Anterior portals in shoulder arthroscopy

Risk of Cephalic Vein Injury During the Creation of an Anterior Portal in Shoulder Arthroscopy

Background

There is a risk of cephalic vein injury during shoulder arthroscopy. However, limited data regarding its anatomic course are available.

Purpose

To analyze the positional relationship and factors affecting the distance between the coracoid tip and cephalic veins.

Study design

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods

A total of 80 contrast-enhanced computed tomography images from 80 patients (mean age, 49.6 ± 20.3 years; 61 men) were retrospectively analyzed. The distance between the center of the coracoid tip and the vertical line through the cephalic vein was measured in the axial (D1) and sagittal (D2) planes. The distance between 1 cm lateral to the center of the coracoid tip and the vertical line through the cephalic vein was measured in the sagittal plane (D3). Each distance was compared according to patient sex and laterality. Associations between each distance and the patient's age, height, weight, and body mass index were investigated.

Results

The mean D1 was 18.4 ± 7.3 mm in 59 patients. The mean D2 was 23.4 ± 11.6 mm, and it was within 10 mm in 10 patients (12.5%). The mean D3 was 33.7 ± 12.2 mm. There was no significant difference in D1, D2, and D3 according to patient sex or laterality. A positive correlation was observed only between D3 and patient height (r = 0.320; P = .034).

Conclusion

The cephalic vein was found to travel a mean of 23.4 mm distal and 33.7 mm distal to 1 cm lateral to the coracoid tip. Therefore, Care should be taken to avoid cephalic vein injury when creating an anterior inferior portal or 5-o'clock portal around these areas.

No Clinical or Radiographic Difference Seen in Arthroscopic Bankart Repair With Knotted Versus Knotless Suture Anchors: A Randomized Controlled Trial at Short-Term Follow-Up

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic results of patients undergoing arthroscopic repair of labral lesions using knotted and knotless anchors.

METHODS

Sixty-four patients with anterior labral lesions (bone defects of the glenoid up to 13.5% or up to 20% if the instability severity index score was less than 4) and without other shoulder pathologies were randomly assigned to 2 groups, with 32 patients in each group. Clinical outcomes were assessed 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery by the Rowe score, Western Ontario shoulder instability index (WOSI), single assessment numeric evaluation (SANE), visual analog scale for pain (VASp), range of motion, and rate of postoperative recurrence. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed, and the anterior and inferior labrum glenoid height indexes and anterior and inferior labral slopes were measured. The primary endpoint was the Rowe score at 24 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients, 24 in the knotted group and 27 in the knotless group, completed 24 months of follow-up. At 24 months, the Rowe scores were 81.7 ± 19.9 points and 85.9 ± 14 points, respectively (P = .623); the WOSI scores were 509.2 ± 480.1 points and 555.9 ± 393.6 points, respectively (P = .533); the SANE scores were 90.7 ± 18.7 points and 89.2 ± 14.8 points, respectively (P = .427); and the VASp scores were 1.7 ± 2.5 points and 2.5 ± 2.7 points, respectively (P = .275). There was no significant difference in range of motion, postoperative recurrence, or MRI parameters between the groups. All subjects (100%) in both groups exceeded the minimal clinically important difference of 9.7 for the Rowe score (P > .999).

CONCLUSION

Repair of Bankart's lesion through the use of knotted and knotless suture anchors yielded similar clinical and radiographic results on analysis at 24 months after operation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I. Randomized controlled clinical trial.

Neurological Complications Following Arthroscopic and Related Sports Surgery: Prevention, Work-up, and Treatment

Arthroscopy of the shoulder, elbow, hip, and knee has become increasingly utilized due to continued advancements in technique, training, and instrumentation. In addition, arthroscopy is generally safe and effective in the utilization of joint preservation surgical techniques. The arthroscopist must utilize a thorough understanding of the surgical anatomy, detailed care with patient positioning, and safe instrumentation portals to prevent associated neurological injury. In the event of postoperative neurological complications, the physician must carefully document the patient history and physical examination while considering the utilization of additional imaging, testing, or surgical nerve exploration with a specialized team depending upon the severity of neurological injury. In this review, we discuss the prevention, evaluation, and treatment of neurological complications related for arthroscopic procedures of the shoulder, elbow, hip, and knee.

Does creating a trough on the anterior glenoid rim make a difference in Arthroscopic Bankart repair using suture anchors? A mid-term follow-up retrospective study

PURPOSE

Creating a trough on the anterior glenoid rim is one of the methods used for arthroscopic Bankart repair with suture anchors. The purpose of this study was to analyze clinical and radiological outcomes of arthroscopic Bankart repair with suture anchors; to compare between the outcomes of surgical procedures with and without trough.

METHODS

Clinical and radiological outcomes were evaluated for 116 patients who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair at our institute from 2005 to 2011. The mean follow-up was 5.2 years (range, 2-8.8 years). All data were divided into trough group (n = 62) and non-trough group (n = 71). Clinical and functional outcomes were assessed pre- and postoperatively as range of motion (ROM), pain on the visual analog scale (p-VAS), function on the visual analog scale (f-VAS), and Rowe score. Radiological outcomes were also evaluated.

RESULTS

The overall postoperative clinical and functional outcomes improved significantly (P < .001). A total of 8 patients (6.8%) showed recurrent instability. Radiologic findings showed mild arthritis in 27 cases (23.1%), moderate arthritis in 6 cases (5.1%), and no severe arthritis. 32 patients showed anterior apprehension after surgery, and 22 out of those 32 patients were from non-trough group. However, no significant difference between the trough and non-trough groups was found with respect to clinical and functional outcomes (P > .05).

CONCLUSION

The additional procedure of creating a trough did not improve clinical outcomes in terms of frank dislocation; however, at the final follow-up, patients with the trough showed less anterior apprehension. Overall, arthroscopic Bankart repair using suture anchors had relatively good clinical outcome, with a redislocation rate of 6.8%.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, Case series.

Comparison of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Vertical Simple Stitch Versus Modified Mason-Allen Stitch in Arthroscopic Bankart Repairs: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study

BACKGROUND

In spite of the probable advantages of Bankart repair with modified Mason-Allen technique, there has been no study to evaluate the clinical outcomes of the modified Mason-Allen technique for Bankart repair.

PURPOSE

To prospectively compare the anatomic and clinical outcomes between the vertical simple stitch and the modified Mason-Allen stitch with respect to the labral height, retear rate, redislocation/apprehension, and various functional outcome scores.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

Patients who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair with double-loaded suture anchors were randomly allocated to 1 of 2 groups: the vertical simple stitch method (SS; n = 45) or the Bankart repair using modified Mason-Allen technique (BRUMA; n = 41). All patients underwent computed tomography arthrography at 6 months postoperatively and various functional outcome measurements at least 2 years postoperatively. The labral height and width at the 3-, 4-, and 5-o'clock positions were measured preoperatively and at 6 months after surgery on axial computed tomography arthrography; the redislocation/apprehension rate, the retear rate, and various functional outcome scores were evaluated at each follow-up visit.

