Protamine pretreatment attenuation of hemodynamic and hematologic effects of heparin-protamine interaction

Flower-like ZIF-8 enhance the peroxidase-like activity of nanoenzymes at neutral pH for detection of heparin and protamine

The peroxide-like catalytic activity of gold nanoclusters (Au-NCs) is very low under physiological conditions (pH 7.4), which greatly limits its biological detection applications. A new nanoenzyme platform was constructed by self-assembly of Au-NCs and ZIF-8/CQDs. It was found that heparin can significantly promote the peroxidase-like activity of Au-NCs on the nanoenzyme platform at pH 7.4. In the presence of H₂O₂, the catalytic activity of Au-NCs on the nanoenzyme platform for TMB increased nearly 50 times. Based on this phenomenon, a colorimetric method was developed to determine heparin in the range of 0.0185-9.25 U/mL, with a detection limit of 0.0027 U/mL. When protamine is introduced, heparin and protamine take the lead in specific binding due to antagonism, which makes heparin unable to adsorb on the surface of ZIF-8/CQDS, thus inhibiting the enhancement of the catalytic activity of Au-NCs. Based on this phenomenon, a colorimetric method was developed to determine protamine in the range of 0.01-0.5 μg/mL, with a detection limit of 0.003 μg/mL. Therefore, this method provides a new idea for the visual detection of heparin and protamine under physiological conditions.

Reversible fluorescence modulation of BSA stabilised copper nanoclusters for the selective detection of protamine and heparin

Depicting fluorescence sensing of protamine and heparin based on aggregation and disaggregation of copper nanoclusters.

The Use of a Heparin Removal Device: A Valid Alternative to Protamine

Purpose

Experiments were carried out to test the efficacy and safety of the heparin removal device, a plasmapheresis filter that binds and eliminates heparin, in the context of extracorporeal circulation.

Procedures and Findings

Six dogs were put on cardiopulmonary bypass after heparinization. Upon weaning, additional heparin was administered to obtain an activated clotting time above 900s. The animals were connected to the heparin removal device and with flows of 500 ml/min, activated clotting time, activated partial thromboplastin time and plasma heparin concentrations were normalised to baseline after 30 min. Hemodynamic parameters remained unaffected. A slight decrease in red and white blood cell count and in platelets was observed which however recovered spontaneously two hours after the filter procedure. No damage to blood components could be observed.

Conclusions

The use of a heparin removal device is as efficient as systemic administration of protamine to reverse the effects of heparinization. It may prevent the adverse reactions linked to protamine administration and therefore be indicated in certain subgroups of patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass.

Protamine Administration Via the Ascending Aorta May Prevent Cardiopulmonary Instability

OBJECTIVE

The method of protamine administration may influence adverse reactions. The authors investigated the effects of 3 different methods of protamine administration on cardiopulmonary function.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized clinical study.

SETTING

Single university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Human volunteer patients.

INTERVENTIONS

Ninety-five patients undergoing cardiac surgery were randomized prospectively into 3 groups. Group central vein control (CVC) and group central vein (CV) received protamine via a central vein over 10 minutes and 2 minutes, respectively. Group ascending aorta (AA) received protamine via the ascending aorta over 2 minutes. Hemodynamic parameters were assessed at 7 intraoperative time points, and pulmonary parameters were assessed at 4 intraoperative time points.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The groups were similar regarding preoperative demographics, intraoperative care, and baseline cardiopulmonary function. However, both the CVC and CV groups exhibited decreased blood pressure and impaired pulmonary oxygenation after protamine administration; these changes were not observed in the AA group. Within-group changes in mean arterial blood pressure after protamine administration were significant in the AA group (mean increase 6.5 mmHg; p = 0.01) but not in the CVC (mean decrease 3.1 mmHg, p = 0.13) or CV (mean decrease 4.3 mmHg, p = 0.14) groups. Within-group changes in arterial oxygenation after protamine administration were significant in the CVC (mean decrease 85 mmHg; p<0.001) and CV (mean decrease 47 mmHg; p = 0.009) groups but not in the AA group (mean decrease 8 mmHg; p = 0.82).

