Patterns of conservation and divergence at the even-skipped locus of Drosophila

Regulation of a duplicated locus: Drosophila sloppy paired is replete with functionally overlapping enhancers

In order to investigate regulation and redundancy within the sloppy paired (slp) locus, we analyzed 30 kilobases of DNA encompassing the tandem, coordinately regulated slp1 and slp2 transcription units. We found a remarkable array of stripe enhancers with overlapping activities surrounding the slp1 transcription unit, and, unexpectedly, glial cell enhancers surrounding slp2. The slp stripe regulatory region generates 7 stripes at blastoderm, and later 14 stripes that persist throughout embryogenesis. Phylogenetic analysis among drosophilids suggests that the multiplicity of stripe enhancers did not evolve through recent duplication. Most of the direct integration among cis-regulatory modules appears to be simply additive, with one notable exception. Despite the apparent redundancy among stripe enhancers, transgenic rescue suggests that most are required for full function, to maintain wingless expression and parasegment boundaries throughout embryogenesis. Transgenic rescue also reveals indirect positive autoregulation by the 7 early stripes, without which alternate stripes within the 14-stripe pattern are lost, leading to embryos with a pair-rule phenotype.

Combinatorial activation and concentration-dependent repression of the Drosophila even skipped stripe 3+7 enhancer

Despite years of study, the precise mechanisms that control position-specific gene expression during development are not understood. Here, we analyze an enhancer element from the even skipped (eve) gene, which activates and positions two stripes of expression (stripes 3 and 7) in blastoderm stage Drosophila embryos. Previous genetic studies showed that the JAK-STAT pathway is required for full activation of the enhancer, whereas the gap genes hunchback (hb) and knirps (kni) are required for placement of the boundaries of both stripes. We show that the maternal zinc-finger protein Zelda (Zld) is absolutely required for activation, and present evidence that Zld binds to multiple non-canonical sites. We also use a combination of in vitro binding experiments and bioinformatics analysis to redefine the Kni-binding motif, and mutational analysis and in vivo tests to show that Kni and Hb are dedicated repressors that function by direct DNA binding. These experiments significantly extend our understanding of how the eve enhancer integrates positive and negative transcriptional activities to generate sharp boundaries in the early embryo.

The cis-regulatory sequences required for expression of the Drosophila melanogaster adult cuticle gene ACP65A

Post-embryonic development in insects requires successive molts. Molts are triggered by ecdysteroids, and the nature of the molt (larval, pupal or adult) is determined by juvenile hormones. The genes encoding cuticle proteins are targets of both classes of hormones, and therefore are interesting models to study hormone action at the molecular level. The Drosophila ACP65A cuticle gene is expressed exclusively during the synthesis of the adult exoskeleton, in epidermal domains synthesising flexible cuticle. We have examined the cis-regulatory sequences of ACP65A using phylogenetic comparisons and functional analysis, and find that only about 180 bp are essential, including an 81 bp intron. The restriction of ACP65A expression appears to depend on a strong repression mechanism.

Evolution of cis-regulatory sequence and function in Diptera

Cis-regulatory sequences direct patterns of gene expression essential for development and physiology. Evolutionary changes in these sequences contribute to phenotypic divergence. Despite their importance, cis-regulatory regions remain one of the most enigmatic features of the genome. Patterns of sequence evolution can be used to identify cis-regulatory elements, but the power of this approach depends upon the relationship between sequence and function. Comparative studies of gene regulation among Diptera reveal that divergent sequences can underlie conserved expression, and that expression differences can evolve despite largely similar sequences. This complex structure-function relationship is the primary impediment for computational identification and interpretation of cis-regulatory sequences. Biochemical characterization and in vivo assays of cis-regulatory sequences on a genomic-scale will relieve this barrier.

Evolution of development in closely related species of flies and worms

One of the main challenges in evolutionary biology is to identify the molecular changes that underlie phenotypic differences that are of evolutionary significance. Comparative studies of early development have shown that changes in the spatio-temporal use of regulatory genes, as well as changes in the specificity of regulatory proteins, are correlated with important differences in morphology between phylogenetically distant species. However, it is not known how such changes take place in natural populations, and whether they result from a single, or many small, additive events. Extending this approach to the study of development of closely related species promises to enrich this debate.