RESULTS

Postoperative labral height and width were significantly increased at all locations (all P < .001) in both groups, but they were not statistically different between groups (all P > .05). Two patients in the SS group (4.4%) and 2 in the BRUMA group (4.9%) experienced redislocation after surgery, and 4 patients in the SS group (8.9%) and 2 in the BRUMA group (4.9%) group showed apprehension after surgery. Additionally, 5 patients in the SS group (11.1%) and 2 in the BRUMA group (4.9%) showed retear at 6 months ( P = .239). There were no differences in any functional outcome scores (all P > .05).

CONCLUSION

There was no difference in the radiologic outcomes at 6 months and the clinical outcomes assessed at least 2 years after surgery between the groups.

Fixation methods and implants in shoulder stabilization: A historical perspective

BACKGROUND

Treatment for shoulder instability has changed significantly over the past decade from open procedures to arthroscopic procedures using a variety of different fixation methods and implants. The development of these implants has been highly influenced by the numerous complications that have arisen using early designs.

METHODS

A review of the literature was performed to describe the history of shoulder stabilization.

CONCLUSION

As biomedical technology improves, we should continue to see changes to implant design and manufacturing. Having an understanding of the history and evolution of these implants will provide us with context in which to guide future implant design and clinical use. This review article provides a comprehensive overview of the evolution of early shoulder stabilization techniques and implants to the modern implants being used today.

Orthopedic resident's learning curve for arthroscopic subscapularis tendon repair: short-term clinical and radiographic outcomes

BACKGROUND

Arthroscopic subscapularis (SSC) repair is a technically demanding procedure with a long learning curve. As effective completion of resident's practical experience remains controversial, a prospective clinical study was performed to assess the functional and anatomical outcomes of subscapularis (SSC) arthroscopic repair by orthopedic residents. The pathological anatomy of the tears, the surgical approach and the difficulties encountered at the beginning of the learning curve were reported.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between June 2009 and June 2010, 30 patients with rotator cuff tear were preoperatively evaluated with clinical exam, Constant and UCLA scores. Surgery was performed under arthroscopy by a team of three orthopedic surgeons in training. A SSC tear, if present, was recorded and treated. The same clinical exam and functional scores were repeated at minimum 6 months of follow-up. Subscapularis strength recovery and tendon healing were investigated with arthromagnetic resonance imaging.

RESULTS

A SSC tear was observed in 11 cases out of 30 and treated arthroscopically. The clinical scores improved in all patients: the average Constant score increased from 34 ± 14 to 77 ± 11 and the UCLA score from 11 ± 5 to 29 ± 3. The SSC tests were negative in all patients with the exception of one. Tendon healing was observed in 10 out of 11 cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopic SSC repair performed by educated residents is possible and leads to good clinical and anatomical results. Surgery duration progressively improved as the learning curve advanced.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 2.

Postoperative evaluation of drill holes for arthroscopic Bankart repair with suture anchors by the use of computed tomography

BACKGROUND

Here we investigated the angle and placement of bone holes for suture anchors using postoperative computed-tomography scapula scans.

METHODS

The study group comprised 20 shoulders from 20 consecutive patients (13 males and seven females; mean age 23.4 years) who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair. All anchors were inserted through the anterior portal after establishing a bone hole at the edge of the glenoid articular surface using a drill. Computed tomography images of the scapula were taken 1 month postoperatively and used to create three-dimensional scapula models with Mimics and Magics software. Bone holes in the anterior-inferior (3:00-6:00) position were assigned either to the non-perforated group if they were positioned entirely inside the glenoid bone or to the perforated group if the far cortex of the glenoid was penetrated by the drill. The angle between the glenoid articular surface and the bone hole was measured in the oblique coronal and transverse plane views. The length of the bone hole was also assessed.

RESULTS

Of the 85 bone holes investigated, 42 were in the 3:00-6:00 position. Perforation was detected in 16 of these 42 holes (38.2%). The angle in the oblique coronal plane view and the length of the bone hole were significantly larger in the non-perforated group than in the perforated group; however, the angle in the transverse plane view did not significantly differ between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Before inserting an implant in the anterior-inferior area, the angle between the drill guide and the glenoid surface in the oblique coronal plane view should be carefully checked to ensure that the length of the hole inside the glenoid bone is adequate.

A bizarre complication of shoulder arthroscopy

A case is presented of an unusual complication of shoulder arthroscopy, which was caused by incorrect location of the posterior portal, inducing neurapraxia of both the axillary and radial nerves, with significant clinical and functional sequelae. A subsequent open surgical neurolysis was required to restore normal nerve function. This type of lesion has not been reported previously. Level of evidence V.

Factors affecting capsular volume changes and association with outcomes after Bankart repair and capsular shift

BACKGROUND

Capsular laxity is a main contributing factor in recurrent shoulder instability and is suggested to be correlated with increased capsular volume. Arthroscopic capsular shift combined with Bankart repair can reduce the capsular volume and reinforce the redundant capsule; however, as the capsuloligamentous structure has viscoelastic properties, it is possible for the shifted and tensioned capsule of the glenohumeral joint to slowly stretch out again over time, resulting in an increase in capsular volume.

PURPOSE

To analyze changes in capsular volume of the glenohumeral joint over time after arthroscopic Bankart repair and capsular shift, the factors associated with these changes, and their relevance to outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

Included in this study were 105 patients (mean age, 25.8 ± 8.2 years) who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair and capsular shift for anterior shoulder instability and computed tomography arthrography (CTA) at 3 months and 1 year postoperatively and whose various functional outcomes were evaluated preoperatively and at the last follow-up (>12 months). Among these patients, 27 also had preoperative CTA. These 27 patients were used to make comparisons between preoperative and 3-month postoperative CTA measurements, and all 105 patients were used for all other comparisons. Two raters measured the separate anterior and posterior capsular volume and cross-sectional area at the 5-o'clock position using 3-dimensional (3D) Slicer software. These measurements were subsequently adjusted for each glenoid size. The changes in capsular volume and cross-sectional area at the 5-o'clock position over time, the factors related to higher change in anterior capsular volume, and their correlation with outcomes were evaluated.

RESULTS

Three months postoperatively, the total and anterior capsular volume and anterior cross-sectional area significantly decreased; however, these values increased again at 1 year postoperatively (all P < .01). The inter- and intraobserver reliabilities of the measurements were excellent (interclass correlation coefficient = 0.717-0.945). Female sex, being an elite athlete, and more dislocations before surgery were related to a higher increase in anterior capsular volume at 1 year (all P < .05). Eight patients had redislocation, and 18 exhibited positive apprehension test postoperatively, and these patients showed significantly higher increases in anterior and total capsular volume at 1 year than did those without redislocation or positive apprehension sign (all P < .01). However, with the exception of Rowe score, a higher increase in anterior capsular volume was not related to functional outcome measures.

CONCLUSION

Surgeons should be aware of the re-increase in anterior capsular volume or restretching trait of the anterior capsule over time, even after successful arthroscopic Bankart repair and capsular shift. In this study, women, elite athletes, and those with frequent dislocations were at high risk of capsular restretching. An increase in capsular volume was related to redislocation and positive apprehension sign as well as with Rowe score.