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicated that administration of protamine via the ascending aorta may be the preferred route. The potential ability of administering protamine via the ascending aorta to prevent cardiopulmonary instability in patients undergoing cardiac surgery deserves further clinical investigation.

Catastrophic cardiovascular adverse reactions to protamine are nitric oxide/cyclic guanosine monophosphate dependent and endothelium mediated: should methylene blue be the treatment of choice?

Clinical and experimental observations prove that heparin-neutralizing doses of protamine increase pulmonary artery pressures and decrease systemic BP. Protamine also increases myocardial oxygen consumption, cardiac output, and heart rate, and decreases systemic vascular resistance. These cardiovascular effects have clinical consequences that have justified studies in this area. Protamine adverse reactions usually have three different categories: systemic hypotension, anaphylactoid reactions, and catastrophic pulmonary vasoconstriction. The precise mechanism that explains protamine-mediated systemic hypotension is unknown. Four experimental protocols performed at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, studied the intrinsic mechanism of protamine vasodilation. The first study reported in vitro systemic and coronary vasodilation after protamine infusion. The second in vitro study suggested that the pulmonary circulation is extensively involved in the protamine-mediated effects on endothelial function. The third study, carried out in anesthetized dogs, reported the methylene blue and nitric oxide synthase blockers neutralization of the protamine vasodilatatory effects. The fourth study suggested that protamine also causes endothelium-dependent vasodilation in heart microvessels and conductance arteries by different mechanisms including hyperpolarization. Reviewing these experimental results and our clinical experience, we suggest methylene blue as a novel approach to prevent and treat hemodynamic complications caused by the use of protamine after cardiopulmonary bypass. In the absence of prospective clinical trials, a growing body of cumulative clinical evidence suggests that methylene blue may be strongly considered as a therapeutic approach in the treatment of distributive shock.

The effect of protamine on the epicardial microflow and the graft flow in open-heart surgery

To evaluate the effect of coronary revascularization on myocardial perfusion and surgical outcome regarding graft flow, we used laser Doppler flowmetry to assess the epicardial microcirculation in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or valve replacement (VR) and electromagnetic flowmetry to measure graft flow in the CABG group. In the CABG group, the preoperative mean laser Doppler flow rate (LDF) in the epicardium of the left ventricle significantly increased at the end of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) (22 +/- 7 arbitrary units (AU) to 60 +/- 13 AU, p < 0.001). This value further increased 10 min after protamine infusion (66 +/- 14 AU, p < 0.01), but was significantly reduced 30 min later (51 +/- 14 AU, p < 0.002). Compared to the post-CPB value (34 +/- 10 ml/min) before protamine infusion, the mean graft flow (ml/min) to this area significantly increased 10 min after protamine infusion (41.3 +/- 10 ml/min, p < 0.001) but significantly decreased 30 min later (29 +/- 9 ml/min, p < 0.001). The preoperative mean LDF in the VR group was significantly higher than in the CABG group (p < 0.01). In the CABG group, there was a positive correlation between the LDF and graft flow at the end of CPB (r = 0.788) and 10 (r = 0.767) and 30 (r = 0.784) min after protamine infusion. This study shows that coronary bypass grafting increases the myocardial microcirculation which, together with graft flow, could give an early indication of the effect of surgery on myocardial microcirculation. Furthermore, protamine was found to be one of the factors contributing to graft flow reduction postoperatively and, therefore, newer methods of heparin reversal may be desirable.

Effective and less toxic reversal of low-molecular weight heparin anticoagulation by a designer variant of protamine

PURPOSE

This investigation assessed protamine reversal of heparin anticoagulation by formation of a protamine-heparin alpha-helix by use of a new designer-variant protamine [+18BE] that was made from an existing protamine variant [+18B] whose non-alpha-helix-forming amino acid proline (P) was replaced by an alpha-helix-forming glutamic acid (E). The rate of administration of the new [+18BE] variant protamine on efficacy and toxicity in comparison to that of [+21] standard protamine and [+18B] was also studied.

