A comparison of in vitro storage markers between gamma-irradiated and non-irradiated apheresis platelet concentrates (APC)

HLA class I depletion by citric acid, and irradiation of apheresis platelets for transfusion of refractory patients

BACKGROUND

Patients can form antibodies to foreign human leukocyte antigen (HLA) Class I antigens after exposure to allogeneic cells. These anti-HLA class I antibodies can bind transfused platelets (PLTs) and mediate their destruction, thus leading to PLT refractoriness. Patients with PLT refractoriness need HLA-matched PLTs, which require expensive HLA typing of donors, antibody analyses of patient sera and/or crossmatching. An alternative approach is to reduce PLT HLA Class I expression using a brief incubation in citric acid on ice at low pH.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Apheresis PLT concentrates were depleted of HLA Class I complexes by 5 minutes incubation in ice-cold citric acid, at pH 3.0. Surface expression of HLA Class I complexes, CD62P, CD63, phosphatidylserine, and complement factor C3c was analyzed by flow cytometry. PLT functionality was tested by thromboelastography (TEG).

RESULTS

Acid treatment reduced the expression of HLA Class I complexes by 71% and potential for C3c binding by 11.5-fold compared to untreated PLTs. Acid-treated PLTs were significantly more activated than untreated PLTs, but irrespective of this increase in steady-state activation, CD62P and CD63 were strongly upregulated on both acid-treated and untreated PLTs after stimulation with thrombin receptor agonist peptide. Acid treatment did not induce apoptosis over time. X-ray irradiation did not significantly influence the expression of HLA Class I complexes, CD62P, CD63, and TEG variables on acid treated PLTs.

CONCLUSION

The relatively simple acid stripping method can be used with irradiated apheresis PLTs and may prevent transfusion-associated HLA sensitization and overcome PLT refractoriness.

To study the effects of gamma irradiation on single donor apheresis platelet units by measurement of cellular counts, functional indicators and a panel of biochemical parameters, in order to assess pre-transfusion platelet quantity and quality during the shelf life of the product

BACKGROUND

The occurrence of transfusion associated graft versus host disease can be prevented by gamma irradiation of blood components. This study was undertaken to assess the effects of gamma irradiation on single donor platelet (SDP) concentrate units.

METHOD

SDPs were collected by a continuous flow apheresis technique (n = 400). The SDPs from each donor were divided into two parts, one gamma-irradiated with 25 Gy and the other used as a non-irradiated control. Swirling and morphological features, cellular counts, biochemical parameters including blood gas analysis, and platelet activation levels (CD62P: p-selectin) by flow cytometry were analyzed on Day 1 and on Day 5.

RESULTS

Swirling and morphology were maintained in all products, in both the groups throughout the shelf life. No significant change was seen in both groups, on the first and fifth day, as far as pO2, pCO2, Na(+), K(+), HCO3 (-) & Ca(2+) were concerned. However, lactate increased and glucose decreased significantly in irradiated products over 5-day storage period. A small but significant decrease in pH and platelet count was found in the irradiated PCs after 5-day storage. The mean proportion of platelets expressing CD62P over 5-day storage increased significantly.

CONCLUSION

After an overall assessment of all our in vitro parameter results and observations, a few of which were significant, while most were not significant, we concluded that a well-preserved quality of gamma irradiated apheresis platelets is maintained throughout the entire 5-day shelf life of the platelet product, with minimal difference compared to non-irradiated platelets.

A new platelet storage lesion index based on paired samples, without and with EDTA and cell counting: Comparison of three types of leukoreduced preparations

Platelets derived from whole blood and diverse apheresis procedures come in contact with various artificial surfaces and undergo contact activation, sheer stress-induced shape changes, aggregation and microvesiculation during collection, processing and storage. These dynamic changes are qualitatively reflected in the log-normal platelet size distribution patterns seen, when using modern automated cell counters and can be measured quantitatively by counting the paired samples, without and with added EDTA, and calculating the differences (d) in platelet cellular indices (dPLT/dMPV/dPDW). Reporting the differences instead of the absolute values of cellular indices makes the measurements independent of basic principles used for cell counting (i.e. aperture-impedance or flow-optic). The measurements can be performed either in blood centres, hospital blood banks or nearby patient clinics equipped with a validated cell counter. At least three useful quality indices could be derived simultaneously from this procedure (accurate estimation of platelet yields using the value of the EDTA-containing sample); quantitative assessment of the % of reversible platelet aggregates, an age/pH/temperature-dependent degree of microvesiculation/apoptosis/PS exposure, based on the response to EDTA. This new set of indices correlate significantly with other conventional tests for platelet quality; hence, provide additional supportive evidence for confirming the low pH values and the subjective poor swirling data occasionally seen with stored PC. In the following study, the Sysmex SE 9000 was successfully employed for estimation of platelet cellular indices comparing the platelet storage lesion index of three types of leukoreduced platelet concentrates in current practice. The relationship between this in vitro response to clinical outcome remains to be established.

