Respiratory center activity during mechanical ventilation

Pulmonary contusions and critical care management in thoracic trauma

Many victims of thoracic trauma require ICU care and mechanical ventilatory support. Pressure and volume-limited modes assist in the prevention of ventilator-associated lung injury. Ventilator-associated pneumonia is a significant cause of posttraumatic morbidity and mortality. Minimizing ventilator days, secretion control, early nutritional support, and patient positioning are methods to reduce the risk of pneumonia.

Levodropropizine does not affect P0.1 and breathing pattern in healthy volunteers and patients with chronic respiratory impairment

To evaluate whether the peripherally acting antitussive levodropropizine could affect the respiratory drive and the breathing pattern, we performed a double-blind, randomised, cross-over trial in 12 healthy volunteers and 12 patients with chronic respiratory impairment associated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Levodropropizine 6% drops (at the recommended dose for adults) or placebo were administered orally t.i.d. for 10 consecutive administrations. Mouth occlusion pressure (P0.1), minute ventilation (V(e)), tidal volume (V(t)), respiratory rate (RR), mean inspiratory flow (V(t)/T(i)), end-tidal CO(2) (EtCO(2)), oxygen saturation (SaO(2)), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)), and the response to a hypercapnic stimulus were measured before and 1 h after the first and the last drug administration. Levodropropizine did not modify P0.1 in basal conditions and after a hypercapnic stimulus, either in healthy volunteers or in patients. In parallel, levodropropizine did not significantly affect V(t), RR, V(e), V(t)/T(i) and EtCO(2) in both the populations. Minor changes were induced by levodropropizine on SaO(2) in healthy volunteers, which despite a statistical difference, were too low to gain a clinical significance. These results confirmed the respiratory safety of levodropropizine 6% drops administered at the recommended dosage either in healthy volunteers or patients with chronic respiratory impairment.

Clinical characteristics, respiratory functional parameters, and outcome of a two-hour T-piece trial in patients weaning from mechanical ventilation

The discrepancy in results from different studies regarding outcome of weaning from mechanical ventilation may be due to several factors such as the differences in patient populations and weaning indexes used. In order to analyze the clinical characteristics and weaning indexes in patients undergoing a 2-h T-piece weaning trial and the relationship between the etiology of acute respiratory failure (ARF) and the outcome of this weaning trial, we prospectively studied 217 patients receiving mechanical ventilation who met standard weaning criteria. Successful weaning occurred in 57.6% (125 of 217) of patients: 13 of 33 (39.4%) patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), 27 of 46 (58.7%) neurologic patients, and 85 of 138 (61.6%) patients with ARF. Ventilatory support was reinstituted in 31.8% (69 of 217) patients: 20 of 33 (60.6%) of patients with COPD, four of 46 (8.7%) neurologic patients, and 45 of 138 (32.6%) patients with ARF (p < 0.001). Reintubation was required in 23 of 148 (15.5%) patients: 15 of 42 (35.7%) neurologic patients, and eight of 93 (8.6%) patients with ARF, whereas no patient with COPD was reintubated (p < 0.001). Using a discriminant analysis, the following variables were selected as the best predictors of outcome: (1) in the whole population, days of mechanical ventilation before weaning trial (DMV), frequency-to-tidal volume ratio (f/VT), maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), airway occlusion pressure (P0.1), maximal expiratory pressure (MEP), and vital capacity (VC); (2) in patients with ARF, DMV, P0.1/MIP, MIP, f/VT, and age; (3) in patients with COPD, f/VT, P0.1, P0.1/MIP, MIP, age, and DMV; (4) in neurologic patients, MIP, MEP, and f/VT.P0.1. Using these predictors, 74.6% of the whole population, 76.1% of patients with ARF, 93.9% of patients with COPD, and 73.9% of neurologic patients were accurately classified as weaning successes or failures. The highest rate of reintubation occurred in neurologic patients. In this group, the ability to cough and clear respiratory secretions, objectively reflected by MEP, may help in clinical decision-making.