Management of ipsilateral supracondylar femur fractures following total knee arthroplasty

Fix or Replace? Comparable Outcomes with Internal Fixation and Distal Femoral Replacement for Periprosthetic Fractures above Total Knee Arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

The optimal treatment for periprosthetic fracture (PPfx) around total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains a topic of debate. Due to its low incidence, comparative studies analyzing arthroplasty and fixation are lacking in the literature. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of distal femoral replacement (DFR) and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for distal femur PPfx.

METHODS

We reviewed a consecutive series of 99 patients who underwent DFR (n = 54) or ORIF (n = 45) for distal femur PPfx. The indications for DFR were reviewed. Fractures were classified based on their relation to the implant using the Su classification. The primary outcome was re-revision, while secondary endpoints included inpatient complications, mortality within the first year, and mechanical complications such as loosening and non-union.

RESULTS

Type 2 fractures were the most prevalent type in both groups (DFR 37 versus ORIF 48.9%), while Type 1 fractures were more commonly treated with ORIF (35.6 versus 16.7%) and Type 3 with DFR (46.3 versus 15.6%) (P = 0.003). The preferred techniques in the ORIF group were plate osteosynthesis (66.7%) and retrograde nailing (31.1%). At a mean follow-up of 4.2 years (range, 1 to 14.1), DFR and ORIF did not demonstrate any difference in revision rates (13 versus 24.4%, P = 0.140) or mortality (3.7 versus 4.4%, P = 0.887). However, more mechanical complications were noted in the ORIF group (22.2 versus 7.4%, P = 0.035).

CONCLUSION

Both distal femoral replacement and open reduction and internal fixation have comparable revision rates, complications, and clinical outcomes when used in supracondylar periprosthetic distal femur fractures. Longer-term studies are needed to assess DFR survivorship as well as outcomes of newer trauma techniques such as nail-plate combinations.

NCB-PP® locking plates outcomes in the treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures. Analysis of a retrospective cohort of 89 patients

INTRODUCTION

The management of periprosthetic femoral fractures is particularly complex in an elderly, frail population, with an increasing incidence due to the increase in femoral prosthesis surgery. The use of locking plates is now widely recommended. The primary objective of this study was to present the results of NCB-PP® locking plates in the management of periprosthetic femoral fractures. The secondary objective was to determine the influence of weight-bearing time on morbidity and mortality and on walking ability. The hypothesis of this study was that NCB-PP® plates would provide radio-clinical results equivalent to those reported in the literature with no influence of time to re-weighting on complication rate and walking level at 1 year post-operatively.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

89 patients (mean age 81 ± 11.9 (28-99), with a female predominance 62/89 (69.7%)) underwent 89 periprosthetic femur fractures (74 THA, 11 TKA and 4 interprosthetic) and treated with NCB-PP® plates were retrospectively included between January 2014 and September 2022. Patients were then divided into 2 groups according to the time to postoperative full weight bearing: "immediate" (n = 30) and "delayed" (n = 59) (a minimum of 6 weeks post-operatively).

RESULTS

The mean follow-up time was 14.6 months. At 6 months post-operatively, 91.8% of patients were consolidated. At 1 year, 36.2% had resumed independent walking, 8.7% required one crutch, 13% two crutches, 33.3% walked with a walker and 8.7% were considered non-walkers. There were 12 complications (13.5%), including 7 mechanical (7.9%) and 5 infections (5.6%), with 10 patients (11.2%) requiring a revision surgery. Mortality at 6 months and 1 year was respectively 9 and 12.4%. There was no significant difference between pre- and post-operative walking levels (p = 0.45). There was no influence of the time to reweighting on the level of walking at 1 year (p = 0.874), on complications (p = 0.17) or on mortality at 1 year (p > 0.99).

CONCLUSION

This study confirms the initial hypothesis and the results of preliminary studies on a smaller sample size regarding bone union of periprosthetic femoral fractures with NCB-PP® plates, with a low rate of mechanical complications. The proportion of patients returning to their previous walking level remains low, but early full weight bearing is still possible without increasing the rate of mechanical complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; retrospective cohort study.

Periprosthetic distal femur fractures around total knee replacements: A comprehensive review

With a growing number of patients undergoing total knee replacements globally, coupled with an elderly population, the incidence of periprosthetic fractures around total knee replacements is increasing. As such, this is a highly topical subject that is gaining increasing interest within the orthopaedic community. This review provides a narrative synthesis of the most contemporary literature regarding distal femoral periprosthetic fractures. We review the related epidemiology, initial patient evaluation, the evolution and relevance of the classification systems and treatment options, particularly related to endoprosthetics and hybrid fixation constructs. The latest orthopaedic evidence related to this topic has been included.

How resources affect management of periprosthetic fractures of the distal femur: perspectives from Israel, South Sudan, and South Africa

Periprosthetic fractures of the distal femur have significant morbidity in both total hip and total knee arthroplasty (THA and TKA, respectively). The incidence of these fractures is growing, with the predominant mechanism of injury being a fall from a standing height and therefore considered fragility fractures. In many countries, improved public funding and a flourishing private health care sector, when coupled with increased life expectancy, translates to more older patients receiving both TKA and THA and therefore an increased prevalence of periprosthetic fractures and their associated complications. These fractures may occur below a long stem THA, above a TKA, or between the two (so-called "interprosthetic fracture"). We will outline fracture classification, risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment options, highlighting perspectives on treating these fractures in Israel, South Africa, and South Sudan. These countries represent differing access to resources, varied comorbidity factors, and differing health care systems. The points of difference and the points of similarity will be considered.

Reliability of current classification systems for periprosthetic distal femur fractures

INTRODUCTION

This study aims to determine which Periprosthetic Distal Femur Fracture (PDFF) classification system is the most reliable. The secondary aim was to determine which classification system correlated most accurately with the surgical management recommended and delivered.

METHODS

Between 2011 and 2019, 83 patients with 83 PDFFs that extended to the femoral component of a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) were retrospectively identified from a trauma database. Minimum follow-up was 1 year. Age, BMI, time from TKA, operative management, and Nottingham Hip Fracture Scores were collected, and AP and lateral radiographs used to classify all fractures using seven established classification systems by two observers blinded to management. In patients treated operatively (n = 69), preoperative radiographs were reviewed by two surgeons with expertise in trauma and knee revision who recommended fixation or distal femoral replacement (DFR) requirement.

RESULTS

Mean age was 80.7 years (SD9.4) and 50 (84.7%) were female. PDFFs occurred at a mean 9.5 years (SD5.2) after primary TKA. Mean follow-up was 3.8 years (SD2.9). Management was fixation in 47, DFR in 22 and non-operative for 14. The Fakler classification demonstrated highest interobserver reliability (ICC=0.948), followed by the Rorabeck (ICC=0.903), UCS (ICC=0.850) and Chen (ICC=0.906). The Neer classification demonstrated weakest agreement (ICC=0.633). Overall accuracy of predicting DFR requirement (as determined by two experts) was highest for the Fakler system (83.9%). Compared with actual management delivered the Rorabeck system was most accurate (94.1%). Multivariate regression demonstrated that the ultimate need for DFR (n = 22) was independently associated with medial comminution (HR 2.66 (1.12-6.35 95%CI), p = 0.027) and fractures distal to the anterior flange and posterior condyle of the femoral component (HR 2.45 (1.13-5.31), p = 0.024).