Trans-subscapularis portal versus low-anterior portal for low anchor placement on the inferior glenoid fossa: a cadaveric shoulder study with computed tomographic analysis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of inserting a glenoid anchor at the 5:30 clockface position using a trans-subscapularis (TSS) portal versus a low anterior (LA) portal.

METHODS

Five surgeons (T.D., J.C., C.V., D.J.O-H., J.S.T.) placed a single anchor in 20 fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders. In each of 2 shoulders, surgeons used an LA portal to insert the anchor, whereas in 2 shoulders a TSS portal was used. Surgeons were directed to place the anchor at the 5:30 position at an angle 45° to the glenoid surface (axial plane) and passing perpendicular to the glenoid rim in the coronal plane. Shoulders were then dissected and computed tomographic (CT) scans obtained. Anchor position relative to the clockface was documented by 2 blinded assessors, as was the angle of insertion in the axial and coronal planes. Statistical significance was calculated with a Student t test for paired samples (confidence interval [CI], 95%; significance, P < .05).

RESULTS

The average deviation from the 5:30 position was 48 minutes (standard deviation [SD], 31 minutes) for the LA portal (average position, 4:42 o'clock) versus 28.5 minutes (SD, 19 minutes) for the TSS group (average position, 5:02 o'clock) (P = .15). The average angle of anchor insertion in the axial plane was 67.2° (SD, 19°) for the LA portal versus 62.8° (SD, 14°) for the TSS portal (P = .49), whereas the average angle of insertion in the coronal plane was 31.3° (SD, 14°) of inferior angulation in the LA group and 14.3° (SD, 8°) of inferior angulation in the TSS group (P = .009). Of the anchors inserted, 9 of 20 (45%) showed evidence of far-cortical perforation. No difference in cortical perforation was seen between the 2 portals, with perforation more likely with anchors inserted greater than 45° in the axial plane (8 of 20) than with those inserted less than 45° (1 of 20) (P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a TSS portal improves the angle of approach to the inferior glenoid rim in comparison with an LA portal, reducing the acuity of the angle of insertion in the coronal plane.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The TSS portal is an option for surgeons performing arthroscopic Bankart repair using anchors low on the glenoid rim.

Multidirectional instability of the shoulder: biomechanics, clinical presentation, and treatment strategies

Multidirectional instability (MDI) of the shoulder is a condition where the dislocation occurs in more than one direction with minimal or no causative trauma. Its pathoanatomy is complex and characterized by a redundant capsule, resulting in increased glenohumeral joint volume. The fact that several further factors may contribute to symptom onset complicates the diagnosis and hampers the identification of a therapeutic approach suitable for all cases. There is general agreement that the initial treatment should be conservative and that surgery should be reserved for patients who have not responded to an ad hoc rehabilitation program. We review the biomechanics, clinical presentation, and treatment strategies of shoulder MDI.

Outcomes of arthroscopic Hill-Sachs remplissage and anterior Bankart repair: a retrospective controlled study including ultrasound evaluation of posterior capsulotenodesis and infraspinatus strength assessment

BACKGROUND

Hill-Sachs lesions are compression fractures that result from shoulder dislocation. They involve "engaging" the humeral head on the anterior glenoid rim when the arm is abducted and externally rotated. The defect grows as the number of dislocations increases.

HYPOTHESIS

Arthroscopic remplissage and anterior Bankart repair do not significantly affect infraspinatus strength while ensuring healing of the capsulotenodesis.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Sixty-one patients with traumatic anterior shoulder instability treated by arthroscopic Bankart repair and Hill-Sachs remplissage at least 24 months previously were compared with a control group of 40 healthy participants. Preoperative imaging included magnetic resonance imaging for Bankart lesion identification and computed tomography to quantify the humeral head defect. Active range of motion and clinical scores (Walch-Duplay, Constant-Murley, and Rowe) were assessed. External rotation (ER) and internal rotation (IR) were measured with arm at the side (ER1 and IR1) and abducted at 90° (ER2 and IR2). Infraspinatus strength was assessed with the scapula free (infraspinatus strength test [IST]) and retracted (infraspinatus scapula retraction test [ISRT]). Infraspinatus tenodesis and posterior capsulodesis healing were evaluated by ultrasound (US).

RESULTS

The follow-up median was 39.5 months (range, 24-56 months). One patient experienced a recurrence of instability at 34 months. In the remplissage patients, ER1 was significantly lower in the affected compared with the unaffected shoulder (P < .001). Mean IST and ISRT strength values did not show differences between sides. The mean Constant-Murley score rose from 62.9 ± 7.1 to 90 ± 5.2 (P < .0001). The Walch-Duplay and Rowe scores were excellent in 23 (78.6%), good in 6 (17.8%), and poor in 1 patient (both scores). The remplissage group had significantly lower ER1 (P < .001), ER2 (P < .001), and IR2 (P < .01) values compared with the control group. Differences in IST and ISRT between the groups were not significant. Capsulotenodesis healing and filling of the Hill-Sachs defect were confirmed by dynamic US in all subjects.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic remplissage is a reliable approach to Hill-Sachs lesions. The ER and IR restriction does not significantly affect quality of life. Infraspinatus strength recovery is satisfactory even compared with healthy subjects. Ultrasound examination allows accurate evaluation of capsulotenodesis healing.

Arthroscopic bankart repair: accessory posterior portal with slotted cannula for lowest capsulolabral access

We present a novel technique for safe establishment of the accessory posterior portal using a slotted cannula. Arthroscopic Bankart repair is a common procedure. A variety of arthroscopic techniques have been described in the literature, commonly using the posterior portal for visualization and the anterior portal with a working cannula. The accessory posterior portal enables elegant access to the lower part of the capsulolabral junction, a firmer grasp and mobilization of the tissue, quick and easy tool exchange using a slotted cannula, and clearer suture placement because of the flat, direct working angle. The skin incision is made small without the need for an arthroscopic cannula, and the portal location is in a relatively safe zone. The use of the accessory posterior portal along with a slotted cannula shortens the duration of the operative procedure and improves safety and performance.

Morphological Characteristics of the Repaired Labrum According to Glenoid Location and Its Clinical Relevance After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair: Postoperative Evaluation With Computed Tomography Arthrography

BACKGROUND

There have been no studies on the postoperative morphological characteristics of the restored labrum at different glenoid locations and its clinical relevance after arthroscopic Bankart repair with suture anchors.

PURPOSE

To analyze the morphological characteristics of the restored labrum at different locations of the glenoid and their relevance to clinical outcomes as well as affecting factors and to trace the inserted suture anchors after arthroscopic Bankart repair using computed tomography arthrography (CTA).

