Are arteriograms necessary in penetrating zone II neck injuries?

Penetrating carotid artery injury by air rifle: a case report

BACKGROUND

Air rifle injuries can cause significant vascular injuries. This air rifle injury has resulted in a penetrating neck trauma traversing the common carotid artery. There is debate around the need for radiological investigation, the most appropriate investigational modality, and the need for surgical exploration versus a conservative approach. This case report aims to exemplify a successful approach to managing Penetrating Carotid Injuries (PCI) while shedding light on the rationale behind the management decisions.

PRESENTATION

An 18-year-old Caucasian man arrived at the hospital following an air rifle injury to the right side of the neck, with active bleeding and a moderate haematoma displacing the trachea. He was haemodynamically stable, with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) of 15 and no evidence of bruit. Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA) showed Right common carotid (CCA) artery injury with associated post-traumatic pseudoaneurysm. The pellet trajectory traverses the right superior thyroid gland. A duplex ultrasound scan (USS) confirmed two areas of arterial blush at the right CCA. Management involved neck exploration under General Anaesthesia (G.A.), repair of right CCA, bullet extraction, and wound washout. He received antibiotics for ten days and a single agent of antiplatelets for three months and was discharged two days postoperatively with no complications. He was followed up for eight months with no evidence of any trauma sequelae.

CONCLUSION

Penetrating carotid artery injuries are a serious concern. The small-sized pellets carry the risk of embolization. Therefore, neck exploration remains the gold standard treatment for PCI. Appropriate operative planning is crucial and can be optimised using radiological diagnostic modalities in haemodynamically stable patients. CTA is a non-invasive, swift, and adequate alternative to arteriography, providing valuable diagnostic information on vascular and aerodigestive injuries and bullet trajectory. This enables appropriate preparedness to achieve excellent outcomes in such critical cases.

Value of clinical examination in the assessment of penetrating neck injuries: a retrospective study of diagnostic accuracy test

Background

There are many high-volume trauma centers in limited resource environments where a thorough clinical examination of patients may contribute to a more economical, accurate, and widely applicable method of determining the proper management of patients with penetrating neck injuries. The purpose of this study was to validate thorough physical examination as a reliable diagnostic tool in these patients.

Methods

We performed an observational retrospective study of a diagnostic accuracy test where we compared clinical findings (symptoms and soft signs on admission of the patient) with the definitive findings according to the gold standard test for each particular situation (selective studies, clinical observation and surgical exploration). The study was conducted at Hospital Occidente Kennedy (HOK) between August 2009 and June 2010.

Results

The sample consisted of the clinical records of 207 (n = 207) patients who went to the emergency room for penetrating neck wounds at Hospital Occidente Kennedy (HOK). Of the total sample, 36.2% (n = 75) of patients were considered “asymptomatic” as they didn’t present with any soft signs of injury. Vascular soft signs were present in 57% (n = 118) of the patients, soft signs of the airway and the upper gastrointestinal tract were present in 15.9% (n = 33) and 21.3% (n = 44) of the patients respectively. The sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) of any soft sign to determine injuries which require surgical repair was 97.4% [CI] [86.5–99.5%] and 98.7% [CI] [92.8–99.8%] respectively, with a range of confidence [CI] of 95%.

Conclusions

Our study’s main findings suggest that patients with neck injuries and no vascular, airway, or gastrointestinal soft sign can be safely managed with a conservative approach. It is important to emphasize the value of the clinical examination since there are many contexts in the modern world where a considerable amount of the population is afflicted by neck trauma and treated under conditions where technological resources are limited.

The role of aerodigestive tract endoscopy in penetrating neck trauma

OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS

To determine the role of aerodigestive tract endoscopy in the management of penetrating neck trauma.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case series.

METHODS

A search of the hospital's trauma database was performed for patients who presented with penetrating neck trauma between July 1989 and June 2008. The mechanism and site of injury, airway status and manipulation, physical findings, diagnostic and therapeutic steps taken, and outcomes were all recorded.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-three patients were identified. There were 144 males and 19 females. The mean age was 28 years (range, 13 to 65 years). There were 105 gunshot wounds, 9 shotgun injuries, and 48 stab wounds. Seventy-three patients (45%) underwent emergent neck exploration, of which 15 had upper aerodigestive tract injuries; intraoperative endoscopy was performed on 13 and was used to guide the repair. Ninety patients (55%) did not meet the criteria for emergent neck exploration. Endoscopy in this group was performed in symptomatic patients, which revealed two cases of unilateral true vocal fold motion impairment, one mucosal laceration of the right mainstem bronchus, one questionable area of injury at the apical segment of the right upper lobe bronchus, and one mucosal laceration of the proximal esophagus.