METHODS

Acetyl-EAA(K2A2K2A)4K2-Amide [+18BE] was administered intravenously in a 1:1 dose to low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH)-anticoagulated (intravenous 150 IU antifactor Xa/kg) dogs over 10 seconds or 3 minutes (n = 7, each group). Reversal efficacy was documented by measuring activated clotting time, thrombin clotting time, antifactor Xa, and antifactor IIa. Toxicity was defined by measuring systemic blood pressure, heart rate, cardiac output, pulmonary artery pressure, and oxygen consumption. Measurements were made at baseline, after administration of LMWH, before its reversal, and for 30 minutes thereafter. Results were compared with those after LMWH reversal with [+21] standard protamine and the [+18B] variant. A total toxicity score (TTS) was calculated for each compound from maximal declines in blood pressure, heart rate, cardiac output, and oxygen consumption.

RESULTS

LMWH anticoagulation reversal was significantly (p < 0.01) less toxic over 10 seconds and 3 minutes with the [+18BE] designer variant (TTS -2.3, -2.2) compared with the [+21] standard protamine (TTS -6.4, -7.2). Percent LMWH reversal at 3 minutes revealed [+18BE] to have antifactor Xa activity as high as 91%, compared with 68% for protamine [+21], when given over 3 minutes (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This investigation documents that a new designer variant of protamine [+18BE] has superior efficacy compared with [+21] standard protamine for reversal of LMWH anticoagulation and that this occurs with a highly favorable toxicity profile.

Heparin and protamine use in peripheral vascular surgery: a comparison between surgeons of the Society for Vascular Surgery and the European Society for Vascular Surgery

It was the intent of this study to document, in general, the patterns and complications of heparin and protamine usage during carotid endarterectomy, aortic and femoral-popliteal-tibial reconstructions for occlusive disease, elective and emergent abdominal aortic aneurysmectomy, thromboembolectomy, and dialysis arteriovenous (AV) fistula placement by surgeons from North America and Europe. All vascular surgeons from the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) and the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) were surveyed by a voluntary, self-reported questionnaire. Six hundred and forty-six completed questionnaires (284 from SVS and 362 from ESVS), representing a 62% response rate, were returned for evaluation. Systemic and regional administration of heparin was common during vascular procedures performed by both SVS and ESVS surgeons. Use of protamine to reverse heparin anticoagulation varied among SVS and ESVS surgeons, respectively, during: carotid endarterectomy (54% vs. 26%, p < 0.01), elective aortic reconstruction for occlusive disease (58% vs. 23%, p < 0.001), elective aortic reconstruction for abdominal aortic aneurysm (63% vs. 27%, p < 0.001), and femoral-popliteal-tibial reconstruction (44% vs. 15%, p < 0.001). Adverse reactions to protamine among the 25,219 and 12,902 cases reported from SVS and ESVS surgeons, respectively, included: hypotension (1209 and 495 cases), pulmonary artery hypertension (65 and eight cases), anaphylaxis (52 and 10 cases), and death (seven and two cases). These adverse responses accounted for 5.3% and 4.0% of the SVS and ESVS cases, respectively. Although this study is subject to the known limitations of a retrospective survey, it is clear that heparin use is common. Protamine reversal of heparin anticoagulation is more common in North America.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Efficacy and toxicity of differently charged polycationic protamine-like peptides for heparin anticoagulation reversal

PURPOSE

The role of total cationic charge of synthetic protamine-like peptides in heparin anticoagulation reversal and accompanying adverse hemodynamic effects was studied.