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

A total of 46 patients (mean age, 26.5 ± 6.8 years) who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair with absorbable suture anchors were enrolled in this study. Patients underwent CTA preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively as well as functional outcome evaluation preoperatively and at the last follow-up (>24 months) with the Rowe score and visual analog scale for pain. Labral height and width were measured on conventional axial CTA images at the 3-, 4-, and 5-o'clock positions twice by 2 raters. The postoperative measurements were also compared with those of the healthy anterior labrum, acquired from the same CTA examination of 32 consecutive patients (mean age, 26.5 ± 8.5 years) with superior labral lesions in the same study period. The postoperative difference in the measurements and between clock positions, and the relationship between the measurements and the clinical factors and functional outcomes, were evaluated. In addition, the locations of all suture anchors were traced on each CTA image, and outcomes according to the locations of the most inferior suture anchors were assessed.

RESULTS

The interobserver and intraobserver reliabilities of measurements at each location were excellent (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.773-0.988). Of the 46 patients, 2 (4.35%) had redislocations after surgery. Postoperative labral height and width were significantly increased at all locations (all P < .001) up to a level similar to the healthy anterior labrum, with significantly larger values at the inferior location compared with the superior location (all P < .05). Patients who had a greater frequency of dislocations before surgery showed a lower postoperative labral height at the 5-o'clock position (P = .012), and this correlated with postoperative instability and poor functional outcomes by the Rowe score (P = .036). In most patients (41/46; 89.1%), the tips of the lowest suture anchors perforated the far cortex, and these anchors were mostly located below the 5-o'clock position (32/41; 78.0%). However, perforation of the far cortex did not affect functional outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Surgeons should be cautious of restoring labral height at the inferior glenoid location for successful arthroscopic Bankart repair. In addition, attention should be given to inserting the lowest suture anchor regardless of clinical significance.

The low-anterolateral portal for arthroscopic biceps tenodesis: description of technique and cadaveric study

PURPOSE

Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis surgery is an important procedure for the correction of biceps tendonitis or in conjunction with rotator cuff repair with biceps symptoms. Recent trends have developed in placing the biceps tendon lower in the bicipital groove for a tenodesis. However, a more distal biceps tenodesis location is technically challenging when carried out arthroscopically with standard posterior and lateral portals. We aimed to establish the safety of a low-anterolateral portal location for direct access to the lowest aspect of the bicipital groove.

METHODS

An anatomical study design was used to examine portal to neurovascular structural measurements in 23 cadaveric shoulders. These shoulders had undergone low-anterolateral portal placement over the inferior most aspect of the bicipital groove as determined by palpation and direct arthroscopic visualization. No arthroscopic irrigation was performed. Following this, the shoulders underwent open dissection with the cannula in place to evaluate for any potential damage to any portion of the axillary nerve.

RESULTS

All of the resultant portals in this study provided direct access to the inferior most aspect of the bicipital groove, and the dissection revealed that the portal was touching a small distal axillary nerve branch on the undersurface of the anterior deltoid in nearly half of the shoulders.

CONCLUSIONS

The placement of a low-anterolateral portal for arthroscopic biceps tenodesis at the distal bicipital groove does not produce significant neurovascular damage; the portal trajectory comes close to distal anterior branches of the axillary nerve. Given these findings, this portal should be placed bluntly to best protect these underlying neurovascular structures.

Indirect ultrasound guidance increased accuracy of the glenohumeral injection using the superior approach: a cadaveric study of injection accuracy

Objective

To investigate whether or not indirect ultrasound guidance could increase the accuracy of the glenohumeral joint injection using the superior approach.

Methods

Twelve shoulders from 7 adult cadavers were anatomically dissected after a dye injection had been performed, while the cadavers were in the supine position. Before the injection, a clinician determined the injection point using the ultrasound and the more internal axial arm rotation was compared to how it was positioned in a previous study. Injection confidence scores and injection accuracy scores were rated.

Results

The clinician's confidence score was high in 92% (11 of 12 shoulders) and the injection accuracy scores were 100% (12 of 12 shoulders). The long heads of the biceps tendons were not penetrated.

Conclusion

Indirect ultrasound guidance and positioning shoulder adducted at 10° and internally rotated at 60°-70° during the superior glenohumeral joint injection would be an effective method to avoid damage to the long head of biceps tendons and to produce a highly accurate injection.

Glenoid bone loss: assessment with MR imaging

PURPOSE

To investigate the agreement among magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, computed tomography (CT), and arthroscopy in the measurement of glenoid bone loss.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was approved by the institutional ethics committee. One hundred seventy-six patients (158 male and 18 female patients; mean age, 26.8 years ± 12.3) with anterior shoulder dislocation underwent both shoulder MR imaging and CT examination. Anterior straight line length, glenoid width, and best-fit bone loss were measured with MR imaging and CT. Sixty-five patients also underwent arthroscopy, which was used as the standard of reference. Assessment of glenoid bone loss at MR imaging was compared with that at CT and arthroscopy. Inter- and intrareader reproducibility of MR imaging-derived measurements of glenoid bone loss was evaluated.

RESULTS

There was excellent correlation between CT and MR imaging with regard to anterior straight line length (r = 0.97, P < .0001), glenoid width (r = 0.95, P < .0001), and severity of glenoid bone loss-particularly with use of best-fit circle width (r = 0.83, P < .0001) rather than best-fit circle area (r = 0.82, P < .0001). In the assessment of glenoid bone loss, the correlation between CT and arthroscopy (r = 0.91, P < .0001) was marginally better than that between MR imaging and arthroscopy (r = 0.84, P < .0001). The inter- and intrareader correlations of MR imaging-derived measurements of glenoid bone loss were excellent (R = 0.90-0.95).

CONCLUSION

MR imaging assessment of glenoid bone loss, particularly with use of glenoid width, is almost as accurate as CT assessment.

Four-quadrant approach to capsulolabral repair: an arthroscopic road map to the glenoid

Advancing technology, improved instrumentation, and a desire to address intra-articular pathology with a minimally invasive approach have driven the expansion of arthroscopic shoulder surgery in the past 2 decades. Proponents cite greatly improved visualization, lack of the need to perform a capsulotomy, fewer subscapularis issues postoperatively, and improved access to the entire glenohumeral joint. Our understanding and recognition of glenohumeral joint pathology have improved, and our ability to appropriately treat it has also improved. Aside from the anteroinferior and superior capsulolabral injury, orthopaedic surgeons have encountered and are able to address combined lesions, posterior labral tears, 270 degrees to 360 degrees labral tears, capsular laxity, humeral avulsion of the glenohumeral ligaments, associated glenoid or humeral bone loss, and partial-thickness rotator cuff tears. To adequately address the extent of pathology encountered in a shoulder instability case, access to the inferior, posteroinferior, and posterior aspects is necessary. In this technical article we present a simplified approach using safe access points by dividing the glenohumeral joint into 4 quadrants that allows for ease of instrumentation and implant placement. This will provide a blueprint for the treatment of capsulolabral injuries. In addition to portal selection and location, we will discuss several instruments we believe are advantageous in tissue manipulation and suture management.

Perianchor radiolucency after knotless anchor repair for shoulder instability: correlation with clinical results of 69 cases

BACKGROUND

Although there would seem to be a logical relationship between radiolucency around the suture anchor and clinical result in Bankart repair, the correlation has not been demonstrated so far.