CONCLUSIONS

Aerodigestive tract endoscopy is critical in assessing and guiding surgical repair of injuries noted on surgical exploration. In stable patients with a low clinical suspicion of aerodigestive tract injury, it was of low yield. We propose a new algorithm for assessing aerodigestive tract injuries that includes multidetector computed tomography, in which only symptomatic patients who fail to meet the criteria for emergent neck exploration undergo endoscopy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Multidetector row computed tomography in the management of penetrating neck injuries

Penetrating neck trauma may occur from gun shots, stabbings, and accidental injury. Approximately 50% of gunshot and 10%-20% of stab-wound patients are reported as having severe injuries and the mortality from severe vascular injuries is reported as high as 50%. Penetrating traumatic neck injury is no longer best managed with exploratory surgery or conventional angiography in the stable patient. Computed tomography angiography has proven to be a useful, safe, and reliable means of diagnosis. Experience with interpreting and reconstructing computed tomography images, understanding the clinically important findings, and avoiding pitfalls is critical for successful patient care. Therefore, radiologists and clinicians who treat trauma patients need to familiarize themselves with the computed tomography angiography technique and appearances of vascular injury and know when to recommend further evaluation, such as interventional angiography or open surgery.

External carotid arterial injury

Carotid vascular trauma has high mortality. The two primary causes of death are associated head injury and vascular injuries that cause exsanguination or stroke. In the past two decades interventional radiology, i.e. techniques of transcatheter embolisation, has become a vital component of the care of these cases. External carotid artery injuries are complex and are often inaccessible causes of exsanguinating haemorrhage. Transcatheter techniques have been shown to be highly effective in controlling this haemorrhage. An overview of injuries of the external carotid artery and its branches is presented.

Prospective evaluation of screening multislice helical computed tomographic angiography in the initial evaluation of penetrating neck injuries

BACKGROUND

The optimal management strategy for patients sustaining penetrating neck injury without an urgent indication for operative exploration remains controversial. The objective of this study was to prospectively assess multislice helical computed tomography angiography (MCTA) as a stand alone screening modality for the initial evaluation of hemodynamically stable patients with penetrating neck injuries. Our hypothesis was that MCTA is a sensitive diagnostic screening test that could noninvasively evaluate the vascular and aerodigestive structures of the neck.

METHODS

After Institutional Review Board approval, all penetrating neck injuries assessed during a 16-month period were prospectively evaluated at a Level I trauma center. Patients without an indication for urgent neck exploration underwent MCTA screening. MCTA accuracy was tested against an aggregate gold standard of final diagnosis encompassing all imaging, surgical procedures and clinical follow-up obtained.

RESULTS

In all, 106 injuries penetrated the platysma; 15 required urgent exploration and 91 underwent MCTA (34 gunshot wounds/57 stab wounds). Nineteen external wounds were in zone 1, 39 were in zone 2, 10 in zone 3, and 23 traversed multiple zones. MCTA was nondiagnostic in 2.2% secondary to artifact from retained missile fragments. Follow-up was achieved in 84.5% of patients for a mean of 33.3 days (range: 2-150). MCTA achieved 100% sensitivity and 93.5% specificity in detecting all vascular and aerodigestive injuries sustained. MCTA correctly identified two tracheal and two carotid artery injuries requiring operative or endovascular repair in asymptomatic patients. No injuries requiring intervention were missed by MCTA.

CONCLUSION

In the initial evaluation of stable penetrating neck injuries, MCTA appears to be a sensitive and safe screening modality. Further investigation is warranted.

Redefining the role of arterial imaging in the management of penetrating zone 3 neck injuries

The purpose of this study was to assess the role of arteriography (AG) in the diagnosis and treatment of vascular trauma in patients with zone 3 penetrating neck injuries. The records of all cases of penetrating neck trauma for the past 14 years at a level 1 trauma center were reviewed retrospectively. Eight hundred forty-four penetrating neck injuries were documented, of which 72 (8.5%) traversed zone 3 of the neck (gunshot, 35; stab, 32; shotgun, 5). Twenty patients (27%) had hard signs of vascular injury (hemorrhage, expanding hematoma, bruit, thrill, neurologic deficit). Twelve of these (60%) underwent immediate exploration, 1 had no significant injury, and 11 had successful surgical repair or ligation of the vascular injury. AG in the other eight patients with hard signs revealed injuries requiring embolization (three patients), urokinase infusion (one patient), and observation (three patients) and one normal examination. Fifty-two patients had no hard signs of vascular injury. Twenty-four of these underwent AG, of which 18 were negative. Positive findings included internal carotid artery narrowings (two patients), external compression of the internal carotid artery (one patient), vertebral artery intimal flap (one patient), and nonbleeding injuries to small, noncritical arteries (two patients), none of which required treatment. Twenty-four of the remaining 28 patients were observed clinically, and 4 patients had negative explorations. Nine patients had ultrasonography performed, but these examinations did not yield any useful information. The absence of hard signs reliably excludes surgically significant vascular injuries in penetrating zone 3 neck trauma, suggesting that AG is not necessary. Hard signs in stable patients should mandate AG because these vascular injuries may be amenable to endovascular therapy.

