stable bony injuries detected only on F/E views. Four other patients had a subluxation detected only on F/E views, but all had other injuries apparent on routine cervical spine imaging.

CONCLUSION

F/E imaging adds little to the acute evaluation of patients with blunt trauma. Other approaches, including magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, or delayed F/E, in the presence of specific clinical concerns would seem to provide a more reasonable approach to adjunctive imaging.