CONCLUSION

The Fakler classification showed highest interobserver agreement and was most accurately predictive of the management recommended by two experts. No classification system accurately predicted the fractures that required DFR, and none included medial comminution which was independently associated with DFR requirement. There remains a need for a PDFF classification system that reliably guides operative management of PDFFs.

A comparison of distal femoral replacement versus fixation in treating periprosthetic supracondylar femur fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The treatment of periprosthetic femur fractures around a total knee replacement remains a technical challenge for the orthopedic surgeon. Management options include non-operative treatment, plate fixation, intramedullary nailing and distal femur replacement (DFR), with few studies comparing fixation with DFR. This is an up-to-date meta-analysis in the literature to directly compare clinical outcomes between fixation and distal femoral replacement in the treatment of supracondylar periprosthetic femur fractures.

METHODS

A stratified literature search of the Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane databases was performed. All studies in English language were searched from inception to July 2022. The search was performed with the following MeSH terms: Periprosthetic fracture AND ORIF OR Internal Fixation AND Distal Femur Replacement. The search was conducted using a predesigned search strategy where all eligible literature was critically appraised for methodological quality using the Cochrane collaboration tool. We included Level I, II and III studies comparing fixation with DFR in the treatment of periprosthetic supracondylar femur fractures. Data from eligible studies were extracted by two authors (NP and AR) and a table created which included author, year, sample size, mean age, measured parameters, follow-up period, fracture classification, length of stay (days), mortality rate, revision rate and complication rate.

RESULTS

The extracted data were pooled for meta-analysis using RevMan® v5.3.5 software (Nordic Cochrane Centre, Copenhagen, Denmark) and forest plots constructed. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant and confidence intervals (CI) set to 95%. A total of six studies were included in the meta-analysis (n = 406). 153 patients underwent distal femur replacement and 253 patients underwent fixation with a mean follow-up time of 71.4 months. The results of this analysis suggest no statistically significant difference in measured outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The results of this meta-analysis suggest no proven statistically significant difference between DFR and fixation in terms of length of hospital stay, mortality rate, revision rate and complication rate for the treatment of periprosthetic supracondylar femur fractures. Further prospective randomized research may help to define the specific indications for each treatment option which must include fracture configuration. Early functional outcome and cost-effectiveness have yet to be evaluated in the available literature.

Bone Hook Reduction Technique Combined with Lateral Parapatellar Arthrotomy for Periprosthetic Distal Femoral Fractures Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Technical Note

OBJECTIVE

To report a bone hook reduction technique combined with lateral parapatellar arthrotomy for periprosthetic distal femoral fractures following total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

From April 2012 to June 2018, a total of 31 knees who underwent this technique for the treatment of periprosthetic distal femoral fractures following TKA were retrospectively reviewed. Through a lateral parapatellar arthrotomy, the vastus lateralis fascia was dissected from the muscle belly to allow anteromedial mobilization of the muscles. With direct visualization of the posteriorly angulated distal fragment, a bone hook was placed on the anterior flange of the femoral component. The hook was then elevated to correct the posteriorly angulated and shortened distal fragment. The coronal and sagittal alignments of the distal segment with the femoral shaft were confirmed using fluoroscopic images, and internal fixation was performed using an anatomically pre-contoured lateral locked plate. Once the overall length and sagittal plane alignment were restored, the plate was inserted via the previous articular approach. The plate was centered on the femur using anteroposterior and lateral fluoroscopy and then fixed.

RESULTS

A total of 28 patients underwent internal fixation using the bone hook reduction technique combined with lateral parapatellar arthrotomy for the treatment of periprosthetic distal femoral fractures following TKA. The average age at operation was 70.9 years (range, 62-83 years), and the average follow-up period was 17.5 months (range, 12-48.5 months). Fractures were classified as Su type I (13/28 [46.4%]), type II (11/28 [39.3%]), and type III (4/28 [14.3%]). Bone union was confirmed radiographically in all patients.

CONCLUSION

The bone hook reduction technique is a simple and effective method to reduce the distal fragment in periprosthetic distal femoral fractures following TKA.

Distal femoral replacement or internal fixation for management of periprosthetic distal femur fractures: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

The number of periprosthetic fractures above a total knee arthroplasty continues to increase. These fractures are associated with a high risk of morbidity and mortality. Techniques for addressing these fractures include open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) and revision arthroplasty, including distal femoral replacement (DFR). The primary aim of this review is to compare mortality and reoperation rates between ORIF and DFR when used to treat periprosthetic distal femur fractures.

METHODS

A systematic review including MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library databases was completed from inception to April 10, 2021. Studies including a comparator cohort were meta-analyzed.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies were identified for inclusion, of which, five had sufficient homogeneity for inclusion in a meta-analysis. 30-day and 2-year mortality was 4.1% and 14.6% in the DFR group. There was no statistically significant difference between ORIF and DFR (log Odds-Ratio (OR) = -0.14, 95 %CI: -0.77 to 0.50). The reoperation rate in the DFR group was 9.3% versus 14.8% for ORIF, with no difference between groups (log OR = 0.10, 95 %CI: -0.59 to 0.79). There was no difference in rates of deep infection (log OR = 0.22, 95 %CI: -0.83 to 1.28). Direct comparison of functional outcomes was not possible, though did not appear significant.

CONCLUSION

DFR in the setting of periprosthetic distal femur fractures is equivalent to ORIF with respect to mortality and reoperation rate and thus a safe and reliable treatment strategy. DFR may be more reliable in complex fracture patterns where the ability to obtain adequate fixation is difficult.

New Classification for Periprosthetic Distal Femoral Fractures Based on Locked-Plate Fixation Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to establish a new classification using locked-plate fixation for periprosthetic distal femoral fracture (PDFF) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and to determine when dual locked-plate fixation is necessary through defining this classification.

METHODS

One-hundred fifteen consecutive PDFFs that underwent operative treatment were reviewed from 2011 to 2019 with minimum 1-year follow-up. Most PDFFs were fixed with single or dual locked-plate fixations using the minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis technique. Based on preoperative radiographs, PDFFs were classified according to the level of main fracture line relative to the anterior flange of femoral component: type I and II, main fracture line located proximal and distal to the anterior flange; and type III, component instability regardless of fracture line requiring revisional TKA. Furthermore, type II fractures were subclassified based on the direction of fracture beak as follows: type II_L, lateral-beak; type II_M, medial-beak. The incidence, treatment methods, and complications were analyzed according to the classification.

