Accuracy of carotid Doppler peak frequency analysis: Results determined by receiver operating characteristic curves and likelihood ratios

Duplex ultrasound for diagnosing symptomatic carotid stenosis in the extracranial segments

BACKGROUND

Carotid artery stenosis is an important cause of stroke and transient ischemic attack. Correctly and rapidly identifying patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis is essential for adequate treatment with early cerebral revascularization. Doubts about the diagnostic value regarding the accuracy of duplex ultrasound (DUS) and the possibility of using DUS as the single diagnostic test before carotid revascularization are still debated.

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the accuracy of DUS in individuals with symptomatic carotid stenosis verified by either digital subtraction angiography (DSA), computed tomography angiography (CTA), or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA).

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CRDTAS, CENTRAL, MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), ISI Web of Science, HTA, DARE, and LILACS up to 15 February 2021. We handsearched the reference lists of all included studies and other relevant publications and contacted experts in the field to identify additional studies or unpublished data.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included studies assessing DUS accuracy against an acceptable reference standard (DSA, MRA, or CTA) in symptomatic patients. We considered the classification of carotid stenosis with DUS defined with validated duplex velocity criteria, and the NASCET criteria for carotid stenosis measures on DSA, MRA, and CTA. We excluded studies that included < 70% of symptomatic patients; the time between the index test and the reference standard was longer than four weeks or not described, or that presented no objective criteria to estimate carotid stenosis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The review authors independently screened articles, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias and applicability concerns using the QUADAS-2 domain list. We extracted data with an effort to complete a 2 × 2 table (true positives, true negatives, false positives, and false negatives) for each of the different categories of carotid stenosis and reference standards. We produced forest plots and summary receiver operating characteristic (ROC) plots to summarize the data. Where meta-analysis was possible, we used a bivariate meta-analysis model.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 25,087 unique studies, of which 22 were deemed eligible for inclusion (4957 carotid arteries). The risk of bias varied considerably across the studies, and studies were generally of moderate to low quality. We narratively described the results without meta-analysis in seven studies in which the criteria used to determine stenosis were too different from the duplex velocity criteria proposed in our protocol or studies that provided insufficient data to complete a 2 × 2 table for at least in one category of stenosis. Nine studies (2770 carotid arteries) presented DUS versus DSA results for 70% to 99% carotid artery stenosis, and two (685 carotid arteries) presented results from DUS versus CTA in this category. Seven studies presented results for occlusion with DSA as the reference standard and three with CTA as the reference standard. Five studies compared DUS versus DSA for 50% to 99% carotid artery stenosis. Only one study presented results from 50% to 69% carotid artery stenosis. For DUS versus DSA, for < 50% carotid artery stenosis, the summary sensitivity was 0.63 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48 to 0.76) and the summary specificity was 0.99 (95% CI 0.96 to 0.99); for the 50% to 69% range, only one study was included and meta-analysis not performed; for the 50% to 99% range, the summary sensitivity was 0.97 (95% CI 0.95 to 0.98) and the summary specificity was 0.70 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.73); for the 70% to 99% range, the summary sensitivity was 0.85 (95% CI 0.77 to 0.91) and the summary specificity was 0.98 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.90); for occlusion, the summary sensitivity was 0.91 (95% CI 0.81 to 0.97) and the summary specificity was 0.95 (95% CI 0.76 to 0.99). For sensitivity analyses, excluding studies in which participants were selected based on the presence of occlusion on DUS had an impact on specificity: 0.98 (95% CI 0.97 to 0.99). For DUS versus CTA, we found two studies in the range of 70% to 99%; the sensitivity varied from 0.57 to 0.94 and the specificity varied from 0.87 to 0.98. For occlusion, the summary sensitivity was 0.95 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.99) and the summary specificity was 0.91 (95% CI 0.09 to 0.99). For DUS versus MRA, there was one study with results for 50% to 99% carotid artery stenosis, with a sensitivity of 0.88 (95% CI 0.70 to 0.98) and specificity of 0.60 (95% CI 0.15 to 0.95); in the 70% to 99% range, two studies were included, with sensitivity that varied from 0.54 to 0.99 and specificity that varied from 0.78 to 0.89. We could perform only a few of the proposed sensitivity analyses because of the small number of studies included.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This review provides evidence that the diagnostic accuracy of DUS is high, especially at discriminating between the presence or absence of significant carotid artery stenosis (< 50% or 50% to 99%). This evidence, plus its less invasive nature, supports the early use of DUS for the detection of carotid artery stenosis. The accuracy for 70% to 99% carotid artery stenosis and occlusion is high. Clinicians should exercise caution when using DUS as the single preoperative diagnostic method, and the limitations should be considered. There was little evidence of the accuracy of DUS when compared with CTA or MRA. The results of this review should be interpreted with caution because they are based on studies of low methodological quality, mainly due to the patient selection method. Methodological problems in participant inclusion criteria from the studies discussed above apparently influenced an overestimated estimate of prevalence values. Most of the studies included failed to precisely describe inclusion criteria and previous testing. Future diagnostic accuracy studies should include direct comparisons of the various modalities of diagnostic tests (mainly DUS, CTA, and MRA) for carotid artery stenosis since DSA is no longer considered to be the best method for diagnosing carotid stenosis and less invasive tests are now used as reference standards in clinical practice. Also, for future studies, the participant inclusion criteria require careful attention.

