Muscarinic M2 receptor synthesis: study of receptor turnover with propylbenzilylcholine mustard

Synthesis, trafficking, and localization of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors

Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors are members of the G-protein coupled receptor superfamily that are expressed in and regulate the function of neurons, cardiac and smooth muscle, glands, and many other cell types and tissues. The correct trafficking of membrane proteins to the cell surface and their subsequent localization at appropriate sites in polarized cells are required for normal cellular signaling and physiological responses. This review will summarize work on the synthesis and trafficking of muscarinic receptors to the plasma membrane and their localization at the cell surface.

Determination of the rate of muscarinic M1 receptor plasma membrane delivery using a regulated secretion/aggregation system

INTRODUCTION

In this study, we used the regulated secretion/aggregation technology (RPD) to determine the rate of human muscarinic M1 (hM1) receptor plasma membrane delivery.

METHODS

hM1 receptors were expressed in CHO cells as C-terminal fusion proteins to a conditional aggregation domain (CAD) consisting of four tandem mutant FKBP12 domains (F(m)).

RESULTS

The CAD prevented the plasma membrane expression of hM1 receptors by causing the formation and intracellular retention of CAD-fused receptor aggregates as determined using intact cell [3H]NMS binding assays and epi-fluorescence microscopy, respectively. Aggregates of CAD-fused hM1 receptor could be disrupted in a concentration-dependent manner by the F(m)-selective ligand AP21998, resulting in an increased hM1 receptor plasma membrane expression. A furin cleavage site positioned between the CAD and the hM1 receptor sequence was cleaved by furin once aggregates of fusion protein were disrupted by AP21998, thus ensuring their irreversible dissolution. The plasma membrane delivery of hM1 receptors begins within 30 min of AP21998 exposure and the rate of delivery was constant for up to eight hours. In the continued presence of AP21998, hM1 receptor plasma membrane expression continued to increase for up to 18 h, then began to decrease toward basal levels as incubation continued out to 72 h. Using mathematical models, we determined the rate constants for the plasma membrane delivery of hM1 receptors from these data. Also, hM1 receptors elicited phosphoinositide hydrolysis to carbachol once expressed at the plasma membrane and the pharmacology of the response varied depending upon the concentration of AP21998 used to cause plasma membrane expression.

DISCUSSION

Overall, our data indicate that the RPD can be used to characterize the kinetics of receptor plasma membrane delivery and to characterize functional responses elicited to different numbers of plasma membrane expressed receptor.

Regulation of muscarinic receptor function in developing oligodendrocytes by agonist exposure

1 Oligodendrocytes, the myelin forming cells in the CNS, express muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChR), primarily M3, coupled to various signal transduction pathways. 2 In the present study we have investigated whether mAChR undergo functional agonist-induced regulation in cultured oligodendrocyte progenitors and differentiated oligodendrocytes. 3 The muscarinic agonist, carbachol (CCh) caused a time-dependent desensitization of phosphoinositide (PI) hydrolysis, and the internalization and down-regulation of receptors. Short-time desensitization (5 min) of PI hydrolysis occurred without receptor internalization and reached 54% by 1 h. The same treatment decreased cell surface receptors labelled with the non-permeable ligand [(3)H]-NMS by 47%, while total receptor density ([(3)H]-scopolamine binding) decreased by 30%. Longer CCh treatment down-regulated receptors by 70% and desensitized the PI response by 80%. 4 Although protein kinase C (PKC) activation desensitized mAChR, CCh-mediated desensitization was independent of PKC. 5 Inhibition of receptor endocytosis by low temperature during the pre-stimulation period or in the presence of hyperosmotic sucrose (0.5 M) blocked desensitization, receptor internalization and down-regulation. 6 Recovery of surface mAChR and their functional activity following down-regulation was slow, returning to control levels by 24 h after agonist removal. In progenitor cells, dose-response curves for CCh-mediated PI hydrolysis and c-fos mRNA expression showed that newly synthesized mAChR were supersensitive after recovery. 7 Overall, the present results provide evidence of functional agonist-mediated mAChR regulation in brain oligodendroglial cells.

Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in the hippocampus, neocortex and amygdala: a review of immunocytochemical localization in relation to learning and memory

Immunocytochemical mapping studies employing the extensively used monoclonal anti-muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) antibody M35 are reviewed. We focus on three neuronal muscarinic cholinoceptive substrates, which are target regions of the cholinergic basal forebrain system intimately involved in cognitive functions: the hippocampus; neocortex; and amygdala. The distribution and neurochemistry of mAChR-immunoreactive cells as well as behaviorally induced alterations in mAChR-immunoreactivity (ir) are described in detail. M35+ neurons are viewed as cells actively engaged in neuronal functions in which the cholinergic system is typically involved. Phosphorylation and subsequent internalization of muscarinic receptors determine the immunocytochemical outcome, and hence M35 as a tool to visualize muscarinic receptors is less suitable for detection of the entire pool of mAChRs in the central nervous system (CNS). Instead, M35 is sensitive to and capable of detecting alterations in the physiological condition of muscarinic receptors. Therefore, M35 is an excellent tool to localize alterations in cellular cholinoceptivity in the CNS. M35-ir is not only determined by acetylcholine (ACh), but by any substance that changes the phosphorylation/internalization state of the mAChR. An important consequence of this proposition is that other neurotransmitters than ACh (especially glutamate) can regulate M35-ir and the cholinoceptive state of a neuron, and hence the functional properties of a neuron. One of the primary objectives of this review is to provide a synthesis of our data and literature data on mAChR-ir. We propose a hypothesis for the role of muscarinic receptors in learning and memory in terms of modulation between learning and recall states of brain areas at the postsynaptic level as studied by way of immunocytochemistry employing the monoclonal antibody M35.

Regulation of the expression and function of the M2 muscarinic receptor

Since the cloning and expression of many of the G protein-coupled receptors during the 1980s, there has been a massive increase in our understanding of many aspects of their function. The use of molecular biology to engineer and express mutant receptors has made it possible to determine key amino acids involved in receptor function. Although advances in molecular biology have contributed greatly to our understanding of the pharmacology and structure of the five subtypes of muscarinic receptor, much remains to be learned about the factors that regulate their expression and function. This review by El-Bdaoui Haddad and Jonathan Rousell describes the current state of awareness and highlights recent advances made in the elucidation of the mechanisms involved in muscarinic receptor regulation. Because most is known about the regulation of expression of the M2 receptor subtype, particular attention will be paid to it. Furthermore, this receptor subtype plays an important role in regulating acetylcholine output from airway cholinergic nerves, and there is substantial evidence from studies both in vivo and in vitro in human and animal models that these receptors are dysfunctional in asthma.