RESULTS

Incidences of type I, II_L, II_M, and III were 64.4%, 8.7%, 24.3%, and 2.6%, respectively. Meanwhile, most PDFFs in type I and II were treated with lateral single locked-plate fixations, except for type II_M, which was treated with either single or dual locked-plate fixations. Overall complications were significantly higher in type II (28.9%) than in type I (10.8%, P = .019). In type II_M, bone union-related complications were significantly higher in single locked-plate fixation (50.0%) than in dual locked-plate fixation (5.6%; P = .013).

CONCLUSION

The new classification provides practical and obvious strategies for the treatment of PDFF following TKA using locked-plate fixation. For type II_M fracture, dual plate fixation is necessary to prevent fixation failure or nonunion.

To Fix or Revise: Differences in Periprosthetic Distal Femur Fracture Management Between Trauma and Arthroplasty Surgeons

INTRODUCTION

This study sought to determine the effect of trauma fellowship training on the surgical decision to fix or revise to distal femoral replacement in periprosthetic distal femur fractures.

METHODS

An anonymous online survey including nine cases of geriatric periprosthetic distal femur fractures was distributed through the Orthopaedic Trauma Association website. Respondents were asked whether they would recommend fixation or revision to distal femoral replacement. Fractures were classified by the location relative to the anterior flange (proximal or distal) and the presence or absence of comminution. Recommendations were compared between type of fellowship completed (trauma, arthroplasty, or both), practice setting, and number of periprosthetic distal femur fractures treated monthly.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-one surgeon survey responses were included. Completion of a trauma fellowship was associated with a higher likelihood of recommending fixation for any periprosthetic distal femur fracture compared with arthroplasty training (odds ratio [OR] 2.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.97 to 3.29; P < 0.0001). Disagreement was significant for comminuted proximal (OR 6.90, 95% CI 3.24 to 14.68; P < 0.0001), simple distal (OR 20.90, 95% CI 6.41 to 67.71; P < 0.001), and comminuted distal fractures (OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.66 to 3.68; P < 0.0001). Dual fellowship-trained surgeons were less likely to recommend fixation than surgeons who completed a trauma fellowship alone (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.93; P = 0.027) and more likely to recommend fixation than surgeons who completed an arthroplasty fellowship alone (OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.13 to 2.63; P = 0.012). Surgeons who treat three or more periprosthetic distal femur fractures monthly showed a significant preference for fracture fixation compared with lower volume surgeons (OR 2.45, 95% CI 1.62 to 3.68; P < 0.0001).

DISCUSSION

Fellowship-trained trauma surgeons show a notable preference for fracture fixation over distal femoral replacement for periprosthetic distal femur fractures, as compared with arthroplasty-trained surgeons. Additional research is needed to clarify surgical indications that maximize outcomes for these injuries.

Current Reconstruction Options in Periprosthetic Fractures Around the Knee

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic fractures are a rare complication after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the incidence of these fractures is growing after the increasing number of TKAs performed every year and the progressive aging of the population. In addition, the surgical treatment and peri-operative management of these complications are demanding, representing a challenge for the orthopedic surgeon.

SIGNIFICANCE

A thorough understanding of these fractures and a correct classification are necessary in order to select the most suitable surgical treatment. The aim of this review was to analyze the epidemiology, classification, diagnosis, surgical treatment, and outcomes of periprosthetic knee fractures in order to give an exhaustive overview.

RESULTS

Reduction and internal fixation with locking plates or intramedullary nails represents the preferred option in case of a stable prosthetic implant. Conversely, in case of loose tibial and/or femoral component, implant revision is mandatory. Conservative treatment is rarely indicated.

CONCLUSION

A deep understanding of the characteristics and patterns of periprosthetic knee fractures, and the determination of the stability of the prosthetic implant are necessary in order to establish the correct treatment.

Review of patient-reported outcomes in periprosthetic distal femur fractures after total knee arthroplasty: a plate or intramedullary nail?

Purpose

This study reviewed the literature regarding the patient-reported treatment outcomes of using either open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with a plate and screw system or intramedullary nail (IMN) fixation for periprosthetic distal femur fractures around a total knee arthroplasty.

Methods

A total of 13 studies published in the last 20 years met the inclusion criteria. The studies included 347 patients who were allocated to ORIF (n = 249) and IMN (n = 98) groups according to the implants used. The primary outcome measures were the Knee Society Score or the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index. The secondary outcome measures included knee range of motion and the rates of complications, including non-union, malunion, infection, revision total knee arthroplasty, and reoperation. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results

The mean Knee Society Scores of ORIF and IMN groups were 83 and 84, respectively; the mean postoperative range of motion of the knee were 99° and 100°, respectively (P < 0.05); the non-union rates were 9.4 and 3.8%, respectively (P > 0.05); the malunion rates were 1.8 and 7.5%, respectively (P < 0.05); surgical site infection rates were 2 and 1.3%, respectively (P > 0.05); the reoperation rates were 9.6 and 5.1%, respectively (P > 0.05); and revision rates of total knee arthroplasty were 2 and 1%, respectively (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

Based on the patient-reported outcome assessments, both ORIF with a plate and screw system and IMN fixation are well-accepted techniques for periprosthetic distal femur fractures around a TKA, and they produce similar functional outcomes.

Management of periprosthetic distal femur fractures using distal femoral arthroplasty and fixation - Comparative study of outcomes and costs

PURPOSE

Our study compares the outcome and cost of distal femoral arthroplasty to that of Fixation (Plating/Retrograde Nailing) in the management of distal femur peri-prosthetic fractures.

METHODS

We reviewed our database for patients admitted with peri-prosthetic distal femoral fractures between 2005 and 2013 (n = 61). The patients were stratified into 2 groups based on management method. The Distal Femoral Arthroplasty group (Group A) had 21 patients and the Fixation group (Group B) had 40 patients. Outcome & cost were compared. Minimum follow-up was 3 years.

RESULTS

The mean length of stay in group A was 9 days whereas in group B was 32 days. All patients were fully weight bearing by day 3 in group A, compared to a mean of 11 weeks in group B. Mean OKS was 28 and KSS score was 70 in group A compared to 27 and 68 in group B. In group A, there were 2 deaths, 1 superficial infection, and 1 DVT. In group B, there were 6 deaths, 1 failure of fixation, 6 mal-unions, 1 non-union and 2 infections. Overall, the distal femoral arthroplasty procedure costs approximately £9600 and the fixation group costs were on average of £9800.

CONCLUSION

Distal femoral arthroplasty appears to provide good clinical results, with comparable overall costs to fixation.

Periprosthetic fractures of the knee: a comprehensive review

Demographic changes have resulted in an increase in the number of older patients diagnosed with degenerative joint disease. Developments in the field of joint arthroplasty allow a broader population to improve their lifestyles. An increased demand for knee arthroplasty has led to a rise in operations performed worldwide. Although there has been a constant propagation of technology and an increase in medical staffing at a professional level, many patients still encounter complications. Though rare, these factors may lead to life-threatening scenarios and a devastating effect on the success of the operation. One such rare complication includes periprosthetic fractures around the knee, a complex injury which requires a cautious and experienced approach. In this review, we analyze the prevalence, risk factors and classification, investigation and treatment options for periprosthetic fractures with total knee arthroplasty.