Reliability of Physical Examination as a Predictor of Vascular Injury after Penetrating Neck Trauma

The policy of routine angiography (ANG) for all penetrating neck wounds results in a high rate of negative studies. The medical records of all patients who presented to Wishard Memorial Hospital and Methodist Hospital of Indiana with penetrating injuries to the neck from January 1992 to April 2001 were reviewed. All patients who were hemodynamically stable underwent four-vessel ANG to evaluate for vascular injury irrespective of findings on physical examination (PE). A total of 216 patients sustained penetrating neck injuries. Patients were divided according to positive or negative PE findings and the results of ANG. Of the 63 patients with a positive PE, 40 (68%) also had a positive ANG finding. Of the 89 patients with negative PE, only 3 had a positive ANG and none of these injuries required operative repair. PE therefore had a 93 per cent sensitivity (SEN) and a 97 per cent negative predictive value (NPV) for predicting the results of ANG. The SEN and NPV of PE for detecting vascular injuries requiring operative repair were both 100 per cent. In this series, no patient with a negative PE had a vascular injury that required operative repair, irrespective of zone of injury. Routine ANG may therefore be unnecessary for patients with penetrating neck injuries and a negative PE.

Penetrating zone II neck injury: does dynamic computed tomographic scan contribute to the diagnostic sensitivity of physical examination for surgically significant injury? A prospective blinded study

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the utility of dynamic computed tomographic (CT) scanning as a diagnostic tool and adjunct to physical examination in the identification of surgically significant penetrating zone II neck injuries.

METHODS

All patients older than 14 years of age who suffered penetrating zone II neck injuries were eligible for entry into the study protocol at an urban Level I trauma center. All patients that presented with signs of surgically significant injury on physical examination underwent immediate neck exploration. Patients that did not show signs of surgically significant injury were entered into the study protocol and underwent soft tissue dynamic CT scan (1/2-cm cuts, 250-mL oral contrast) of the neck after initial resuscitation. After CT scan, all patients entered into the study protocol underwent esophagography. After completion of radiologic assessment, all study protocol patients underwent surgical exploration of the neck. The patient's surgical team was blinded to results of the CT scan and esophagography before and during surgical exploration of the neck.

RESULTS

During a 42-month period from May 1997 to March 2001, 42 patients were entered into the study protocol. Thirty-six (86%) of the injuries were secondary to stab wounds and the rest were caused by gunshot wounds. Surgical exploration revealed four esophageal injuries, of which two (50%) were missed by CT scan. Esophagography missed the identical esophageal injuries, as did CT scan. Both of the missed esophageal injuries were secondary to stab wounds. Seven internal jugular vein injuries were diagnosed intraoperatively, of which four (57%) were diagnosed by CT scan. During the study period, all patients with carotid artery and tracheal injuries were diagnosed by physical examination and thus underwent immediate surgical exploration without study entry.

CONCLUSION

Dynamic CT scan contributes minimally to the sensitivity of physical examination in the diagnosis of surgically significant penetrating zone II neck injury. Diagnosis of esophageal injuries with dynamic CT scan appears no better than esophagography. CT scan has greater sensitivity than physical examination for the diagnosis of jugular venous injuries; however, the majority of these injuries do not require identification or surgical intervention.

Traumatic arteriovenous fistula of the vertebral artery

A 22-year-old woman sustained a stab wound injury of the right vertebral artery. Initial treatment with endovascular embolization using platinum coils in a local hospital could not stop the bleeding. The patient was transferred to our department in hypovolemic shock. Further angiography revealed an arteriovenous fistula. Open surgical revision occluded the vertebral artery and the patient recovered without neurological deficit.

Continued experience with physical examination alone for evaluation and management of penetrating zone 2 neck injuries: results of 145 cases

PURPOSE

Our preliminary experience with physical examination alone in the evaluation of penetrating zone 2 neck injuries for vascular trauma was previously reported in 28 patients over a 2-year period (1991-1993). The purpose of the current study was to examine the results of this approach in a much larger group of patients over an 8-year period.