Grading of Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis: Validation of Doppler/Duplex Ultrasound Criteria and Angiography Against Endarterectomy Specimen

OBJECTIVES

duplex ultrasound has replaced angiography prior to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in many institutions. However, the indications for CEA are based on angiographically controlled studies and widely accepted ultrasound criteria do not exist. Consequently, the reliability of Doppler and/or duplex ultrasound to predict a high-grade ICA stenosis has to be proven.

DESIGN

prospective validation study.

MATERIALS

one hundred and fifty carotid bifurcations assessed by ultrasound and selective angiography and 68 acrylat outcasts of carotid specimen after eversion CEA.

METHODS

ICA stenosis was measured angiographically according to the ECST criteria. Combined Doppler acoustic standard criteria (CDASC), peak systolic frequency (PSF), peak systolic velocity (PSV) and end-diastolic velocity (EDV) served as criteria for the ultrasound assessment. These criteria and the results of angiography were compared to the degree of ICA stenosis determined by specimen measurements.

RESULTS

the median degree of ICA stenosis as assessed by angiography (82%, range 56-97%) and CDASC (83%, range 50-99%) corresponded well to the specimen measurements (80%, range 50-95%). The sensitivity of angiography and CDASC to predict a 70-90% ICA stenosis (ECST criteria) compared to the specimen measurements was 88% and 95%, respectively. The positive predictive value (PPV) reached 92% and 96%, respectively. CDASC were equivalent to angiography and were superior to the best single frequency or velocity parameters. If CDASC do not indicate a >/=70% ICA stenosis in spite of a PSV >/=180 cm/s and/or an EDV >/=50 cm/s, angiography may detect patients with a >70% ICA stenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

CDASC are valid in the quantification of high-grade ICA stenosis. They are more reliable than single velocity and/or frequency measurements. However, if velocity criteria and CDASC do not agree, angiography should be performed.

Duplex ultrasound for assessment of superior mesenteric artery blood flow

Duplex ultrasound (DU) is recognised as a valuable tool for the assessment of blood flow in many vascular territories. The application of this technique to the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) has increased rapidly throughout the last decade. The purpose of this review is to collate currently available information on the utility of SMA DU, both in terms of research and clinical practice. Research investigations have revealed low intra- and interobserver variability in the estimation of Doppler variables, while reliable evaluation of B-mode dimensions requires repeated measurements. SMA blood flow velocity has been found to be dependent upon changes in central haemodynamics and in peripheral resistance, which was documented in studies with hypotension, medication and post-prandially. Food intake induces mesenteric vasorelaxation reflected by a 10-fold increase in the diastolic velocity. This feature has been utilised in studies on mesenteric physiology, which confirmed parasympathetic activity during hypovolaemia, and showed that exercise increases splanchnic resistance and reduces its blood flow following a 50% reduction in the hepato-splenic and a 25% reduction in the mesenteric blood flow. Clinical studies have documented high sensitivity and specificity of DU in detection of disease in splanchnic arteries. Diastolic velocity was found to be the most accurate indicator of SMA stenosis, while an absent Doppler signal from a well visualised vessel has been found to be a reliable predictor of occlusion. The high predictive value of DU in the detection of mesenteric artery disease, together with its simplicity and non-invasiveness, suggests that DU should take precedence over arteriography in both clinical practice and laboratory investigations.