Periprosthetic fractures about total knee arthroplasty

Periprosthetic fracture after total knee arthroplasty presents a difficult complication for many orthopaedic surgeons. These fractures occur most frequently around the distal femur followed by the patella and then tibia. These fractures are frequently complicated by poor bone quality or compromised bone due to the presence of the implants. Surgical treatment is typically necessary and requires varied techniques of open fixation, intramedullary fixation, or revision arthroplasty. Outcomes of these injuries vary widely. This review aims to describe the epidemiology, classification, treatment options and outcomes for periprosthetic fractures following total knee arthroplasty.

Comparison of outcomes and analysis of risk factors for non-union in locked plating of closed periprosthetic and non-periprosthetic distal femoral fractures in a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The primary aim was to compare the outcomes of locked plating of closed distal femur periprosthetic and non-periprosthetic fractures by testing the hypothesis that outcomes would be worse in the periprosthetic group. The secondary aim of this study was to identify risk factors for non-union.

METHODS

A single-center study over an 8-year period utilizing a retrospective cohort design was performed. Sixty-eight patients with periprosthetic fractures and 57 patients with non-periprosthetic fractures met inclusion criteria for the study. There was a significant difference between groups in mean age (80.1 years periprosthetic vs. 70.9 years non-periprosthetic (p < 0.001)). Statistical analysis between groups was used to assess the outcomes of time to union, incidence of non-union, post-operative functionality, incidence of complications, progression to revision surgery, and mortality. A secondary multivariable analysis was used to assess risk factors for non-union and factors positively associated with union.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in outcomes between groups. Union rates were 83.8% (57/68) in the periprosthetic group and 78.9% (45/57) in the non-periprosthetic group (p = 0.648). Comminution was identified as a significant risk factor for non-union (p = 0.005). Use of a submuscular technique had a significant positive association with union (p = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes of surgical treatment for periprosthetic and non-periprosthetic distal femur fractures are similar. There is a significant risk of non-union in locked plating of both groups.

Femoral Periprosthetic Fractures after Total Knee Arthroplasty: New Surgically Oriented Classification with a Review of Current Treatments

Purpose

As the number of total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) increases, the incidence of femoral periprosthetic fractures after TKA is also increasing. This review aimed to suggest a new surgically oriented classification system for femoral periprosthetic fractures.

Methods

We investigated the classifications, and current treatment trends for femoral periprosthetic fractures after TKA by means of a thorough review of the relevant literature.

Results

Numerous studies reported good results of surgical treatment with modern fixatives including locking compression plates and retrograde intramedullary nails. However, few classifications of femoral periprosthetic fractures reflect the recent developments in surgical treatment.

Conclusions

We recommend that surgical management be considered the first-line treatment for femoral periprosthetic fractures after TKA. Our new classification will help in deciding the surgical treatment option for femoral periprosthetic fractures after TKA.

Impact of time to surgery from injury on postoperative infection and deep vein thrombosis in periprosthetic knee fractures

PURPOSE

Periprosthetic fracture (PPF) is a serious complication that occurs in 0.3%-2.5% of all total knee arthroplasties used to treat end-stage arthritis. To our knowledge, there are no studies in the literature that evaluate the association between time to surgery after PPF and early postoperative infections or deep vein thrombosis (DVT). This study tests our hypothesis that delayed time to surgery increases rates of postoperative infection and DVT after PPF surgery.

METHODS

Our study cohort included patients undergoing PPF surgery in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2006-2015). The patients were dichotomized based on time to surgery: group 1 with time ≤2 days and group 2 with time >2 days. A 2-by-2 contingency table and Fisher's exact test were used to evaluate the association between complications and time to surgery groups, and multivariate logistic regression was used to adjust for demographics and known risk factors.

RESULTS

A total of 263 patients (80% females) with a mean age of 73.9 ± 12.0 years were identified receiving PPF surgery, among which 216 patients were in group 1 and 47 patients in group 2. Complications in group 1 included 3 (1.4%) superficial infections (SI), 1 (0.5%) organ space infection (OSI), 1 (0.5%) wound dehiscence (WD), and 4 (1.9%) deep vein thrombosis (DVT); while complications in group 2 included 1 (2.1%) SI, 1 (2.1%) OSI, 1 (2.1%) DVT, and no WD. No significant difference was detected in postoperative complications between the two groups. However, patients in group 2 were more likely (p = 0.0013) to receive blood transfusions (57.5%) than those in group 1 (32.4%).

CONCLUSION

Our study indicates patients with delayed time to surgery have higher chance to receive blood transfusions, but no significant difference in postoperative complications (SI, OSI, WD, or DVT) between the two groups.

Clinical outcome and quality of life of patients with periprosthetic distal femur fractures and retained total knee arthroplasty treated with polyaxial locking plates: a single-center experience

PURPOSE

The number of total knee arthroplasties (TKA) increased rapidly. In conjunction with higher implantation rates, periprosthetic femur fractures following TKA are also gradually increasing. Purpose of this study was to evaluate polyaxial locking plate treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures with retained total knee replacement using polyaxial locking plates in regard to quality of life, functional outcome and complications.

METHODS

The Study design is a single-center retrospective cohort analysis. Included were patients with periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures with a well-fixed knee prosthesis initially treated with NCB plate (Non-contact bridging plate, Zimmer Inc., Warsaw, IN). Primary outcome was measured including quality of life and functional status using the SMFA-D score (German short musculoskeletal function assessment questionnaire), the mortality rate and union rate. Formerly published SMFA-data presenting representative randomly chosen cross-sectional data from general population of the USA and Dutch population was used as historic control group.

RESULTS

In total, 45 patients with a mean age of 74 years were included (10 males; 35 females). Body mass index averaged 27.4 kg/m². Follow-up averaged 52 months. Comparison of the SMFA-D scores showed higher scores according to bother index (41.5 vs. 15.7/13.8) and function index (42.5 vs. 14.5/12.7). Mortality rate was 26.7%. The CCI was directly related to the mortality rate (p = 0.033). Union was achieved in 35 of 45 fractures (78%) six months after the index procedure. The ultimate union rate including following procedures at last follow-up was 95.6%.

CONCLUSION

Besides already highlighted limitations in range of motion, we quantified patient-related limitations in daily living. A large number of patients after surgery are not self-reliant mobile or on orthopedic aids. A high CCI was directly related to the mortality rate and can be used as a predictive factor for postoperative mortality.

One year after proximal or distal periprosthetic fracture of the femur -two conditions with divergent outcomes?