METHODS

The medical records for all patients admitted to our level I trauma center (all of them entered into our prospective protocol) between December 1991 and April 1999 with penetrating zone 2 neck trauma were reviewed for their initial presentation and any documented vascular injury.

RESULTS

A total of 145 patients made up the study group; in 30 of these patients, the penetrating trajectory also traversed zone 1 or 3. Thirty-one patients (21%) had hard signs of vascular injury (active bleeding, expanding hematoma, bruit/thrill, pulse deficit, central neurologic deficit) and were taken immediately to the operating room; 28 (90%) of these 30 patients had either major arterial or venous injuries requiring operative repair (the false-positive rate for physical examination thus being 10%). Of the 114 patients with no hard signs, 23 underwent arteriography because of proximity of the injury to the vertebral arteries or because the trajectory included another zone. Of these 23 arteriograms, three showed abnormalities, but only one required operative repair. This case had no complications relating to the initial delay. The remaining 91 patients with no hard signs were observed without imaging or surgery for a minimum of 23 hours, and none had any evidence of vascular injury during hospitalization or during the initial 2-week follow-up period (1/114; false-negative rate for physical examination, 0.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

This series confirms the earlier report indicating that patients with zone 2 penetrating neck wounds can be safely and accurately evaluated by physical examination alone to confirm or exclude vascular injury. The missed-injury rate is 0.7% (1/145) with this approach, which is comparable to arteriography in accuracy but less costly and noninvasive. Long-term follow-up is needed to confirm this management option.

Penetrating neck trauma

Penetrating neck trauma can pose significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges for emergency physicians. Factors contributing to these problems are complex anatomy, proximity of vital structures, and potential for rapid deterioration of airway, vascular, or neurologic injuries. Other contributing factors are the lack of consensus in the literature regarding appropriate evaluation and management of penetrating neck injuries, and insufficient resources or experienced personnel at some institutions. This review focuses on the key components of the history and physical examinations that allow for an assessment of the severity and type of structures involved. In addition, current methods of airway management, as well as ways to manage penetrating neck trauma efficiently and cost effectively, are discussed.

Selective management of penetrating neck trauma based on cervical level of injury

BACKGROUND

Selective surgical exploration of penetrating neck wounds is now the standard of care, but the safety and cost effectiveness of selective diagnostic testing remains controversial. We herein review our 18-year prospective evaluation of a progressively selective approach.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Since 1979, 312 patients sustained penetrating trauma to the anterior neck; 75% were stabbed and 24% were shot. Zone I was penetrated in 13%, zone II in 67%, and zone III in 20%.

RESULTS

In all, 105 (34%) of the patients had early exploration (16% were nontherapeutic). Of the 207 (66%) observed, 1 (0.5%) required delayed exploration. Length of stay was 8.0 days following exploration, 5.1 days following negative exploration, and 1.5 days following observation. In the last 6 years, 40% have had adjunctive testing: 69% of zone I, 15% of zone II, and 50% of zone III injuries.

CONCLUSION

Selective management of penetrating neck injuries is safe and does not mandate routine diagnostic testing for asymptomatic patients with injuries in zones II and III.

Locked-in syndrome resulting from cervical spine gunshot wound

A patient sustained a cervical spine gunshot wound resulting in immediate quadriplegia and obstruction of both vertebral arteries. After an 8-hour delay, basilar artery thrombosis occurred and resulted in locked-in syndrome. Bilateral occlusion of the vertebral arteries after penetrating cervical trauma has not been reported previously. The incidence and treatment of traumatic basilar thrombosis and locked-in syndrome is reviewed. Rapid diagnosis of ascending thrombosis and prompt treatment with hyperdynamics and anticoagulation may improve outcome.

The management of penetrating injuries of the anterior triangle of the neck

The management of penetrating injuries of the anterior triangle of the neck is controversial and poses several problems. A policy of mandatory neck exploration of these injuries is followed in the Department of General Surgery at the State Hospital, Windhoek. A retrospective study of patients presenting to one of the four surgical firms at The State Hospital was performed to see if this policy was justified. Twenty-seven patients were reviewed of which 25 presented acutely and two presented late with severe complications. The clinical and operative findings and the mortality rate of 7 per cent were similar to previous reports. The negative exploration of 30 per cent was less than previous reports of mandatory neck exploration for penetrating trauma. This may have been because exploration was limited to injuries involving the anterior triangle of the neck in this series. All 14 patients with positive clinical findings were found to have injuries at exploration and five of 13 patients (38 per cent) with no clinical signs were found to have injuries. Given these results and in the setting of The State Hospital it was felt that the policy of mandatory exploration was justified.