METHODS

Five protamine variants having specific total charges of [+8], [+16], [+18], [+20], and [+21] were synthesized by fluorenylmethoxycarbonyl procedures. Each of these lysine-containing peptides plus arginine-containing control salmine native protamine (n-protamine, [+21] charge) was studied in five dogs who received heparin 150 IU/kg intravenously followed by 1.5 mg/kg (intravenously during a 10-second period) of the synthesized peptide or control n-protamine.

RESULTS

Anticoagulation reversal as assessed by a number of coagulation tests was more effective with peptides of greater cationic charge. In this regard, activated clotting time reversal 3 minutes after peptide administration was 7%, [+8]; 54%, [+16]; 81%, [+18]; 92%, [+20]; 81%, [+21]; and greater than 100% [n-protamine]. Reversal of heparin anticoagulation at 3 and 30 minutes, respectively, correlated significantly (*p < or = 0.05, p < or = 0.01 [see corresponding symbols within abstract]) with total cationic charge as assessed by activated clotting time (r = 0.97, 0.99 ), prothrombin time (r = 0.98, 0.87*), activated partial thromboplastin time (r = 0.99, 0.78), thrombin clotting time (r = 0.84,* 0.85*), heparin anti-Xa activity (r = 0.87,* 0.85*), and heparin anti-IIa activity (r = 0.79 at 3 minutes, p = 0.06). Maximum declines in systemic mean arterial pressure (MAP) were greater with more positively charged peptides: -1 mm Hg, [+8]; -3 mm Hg, [+16]; -31 mm Hg; [+18]; -31 mm Hg, [+20]; -35 mm Hg, [+21]; and -34 mm Hg [n-protamine]. Maximum decreases in MAP, cardiac output, and systemic oxygen consumption were highly correlated (p < or = 0.05) with total cationic charge: MAP, r = 0.87; cardiac output, r = 0.87; and systemic oxygen consumption, r = 0.86. A total toxicity score, reflecting adverse hemodynamic effects, was greater with increasing charge: -1.9 +/- 1.1, [+8]; -2.7 +/- 0.8, [+16]; -6.6 +/- 3.3, [+18]; -6.1 +/- 3.5, [+20]; -6.9 +/- 3.8, [+21]; and -7.0 +/- 5.2 [n-protamine]. The correlation of mean peptide total toxicity score to total cationic charge was significant (r = 0.89, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest for the first time that effective alternatives to salmine protamine for reversal of heparin anticoagulation can be synthesized. Furthermore, total cationic charge appears to be an important determinant for both anticoagulation reversal and toxicity of protamine-like peptides.

Protamine releases endothelium-derived relaxing factor from systemic arteries. A possible mechanism of hypotension during heparin neutralization

BACKGROUND

When used to reverse the anticoagulant effect of heparin, protamine sulfate often causes vasodilation that can lead to systemic hypotension. Protamine is rich in the basic amino acid arginine, which is the precursor of endothelial cell synthesis of nitric oxide, and nitric oxide is the active component of endothelium-derived relaxing factor (EDRF).

METHODS AND RESULTS

To determine whether the hypotensive effect of protamine could be due to stimulated release of EDRF, we studied rings (4-5 mm) of canine coronary, femoral, and renal artery suspended in organ chambers containing physiological salt solution (37 degrees C and 95% O2-5% CO2). Arterial rings with and without endothelium were contracted with prostaglandin F2 alpha (2 x 10(-6) M) and exposed to increasing concentrations of protamine (final organ bath concentration, 40-400 micrograms/ml). In arterial segments without endothelium, protamine caused only a modest decrease in tension. However, protamine induced concentration-dependent relaxation in all arterial segments with endothelium, which was significantly greater than in segments without endothelium (p less than 0.05). The endothelium-dependent relaxation induced by protamine was inhibited by NG-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA) (10(-5) M), but L-NMMA had no effect on rings without endothelium. The action of L-NMMA could be reversed by L-arginine (10(-4) M) but not D-arginine (10(-4) M).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that protamine stimulates the release of EDRF from arterial endothelium, and that endothelium-dependent vasodilation may be an important cause of systemic hypotension during protamine infusion.