HYPOTHESIS

Knotless suture anchor is a viable alternative for arthroscopic Bankart repair, but postoperative radiologic findings of radiolucency around anchors are correlated with poor clinical results.

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

Sixty-nine consecutive patients with Bankart lesions were treated with arthroscopic reconstruction using knotless metal suture anchors. The mean follow-up was 40 months. Clinical and radiologic analysis was performed retrospectively. A new concept of perianchor radiolucency was introduced and, according to this radiologic finding, patients were divided into 2 subgroups: the perianchor radiolucency group and those who did not reveal perianchor radiolucency. The perianchor radiolucency group was further subdivided by shape and location. "Root type" was defined as a radiolucent halo at the root of the anchor, and perianchor radiolucency without any root halo was named "branch type." Location of perianchor radiolucency was described as above or below the equator of the glenoid.

RESULTS

After operation, the mean Rowe score increased to 93.8 from 43.1, and computed tomography arthrogram showed a 97% healing rate. Reoperations were performed due to 1 case of redislocation and 2 cases of anchor arthropathy. All these reoperated cases revealed perianchor radiolucency before reoperation. Other than reoperated cases, 2 patients showed apprehension at final evaluation. The perianchor radiolucency group had a significantly lower Rowe scores than the group that showed no perianchor radiolucency. Some of the patients in the perianchor radiolucency group had peculiar radiologic findings frequently associated with complications. The radiologic findings that consisted of root-type perianchor radiolucency located below the equator of the glenoid was termed the "ominous sign." Osteophytes of the humeral head together with the ominous sign is considered a warning sign of forthcoming progression of anchor arthropathy, and the authors suggest early surgical intervention with these findings.

CONCLUSION

After Bankart repair using knotless suture anchor, the ominous sign might be an important warning sign for possible forthcoming complications including redislocation, anchor arthropathy, and residual instability.

The surgical outcome of immediate arthroscopic Bankart repair for first time anterior shoulder dislocation in young active patients

This study evaluated the surgical outcomes of young active patients with arthroscopic Bankart repair within 1 month after first-time anterior shoulder dislocation. From July 2002-October 2004, patients presented with first-time traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation and treated with arthroscopic stabilization within 1 month of injury were retrospectively reviewed. Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography were performed before the operation in all cases. Cases with contralateral shoulder multidirectional instability or glenoid bone loss of more than 30% on preoperative computed tomography on the injury side were excluded. All patients were treated with arthroscopic Bankart repair, using metallic suture anchors or soft tissue bio-absorbable anchors by a same group of surgeons and followed the same rehabilitation protocol. Recurrence, instability signs, range of motion, WOSI score, Rowe score and complications were assessed. Thirty-eight patients were recruited: the average age was 21 (16-30). All patients had definite trauma history. Radiologically, all patients had Bankart/Hill-Sachs lesion. All the operations were done within 1 month after injury (6-25 days). The average hospital stay was 1.2 days (1-5 days). The average follow-up was 28 months (24-48 months). There were two cases of posttraumatic re-dislocation (5.2%). The average external rotation lag was 5 degrees (0-15) in 90 degrees shoulder abduction when compared with contralateral side. 95% of patients had excellent or good Rowe score. The average WOSI score was 83%. There was one case of transient ulnar nerve palsy and one case of superficial wound infection. This study concluded that immediate arthroscopic Bankart repair with an accelerated rehabilitation program is an effective and safe technique for treating young active patients with first-time traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation.

Anatomic risks of shoulder arthroscopy portals: anatomic cadaveric study of 12 portals

PURPOSE

The purpose of this anatomic cadaveric study was to determine with trocars in situ the relationships of 12 shoulder arthroscopic portals frequently used with the adjacent musculotendinous and neurovascular structures.

METHODS

Twelve shoulders of embalmed cadavers installed in a beach-chair position were dissected. Twelve different portals were established by using their authors' description: posterior "soft point," central posterior, anterior central, anterior inferior, anterior superior, 5 o'clock portal, Neviaser, superolateral, transrotator cuff approach, Port of Wilmington, anterolateral, and posterolateral. Six of these portals were placed on each shoulder so that each portal was studied 6 times. Dissections were conduced with trocars in situ to take into account their volume. The distance to the adjacent relevant neurovascular structures at risk (axillar and suprascapular nerves, axillar and suprascapular arteries, and cephalic vein) were measured, arm at side, by using a calliper. Musculotendinous structures crossed by portals were noticed.

RESULTS

The cephalic vein was injured twice by anterior portals. The 5 o'clock portal is at most risk of neurovascular injury. It is located at mean distances to the axillar artery and nerve of 13 and 15 mm, respectively. Other anterior, posterior, superior, and lateral portals are safe with mean distances higher than 20 mm. No musculotendinous rupture nor large injury occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study shows that the trocars placement of the studied portals did not create, except for the cephalic vein, any lesion of the neurovascular adjacent structures.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study suggests, except for the 5 o'clock portal, the safety of the shoulder arthroscopic portals tested regarding to the neurovascular adjacent structures.

A comparison of risk between the lateral decubitus and the beach-chair position when establishing an anteroinferior shoulder portal: a cadaveric study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess, using a technique that minimally distorts the normal anatomy, the risk of injury when establishing a 5 o'clock shoulder portal in the lateral decubitus versus beach-chair position.

METHODS

The anteroinferior portal was simulated with Kirschner wires (K-w) drilled orthogonally at the 5 o'clock position in 13 fresh frozen human cadaveric shoulders. The neighboring neurovascular structures were identified through an anteroinferior window made in the inferior glenohumeral ligament. Their relations to the K-w and surrounding structures were recorded in both positions.

RESULTS

The median distance from the musculocutaneous nerve to the K-w was shorter in the lateral decubitus position than in the beach chair position (13.16 mm v 20.49 mm, P = .011). The cephalic vein was closer to the portal in the beach-chair position than in the lateral decubitus position (median 8.48 mm v 9.93 mm, P = .039). The axillary nerve was closer to the K-w in the lateral decubitus position than in the beach-chair position (median 21.15 mm v 25.54 mm, P = .03). No differences in the distances from the K-w to the subscapular and anterior circumflex arteries were found when comparing both positions. The mean percentage of subscapular muscle height from its superior border to the K-w was 53.03%.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed the risk of injury establishing a transubscapular portal in either position. The musculocutaneous nerve and the cephalic vein are the most prone to injury. In general, the beach-chair position proved to be safer.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Inserting anchor devices orthogonally would permit stronger fixation but presents the risk of damaging neurovascular structures. This study focused on showing the neurovascular risk of performing full orthogonal insertion. Considering the good results reported with the usual superior-anterior portals, we do not recommend performing a transubscapular portal in routine shoulder arthroscopy.

