Comparison of two carboplatin-containing regimens with standard chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer in a randomised phase II study. The EORTC Lung Cancer Cooperative group

Platinum versus non-platinum chemotherapy regimens for small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a very fast growing form of cancer and is characterised by early metastasis. As a result, chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatment. A number of different platinum-based chemotherapy regimens and non-platinum-based chemotherapy regimens have been used for the treatment of SCLC, with varying results. This review was conducted to analyse the data from these studies in order to compare their effectiveness.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness of platinum chemotherapy regimens compared with non-platinum chemotherapy regimens in the treatment of SCLC with respect to survival, tumour response, toxicity and quality of life.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the biomedical literature databases CENTRAL (TheCochrane Library 2014, Issue 7), MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL from 1966 to August 2014. In addition, we handsearched reference lists from relevant resources.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials involving patients with pathologically confirmed SCLC (including both limited-stage disease and extensive-stage disease) and the use of a platinum-based chemotherapy regimen in at least one treatment arm and a non-platinum-based chemotherapy regimen in a separate arm.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by the Cochrane Collaboration. Two authors independently assessed search results. We assessed included studies for methodological quality and recorded the following outcome data: survival, tumour response, toxicity and quality of life. We combined the results of the survival, tumour response and toxicity data in a meta-analysis. Quality-of-life data were analysed individually.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 32 studies involving 6075 patients with SCLC were included in this systematic review. The majority of studies were multi-centre randomised controlled trials conducted throughout Europe, North America and Asia with the earliest study publishing data in 1981 and the latest in 2014. The duration of studies ranged from 12 to 72 months with a median of 32 months. The median age of patients in the vast majority of studies was between 60 and 65 years of age. Eighteen studies presented data on extensive-stage disease. Nine studies presented data on limited-stage disease. Eleven studies did not present data based on the disease stage. These data were analysed separately in subgroup analyses. Sixteen (50%) studies were of good quality with a low risk of bias and the data from these studies were analysed separately in a heterogeneity analysis.There was no statistically significant difference between treatment groups in terms of survival at 6 months, 12 months and 24 months. There was also no statistically significant difference in terms of overall tumour response. However, platinum-based treatment regimens did have a significantly higher rate of complete response. Platinum-based chemotherapy regimens had significantly higher rates of nausea and vomiting and thrombocytopenia toxicity. Four trials presented quality-of-life data, but, due to the different systems used to measure quality of life this data could not be combined in a meta-analysis.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Platinum-based chemotherapy regimens did not offer a statistically significant benefit in survival or overall tumour response compared with non-platinum-based regimens. However, platinum-based chemotherapy regimens did increase complete response rates, at the cost of higher adverse events including nausea and vomiting, anaemia and thrombocytopenia toxicity. These data suggest non-platinum chemotherapy regimens have a more advantageous risk-benefit profile. This systematic review highlights the lack of quality-of-life data in trials involving chemotherapy treatment for SCLC. With poor long-term survival associated with both treatment groups, the issue of the quality of the survival period takes on even more significance. It would be beneficial for future trials in this area to include a quality-of-life assessment.

Platinum versus non-platinum chemotherapy regimens for small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a very fast growing form of cancer and is characterised by early metastasis. As a result, chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatment. A number of different platinum-based chemotherapy regimens and non-platinum-based chemotherapy regimens have been used for the treatment of SCLC, with varying results. This review was conducted to analyse the data from these trials in order to compare their effectiveness.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness of platinum chemotherapy regimens compared with non-platinum chemotherapy regimens in the treatment of SCLC with respect to survival, tumour response, toxicity and quality of life.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the biomedical literature databases CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2007, Issue 2), MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL from 1966 to April 2007. In addition, we handsearched reference lists from relevant resources.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials involving patients with pathologically confirmed (cytological or histological) SCLC and the use of a platinum-based chemotherapy regimen in at least one treatment arm and a non-platinum-based chemotherapy regimen in a separate arm.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed search results. We assessed included studies for methodological quality and recorded the following outcome data: survival, tumour response, toxicity and quality of life. We combined the results of the survival, tumour response and toxicity data in a meta-analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 29 trials involving 5530 patients were included in this systematic review. There was no statistically significant difference between treatment groups in terms of survival at 6 months, 12 months and 24 months. There was also no statistically significant difference in terms of overall tumour response. However, platinum-based treatment regimens did have a significantly higher rate of complete response. Platinum-based chemotherapy regimens had significantly higher rates of nausea and vomiting, anaemia and thrombocytopenia toxicity. Three trials presented quality of life data but the data presented were not complete and therefore could not be combined in a meta-analysis.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Platinum-based chemotherapy regimens did not offer a statistically significant benefit in survival or overall tumour response compared with non-platinum-based regimens. However, platinum-based chemotherapy regimens did increase complete response rates, at the cost of higher adverse events including nausea and vomiting, anaemia and thrombocytopenia toxicity. These data suggest non-platinum chemotherapy regimens have a more advantageous risk-benefit profile. This systematic review highlights the lack of quality of life data in trials involving chemotherapy treatment for SCLC. With poor long-term survival associated with both treatment groups, the issue of the quality of the survival period takes on even more significance. It would be beneficial for future trials in this area to include a quality of life assessment.