INTRODUCTION

Arthroplasty of the hip and knee is 1 of the 20 most frequent operations in Germany. Periprosthetic fracture is one of the most feared complications following primary or revision arthroplasty. Present publication aims to analyse differences between patients with periprosthetic fracture around total knee arthroplasty (PFTKA) and patients with periprosthetic fracture around total hip arthroplasty (PFTHA) concerning demographics, clinical course, complications and return to pre-fracture mobility.

METHODS

Prospective single-centre observation study of periprosthetic femoral fractures with stable implants. Present subgroup analysis includes patients with PFTKA and PFTHA. All patients were treated with polyaxial angular stable plates using two standardized techniques: a minimally invasive percutaneous distal insertion technique and a mini-open technique. Data collection included implant- and operation-related information as well as demographics, clinical course, complications and return to pre-fracture mobility. Data were collected during a 12-month follow-up.

RESULTS

We were able to analyse the data of 73 patients. The PFTKA group had 37 patients with a mean age of 76 ± 10 years; 88% were female. After 1 year, 3 patients in this cohort had died; 68% of survivors had reached their pre-fracture mobility; 22% had undergone operative revisions for various reasons. The PFTHA cohort included 36 patients with a mean age of 80 ± 13 years, 72% were female. After 1 year, 9 patients had died in this cohort, 42% of survivors had reached their pre-fracture mobility. Non-operative complications occurred for 16% in the PFTKA group and 64% in the PFTHA group (p < 0.001). 11% had undergone operative revisions for various reasons, among them, two cases of nonunion but no primary infection.

CONCLUSION

On average, compared to the PFTHA patients, PFTKA patients were younger, underwent significantly lower rates of non-operative complications, had a tendency towards lower mortality, and returned to pre-fracture mobility at higher rates, although they tended to have more revisions when compared to treatment for PFTHA. Overall, when periprosthetic fractures of the femur were treated using polyaxial locking plate osteosynthesis, patients showed very low rates of nonunion and no primary infection.

Comparing Outcomes of Tumor Prosthesis Revision and Locking Plate Fixation in Supracondylar Femoral Periprosthetic Fractures

Background

Periprosthetic fractures around a total knee replacement (TKR) can be complex and difficult to manage, requiring the surgical expertise of the trauma and arthroplasty surgeon. There are a number of treatment modalities available, each with their own merits and limitations. As data on tumor prosthesis revision in periprosthetic fractures is sparse, this study aims to evaluate the results of revision using a tumor prosthesis and compare them with those of fixation using a locking plate in periprosthetic fractures after TKR.

Methods

This is a retrospective study of 15 patients who underwent either tumor prosthesis revision (n = 7) or locking plate fixation (n = 8) for supracondylar femoral periprosthetic fractures in our hospital from 2009 and 2014. The mean follow-up time for these patients was 44 months. This study's main outcome measures were pain relief, return to premorbid ambulatory function, and complications.

Results

The revision and fixation groups saw five versus three patients achieve pain relief (71.4% vs. 37.5%, p = 0.315), and two versus four patients return to their premorbid ambulatory function (28.6% vs. 50%, p = 0.608) at the follow-up, respectively. The mean time to weight-bearing in the revision group and fixation group was 2.9 days and 18.9 weeks, respectively (p = 0.001). There were eight complications seen in the revision group with none requiring reoperation; there were five complications seen in the fixation group, and two required reoperation.

Conclusions

The results of revision TKR using a tumor prosthesis were comparable to those of fixation using a locking plate in periprosthetic fractures after TKR. Tumor prosthesis revision may be considered as a viable alternative to locking plate fixation when indicated.

Early femoral condyle insufficiency fractures after total knee arthroplasty: treatment with delayed surgery and femoral component revision

Background

Periprosthetic fracture following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is usually associated with a traumatic event and typically treated with fracture fixation techniques. However, we report on a series of patients with early atraumatic condyle fractures that occurred as a result of insufficiency of the unloaded preoperative femoral condyle treated with delayed reconstruction.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed a series of 7 patients who sustained femoral condyle fractures following TKA and evaluated risk factors for insufficiency.

Results

There were 6 females and 1 male with an average age of 65.5 (range, 63-75) years and an average body mass index of 29.4 (range, 27-32). Fracture occurred on average 24.9 days from the index surgery and secondary to a low energy mechanism. Five patients had valgus alignment (mean, 15.2°) preoperatively and sustained fracture of the unloaded medial femoral condyle. Two patients had varus alignment (mean, 7.0°) preoperatively and both fractured the unloaded lateral condyle. One patient underwent early intervention requiring distal femoral replacement secondary to femoral bone loss. The remaining 6 patients underwent delayed surgery for an average of 6 weeks to allow for fracture healing followed by femoral component revision. At last follow-up (average, 48.5 months), 1 patient required a tibial component revision; however, no revision of the femoral component was required.

Conclusions

Early femoral condyle insufficiency fractures following TKA may be a risk in females with poor bone quality and preoperative valgus alignment. Delayed surgery and femoral component revision is a treatment strategy that prevented the need for other tertiary reconstruction.

An alternative treatment for osteoporotic Su Type III periprosthetic supracondylar femur fractures: Double locking plate fixation

Introduction

Patients with Su Type III fractures based on total knee arthroplasty (TKA) constitute a patient group with problematic treatment and management. Although it has difficulties, open reduction and internal fixation is one of the treatment options.

Method

A retrospective evaluation was made of 22 patients surgically treated in our clinic with double locking, low contact titanium plate and screw for a Su Type III periprosthetic fracture based on TKA. The patients were evaluated with bone mineral densitometry, postoperative Knee Society Score (KSS), WOMAC and radiological evaluations.

Results

The mean follow-up period of the patients was 68.6 ± 15.5 months, with pain-free weight-bearing determined at 4.9 ± 1.1 months and mean radiological union at 18.5 ± 4.3 weeks. Revision was required because of non-union in 2 (9.09%) cases. The postoperative KSS value was 81.8 ± 7.8, the WOMAC value was 78.1 ± 5.3 and the T-score was −3.3 ± 0.3. At the final follow-up examination, a correction loss (4.9° ± 1.5°) was determined in the mean knee valgus angle according to the mechanical axis, which was statistically significant but remained within the physiological limits (p = 0.21).

Conclusion

In addition to providing the advantages of rigid fixation together with early and effective rehabilitation, satisfactory clinical and radiological results were obtained with the application of double locking plate and screw in the treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures based on TKA, with osteoporosis.

Level of evidence

Level IV, Therapeutic study.

Outcome of osteosynthesis for periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

Incidence of periprosthetic fractures around knee is going to rise in near future due to dramatic increase in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Our study is a retrospective case series describing the outcome of osteosynthesis for periprosthetic fractures after TKA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed the outcome of osteosynthesis for periprosthetic fractures with stable implants in 43 patients having 45 fractures operated between 2010 and 2015.