Prevention of transfusion-associated graft-versus-host disease by inactivation of T cells in platelet components

Patients with hematological malignancies and infants with congenital immunodeficiencies who received blood are two of many populations at risk for transfusion-associated graft-versus-host disease (TA-GVHD). Of the methodologies (eg, photoinactivation, peglyation, ultraviolet light, and irradiation) that can be used to prevent TA-GVHD, only irradiation of whole blood and cellular components is currently accepted practice of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Among the newer methods that have been developed to reduce the risks of bacterial and viral contaminants of platelet transfusions, photochemical treatment (PCT) using psoralens and long-wavelength ultraviolet (UVA) irradiation modifies bacterial and viral genomes sufficiently to inhibit replication. Among a broad group of compounds, the synthetic psoralen compound amotosalen hydrochloride (HCl) (S-59) has been shown to be particularly effective in inactivating bacteria and viruses, without adversely affecting in vitro and in vivo platelet function.

Effect of gamma radiation on the in vitro aggregability of WBC-reduced apheresis platelets

BACKGROUND

The effect of gamma radiation on single-donor apheresis platelet concentrates (SDPs) has been elucidated only incompletely. The only existing report on the function of SDPs stored in the irradiated state found a deterioration in the in vitro aggregability at the end of shelf life in SDPs divided before irradiation with 1500 cGy.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The in vitro properties of platelets were examined in four series of irradiated and control platelets, each obtained from the same 15 donors. Irradiation with 3000 cGy was performed on Days 0, 3, and 5. Cellular content, aggregability by ADP alone or ADP and epinephrine, spontaneous and induced CD62 expression, beta-thromboglobulin release, glucose consumption, lactate production, and pH were measured immediately after preparation and on Days 3 and 5 after donation.

RESULTS

Comparable in vitro properties were measured in irradiated and control platelets, whether irradiation was performed on Day 3 or Day 5. However, in platelets irradiated on Day 0, we found a significantly better in vitro aggregability by 20 microM: ADP immediately after irradiation and by 10 microM: ADP and 2 microM: epinephrine at the end of shelf life than was found in the other groups (Day 5 results: Day 0 irradiation: 75 +/- 32%; Day 3 irradiation: 45 +/- 45%; Day 5 irradiation: 47 +/- 41%; control: 40 +/- 24%; p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Gamma radiation had no adverse effect on platelet quality in extremely WBC-reduced SDPs. On the contrary, a slight, but significantly better in vitro aggregability was found in SDPs irradiated before storage than in platelets irradiated later during storage and in unirradiated platelets. This increased in vitro aggregability persisted until the end of shelf life.

The irradiation of blood and blood components to prevent graft-versus-host disease: technical issues and guidelines

In recent years, there have been several advances in blood irradiation practice. These include a better definition of the most appropriate dose level that should be used when irradiating blood components. Commercial innovation has provided the tools for a quality assurance program to assess the dose that is delivered throughout the canister in a free-standing irradiator, and, through the use of radiation-sensitive indicator labels, to confirm that the irradiation process has taken place. With the apparent increased use of linear-accelerators to irradiate blood components, appropriate quality assurance measures need to be developed. The maximum storage period for irradiated red cells should be shorter than for nonirradiated red cells if the treatment is performed early during the storage period because irradiation reduces the in vivo 24-hour red cell recovery parameter. The storage period for irradiated platelets does not need to be modified. Some questions are being raised regarding whether fresh-frozen plasma should be irradiated to inactivate a small number of immunocompetent progenitor cells that may be present. Table 4 summarizes the practices that should be followed in connection with the technical issues that have been addressed in this article. These guidelines follow the recommendations issued in July 1993 by the FDA in the United States. This article and Tables 1 and 2 contain additional guidelines.