Hematopoietic Protection by Dexamethasone or Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF) in Patients Treated With Carboplatin and Ifosfamide

Based on preclinical studies, the authors undertook a pilot study to determine the hematologic and biologic effects of pretreatment with dexamethasone (Dex) or granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in patients receiving carboplatin and ifosfamide. Patients (n = 28) with metastatic solid tumors were randomized to receive pretreatment with Dex or GM-CSF or no pretreatment prior to courses 1 or 2 of carboplatin and ifosfamide. No alteration in dose of chemotherapy was allowed between course 1 and 2. Alterations of hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity and selected biologic parameters were compared between courses 1 and 2. Patients without any pretreatment demonstrated worsening hematologic toxicity in course 2 compared to course 1. In contrast, Dex pretreatment reduced hematopoietic toxicity and improved the absolute granulocyte count (AGC) and platelet count recovery times. For example, course 1 versus course 2 (with Dex pretreatment): AGC nadir (mm3) 153 versus 549 (p = 0.07), days AGC <500/mm3 7.8 versus 4.0 (p = 0.10), days to AGC recovery >1,500/mm3, 26 versus 22 (p = 0.034). Overall comparison between all five cohorts by analyses of variance demonstrated that intervention with Dex improved multiple hematopoietic toxicities, including AGC nadir (p = 0.015), and recovery times to AGC >1,500/mm3 (p = 0.07) and platelet count to >100,000/mm3 (p = 0.05). GM-CSF pretreatment did not worsen hematopoietic parameters after course 2 compared to course 1. Expected biologic effects of Dex and GM-CSF treatment were observed. Patients demonstrated an overall response rate of 32%, 1 complete response, and 8 partial responses. In patients with cancer, pretreatment with Dex or GM-CSF may significantly decrease the hematopoietic toxicity of chemotherapeutic agents.

Overview of past, present and future of the EORTC Lung Cancer Group. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer

The EORTC Lung Cancer Group (LCG) is a multidisciplinary international group of experts performing clinical research in lung cancer since 1962. Originally, the group consisted mainly out of French and Belgian investigators and expanded gradually into a wide range of investigators from all European Union countries, as well as some investigators from Switzerland, Poland, Czech Republic, Egypt, Slovenia, South Africa, Peru, Brazil and Cyprus. Despite the wide collaboration, it remains a difficult task to perform high quality large clinical research trials to answer important scientific questions in the treatment of lung cancer. For this reason, the EORTC Lung Cancer Group has invested a lot of efforts in promoting worldwide, randomised phase III studies in collaboration with other Groups. Furthermore, the LCG promotes small phase II trials of new drugs or treatments for lung cancer and stimulates the investigation of new strategies and treatments for rare intrathoracic malignancies.

Standard versus alternating non-cross-resistant chemotherapy in extensive small cell lung cancer: an EORTC Phase III trial

Alternating chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer has been tested in several studies. Some have shown positive results that have not been confirmed in other studies. In all of the studies, however, the degree of non-cross-resistance in the regimens was questionable. The EORTC Lung Cancer Study Group developed two equipotent regimens: (i) standard (CDE)-cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, etoposide; (ii) (VIMP)-vincristine, carboplatin, ifosfamide, mesna, both non-cross-resistance. These two combinations were alternated and compared with the standard chemotherapy regimen in a group of 143 patients with extensive small cell lung cancer. Median survival was 7.6 months in the standard arm and 8.7 in the alternating arm (P = 0.243). Median time to progression was 5.8 and 6.4 months, respectively (P = 0.166). Median response duration was 7.0 and 6.8 months (P = 0.221). The use of two alternating regimens with a proven degree of non-cross-resistance did not result in any improvement in survival in patients with extensive small cell lung cancer.

Can we predict very short term survival in small cell lung cancer?

We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 151 consecutive patients diagnosed as small cell lung cancer in our department and who had at least one course of chemotherapy. Nineteen patients died during the first 2 months, of the probability were reported to construct a receiver operating characteristic curve i.e. 13% of the population. The probability of dying within 2 months was investigated through a stepwise logistic regression. A performance status < or = 70 (Karnofsky index), an age > 60, a platelet count < or = 150,000/mm3, elevated alkaline phosphatase and a sodium < or = 135 mmol/l were independent predictors of a very short term survival and contributed to the equation for the probability of dying within a 2-month period. Sensitivity and specificity for various cutoff points characteristic curve allowing one to determine for a given patient his risk of being a very short term survivor. Such an approach could prevent inclusion of patients with high risk of early death in clinical trials and help to choose appropriate treatments for such poor risk patients.

Testing the possible non-cross resistance of two equipotent combination chemotherapy regimens against small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study of the EORTC Lung Cancer Cooperative Group

The Goldie-Coldman hypothesis of alternating non-cross resistant combination chemotherapy regimens for small-cell lung cancer has never been adequately evaluated. In previously reported studies non-cross resistance and/or equipotency of the combinations used had not been tested before the phase III study was started. We describe two combination chemotherapy regimens with comparable efficacy against small-cell lung cancer and present a phase II test of their possible non-cross resistance. Patients clinically resistant to cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and etoposide (CDE), were treated with the second-line regimen consisting of vincristine, ifosfamide, mesna and carboplatin (VIMP) (n = 25). This resulted in 1 complete and 14 partial responses, response rate 60% [95% confidence interval (CI): 38.7-78.9%]. Patients clinically resistant to vincristine, carboplatin (n = 22) or ifosfamide, mesna, carboplatin (n = 21) were treated with CDE, resulting in 6 complete responses and 16 partial responses, response rate 51% (95% CI: 35.5-66.7%). The clinical value of such a degree of non-cross resistance has to be evaluated in a phase III study.