Increased alcohol consumption in weight-reduced rats is modulated by the renin-angiotensin system

Early malnutrition favours heavy ethanol intake in weaning rats without long-lasting effects

INTRODUCTION

Although food restriction is well known to increase ethanol intake, the subject has not been extensively studied in developing animals which could be more vulnerable to long-lasting effects. Therefore, the aim of this study was to show some findings concerning this subject.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Food restriction was used to produce malnutrition either during lactation (lactating dams food restricted 60%) or after weaning (pups food restricted 60%). At weaning, day 25, males were assigned to one of the following groups: C, food ad libitum throughout the experiment - control group; MW, malnourished only after weaning; ML, malnourished only during lactation period; and MLW, malnourished throughout the experiment, during lactation and after weaning. All rats were kept isolated in cages in which they could choose to drink either a 10% ethanol solution or tap water (from days 25 to 45). Re-exposure to this model was performed on day 49. Between exposure and re-exposure, rats drank tap water for 4 days.

RESULTS

There was a significant effect of malnutrition during lactation, up to day 35, with heavy drinking patterns (ethanol intake day 2: C, 8 g/kg; MW, 9 g/kg; ML, 19 g/kg; and MLW, 22 g/kg). This heavy drinking pattern lasted until the recovery of body weight. Food restriction after weaning had significant effects after 14 days, when a statistically significant decrease in body weight occurred (body weight day 39: C, 147.8 g; MW, 98.5 g). Only rats which were persistently malnourished (MLW and MW) drank ethanol more significantly than their ad libitum-fed counterparts during the re-exposure period (ethanol intake: malnourished, 5 g/kg; and well-nourished, 2.5 g/kg). Adulteration of the ethanol solution with quinine (0.1 g/l) precluded the effect of malnutrition.

CONCLUSIONS

Malnutrition during early development had no long-lasting effects on ethanol consumption. In addition, malnutrition increased ethanol consumption as long as it kept body weight low, which was apparently more significant in young animals.

Histaminergic activation of endogenous angiotensin II fails to inhibit alcohol intake in rats

Demonstrations that alcohol intake can be inhibited by pharmacological activation of the renal renin-angiotensin system (RRA) or injection of angiotensin II (ANG II) in rats led to this study of a role for endogenous ANG II in inhibition of alcohol intake in rats. Relatively small doses of histamine, above threshold for eliciting drinking of water and activation of the RRA, were injected SC in adult male Sprague-Dawley rats with access to 3.0% alcohol in 45-min one-bottle alcohol tests and in two-bottle tests in which alcohol and water were available at the midpoint of the 12-h dark phase. The 0.312 and 1.25 mg/kg doses of SC histamine elevated plasma renin activity to levels similar to those in rats that had just eaten food. Neither dose of histamine affected alcohol intake in one-bottle tests. A relatively large 10 mg/kg dose of histamine increased alcohol intake in a one-bottle test, but decreased alcohol intake and increased water intake in two-bottle tests. The inhibitory effect of the 10 mg/kg dose of histamine on alcohol intake was completely blocked by SC 10 mg/kg losartan, a selective AT1 angiotensin receptor antagonist. This 10 mg/kg dose of losartan given alone, however, failed to increase alcohol intake in one- or two-bottle tests. These results generally do not support a role for endogenous ANG II as an inhibitory physiological signal in the control of alcohol ingestion in rats, because histaminergic activation of RRA, using small but physiologically meaningful doses of histamine, failed to inhibit alcohol intake.