RESULTS

Out of 43 patients, the majority were female (M-15, F-28) with mean age of 65.95 years, majority had left knee involved (L-24, R-19), with fractures involving femur, tibia and patella, respectively, in 29, 11 and 5 patients. Fracture pattern was Rorabeck type 2 in 29, Felix type 2 in 6, type 3 in 5, Goldberg type 2 in 3, type 3a in 2, Unified classification system type A in 2, B1 in 35, C in 4, E in 2 cases. Anterior femoral cortex notching was found in 13 patients with femoral fractures. According to Tayside classification, 12 patients had type 1 and one had type 2 notching. Different implants were used according to the need of the fractures. After TKA, the mean Hospital for Special Surgery score was 84.2, which reduced to mean 76 at 9 months following osteosynthesis. Three patients had nonunion, one had delayed union and one had implant failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Osteosynthesis for periprosthetic fractures around knee with locked compression plate gives promising results. Fractures involving patella are associated with inferior functional outcome. Understanding the fracture pattern and bone stock available for fixation with correct choice of implant and correct surgical technique gives promising outcome in periprosthetic fractures around knee.

Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty for the Management of Periprosthetic Fractures

Periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can present reconstructive challenges. Not only is the procedure technically complex, but patients with these fractures may have multiple comorbidities, making them prone to postoperative complications. Early mobilization is particularly beneficial in patients with multiple comorbidities. Certain patient factors and fracture types may make revision TKA the ideal management option. Periprosthetic fractures around the knee implant occur most frequently in the distal femur, followed by the tibia and the patella. Risk factors typically are grouped into patient factors (eg, osteoporosis, obesity) and surgical factors (eg, anterior notching, implant malposition). Surgical options for periprosthetic fractures that involve the distal femur or proximal tibia include reconstruction of the bone stock with augments or metal cones or replacement with an endoprosthesis.

What Are the Preoperative Outcome Measures That Predispose to Periprosthetic Fractures After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND

There is little known in the literature about whether preoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) would affect the risk of periprosthetic fractures (PPFs) after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Our study aims to evaluate the predictive values of PROMs on PPF after primary TKA. We hypothesize that poorer PROMs are associated with a higher risk of PPF after primary TKA.

METHODS

We reviewed prospectively collected data in our hospital arthroplasty registry. Patients who sustained PPF after primary TKA between 2000 and 2015 were identified. Forty-two patients were identified and matched for gender, age, and body mass index to a control group of 84 patients who had primary TKA without PPF in a 2:1 ratio. Preoperative demographics, Short Form-36 (SF-36) scores, Oxford Knee score and Knee Society Score were evaluated. Variables of PROMs were entered into a multivariate logistic regression model. A variable was considered to be a significant predictor if its odds ratio was significant at P < .05.

RESULTS

After multivariate regression analysis, SF-36 subdomains of physical functioning (PF) and vitality (VT) were identified as significant predictors for PPFs after primary TKA. A lower SF-36 PF and VT scores were associated with higher risks of sustaining a PPF after primary TKA.

CONCLUSION

From our study, low preoperative SF-36 PF and VT scores are associated with a higher risk of PPFs after primary TKA. These results can allow the preoperative identification of patients at higher risk of PPF, and appropriate preoperative counseling, optimization, and close follow-up can be instituted for this at-risk group.

Periprosthetic knee fractures. A review of epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis, management and outcome

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE WORK

Periprosthetic knee fractures incidence is gradually raising due to aging of population and increasing of total knee arthroplasties. Management of this complication represents a challenge for the orthopaedic surgeon. Aim of the present study is to critically review the recent literature about epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis, management and outcome of periprosthetic knee fractures.

METHODS

A systematic search of Embase, Medline and Pubmed was performed by two reviewers who selected the eligible papers favoring studies published in the last ten years. Epidemiology, risk factors, diagnostic features, clinical management and outcome of different techniques were all reviewed.

RESULTS

52 studies including reviews, meta-analysis, clinical and biomechanical studies were selected.

CONCLUSIONS

Correct clinical management requires adequate diagnosis and evaluation of risk factors. Conservative treatment is rarely indicated. Locking plate fixation, intramedullary nailing and revision arthroplasty are all valuable treatment methods. Surgical technique should be chosen considering age and functional demand, comorbidities, fracture morphology and location, bone quality and stability of the implant. Given the correct indication all surgical treatment can lead to satisfactory clinical and radiographic results despite a relevant complication rate.

Periprosthetic fractures of the distal femur after total knee arthroplasty : Plate versus nail fixation

The incidence of periprosthetic fractures about a TKA is increasing. Traditionally, these fractures are classified by their location and prosthesis integrity. In the setting of a supracondyar fracture about a well-fixed prosthesis, both plate and nail fixation of the fracture present themselves as options, each with unique benefits and pitfalls. Through review and discussion of the literature, we aim to describe some of the patient, fracture, and implant related factors that should be considered when planning fixation of periprosthetic fractures about a TKA. Additionally, we present several technical pearls that may be useful in the successful treatment of these difficult injuries.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Periprosthetic fractures associated with total knee arthroplasty

Fractures around total knee arthroplasties pose a significant surgical challenge. Most can be managed with osteosynthesis and salvage of the replacement. The techniques of fixation of these fractures and revision surgery have evolved and so has the assessment of outcome. This specialty update summarises the current evidence for the classification, methods of fixation, revision surgery and outcomes of the management of periprosthetic fractures associated with total knee arthroplasty.

Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2016;98-B:1489–96.

[Importance of revision- and tumor-endoprosthetics in the treatment of periprosthetic fractures of the lower extremity]

Periprosthetic fractures of hip and knee prostheses are gaining clinical significance due to the increasing numbers of of primary arthroplasties. Additionally, these fractures are often associated with poor bone quality or present in patients after multiple revision procedures and concomitant excessive bone defects precluding those patients to be adequately treated by conventional osteosynthesis. Revision implants provide a wide range of options for the treatment of these fractures in order to achieve good clinical results. In the acetabular region cavitary defects associated with periprosthetic fractures can be treated by the use of megacups. Extensive segmental defects and pelvic discontinuity necessitate the use of cups with additional iliac support or even customized implants. Proximal femoral fractures can usually be fixed with modular stems and diaphyseal anchorage. Periprosthetic knee joint fractures can be treated with revision implants with modular sleeves or augment-combinations allowing sufficient bridging of bony defects. Functional reconstruction or refixation of the extensor mechanism is of crucial importance.

A Unique Pattern of Peri-Prosthetic Fracture Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: The Insufficiency Fracture

An isolated periprosthetic compression fracture following total knee arthroplasty has not been described in periprosthetic fracture classifications. Thus, the purpose is to describe this unique type of fracture based on clinical and radiographic analysis and identify the incidence and potential risk factors of this fracture. A retrospective chart review was performed from a database of 5864 primary total knee. A total of 56 (0.9%) periprosthetic fractures were identified with 15 (26.8%) of them demonstrating an isolated lateral compression fracture. Patients exhibiting this fracture pattern had a mean preoperative varus deformity of 176.3° and had poor bone quality (T score: -2.1). It is important to recognize that a compression fracture is not an infrequent finding and that further workup maybe warranted when clinical suspicion is high.