Absence of complement-mediated events after protamine reversal of heparin anticoagulation

Protamine reversal of heparin anticoagulation is associated with adverse hemodynamic effects that may be attenuated with protamine pretreatment (PP). This study assesses the role of complement activation during these phenomena in adult cardiac surgery patients. Sixteen individuals undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass were given intravenous normal saline or protamine (2 mg/kg) as a randomized pretreatment prior to undergoing heparin anticoagulation (400 IU/kg), coronary artery revascularization, and subsequent reversal of the anticoagulated state with protamine (4 mg/kg). Blood pressure, pulmonary artery diastolic pressure (PAD), heart rate, and cardiac output (CO) were measured during and after pretreatment, prior to heparin reversal by protamine, and for 10 min after reversal. Total hemolytic complement (CH50), C3 conversion to C3b, C3a/C5a, platelet count, and white blood cell count (WBC) were also measured at the same time periods. No significant correlation existed between complement activation and hemodynamic events, as might have been evident by decreased CH50, increased C3 conversion to C3b, or elevations in C3a/C5a levels. PP significantly prevented the CO decrease occurring at 1 and 3 min following heparin reversal by protamine (-0.8 and -1.4 liters/min vs 0.1 and -0.2 liters/min, P less than 0.05 and P less than 0.01, respectively). Reversal hypotension was less with PP, although PAD fell equally in both groups. WBC decreases after heparin reversal were less after PP (-25% vs -7%, P = 0.06). These data support the conclusion that, contrary to earlier reports, adverse hemodynamic and hematologic responses accompanying protamine reversal of heparin anticoagulation do not appear to be correlated with activation of complement. In fact, those patients having the greatest C3a generation exhibited the least hemodynamic changes.

Reversal of depressed oxygen consumption accompanying in vivo protamine sulphate-heparin interactions by the prostacyclin analogue, iloprost

Oxygen consumption (VO2) is known to be depressed 50 to 60% during protamine sulphate reversal of heparin anticoagulation. Accompanying this event are systemic hypotension, pulmonary artery hypertension and thrombocytopaenia. The effect of a pro-stacyclin analogue, iloprost, on protamine-induced changes in VO2 was assessed in this investigation. Three groups of anaesthetised adult mongrel dogs were studied: Group I--control subjects received i.v. normal saline infusions (n = 10); Group II--subjects received low-dose i.v. iloprost infusions (25-50 ng/kg/min) over 30 min (n = 7); and Group III--subjects received high-dose i.v. iloprost infusions (175 ng/kg/min) over 30 min (n = 7). All dogs initially received sodium heparin, 150 IU/kg i.v. Protamine sulphate, 1.5 mg/kg i.v., was subsequently administered over 10 s following the first 20 min of saline or iloprost infusion. Continuous measurements included: mixed venous (SvO2) and arterial (SaO2) oxygen saturation, arterial blood pressure, pulmonary artery pressure, heart rate and carotid artery flow (CaQ). Thermodilution cardiac output (CO) allowed calculation of VO2. Platelet counts were performed before and 3 min after protamine infusion. The VO2 declines in Group II and III subjects compared to Group I controls were markedly less. Maximum VO2 declines in Group I control dogs of -38.2 +/- 26.7% and Group II dogs of -34.1 +/- 36.8% at 75 to 90 s post-reversal contrasted to -2.9 +/- 31.9% in Group III animals at the same time interval. VO2 increases occurred 3 to 10 min after protamine exposure in Group III animals, as did attenuation of systemic hypotensive and pulmonary hypertensive responses in this group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Intraoperative management of abdominal aortic aneurysms. The anesthesiologist's viewpoint

Factors that influence the choice of anesthetic, monitoring methods, and fluid management for aneurysm repair are reviewed, with particular attention to epidural anesthesia and analgesia and the pulmonary artery catheter. Management of bleeding, renal preservation, temperature control, and myocardial ischemia are discussed, and special anesthetic issues associated with ruptured aneurysms and juxtarenal and suprarenal surgery are summarized.