The accessory posteromedial portal revisited: utility for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is a technically challenging procedure. Accessory arthroscopic portals have been described that allow for optimal suture anchor placement, suture management, and knot tying. We describe here the usefulness of an accessory posteromedial portal that facilitates direct suture retrieval through the posterior aspect of a rotator cuff tear. This portal is created approximately 4 to 5 cm medial to the posterolateral corner of the acromion and 2 cm inferior to the scapular spine. The accessory posteromedial portal is especially useful when a retracted tear of the infraspinatus or teres minor is encountered. Because these tendons retract in a posterior and medial direction, the accessory posteromedial portal places the tendon-penetrating device in an ideal position for suture passage through the posterior portion of the rotator cuff tear. This portal also allows placement of margin convergence sutures for large U-shaped or L-shaped tears by permitting a direct "hand-off" of the suture to or from a second penetrating device that is placed through a standard anterior portal. If multiple suture anchors are required (as in the case of large or massive cuff tears, or when double-row fixation is employed), sutures can be pulled out through the accessory posteromedial portal to facilitate suture management.

Arthroscopic treatment of anterior shoulder instability using knotless suture anchors

PURPOSE

In this study, we evaluated the results of arthroscopic stabilization of the shoulder using knotless anchors and the lesions associated with anterior-inferior labrum avulsion.

TYPE OF STUDY

Retrospective clinical study.

METHODS

Twenty consecutive patients affected with anterior unidirectional post-traumatic shoulder instability were treated with arthroscopic reconstruction using knotless anchors. During the surgical procedure, associated lesions such as superior labrum anterior posterior (SLAP) (15%) and rotator interval (15%) were repaired. The patients were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 43 months.

RESULTS

Eighty percent of patients resumed sports activity without any limitation and 90% of patients were satisfied with the results of surgery. One patient (5%) had a recurrent dislocation; this patient resumed a contact sport activity despite medical advice. One patient (5%) related signs of shoulder insecurity at the extreme degree of abduction and external rotation; this patient had resumed sports activity with a moderate limitation and was the only patient who was not completely satisfied with the results of surgery. No significant difference was observed between the operated and the contralateral shoulder according to the Rowe and Constant scores. The mean loss of external rotation was 3 degrees . We did not have any cases of anchor loosening, nor did we find signs of shoulder degenerative osteoarthritis on the radiographs.

CONCLUSIONS

The knotless anchor seems to be a viable alternative for arthroscopic labrum repair, allowing a good capsular shift. Arthroscopic management of shoulder instability allows us to diagnose and treat associated lesions, thus improving the success rate of this type of surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series.

Glenohumeral arthroscopy portals established using an outside-in technique: neurovascular anatomy at risk

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to examine the neurovascular structures at risk during placement of glenohumeral arthroscopy portals using an outside-in technique.

TYPE OF STUDY

Anatomic cadaveric study.

METHODS

Five fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens were used in this study. Each shoulder was mounted on a custom-designed apparatus allowing shoulder arthroscopy in a lateral decubitus position. The following portals were established using an outside-in technique and marked using an 18-gauge spinal needle: posterior, posterolateral, anterior, 5-o'clock, anterosuperolateral, and Port of Wilmington. Each specimen was carefully dissected after the procedure, and the distance from each portal site to the adjacent relevant neurovascular structures (axillary nerve, musculocutaneous nerve, lateral cord of the brachial plexus, cephalic vein, and axillary artery) was measured using a precision caliper.

RESULTS

Except for the cephalic vein, all of the neurovascular structures were more than 20 mm away from all the portals evaluated. When creating either an anterior portal or a 5-o'clock position portal, the mean distance from the portal to the cephalic vein was 18.8 mm and 9.8 mm, respectively. In one anterior portal, a direct injury to the cephalic vein occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that shoulder arthroscopy portals placed in an outside-in fashion are unlikely to produce neurologic injury. However, the cephalic vein is at risk during placement of an anterior or 5-o'clock position portal, although probably with minimal subsequent patient morbidity. Placing portals in an outside-in fashion guarantees the correct angle of approach, with minimal risk to adjacent neurologic structures.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study shows the safety of standard and accessory glenohumeral arthroscopy portals.

Arthroscopic rotator interval repair: the three-step all-inside technique

Many clinical reports have emphasized the importance of rotator interval lesions in patients with glenohumeral instability, and many investigators have described open repair techniques, either as a supplement to other capsule reconstruction or as an isolated procedure. In this article, an original arthroscopic technique for rotator interval closure is described. This technique allows the operator to accurately manage the degree of tightening of the rotator interval, the knot tying, and the suture cutting, under direct intra-articular arthroscopic vision.

The new subclavian portal and modified Neviaser portal for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

Shoulder arthroscopy and the introduction of suture anchors has provided the surgeon with the ability to repair rotator cuff tears through minimal incisions. Rotator cuff repair involves the use of several portals, such as the posterior portal, the anterior portal, the anterior superior portal, the anterior inferior portal, and the Neviaser portal. The authors have developed 2 additional portals, the new Subclavian portal and the modified Neviaser portal, to improve the safety and efficacy of rotator cuff repair and solve a number of problems associated with traditional repair techniques. The subclavian portal is located directly below the clavicle, 1 to 2 cm from the acromioclavicular joint, and instruments are aimed medial to lateral. The modified Neviaser portal changes the angle of insertion of the Neviaser portal. Instruments are aimed 20 degrees from the horizontal plane and 45 degrees anterior, directly at the suture anchor. Repair techniques using each portal were reviewed. Twenty cadaveric shoulders were dissected for each portal and the anatomy from each portal was documented. The cadaveric dissections showed that this portal passes greater than 6 cm from the brachial plexus, musculocutaneous nerve, and subclavian artery and vein, and 4.7 cm from the cephalic vein. The modified Neviaser portal was shown to be safer than the Neviaser portal because it passes on top of the supraspinatous muscle, thereby protecting the suprascapular nerve. These portals provide an optimal angle of approach to the rotator cuff tendon and suture anchor as well as improved safety and efficacy in the repair of rotator cuff tears.

Arthroscopic repair of anterior glenohumeral instability and rotator interval lesions

As the techniques and instrumentation for shoulder arthroscopy continue to improve and evolve, its role in the treatment of anterior shoulder instability progresses also. With more surgeons becoming familiar with these advancements and techniques, arthroscopic stabilization results continue to improve and help arthroscopy become the "preferred method" for the treatment of shoulder instability. Adjunct procedures such as closure of the rotator interval also are helping to improve our arthroscopic results and are an important improvement in our understanding of the pathoanatomy of shoulder instability repairs.

Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis: a new technique using bioabsorbable interference screw fixation

PURPOSE

To report a new technique of arthroscopic biceps tenodesis using bioabsorbable interference screw fixation and the early results.

TYPE OF STUDY

Prospective, nonrandomized study.

METHODS

TECHNIQUE

The principle of arthroscopic biceps tenodesis is simple: after biceps tenotomy, the tendon is exteriorized and doubled on a suture; the biceps tendon is then pulled into a humeral socket (7 or 8 mm x 25 mm) drilled at the top of the bicipital groove, and fixed using a bioabsorbable interference screw (8 or 9 mm x 25 mm) under arthroscopic control.

