Electrical properties of ON-OFF transient amacrine cells in the carp retina

Asymmetric temporal properties in the receptive field of retinal transient amacrine cells

The speed of signal conduction is a factor determining the temporal properties of individual neurons and neuronal networks. We observed very different conduction velocities within the receptive field of fast-type On-Off transient amacrine cells in carp retina cells, which are tightly coupled to each other via gap junctions. The fastest speeds were found in the dorsal area of the receptive fields, on average five times faster than those detected within the ventral area. The asymmetry was similar in the On- and Off-part of the responses, thus being independent of the pathway, pointing to the existence of a functional mechanism within the recorded cells themselves. Nonetheless, the spatial decay of the graded-voltage photoresponse within the receptive field was found to be symmetrical, with the amplitude center of the receptive field being displaced to the faster side from the minimum-latency location. A sample of the orientation of varicosity-laden polyaxons in neurobiotin-injected cells supported the model, revealing that approximately 75% of these processes were directed dorsally from the origin cells. Based on these results, we modeled the velocity asymmetry and the displacement of amplitude center by adding a contribution of an asymmetric polyaxonal inhibition to the network. Due to the asymmetry in the conduction velocity, the time delay of a light response is proposed to depend on the origin of the photostimulus movement, a potentially important mechanism underlying direction selectivity within the inner retina.

GABA-Mediated inhibition between amacrine cells in the goldfish retina

Retinal amacrine cells have abundant dendro-dendritic synapses between neighboring amacrine cells. Therefore an amacrine cell has both presynaptic and postsynaptic aspects. To understand these synaptic interactions in the amacrine cell, we recorded from amacrine cells in the goldfish retinal slice preparation with perforated- and whole cell-patch clamp techniques. As the presynaptic element, 19% of the cells recorded (15 of 78 cells) showed spontaneous tetrodotoxin (TTX)-sensitive action potentials. As the postsynaptic element, all amacrine cells (n = 9) were found to have GABA-evoked responses and, under perforated patch clamp, 50 microM GABA hyperpolarized amacrine cells by activating a Cl(-) conductance. Bicuculline-sensitive spontaneous postsynaptic currents, carried by Cl(-), were observed in 82% of the cells (64 of 78 cells). Since the source of GABA in the inner plexiform layer is amacrine cells alone, these events are likely to be inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs) caused by GABA spontaneously released from neighboring amacrine cells. IPSCs were classified into three groups. Large amplitude IPSCs were suppressed by TTX (1 microM), indicating that presynaptic action potentials triggered GABA release. Medium amplitude IPSCs were also TTX sensitive. Small amplitude IPSCs were TTX insensitive (miniature IPSCs; n = 26). All of spike-induced, medium amplitude, and miniature IPSCs were Ca(2+) dependent and blocked by Co(2+). Blocking of glutamatergic inputs by DL-2-amino-phosphonoheptanoate (AP7; 30 microM) and 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione (CNQX; 2 microM) had almost no effect on spontaneous GABA release from presynaptic amacrine cells. We suggest that these dendro-dendrotic inhibitory networks contribute to receptive field spatiotemporal properties.

Voltage dependency of light-evoked on-off transient amacrine cell responses in carp retina

The voltage dependency of the ON and the OFF components of transient amacrine cell responses was studied using two-electrode voltage-clamp and current-clamp techniques in the isolated retina of the carp. The two independent approaches gave similar data. When cells were voltage clamped near their resting potentials, both response components were associated with transient inward currents. Hyperpolarization increased response size (current or voltage) whilst depolarization decreased it. Response reversal, or a tendency for it, occurred at membrane potentials significantly more positive than the resting level with some quantitative variability. These data support the view that the ON-OFF depolarizations represent basically excitatory postsynaptic potentials and that the transience of the responses cannot mainly be due to any voltage-dependent conductance.