Involvement of cell shape in the replication and segregation of chromosomes in Escherichia coli

Recollections of a Helmstetter Disciple

Nearly fifty years ago, it became possible to construct E. coli minichromosomes using recombinant DNA technology. These very small replicons, comprising the unique replication origin of the chromosome oriC coupled to a drug resistance marker, provided new opportunities to study the regulation of bacterial chromosome replication, were key to obtaining the nucleotide sequence information encoded into oriC and were essential for the development of a ground-breaking in vitro replication system. However, true authenticity of the minichromosome model system required that they replicate during the cell cycle with chromosome-like timing specificity. I was fortunate enough to have the opportunity to construct E. coli minichromosomes in the laboratory of Charles Helmstetter and, for the first time, measure minichromosome cell cycle regulation. In this review, I discuss the evolution of this project along with some additional studies from that time related to the DNA topology and segregation properties of minichromosomes. Despite the significant passage of time, it is clear that large gaps in our understanding of oriC regulation still remain. I discuss some specific topics that continue to be worthy of further study.

The selective value of bacterial shape

Why do bacteria have shape? Is morphology valuable or just a trivial secondary characteristic? Why should bacteria have one shape instead of another? Three broad considerations suggest that bacterial shapes are not accidental but are biologically important: cells adopt uniform morphologies from among a wide variety of possibilities, some cells modify their shape as conditions demand, and morphology can be tracked through evolutionary lineages. All of these imply that shape is a selectable feature that aids survival. The aim of this review is to spell out the physical, environmental, and biological forces that favor different bacterial morphologies and which, therefore, contribute to natural selection. Specifically, cell shape is driven by eight general considerations: nutrient access, cell division and segregation, attachment to surfaces, passive dispersal, active motility, polar differentiation, the need to escape predators, and the advantages of cellular differentiation. Bacteria respond to these forces by performing a type of calculus, integrating over a number of environmental and behavioral factors to produce a size and shape that are optimal for the circumstances in which they live. Just as we are beginning to answer how bacteria create their shapes, it seems reasonable and essential that we expand our efforts to understand why they do so.

Is Escherichia coli getting old?

Whether or not bacteria divide symmetrically, the inheritance of cell poles is always asymmetrical. Because each cell carries an old and a new pole, its daughters will not be the same. Tracking poles of cells and measuring their lengths and doubling times in micro-colonies, Stewart et al.1 observed that growth rate diminished in cells inheriting old poles and concluded that these cells are susceptible to aging. Here, their results are compared with studies on the variabilities of length and age at division. It is argued that the decreased growth rate in old pole cells falls within the expected variation and may therefore be sufficiently far from a catastrophe-like cell death through aging.

Morphogenesis of Escherichia coli

The shape of Escherichia coli is strikingly simple compared to those of higher eukaryotes. In fact, the end result of E. coli morphogenesis is a cylindrical tube with hemispherical caps. It is argued that physical principles affect biological forms. In this view, genes code for products that contribute to the production of suitable structures for physical factors to act upon. After introduction of a physical model, the discussion is focused on the shape-maintaining (peptidoglycan) layer of E. coli. This is followed by a detailed analysis of the structural relationship of the cellular interior to the cytoplasmic membrane. A basic theme of this review is that the transcriptionally active nucleoid and the cytoplasmic translation machinery form a structural continuity with the growing cellular envelope. An attempt has been made to show how this dynamic relationship during the cell cycle affects cell polarity and how it leads to cell division.

Chromosome and low copy plasmid segregation in E. coli: visual evidence for distinct mechanisms

We have investigated DNA segregation in E. coli by inserting multiple lac operator sequences into the chromosome near the origin of replication (oriC), in the hisC gene, a terminus marker, and into plasmids P1 and F. Expression of a GFP-LacI fusion protein allowed visualization of lac operator localization. oriC was shown to be specifically localized at or near the cell poles, and when duplicated, one copy moved to the site of new pole formation near the site of cell division. In contrast, P1 and F localized to the cell center and on duplication appeared to move rapidly to the quarter positions in the cell. Our analysis suggests that different active processes are involved in movement and localization of the chromosome and of the two plasmids during segregation.

Replication and segregation of a miniF plasmid during the division cycle of Escherichia coli

Replication of the miniF plasmid pML31 was examined during the division cycle of Escherichia coli growing with doubling times between 40 and 90 min at 37 degrees C and compared to the replication of plasmid pBR322 and the minichromosome pAL70. The replication pattern of pML31 was indistinguishable from that of pBR322 at all growth rates and very different from the cell-cycle-specific replication of the minichromosome. It is concluded that both pML31 and pBR322 plasmids can replicate at all stages of the division cycle, with a probability of replication that increases gradually, but perhaps not exponentially, during the cycle. In contrast, the modes of segregation of pML31 and pBR322 plasmids into daughter cells at division appeared to differ, raising the possibility that pML31 may segregate in a nonrandom fashion similar to that of chromosomes and minichromosomes.

Hypothesis: chromosome separation in Escherichia coli involves autocatalytic gene expression, transertion and membrane-domain formation

To explain how daughter chromosomes are separated into discrete nucleoids and why chromosomes are partitioned with pole preferences, I propose that differential gene expression occurs during DNA replication in Escherichia coli. This differential gene expression means that the daughter chromosomes have different patterns of gene expression and that cell division is not a simple process of binary fission. Differential gene expression arises from autocatalytic gene expression and creates a separate proteolipid domain around each developing chromosome via the coupled transcription-translation-insertion of proteins into membranes (transertion). As these domains are immiscible, daughter chromosomes are simultaneously replicated and separated into discrete nucleoids. I also propose that the partitioning relationship between chromosome age and cell age arises because the poles of cells have a proteolipid composition that favours transertion from one nucleoid rather than from the other. This hypothesis forms part of an ensemble of related hypotheses which attempt to explain cell division, differentiation and wall growth in bacteria in terms of the physical properties and interactions of the principal constituents of cells.

Chromosome partition in Escherichia coli

The past year has seen important genetic and biochemical advances in our understanding of the mechanisms that are involved in chromosome partition into two daughter cells in Escherichia coli. Topoisomerase IV and XerCD recombinase have been shown to be required for the unlinking of replicated chromosomes. MukB, an alpha-helical coiled-coil protein, has been shown to be involved in chromosome partition, and this is the first candidate for a bacterial motor protein. Another protein, FtsZ, has been shown to form a constriction ring in cell division and may also relate to chromosome partition.

Rate maintenance of cell division in Escherichia coli B/r: analysis of a simple nutritional shift-down

A competitive (nonmetabolizable) inhibitor of glucose uptake, alpha-methylglucoside, was used to limit the growth of Escherichia coli. Cell division during such a nutritional shift-down was studied in batch cultures and with the "baby-machine" technique. Following a brief delay, the rate of division was maintained for 60 to 70 min in batch cultures and for an extended period in the baby machine. Decreases in cell size were due, in part, to a possible reduction in the mass per chromosome origin at the time of replication initiation and a shorter time interval between initiation and the subsequent division. These unusual findings suggest that this method for abrupt change in growth rate without modifying repression patterns is useful for studying the control of various aspects of the bacterial cell.

Relationships between chromosome segregation, cell shape and temperature in Escherichia coli

The partitioning of chromosomes into daughter cells during the division of Escherichia coli is non-random. As a result, the chromosome containing the older template DNA strand has a higher probability of segregating toward the old cell pole than toward the new cell pole. The numerical value of this probability is a function of the incubation temperature. It is shown here that a recent model for explaining the physiological basis for non-random chromosome segregation also explains the temperature dependence of the segregation process.