PATIENTS

43 patients treated with this technique between 1997 and 1999 were followed-up for at least 1 year. The technique was indicated in 3 clinical situations: (1) with arthroscopic cuff repair (3 cases), (2) in case of isolated pathology of the biceps tendon with an intact cuff (6 cases), and (3) as an alternative to biceps tenotomy in patients with massive, degenerative and irreparable cuff tears (34 cases). The biceps pathology was tenosynovitis (4 cases), prerupture (15 cases), subluxation (11 cases), and luxation (13 cases).

RESULTS

The absolute Constant score improved from 43 points preoperatively to 79 points at review (P <.005). There was no loss of elbow movement and biceps strength was 90% of the strength of the other side. Two patients, operated on early in the series, presented with a rupture of the tenodesis. In both cases the bicipital tendon was very friable and the diameter of the screw proved to be insufficient (7 mm). No neurologic or vascular complications occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis using bioabsorbable screw fixation is technically possible and gives good clinical results. This technique can be used in cases of isolated pathologic biceps tendon or a cuff tear. A very thin, fragile, almost ruptured biceps tendon is the technical limit of this arthroscopic technique.

An arthroscopic technique for confirming intra-articular subluxation of the long head of the biceps tendon: the ramp test

The purpose of this technical note is to introduce the ramp test and explain this arthroscopic technique. The ramp test is used to test the integrity of the soft tissue restraint to intra-articular subluxation of the long head of the biceps tendon. Injury to the soft tissue restraint, the hidden lesion, has been proposed as occurring in conjunction with a full-thickness rotator cuff tear. Both cadaveric dissections and arthroscopic patient assessments were conducted to develop the ramp test. In this study, 17 patients also presented with refractory anterior shoulder pain and underwent arthroscopy to further characterize the ramp test. An abnormal examination result showed that the long head of the biceps tendon translated medially and inferiorly across the humeral head. In addition, this subgroup of 17 patients all had an abnormal ramp test but did not have a full-thickness rotator cuff tear. The ramp test is now applied to all arthroscopic procedures by the senior author, and we recommend its use for arthroscopic confirmation of intra-articular subluxation of the long head of the biceps tendon. Thus, we advocate that an abnormal ramp test result indicates pathology and warrants the surgical removal of the long head of the biceps tendon from the glenohumeral joint.

Differential arthroscopic portal placement for rotator cuff repair

We report an effective technique of arthroscopic portal placement for rotator cuff repair of the shoulder. The differential portals are placed depending on the location of the tear. After the glenohumeral arthroscopic examination, the subacromial bursoscopy is performed through the same posterior skin portal. With the rotator cuff tear in view, a spinal needle is inserted to the center of the tear, 3 cm from the lateral margin of the acromion (middle working portal). Another spinal needle is then inserted into the posterior lip of the tear, 1 cm from the lateral margin of the acromion (rear viewing portal). The rear viewing portal provides a good downward en-face view of the tear, and the middle working portal allows better access to the anterior and posterior margins of the cuff tear than the usual posterior and lateral portals do. This differential portal placement with respect to the location of the rotator cuff tear ensures superior access for arthroscopic repair of rotator cuff tears.

The 7-o'clock posteroinferior portal for shoulder arthroscopy

BACKGROUND

Access to the inferior glenohumeral joint of the shoulder is very limited through the traditional 2- or 3-o'clock anterior portals.

HYPOTHESIS

The 7-o'clock posteroinferior portal offers an excellent alternative approach.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive anatomic study.

METHODS

Six paired cadaveric shoulders were used to arthroscopically develop and test a 7-o'clock posteroinferior portal. The distances between the portal and the subscapular and axillary nerves were measured with the arm in six different positions, combining flexion, extension, abduction, and adduction.

RESULTS

The distance from the 7-o'clock posteroinferior portal to the axillary nerve was 39 +/- 4 mm and to the suprascapular nerve was 28 +/- 2 mm. There was no statistically significant nerve-to-portal differential distance when the arm was placed in flexion, extension, abduction, or adduction. The inside-to-outside technique produced a 7-o'clock posteroinferior portal approximately 5 mm further from both the axillary and suprascapular nerves than did the outside-to-inside method. The angle of divergence from the 7-o'clock posterior portal skin incision to the axillary nerve was 47 degrees and to the suprascapular nerve was 33 degrees.

CONCLUSIONS

The 7-o'clock portal affords safe, direct working access to the inferior capsular recess of the glenohumeral joint.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The 7-o'clock portal is a safe and effective technique for use by shoulder surgeons.

The posterolateral portal: A new approach for shoulder arthroscopy

Since the beginning of shoulder arthroscopy, many different approaches were described for Bankart repair to allow visualization and treatment. The anterior portals do not allow access to the posterior and inferior part of the glenoid. We present a new instrumental portal for shoulder arthroscopy. This approach is perfectly safe, without any anatomic risk. It is particularly helpful in the correct treatment of an anterior Bankart lesion, in repairing posterior and inferior extensions of a Bankart lesion, and in performing a plication in multidirectional hyperlaxity.

The accessory posterior portal for shoulder arthroscopy: Description of technique and cadaveric study

As the indications for shoulder arthroscopy continue to expand, so too does the need for complete access to the glenohumeral joint. Specific regions of the joint, including the axillary recess, are often times difficult to access using traditionally described posterior and anterior portals. In this article, we describe a technique for the placement of an accessory posterior portal into the inferior hemisphere of the glenohumeral joint, effectively in the 8 o'clock or 4 o'clock position. To demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of this portal, 6 cadaveric specimens were dissected after the placement of a standard and accessory posterior portal. The proximity of the posterior portals to the axillary and suprascapular nerves was analyzed. Measurements were made in simulated beach-chair and lateral decubitus positions. The authors show that the accessory posterior portal is safe to use and may prove useful to the surgeon who wishes to gain access to the inferior recesses of the glenohumeral joint.

The low anterior five-o'clock portal during arthroscopic shoulder surgery performed in the beach-chair position

We evaluated the difficulty, accuracy, and safety of establishing a low anterior 5-o'clock portal for anterior capsulolabral repair in patients positioned in the beach-chair position during shoulder arthroscopy. An initial 5-o'clock portal was created using an inside-out technique as described by Davidson and Tibone. During establishment of the portal, significant force was required to lever the humeral head laterally, and chondral indentations were noted in several specimens. Because of the difficulty noted establishing the 5-o'clock portal using an inside-out technique, we attempted to establish a 5-o'clock anterior portal using an outside-in technique. Seven fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders underwent shoulder arthroscopy in the beach-chair position. After the establishment of a 3-o'clock portal, a specially constructed guide was used to place a pin at the 5-o'clock position. The distances of the pins from the cephalic vein and the musculocutaneous and axillary nerves were recorded. The bottom (5-o'clock position) and top (3-o'clock position) pins varied from 12 to 20 mm from the musculocutaneous and axillary nerves. The bottom pin was located within 2 mm of the cephalic vein and varied from medial to lateral in different specimens. We do not recommend the use of a 5-o'clock portal using an inside-out or outside-in technique for patients positioned in the beach-chair position during shoulder arthroscopy because of the potential for cephalic vein or articular cartilage injury.