Anterior repression of a Drosophila stripe enhancer requires three position-specific mechanisms

The striped expression pattern of the pair-rule gene even skipped(eve) is established by five stripe-specific enhancers, each of which responds in a unique way to gradients of positional information in the earlyDrosophila embryo. The enhancer for eve stripe 2(eve 2) is directly activated by the morphogens Bicoid (Bcd) and Hunchback (Hb). As these proteins are distributed throughout the anterior half of the embryo, formation of a single stripe requires that enhancer activation is prevented in all nuclei anterior to the stripe 2 position. The gap genegiant (gt) is involved in a repression mechanism that sets the anterior stripe border, but genetic removal of gt (or deletion of Gt-binding sites) causes stripe expansion only in the anterior subregion that lies adjacent to the stripe border. We identify a well-conserved sequence repeat, (GTTT)4, which is required for repression in a more anterior subregion. This site is bound specifically by Sloppy-paired 1 (Slp1),which is expressed in a gap gene-like anterior domain. Ectopic Slp1 activity is sufficient for repression of stripe 2 of the endogenous eve gene,but is not required, suggesting that it is redundant with other anterior factors. Further genetic analysis suggests that the(GTTT)4-mediated mechanism is independent of the Gt-mediated mechanism that sets the anterior stripe border, and suggests that a third mechanism, downregulation of Bcd activity by Torso, prevents activation near the anterior tip. Thus, three distinct mechanisms are required for anterior repression of a single eve enhancer, each in a specific position. Ectopic Slp1 also represses eve stripes 1 and 3 to varying degrees,and the eve 1 and eve 3+7 enhancers each contain GTTT repeats similar to the site in the eve 2 enhancer. These results suggest a common mechanism for preventing anterior activation of three different eve enhancers.

Macro-evolution of the hairy enhancer in Drosophila species

It has been suggested that many of the changes in the developmental program might be in the cis-acting promoters and enhancer regions. Here I study the macro-evolutionary changes of an enhancer region for the early developmental gene hairy in Drosophila melanogaster, D. simulans, D. pseudoobscura, D. willistoni, D. nebulosa, D. hydei, and D. virilis. The enhancer region is characterized by small, highly conserved blocks interspersed among highly variable regions. Nevertheless, species phylogenies constructed by the enhancer sequences agree with the widely accepted phylogeny of these species. The evolution of the variable regions is consistent with a molecular clock, while the evolution of the conserved blocks is significantly different from a clock. In particular, the D. pseudoobscura lineage shows the highest degree of species-specific change consistent with changes in expression timing reported in an earlier study. It has been suggested that the variation in sequence length between highly conserved blocks may play a role in the coordination of regulatory processes, such as protein-protein interactions; thus, stabilizing selection has been suggested to act on the length variations. Here I develop a test for stabilizing selection on length variation and show that the hairy enhancer does not show statistically significant evidence for stabilizing selection. J. Exp. Zool. (Mol. Dev. Evol.) 291:175-185, 2001.

even skipped is required to produce a trans-acting signal for larval neuroblast proliferation that can be mimicked by ecdysone

Development of a multicellular organism requires precise coordination of cell division and cell type determination. The selector homeoprotein Even skipped (Eve) plays a very specific role in determining cell identity in the Drosophila embryo, both during segmentation and in neuronal development. However, studies of gene expression in eve mutant embryos suggest that eve regulates the embryonic expression of the vast majority of genes. We present here genetic interaction and phenotypic analysis showing that eve functions in the trol pathway to regulate the onset of neuroblast division in the larval CNS. Surprisingly, Eve is not detected in the regulated neuroblasts, and culture experiments reveal that Eve is required in the body, not the CNS. Furthermore, the effect of an eve mutation can be rescued both in vivo and in culture by the hormone ecdysone. These results suggest that eve is required to produce a trans-acting factor that stimulates cell division in the larval brain.

The even-skipped locus is contained in a 16-kb chromatin domain

The even-skipped (eve) gene of Drosophila melanogaster is a crucial member of the pair-rule class of segmentation genes. We report here the characterization of a 16-kb region sufficient for all known aspects of eve expression and the rescue of an eve null mutation. We began by examining 45 kb surrounding the eve coding sequence for DNaseI hypersensitive sites and other transcription units. We find that the previously identified eve regulatory elements, those for early stripes 2, 3, and 7 and the late element, do not generate prominent hypersensitive sites. However, strong, constitutive DNaseI hypersensitive sites flank a 16-kb region, within which one developmentally regulated site is found at the eve promoter region. P-element transformation of this 16-kb domain into eve mutants rescues them to adult viability. This 16-kb domain contains regulatory elements for all known features of eve expression: the seven major blastoderm stripes, minor stripe expression during germ band extension, and later expression in the lateral mesodermal muscle precursor cells, in the central nervous system, adjacent to the invaginating proctodeum, and in a ring around the anal pad. We have begun a preliminary dissection of the 16-kb domain into its constituent regulatory elements. Other major findings include the following: (1) There is a second element for late stripe expression adjacent to the traditional late element. (2) A stripe element 3' of the gene interacts with the late element to give rise to the minor stripes seen in the even-numbered parasegments. (3) Expression in the proctodeum and anal pad is driven by sequences both 5' and 3' of the gene. (4) Expression in different sites in the central nervous system is driven by separable elements widely dispersed throughout 8 kb 3' of the gene.