Field testing the Unified Classification System for periprosthetic fractures of the femur, tibia and patella in association with knee replacement: an international collaboration

The Unified Classification System (UCS) was introduced because of a growing need to have a standardised universal classification system of periprosthetic fractures. It combines and simplifies many existing classification systems, and can be applied to any fracture around any partial or total joint replacement occurring during or after operation. Our goal was to assess the inter- and intra-observer reliability of the UCS in association with knee replacement when classifying fractures affecting one or more of the femur, tibia or patella. We used an international panel of ten orthopaedic surgeons with subspecialty fellowship training and expertise in adult hip and knee reconstruction ('experts') and ten residents of orthopaedic surgery in the last two years of training ('pre-experts'). They each received 15 radiographs for evaluation. After six weeks they evaluated the same radiographs again but in a different order. The reliability was assessed using the Kappa and weighted Kappa values. The Kappa values for inter-observer reliability for the experts and the pre-experts were 0.741 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.707 to 0.774) and 0.765 (95% CI 0.733 to 0.797), respectively. The weighted Kappa values for intra-observer reliability for the experts and pre-experts were 0.898 (95% CI 0.846 to 0.950) and 0.878 (95% CI 0.815 to 0.942) respectively. The UCS has substantial inter-observer reliability and 'near perfect' intra-observer reliability when used for periprosthetic fractures in association with knee replacement in the hands of experienced and inexperienced users.

Periprosthetic fractures following total knee arthroplasty

Periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasty may occur in any part of the femur, tibia and patella, and the most common pattern involves the supracondylar area of the distal femur. Supracondylar periprosthetic fractures frequently occur above a well-fixed prosthesis, and risk factors include anterior femoral cortical notching and use of the rotational constrained implant. Periprosthetic tibial fractures are frequently associated with loose components and malalignment or malposition of implants. Fractures of the patella are much less common and associated with rheumatoid arthritis, use of steroid, osteonecrosis and malalignment of implants. Most patients with periprosthetic fractures around the knee are the elderly with poor bone quality. There are many difficulties and increased risk of nonunion after treatment because reduction and internal fixation is interfered with by preexisting prosthesis and bone cement. Additionally, previous soft tissue injury is another disadvantageous condition for bone healing. Many authors reported good clinical outcomes after non-operative treatment of undisplaced or minimally displaced periprosthetic fractures; however, open reduction or revision arthroplasty was required in displaced fractures or fractures with unstable prosthesis. Periprosthetic fractures around the knee should be prevented by appropriate technique during total knee arthroplasty. Nevertheless, if a periprosthetic fracture occurs, an appropriate treatment method should be selected considering the stability of the prosthesis, displacement of fracture and bone quality.

The treatment of periprosthetic femur fractures after total knee arthroplasty

Periprosthetic femur fractures after total knee arthroplasty are a rising concern; however, when properly diagnosed, they can be managed nonoperatively or operatively in the form of locking plate fixation, intramedullary nailing, and arthroplasty. The degree of osteoporosis, stability of the femoral implant, and goals of the patient are a few critical variables in determining the ideal treatment. Despite excellent outcomes from each of these operative choices, the risk of nonunion, malunion, instability, and refracture cannot be ignored.

Periprosthetic fractures around total knee arthroplasty

Periprosthetic fractures around total knee replacements were first reported more than 30 years ago. They are becoming more common. Various associated risk factors have been described. Treatment options for femoral fractures around total knee replacements include non-operative management, locked plates, retrograde intramedullary nails and revision arthroplasty. Periprosthetic fractures of the tibia and patella are also described, but are less common. This review article provides an overview of the epidemiology and frequency of periprosthetic fractures around total knee replacement, their initial assessment and the current treatment options available.

Periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

To evaluate outcome in 20 patients treated for periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

Records of 14 women and 6 men aged 45 to 85 (mean, 67) years who underwent operative (n=18) or conservative (n=2) treatment for periprosthetic fractures of the supracondylar femur (n=15), patella (n=3), and tibia (n=2) following minor falls (n=18) or high-velocity injury (n=2) were reviewed. The mean time from TKA to fracture was 43 (range, 14-98) months. Of the 15 supracondylar femoral fractures, 2 were managed with immobilisation in a long leg cast, 11 with internal fixation using locked compression plating, and 2 with revision arthroplasty. All 3 patellar fractures were managed with tension band wiring. Both tibial fractures were managed with revision arthroplasty. Radiographic and functional outcomes (the Knee Society scores) were assessed.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 35 (range, 24-48) months. All fractures healed after a mean of 15 (range, 12-38) weeks. One patient had delayed union. Postoperative alignment was satisfactory in all patients except one (with 5º varus). The mean tibiofemoral angle was 4º valgus. The mean range of motion was 98.5º. The mean Knee Society knee score was 85 (range, 75-89) and the functional score was 76 (range, 70-85). No patient had implant failure, loss of reduction, deep infection, deep vein thrombosis, or pulmonary embolism.

CONCLUSION

The locked compression plate is effective in managing periprosthetic femoral fractures. Periprosthetic patellar and tibial fractures are uncommon. The latter often warrant revision arthroplasty owing to the loose implant.

Custom intramedullary intercalating device for treatment of supracondylar fracture between constrained total knee arthroplasty and well-fixed total hip arthroplasty

Management of periprosthetic fractures between ipsilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) is difficult, and is further complicated in the setting of poor femoral bone stock. We present a case of supracondylar fracture between THA and long-stemmed TKA femoral components in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis, deficient metaphyseal bone stock, and recurrent fractures. A long custom intramedullary intercalating component was devised to link the well-fixed existing THA stem to a revision distal femoral component. The resulting construct was stable and allowed for full weight-bearing ambulation, representing a useful treatment option in the management of periprosthetic fractures between revision TKA and well-fixed THA.

Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for periprosthetic distal femoral fractures after total knee arthroplasty

Purpose

To evaluate the outcomes of the treatment of distal femoral fractures using minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis following total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Materials and Methods

From July 2008 to October 2011, 14 patients were treated with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for periprosthetic fractures following TKA. The mean duration of follow-up was 19.2 months and the mean age was 69.7 years. Lewis and Rorabeck classification was used to categorize the type of fracture. Pre- and postoperative range of motion, femorotibial angle, and Knee society score, time to bony union, and complications were evaluated.

Results

The mean range of motion was 108.4 degrees preoperatively and 107.3 degrees postoperatively. No significant difference was observed in the pre- and postoperative mean range of motion. The average time to bony union was 3.9 months. The knee society score was 82.6 points preoperatively and 78.9 points postoperatively. The mean femorotibial angle was changed from 6.1 degrees valgus postoperatively to 4.6 degrees valgus postoperatively. There was no complication during the follow-up.

Conclusions

Minimally invasive plate fixation for distal femur fractures after TKA showed good results. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis is a recommendable treatment method for periprosthetic fractures.