Complement depletion and persistent hemodynamic-hematologic responses in protamine-heparin reactions

Hypotension, bradycardia, pulmonary artery hypertension, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia have been suspected to be due to complement activation following protamine reversal of heparin. This investigation examined these phenomena in complement-depleted animals. Eight dogs received intraperitoneal naja n. naja cobra venom factor (CVF), 20 U/kg, 48 and 24 hr prior to anticoagulation with sodium heparin, 150 IU/kg, and reversal 30 min later with protamine sulfate, 1.5 mg/kg. Decomplementation was confirmed in all dogs. Systemic blood pressure (BP), pulse (HR), pulmonary artery systolic and diastolic pressures, (PAS, PAD), cardiac output (CO), platelet count (PTC), and white blood count (WBC) with differential were monitored. The maximal mean changes for the entire group were BP, -43 mm Hg; HR, -16; PAS, +6 mm Hg; PAD, +3 mm Hg; CO, -27%; PTC, -49%; and WBC, -48%. These hemodynamic and hematologic responses, occurring in the face of CVF-induced decomplementation, support the conclusion that complement components C3 and C5-C9 are not influential factors contributing to these protamine-heparin-induced events.

The effect of protamine sulfate on platelet function

The adverse effects of protamine sulfate, used to neutralize the anticoagulant action of heparin, include systemic hypotension, pulmonary artery hypertension, thrombocytopenia and leukopenia. For further evaluation of protamine's mechanism of action, a three-part investigation was performed. In part I platelet-rich plasma (PRP) was prepared from canine blood samples (n = 6) taken before and 2 minutes after injection of protamine. In part II human PRP (n = 5) was preincubated with protamine or distilled water. Adenosine diphosphate-induced aggregation of protamine-treated platelets was unchanged, but thrombin-induced aggregation was inhibited in both canine and human preparations (p less than 0.05). In part III thrombocytopenia was produced in splenectomized dogs (n = 5), using microporous filters, to 4.5-8.4% of the initial platelet count. Protamine reversal of the heparinization caused hypotension (maximally -29 mmHg 90 s after protamine), but not pulmonary arterial hypertension. Leukopenia developed before additional thrombocytopenia appeared. Protamine-platelet interaction inhibits thrombin-induced platelet aggregation. Platelets may play an important role in the pulmonary pressure rise during protamine reversal, but do not mediate the systemic hypotension.

Haemodynamic and haematologic alterations with protamine reversal of anticoagulation: comparison of standard heparin and a low molecular weight heparin fragment

Reversal of anticoagulation with protamine sulfate causes many adverse haemodynamic and haematologic effects which could be due to differences in the mechanism of action of standard and low molecular weight heparin. Three groups of dogs were investigated: one group received normal saline pretreatment followed by heparinisation with standard heparin 150 IU/kg followed by protamine sulfate reversal 1.5 mg/kg after aortic interposition grafting: the second group were given normal saline pretreatment followed by heparinisation with low molecular weight heparin 150 U antiXa/kg and after grafting protamine sulfate reversal 1.5 mg/kg. The third group were given protamine sulfate pretreatment 2.25 mg/kg followed by low molecular weight heparin 150 U antiXa/kg and later protamine sulfate reversal 1.5 mg/kg after grafting. The same haemodynamic changes were seen regardless of the type of heparin or pretreatment with protamine given along with low molecular weight heparin. There was a suggestion that regular heparin cause a more pronounced increase in pulmonary artery pressure and a decrease in heart rate. On the other hand the systemic hypotension and reduction of cardiac output seemed more pronounced in the low molecular weight heparin group. Platelet count decreased less in the low molecular weight heparin group, but white blood cell count was equally reduced. Pretreatment with protamine did not abolish the adverse effects of protamine when reversing anticoagulation achieved with low molecular weight heparin, a finding not shared with standard heparin-protamine interactions.