Quantification and assessment of carotid artery lesions: degree of stenosis and plaque volume

Various methods were developed for the quantification of the degree of stenosis: B-mode imaging, CW Doppler with spectral analysis, PW-duplex, and color-flow imaging. The degree of stenosis can be evaluated using transverse views of the carotid in conventional B-mode imaging. The diameters of the residual lumen (Ds) and the external diameter (De) of the artery at the same level are measured and the degree of stenosis (in area) is calculated. Two different Doppler methods have been designed and validated for the quantification of the stenosis degree. The first one is based on the determination of the maximal velocity inside the stenosis and requires the use of a duplex device. The second one, based on the quantification of the hemodynamic disturbances at the outlet of the stenosis, can be used either with a duplex system or with a continuous-wave Doppler system (pencil probe). The color display mode facilitates the determination of the residual lumen and therefore contributes to making the B-mode method more accurate. Moreover, it provides a visualization of the blood flow which avoids most of the misinterpretations of B-mode or Doppler data. Several classification systems based on subjective or semi-quantitative criteria (morphological or hemodynamic) were used to identify different grades of stenosis (< 40%, 40% to 60%, 60% to 90%, etc.) These classifications provide an evaluation of the degree of stenosis accurate enough to discuss the possibility of performing an endarterectomy on a symptomatic patient. When the surgical treatment seems to be inappropriate, the patient is treated medically; the follow-up of the lesion (ie, every 6 months) requires a more precise evaluation of the plaque changes than does stenosis classification. Several parameters have been designed and validated for the quantification of the degree of stenosis by ultrasound. These parameters, whether measured with the B-mode and color image or with the Doppler spectrum, allow quantification of the stenosis degree in percentage of lumen reduction with a precision of approximately +/- 10%. Such a quantitative assessment of carotid lesions for a long period of time may be very helpful in evaluating the beneficial effects of medical treatment or in detecting any significant increase of the stenosis that could lead to surgical treatment. A new method for the plaque volume assessment has been recently validated. The plaque volume index expressed in mm3 is calculated from longitudinal and transversal B mode views of the bifurcation.

An atherosclerosis risk factor assessment program for patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease

From a group of 251 high-risk patients less than 65 years of age, 84 with angiographic or vascular laboratory proven peripheral arterial occlusive disease were evaluated in detail. The following risk factors were identified: smoking in 91% with an average of 35 +/- 18 pack/years; treated or untreated hypertension in 40%; hyperlipidemia in 49%; obesity with a body weight greater than 120% of ideal in 18%; diabetes in 9%; family history of premature vascular disease in 70%; and hyperuricemia in 13%. Based on these results, we have introduced a practical approach for investigating and managing risk factors that can be administered by paramedical personnel, utilizing a questionnaire given to patients and standard blood tests to identify important risk factors. The results of the completed questionnaires and blood test are entered on a microcomputer. A program written using d-Base III stores the data, identifies the risk factors and grades their severity. We have designed an information booklet that highlights the individual patient's risk factors and suggests alternatives for management based on the sources of medical and community help available in our area.

Recent advances in imaging and evaluation of blood flow using ultrasound

Use of ultrasound for noninvasive evaluation of the vascular system is now commonplace. A new imager has been developed that depicts Doppler images (moving structures) and B-mode images (nonmoving structures) on the same image screen. The new instrument and its potential for clinical use are described.