Biphasic effect of sodium fluoride and guanyl nucleotides on binding to prostaglandin E2 receptors in rat epididymal adipocyte membranes

nArgBP2-SAPAP-SHANK, the core postsynaptic triad associated with psychiatric disorders

Despite the complex genetic architecture, a broad spectrum of psychiatric disorders can still be caused by mutation(s) in the same gene. These disorders are interrelated with overlapping causative mechanisms including variations in the interaction among the risk-associated proteins that may give rise to the specific spectrum of each disorder. Additionally, multiple lines of evidence implicate an imbalance between excitatory and inhibitory neuronal activity (E/I imbalance) as the shared key etiology. Thus, understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying E/I imbalance provides essential insight into the etiology of these disorders. One important class of candidate risk genes is the postsynaptic scaffolding proteins, such as nArgBP2, SAPAP, and SHANK that regulate the actin cytoskeleton in dendritic spines of excitatory synapses. This review will cover and discuss recent studies that examined how these proteins, especially nArgBP2, are associated with psychiatric disorders. Next, we propose a possibility that variations in the interaction among these proteins in a specific brain region might contribute to the onset of diverse phenotypes of psychiatric disorders.

The assembly of scaffolding proteins, key regulators of many signaling pathways, found in the brain’s synapses underpin a diverse range of neuropsychiatric disorders. Sunghoe Chang and colleagues from Seoul National University, South Korea, review how these postsynaptic proteins regulate the cellular cytoskeleton in nerve cell protrusions to maintain the balance between excitatory and inhibitory inputs in the brain. They discuss how perturbations in three particular proteins can cause an imbalance in synaptic signals that leads to conditions such as bipolar disorder, schizophrenia and autism. The authors propose that these proteins form a “core scaffolding triad” and interact in different ways to cause different mental illnesses. Dysregulation of these proteins could explain how mutations in the same genes, depending on whether they boost or decrease gene expression, contribute to the onset of diverse psychiatric disorders.

Is there an optimal dose for dietary linoleic acid? Lessons from essential fatty acid deficiency supplementation and adipocyte functions in rats

Differential effects of n-3 and n-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) have been demonstrated on adipose tissue physiology. Facing to the widely recognized beneficial effects of n-3 PUFAs, the n-6 PUFA effects remain controversial. Thus, we further analyzed the linoleic acid (LA) influence on adipocyte functions. To this aim, we treated by LA supplementation at three distinct doses (1, 2.5, or 5% of energy intake) rats with essential fatty acids deficiency (EFAD). PUFA composition was determined in blood and white adipose tissue (WAT), while lipolytic and lipogenic activities were measured in isolated adipocytes. EFAD rats exhibited reduced WAT mass and increased EFAD biomarkers. WAT mass was completely recovered after supplementation, irrespective of LA dose. However, neither body mass nor EFAD biomarkers returned to control with 1% LA, while LA abundance doubled in adipocytes from rats supplemented with 5% LA. Regarding lipolysis, 2.5% LA normalized the EFAD-induced alterations. A trend to decrease the maximal stimulation of lipolysis was observed with 1 and 5% LA. Regarding lipogenesis, the lower and higher LA doses increased basal activity and hampered insulin to further stimulate glucose incorporation into lipids whereas 2.5% LA normalized the basal or insulin-stimulated levels. Our results show that dietary linoleate at 2.5% restored anatomical, biochemical, and functional disturbances induced by EFAD. At higher dose, LA tended to reduce triacylglycerol breakdown, to increase triacylglycerol assembly, and to provoke insulin resistance. Therefore, LA influence on adipocyte functions does not appear to follow a typical dose-response relationship, adding further complexity to the definition of its dietary requirement.

A common low-affinity binding site for primary prostanoids on bovine aortic endothelial cells

[3H]PGE2 and [3H]PGF2 alpha were shown to bind with similar binding capacity and dissociation constants to bovine aorta endothelial cells. The similarity in the binding parameters suggests that both agonists may bind to the same binding site. Displacement of [3H]PGE2 performed with PGE2, PGF2 alpha or U-46619, a thromboxane agonist, shows that all three prostanoids displaced the bound [3H]PGE2 with comparable potency (IC50 = 10(-7) M). These results indicated that the three different prostanoids, which serve as specific agonists to different prostanoid receptors, also compete for the same binding site in bovine endothelial cells with similar affinity. Comparison of the displacement of [3H]PGE2 or [3H]PGF2 alpha by a number of prostaglandin agonists and antagonists further supports the notion that the natural prostanoids bind with similar affinities to the same binding site. Thus, sulprostone, an EP1/EP3 agonist, displaced bound [3H]PGE2 and [3H]PGF2 alpha with IC50 of about 10(-7) M. On the other hand, thromboxane antagonists (BAY u-3405 and GR-32191B), EP1 specific antagonist (SC-19220) EP1/DP antagonist (AH-6809) and iloprost, a stable prostacyclin agonist, failed to displace bound [3H]PGE2 or [3H]PGF2 alpha at a concentration range of 10(-9)-10(-6) M. Gradual increase of sodium fluoride (NaF), a general activator of G binding proteins, or incubation of permeabilized cells with GTP gamma S resulted in a decrease in [3H]PGE2 binding, suggesting that the binding site represents a low-affinity common prostanoid receptor which, similar to other prostanoid receptors, is probably coupled with G binding proteins.

Prostaglandin E2 can bimodally inhibit and stimulate the epididymal adipocyte adenylyl cyclase activity

Measurements of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2)-induced adenylyl cyclase activity in membranes isolated from epididymal rat adipocytes revealed inhibition of cAMP production at low concentrations of PGE2 (less than 10 mM) and stimulation at higher concentrations. This biphasic effect of PGE2 was obtained when adenylyl cyclase was stimulated with GTP or NaF. In the presence of forskolin only the inhibitory phase by PGE2 was observed. Sulprostone, a PGE2 analogue, did not affect cAMP synthesis in the presence of either GTP or NaF; however, in the presence of forskolin, it inhibited cAMP production similarly to PGE2. Treatment of the membranes with cholera or pertussis toxin did not alter the biphasic effect of PGE2 on cAMP production. These findings raise the possibility that PGE2 acts through several receptor subtypes which are coupled to GTP binding proteins different from the classical Gi or Gs proteins.