Melanoma therapy

Potential of interferon-alpha in solid tumours: part 1

Interferon-alpha (IFNalpha) is a pleiotropic cytokine with direct and indirect antitumour effects. These include prolongation of the cell cycle time of malignant cells, inhibition of biosynthetic enzymes and apoptosis, interaction with other cytokines, and immunomodulatory and antiangiogenic effects. The first clinical trials in solid tumours used crude preparations of natural IFNalpha and demonstrated that tumour regressions in solid tumours and haematological malignancies were possible. Since the advent of genetic engineering technology, recombinant (r) IFNalpha has been widely evaluated in solid tumours. This review discusses the use and potential of rIFNalpha in solid tumours; the first part focuses on malignant melanoma and metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). In the adjuvant treatment of malignant melanoma, rIFNalpha has been tested in randomised trials in more than 6000 patients. High-dosage IFNalpha (> or =10MU) prolongs disease-free survival (DFS) but not overall survival (OS). Low-dosage IFNalpha (< or =3MU) has not been shown to prolong DFS or OS, and current data do not support its use outside clinical trials. The latest United Kingdom Co-ordinating Committee on Cancer Research meta-analysis of ten randomised trials that used adjuvant rIFNalpha has shown that there is a benefit in DFS but not OS. No conclusions can be reached for intermediate-dosage IFNalpha (5 to 10MU) until the mature results of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) study 18952 are available. In RCC, current evidence does not support the use of adjuvant IFNalpha. In metastatic malignant melanoma and RCC, reported response rates to rIFNalpha are approximately 15%. In a minority of responding patients, however, these responses can be long-standing. In metastatic malignant melanoma, IFNalpha combined with other cytotoxic agents with or without interleukin-2 has achieved high response rates but has not improved survival. In metastatic RCC, intermediate dosages of rIFNalpha should be used and therapy should probably be prolonged (>12 months); response depends on prognostic factors such as good performance status, whereas survival is affected by factors such as low tumour burden. Nephrectomy should therefore be considered in patients with good performance status prior to IFNalpha immunotherapy in advanced RCC, even in patients with metastatic disease. The toxicity of high-dosage IFNalpha and the lack of definite benefit on OS with high- or low-dosage IFNalpha do not support its use outside clinical trials. Data from the ongoing US Intergroup studies, the ongoing EORTC 18991 study (long-term therapy with pegylated IFNalpha) and mature data from EORTC 18952 (intermediate-dosage IFNalpha) will help establish the role of IFNalpha as adjuvant therapy in malignant melanoma.

[Interferons and malignant melanoma]

BACKGROUND

Alpha interferon is currently used in the treatment of malignant melanoma mainly as adjuvant therapy at the first stage of the illness (primary tumor) and at the second stage (lymph node invasion).

CURRENT POSITION AND MAIN POINTS

At metastatic stage, interferon alpha has no adverse indication when used alone. However, studies are on going to assess its potential synergistic effect combined with chemotherapy and its interest for maintaining clinical response. Beta and gamma interferon have no adverse indication in the treaTment of malignant melanoma.

PERSPECTIVE

Although its action has been mainly demonstrated on relapse free survival, and the impact on quality of life remains important, additional new studies will be required to confirm its interest as adjuvant therapy for melanoma. In addition, the future use of pegylated interferon which would permit a reduction in the number of injections is of a significant interest.

Metastatic melanoma: chemotherapy

The incidence of cutaneous melanoma has been rapidly increasing, with an estimate of 47,700 new cases diagnosed in 2000 in the United States. In the early phase of its natural history, melanoma is cured in most cases by surgery, but once the metastatic phase develops, it is almost always fatal. The treatment of metastatic melanoma remains unsatisfactory. Systemic therapy has not been successful up to now, with very low response rates to single-agent chemotherapy. Polychemotherapy has increased the response rate (RR), without a significant improvement in overall survival. Immunotherapy alone is able to induce only a few durable complete responses (CRs). New chemotherapeutic and biologic agents are now available and promising combined approaches targeting the tumor by several different mechanisms are desirable and will probably represent the future modality of treatment.

Management of cutaneous malignant melanoma by dermatologists of the American Academy of Dermatology. I. Survey of biopsy practices of pigmented lesions suspected as melanoma

BACKGROUND

The incidence of malignant melanoma (MM) has rapidly increased during the past five decades. Relatively little information is available on whether the role of the dermatologist has increased concomitantly in the surgical management of this cancer.

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to learn how members of the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) treat patients with lesions highly suspected as being MM and how the management of these patients may have changed over the past decade. This, the first of a two-part series, concerns biopsies.

METHODS

The data for the study were collected by means of a questionnaire that was sent to all members of the AAD practicing in the United States (N = 7412).

RESULTS

A total of 2991 valid questionnaires were returned, a response rate of 40%. The majority of respondents (89% in 1982; 90% in 1992) stated that they performed the biopsies of pigmented lesions suspected of being MMs. Excisional biopsy was the preferred technique (58% in 1982; 68% in 1992). The type of biopsy and who performed the initial biopsy of a suspected MM were associated with the following factors: (1) the number of years in practice, (2) the type of practice, and (3) whether the dermatologist subsequently performed the definitive surgery for the MM. Regional variations in biopsy practices were also noted.

CONCLUSION

Most AAD dermatologists who responded to the questionnaire perform the biopsies of lesions highly suspected of being MM. During the last decade an increasing proportion of dermatologists are performing excisional biopsies rather than other types of biopsies for such lesions.