Biomechanics of the Bankart repair: the relationship between glenohumeral translation and labral fixation site

The specific aim of this study was to quantify glenohumeral translations in cadaveric shoulders after repair of the superior and middle regions of a surgically created Bankart lesion and after repair of the superior, middle, and inferior regions of the same lesion. Anterior-posterior, superior-inferior, and medial-lateral translations in nine cadaveric specimens were tested with shoulders in 0 degree, 45 degrees, and 90 degrees of humeral abduction and varying degrees of humeral rotation. There was statistically significantly less anterior and inferior translation after three-site labral repair compared with after two-site labral repair, and this effect was greatest at 90 degrees of glenohumeral abduction. The decreased translations demonstrated with three-site repair emphasized the importance of careful repair of the labrum to the inferior glenoid rim during a Bankart reconstruction and suggested that failure to do so may be a contributing factor to recurrent instability after anterior shoulder reconstruction.

The antero-inferior (transmuscular) approach for arthroscopic repair of the Bankart lesion: an anatomic and clinical study

In order to find a direct approach to the antero-inferior third of the glenoid rim, an anatomic study was performed on a total of 89 shoulders (48 cadavers). To obtain defined reference points for the anterior inferior third of the glenoid cavity, it was compared with the hour markings on a clock face. The 4:30 position on the right shoulder and the 7:30 position on the left shoulder were defined as the relevant reference points. The average distance between the palpable end of the coracoid process and the 4:30 and 7:30 positions was 19 mm. The average distance to the point of intersection of the musculocutaneous nerve with the medial margin of the conjoined tendon was more than 5 cm, and was never less than 2 cm. The average distance of the axillary nerve from the 4:30 position was 2.5 cm in the horizontal plane, with a minimum of 1.5 cm. Radially, the average distance of the axillary nerve was 1.7 cm, with a minimum of 1.3 cm. The anatomic study was followed by a clinical study of 264 patients. An antero-inferior portal located maximum 2 cm distal from the palpable coracoid tip was selected for the introduction of a trocar sheath and blunt trocar, passing through the subscapularis muscle to access the antero-inferior area of the glenoid rim. As additional protection for the musculocutaneous nerve, the direction of the trocar was adjusted during introduction. Reattachment of the labrum-capsule complex was performed extra-articularly. In all cases, at least one implant was located inferior to the 4:30 or 7:30 position. No neurovascular complications arose out of the choice of portal. Out of the 264 patients, the first 100 shoulders (98 patients) were followed-up after an average time of 35 months (18 to 62 months). The recurrence rate was 9%. Excluding the first 30 shoulders (30 patients) from the development phase of the technique, the recurrence rate is only 5.7%. The rate of return to overhead sports activities was 62% and to collision sports activities 70%.

Anterior-inferior (5 o'clock) portal for shoulder arthroscopy

The present study describes an anterior-inferior portal for arthroscopic shoulder instrumentation at the 5 o'clock position along the glenoid rim. An anterior-inferior portal was established in 14 cadaver shoulders. The portal was created in an inside-to-outside fashion, with the humerus maximally adducted, directing the guide rod as far lateral as possible. Using the described technique, a 5 o'clock portal travels through the subscapularis and lateral to the conjoined tendon. Distance between the portal and the musculocutaneous nerve was 22.9 +/- 4.9 mm (mean +/- SD), and 24.4 +/- 5.7 mm between the portal and the axillary nerve. Previously described portals were either at, or above the 3 o'clock position, resulting in an acute, difficult angle of approach to the glenoid neck. Through a combination of proper arm positioning and rod insertion technique, the 5 o'clock portal can be created safely and is of great potential utility for arthroscopic shoulder stabilization procedures.

Arthroscopic Bankart suture repair for recurrent traumatic unidirectional anterior shoulder dislocations

We report our experience with arthroscopic repair of the Bankart lesion following traumatic unidirectional anterior shoulder dislocation. Thirty consecutive patients (7 women, 23 men; average age, 26.5 years) were followed for an average of 38 months (minimum 2-year follow-up) after arthroscopic Bankart suture repair for recurrent shoulder dislocation. The study included patients who had pure shoulder dislocations (excluding those with instability secondary to subluxation, multidirectional instability, or an atraumatic origin), had experienced an initial frank shoulder dislocation (documented radiographically or requiring the assistance of medical personnel for reduction), and had a Bankart lesion, visualized arthroscopically. Clinical evaluation using the Rowe functional grading system showed 11 patients rated as excellent, 8 as good, 3 as fair, and 8 as poor. Six of 8 patients were rated as poor because they frankly redislocated following their arthroscopic shoulder stabilization. Our study shows a 27% failure rate in this group. Critical reevaluation of the transglenoid arthroscopic Bankart procedure is mandatory to identify the appropriate patient population for this procedure.

Lateral traction during shoulder arthroscopy: its effect on tissue perfusion measured by pulse oximetry

We studied the effect of three methods of shoulder traction during arthroscopy on arterial oxygen saturation measured by a pulse oximeter applied to the fingertip of the arm in traction. Simple longitudinal traction ablated the oxygen saturation in only 1 of 30 patients. Adding vertical traction perpendicular to the arm ablated the oxygen saturation in 25 of 30 patients when a 2-inch wide sling was used and in 7 of 30 patients when a 4-inch sling was used. In this series, the pulse oximeter did not demonstrate gradual gradations in arterial oxygen saturation loss. Rather, the pulse oximeter provided an all-or-none warning signal for tissue hypoxia.

Arthroscopic shoulder stabilization using Mitek anchors

The purpose of this paper is to report our experience with an arthroscopic stabilization technique using bone anchors in the treatment of chronic unidirectional anterior-inferior shoulder instability. 30 of 32 patients (average age, 26 years) were followed for an average of 24 months (range 12 to 36). There were 28 patients with dislocations and four with subluxations. In the group of the dislocators five patients had more than 10 dislocations and 15 patients between one and seven (average three). In 68% a sport injury was the reason for the first dislocation. Due to the length of the labroligamentous detachment two to four anchors were used for stabilization. According to the criteria of Rowe, in the group of the subluxators (4) two had an excellent and two a good result. In the group of the dislocators (26) two patients dislocated their shoulder again after reconstruction without a new accident, one had a recurrent dislocation from significant trauma. Two of them had an open stabilization afterwards. Overall there were 53.9% excellent, 34.6% good and 11.5% poor results. In 50% there was no restriction of shoulder motion, 21% had a loss of external rotation of 5 degrees and 29% of 10 degrees. Arthroscopic shoulder stabilization with help of Mitek anchors seems to be a good method for treatment of chronic unidirectional anterior-inferior instabilities with less than 10 dislocations preoperatively. All patients, who suffered a spontaneous recurrent dislocation, had more than 10 dislocations before. In these cases this arthroscopic procedure is not suited to restore stability, even if a Bankart-lesion is present.