Aortocaval compression syndrome: its 50-year history

Motor Vehicle Accident during Pregnancy with Two Lifes at Risk: A Case Report

Introduction:

Major trauma is the leading non-pregnancy-related cause of maternal and fetal deaths. In particular, traffic accidents account for the majority of accident causes and present the highest mortality for the mother and fetus. Seat belt use has reduced mortality rates for both the mother and the unborn child, however, certain potential patterns of injury occur due to the restraining mechanical forces of the worn seat belts on the body. Since life-threatening injuries in pregnancy are nevertheless rare, trauma care of pregnant women continues to be an exceptional situation and a particularly stressful situation for the attending physicians, including the fact that two lives are potentially at stake.

Case Report:

In this article, we report on a patient in the 37th week of pregnancy who was involved in a high-speed trauma as a front passenger of a car. Initially awake as well as responsive and hemodynamically stable, the patient’s condition deteriorated on the way to the emergency room (ER). On arrival in the ER, according to the Advanced Trauma Life Support concept, interdisciplinary consensus had to be reached between the departments involved regarding further diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. With the knowledge of the special anatomical and physiological changes in the context of pregnancy, both the mother and the child could be stabilized in order to subsequently gain further important information about the present injury pattern during the performed diagnostics and finally to be able to adequately treat the trauma sequelae.

Conclusion:

Because the care of traumatic life-threatening injuries in pregnancy is rare overall, it poses a special challenge for the attending trauma team in the ER. In order to avert the fatal fate of both the mother and the unborn child, a structured, symptom and patient-oriented interdisciplinary approach is indispensable, especially in these exceptional situations, in order to achieve the best possible outcome for those affected.

Lateral Position for Cesarean Delivery Because of Severe Aortocaval Compression in a Patient With Marfan Syndrome: A Case Report

Prompt recognition and management of hypotension resulting from aortocaval compression syndrome are essential to optimize the maternal and fetal outcomes. Management involves increasing leftward uterine displacement and sometimes full lateral positioning, although lateral position during cesarean delivery is typically considered to be impractical. We report an obstetric patient case of severe aortocaval compression syndrome resulting in hypotension and loss of consciousness that ultimately underwent cesarean delivery under general anesthesia in the lateral position. Performing cesarean delivery in the lateral position is virtually unreported, and this unique strategy prevented further symptoms of aortocaval compression and enabled safe delivery.

Anaesthesia for Caesarean section and neonatal acid-base status: a meta-analysis

Spinal anaesthesia is generally preferred for Caesarean section. Its superiority for the baby is often assumed. Umbilical artery acid-base status provides a valid index of fetal welfare. Twenty-seven studies reporting neonatal acid-base data with different types of anaesthesia were used to compare umbilical artery or vein pH and base deficit, using random-effect meta-analysis. Cord pH was significantly lower with spinal than with both general (difference: -0.015; 95% CI -0.029 to -0.001; 13 studies, 1272 subjects) and epidural anaesthesia (difference -0.013; 95% CI -0.024 to -0.002; 11 studies, 828 subjects). Larger doses of ephedrine contributed to the latter effect (p = 0.023). Sixteen studies reported a base deficit, which was significantly higher for spinal than for general (difference 1.109; 95% CI 0.434-1.784 mEq.l(-1); seven studies, 695 subject) and epidural anaesthesia (difference 0.910; 95% CI 0.222-1.598 mEq.l(-1); seven studies, 497 subjects). Spinal anaesthesia cannot be considered safer than epidural or general anaesthesia for the fetus.

Hemodynamic effects of simultaneous administration of intravenous ephedrine and spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the hemodynamic effects of an intravenous (IV) ephedrine bolus given simultaneously with spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery.

DESIGN

Randomized, prospective, double-blind study.

SETTING

Tertiary-care academic medical center.

PATIENTS

40 ASA physical status I and II nonlaboring women undergoing elective cesarean delivery of term, uncomplicated, singleton pregnancies.

INTERVENTIONS

After a 10 mL/kg IV lactated Ringers bolus given over 15 minutes, patients simultaneously received an IV dose of 2 mL (10 mg) ephedrine or 2 mL saline, and an intrathecal dose of 12 mg (1.6 mL 0.75%) bupivacaine with 10 microg of fentanyl. Hypotension, defined as a 20% decrease in mean arterial pressure (MAP), was treated with 10-mg IV doses of ephedrine.

MEASUREMENTS

Hemodynamic (heart rate and MAP) and non-invasive thoracic impedance (cardiac index, stroke index, and systemic vascular resistance index) measurements at baseline and at 1-minute intervals until the time of delivery. Total fluid, supplemental ephedrine, and Apgar scores were recorded. Data were evaluated using analysis of variance (ANOVA), ANOVA for repeated measures, and Mann-Whitney U-tests where appropriate, with p < 0.05 considered significant.

MAIN RESULTS

Significant changes from baseline in MAP, systemic vascular resistance index, heart rate, and cardiac index were observed in both groups after spinal anesthesia. However, there were no differences between the ephedrine and saline groups in the incidence and severity of change from the baseline. The overall incidence of hypotension was 70% in both groups. No difference in total fluid or supplemental ephedrine use was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

10 mg of IV ephedrine given at the time of spinal anesthesia, and after a 10 mL/kg lactated Ringers fluid bolus, does not diminish the incidence or severity of hypotension in parturients undergoing cesarean delivery.