Functional outcome of total knee arthroplasty after periprosthetic distal femoral fracture

A prospective matched cohort study was performed to compare functional outcomes between 28 patients with periprosthetic femoral fractures and 28 with primary total knee arthroplasties (TKA). The mean follow-up was 6.7 years (range, 5-9). Radiographic osteopenia was a predisposing factor, but not notching, body mass index, or preinjury knee scores or motion. At last follow-up, the Knee Society scores, knee motion, Womac, and SF-12 were significantly lower in the fracture group, and were significantly decreased compared to the preinjury status. We found that periprosthetic distal femoral fracture after TKA worsens functional outcomes at the medium term, but arthroplasty complication and survival rates were similar in both groups.

Medial femoral condyle fracture after cementless unicompartmental knee replacement: a rare complication

This case report describes a rare complication of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Femoral fracture after TKR is a serious and relatively common problem, but to the best of our knowledge, only one case of femoral condylar fracture after UKA has been reported thus far.

The outcome and complications of the locked plating management for the periprosthetic distal femur fractures after a total knee arthroplasty

Background

The osteosynthesis of the periprosthetic fractures following a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can be technically difficult with the relatively small satisfactory outcomes and the high complication rates. The purpose of the study is to analyze the mid-term radiological and functional outcomes following the locked plating of the distal femur periprosthetic fractures after a TKA.

Methods

Records of 20 patients with a periprosthetic distal femur fracture following TKA treated by the locked plate osteosynthesis were retrospectively evaluated. The union rate, complications and functional outcome measures were analyzed.

Results

Successful union was achieved in 18 of the 19 patients available for the follow-up. The mean follow-up was 39 ± 10 months. Significant reductions (p < 0.05) in the range of motion and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) scores were evident in the follow-up. Secondary procedures were required in 5 patients to address the delay in union and the reduced knee range of motion. The osteosynthesis failed in 1 patient who underwent a revision TKA.

Conclusions

The satisfactory union rates can be achieved with the locked plate osteosynthesis in the periprosthetic distal femur fractures after TKA. Prolonged rehabilitation coupled with the un-modifiable risk factors can decrease the activity and satisfaction levels, which can significantly alter the functional outcome.

[Minimally invasive treatment of geriatric and osteoporotic femur fractures with polyaxial locking implants (NCB-DF®)]

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic femur fractures in elderly patients are a challenging surgical procedure. The aim of this study was a prospective evaluation of minimally invasive implantation of non-contact bridging (NCB-DF®) plates.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 30 osteosynthesis procedures in 29 patients (average age 76 years and mean ASA 2.9) with complex femur fractures were registered, 19 fractures were periprosthetic and osteoporosis was present in 17 bones. In 25 patients a minimally invasive percutaneous procedure was performed using a standardized technique. An x-ray examination and clinical follow-up were performed after 6, 12 and 24 weeks.

RESULTS

The early complications (14% in total) included 1 plate breakage after 16 weeks as well as 3 minor revisions for screw length correction. The x-ray follow-up after 24 weeks showed a secondary extension deficit of 10° and 15° in the knee joint in 2 patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The NCB-DF® implantation using a standardized minimally invasive technique in periprosthetic femur fractures is a safe alternative in elderly patients. In this very sensitive population the early revision rate within the first 24 weeks is noticeable lower compared to similar procedures.

NCB-plating in the treatment of geriatric and periprosthetic femoral fractures

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is the presentation of the polyaxial locking NCB-plate in the treatment of femoral fractures, especially in elderly patients and in proximity of a prosthetic implant. The reduction and fixation of these fractures is a challenging surgical procedure with high complication rates reported up to 40%.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 72 patients with femoral fractures had polyaxial locking plate osteosynthesis. Indications included fractures of the shaft and around an implant. Concerning surgical procedures, three different standardized techniques were performed: (1) minimally invasive with percutaneous distal insertion using a targeting device; (2) mini-open with additional cerclage wire via the same approach and (3) a conventional open reduction and internal fixation. Data collection included intraoperative data and early complications at 6, 24 and 52 weeks. Fifty-two patients had an implant or prosthesis in situ. Thirty-three patients were treated by technique (1), 32 patients had mini-open surgery and seven patients conventional open surgery.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients attended clinical follow-up after 52 weeks. Twenty-two patients were interviewed by telephone, two were untraceable and nine patients had died. Bony consolidation without secondary loss of reduction was confirmed after 52 weeks in all patients but two. Plate breakage occurred in these two at 25 and 31 weeks after surgery due to non-union. Implant related complications (17% in total) lead to surgical revision in five other cases: two deep wound infections as well as three minor revisions. When itemizing complications according to surgical technique used, most major complications occurred following open surgery.

CONCLUSION

The availability of polyaxial locking implants widened the range of indications for plate fixation in femoral fractures. The advantages of the polyaxial locking implant combined with minimally invasive surgical technique contribute to successful management of this population category. Early revision rate is noticeably lower compared to similar procedures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV retrospective series.

Recent advances and developments in knee surgery: principles of periprosthetic knee fracture management

The management of distal femoral, tibial and patellar fractures after total knee arthroplasty can be complex. The incidence of these fractures is increasing as the number of total knee arthroplasties being performed and patient longevity is increasing. There is a wide range of treatment options including revision arthroplasty for loose implants. This review article discusses the epidemiology, risk factors, classification and treatment of these fractures.

Periprosthetic fractures in the distal femur following total knee replacement: A review and guide to management

The management of distal femoral fractures following a total knee replacement can be complex and requires the equipment, perioperative support and surgical skills of both trauma and revision arthroplasty services. Recent advances in implant technology have changed the management options of these difficult fractures. This article describes the options available and discusses the latest evidence.

The risk of peri-prosthetic fracture after primary and revision total hip and knee replacement

Peri-prosthetic fracture after joint replacement in the lower limb is associated with significant morbidity. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of peri-prosthetic fracture after total hip replacement (THR) and total knee replacement (TKR) over a ten-year period using a population-based linked dataset.

Between 1 April 1997 and 31 March 2008, 52 136 primary THRs, 8726 revision THRs, 44 511 primary TKRs, and 3222 revision TKRs were performed. Five years post-operatively, the rate of fracture was 0.9% after primary THR, 4.2% after revision THR, 0.6% after primary TKR and 1.7% after revision TKR. Comparison of survival analysis for all primary and revision arthroplasties showed peri-prosthetic fractures were more likely in females, patients aged > 70 and after revision arthroplasty.

Female patients aged > 70 should be warned of a significantly increased risk of peri-prosthetic fracture after hip or knee replacement. The use of adjuvant medical treatment to reduce the effect of peri-prosthetic osteoporosis may be a direction of research for these patients.

Periprosthetic fractures of the femur after total knee arthroplasty

Periprosthetic fracture following total knee arthroplasty is a potentially serious complication. This injury can involve the distal femur, proximal tibia or the patella. This review article analyzes the prevalence, risk factors, classification and treatment options for periprosthetic fractures of the femur.