Analysis of an even-skipped rescue transgene reveals both composite and discrete neuronal and early blastoderm enhancers, and multi-stripe positioning by gap gene repressor gradients

The entire functional even-skipped locus of Drosophila melanogaster is contained within a 16 kilobase region. As a transgene, this region is capable of rescuing even-skipped mutant flies to fertile adulthood. Detailed analysis of the 7.7 kb of regulatory DNA 3′ of the transcription unit revealed ten novel, independently regulated patterns. Most of these patterns are driven by non-overlapping regulatory elements, including ones for syncytial blastoderm stage stripes 1 and 5, while a single element specifies both stripes 4 and 6. Expression analysis in gap gene mutants showed that stripe 5 is restricted anteriorly by Kruppel and posteriorly by giant, the same repressors that regulate stripe 2. Consistent with the coregulation of stripes 4 and 6 by a single cis-element, both the anterior border of stripe 4 and the posterior border of stripe 6 are set by zygotic hunchback, and the region between the two stripes is ‘carved out’ by knirps. Thus the boundaries of stripes 4 and 6 are set through negative regulation by the same gap gene domains that regulate stripes 3 and 7 (Small, S., Blair, A. and Levine, M. (1996) Dev. Biol. 175, 314–24), but at different concentrations. The 3′ region also contains a single element for neurogenic expression in ganglion mother cells 4–2a and 1–1a, and neurons derived from them (RP2, a/pCC), suggesting common regulators in these lineages. In contrast, separable elements were found for expression in EL neurons, U/CQ neurons and the mesoderm. The even-skipped 3′ untranslated region is required to maintain late stage protein expression in RP2 and a/pCC neurons, and appears to affect protein levels rather than mRNA levels. Additionally, a strong pairing-sensitive repression element was localized to the 3′ end of the locus, but was not found to contribute to efficient functional rescue.

Structure and evolution of a pair-rule interaction element: runt regulatory sequences in D. melanogaster and D. virilis

Pair-rule genes serve two important functions during Drosophila development: they first initiate periodic patterns, and subsequently interact with each other to refine these patterns to the precision required for definition of segmental compartments. Previously, we described a pair-rule input region of the runt gene. Here we further characterize this region through the use of reporter gene constructs and by comparison with corresponding sequences from Drosophila virilis. We find that many but not all regulatory properties of this '7-stripe region' are functionally conserved. Moreover, the similarity between these homologous sequences is surprisingly low. When compared to similar data for gap gene input element, our data suggest that pair-rule target sequences are less constrained during evolution, and that functional elements mediating pair-rule interactions can be dispersed over many kilobases.

Allosteric regulation of even-skipped repression activity by phosphorylation

The Drosophila homeodomain protein Even-skipped (Eve) is a well characterized transcriptional repressor. Here, we show that Eve's ability to function in vitro is negatively regulated by phosphorylation. DNA-binding activity was unaffected by phosphorylation, but phosphorylated Eve was unable to interact with the TATA-binding protein (TBP), a known target for repression. Unexpectedly, phosphorylation of the Eve N terminus, which is dispensable for repression and TBP binding, was necessary and sufficient to inactivate Eve. LiCl, which specifically inhibits glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK-3), reduced Eve phosphorylation in nuclear extract and blocked inhibition of repression. In addition, Eve was phosphorylated and inactivated by purified GSK-3 beta plus casein kinase II. Our results suggest a novel mechanism of transcriptional control involving phosphorylation-induced allosteric interference with a repressive protein-protein interaction.

Drosophila Paired regulates late even-skipped expression through a composite binding site for the paired domain and the homeodomain

The even-skipped (eve) pair-rule gene plays a key role in the establishment of the anterior-posterior segmental pattern of the Drosophila embryo. The continuously changing pattern of eve expression can be resolved into two phases. Early expression consists of seven broad stripes in the blastoderm embryo, while late expression, which occurs after cellularization, consists of narrow stripes with sharp anterior borders that coincide with the odd-numbered parasegment boundaries. Previous studies have shown that these two phases are controlled by separate classes of cis elements in the eve promoter. Early stripes are expressed by multiple stripe-specific elements under the control of maternal-effect genes and gap genes, while late stripes are expressed by a single regulatory element, the ‘late element’, under the control of pair-rule genes including eve itself. We report here that paired (prd), a pair-rule gene which had been considered to be below eve in the regulatory hierarchy of pair-rule genes, in fact plays a critical role in the regulation of late eve expression. Transgenic analysis shows that this regulation is largely mediated by an evolutionarily conserved sequence within the late element termed PTE (Paired Target Element). In vitro analysis shows that the Prd protein binds strongly to this sequence. Interestingly, PTE contains juxtaposed binding sites for the two DNA-binding domains of the Prd protein, the paired domain and the homeodomain. Mutagenesis of either binding site leads to significant reduction in the activity of the late element, indicating that both DNA-binding domains in the Paired protein are required for regulation.