Mammographic patterns in breast cancer chemoprevention with fenretinide (4-HPR)

A two-by-two factorial trial comparing oral with transdermal estrogen therapy and fenretinide with placebo on breast cancer biomarkers

PURPOSE

Oral conjugated equine estrogen (CEE) and medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) increase breast cancer risk, whereas the effect of transdermal estradiol (E2) and MPA is less known. Fenretinide may decrease second breast malignancies in premenopausal women but not in postmenopausal women, suggesting a hormone-sensitizing effect. We compared the 6 and 12-month changes in insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I), IGF-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3), IGF-I:IGFBP-3 ratio, sex-hormone binding-globulin, and computerized mammographic percent density during oral CEE or transdermal E2 with sequential MPA and fenretinide or placebo.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

A total of 226 recent postmenopausal healthy women were randomly assigned in a two-by-two factorial design to either oral CEE 0.625 mg/day (n = 111) or transdermal E2, 50 microg/day (n = 115) and to fenretinide 100 mg/twice a day (n = 112) or placebo (n = 114) for 12 months. Treatment effects were investigated by the Kruskall-Wallis test and analysis of covariance. P values were two-sided.

RESULTS

After 12 months, oral CEE decreased IGF-I by 26% [95% confidence interval (CI), 22-30%] and increased sex-hormone binding-globulin by 96% (95% CI, 79-112%) relative to baseline, whereas no change occurred with transdermal E2 (P < 0.001 between groups). Fenretinide decreased IGFBP-3 relative to placebo (P = 0.04). Percentage of breast density showed an absolute increase of 3.5% (95% CI, 2.5-4.6%) during hormone therapy without differences between groups (P = 0.39).

CONCLUSIONS

Oral CEE has more favorable changes than transdermal E2 on circulating breast cancer risk biomarkers but gives similar effects on mammographic density. Fenretinide exerted little modulation on most biomarkers. The clinical implications of these findings require additional studies.

Apoptosis and restriction of G(1)/S cell cycle by fenretinide in Burkitt's lymphoma mutu I cell line accessed with bcl-6 down-regulation

Fenretinide (4-HPR) is a synthetic retinoid with cancer chemopreventative potential and clinically manageable side effects, compared to the prototype retinoid, all-trans retinoic acid (RA). 4-HPR has been shown to modulate cell proliferation and induce apoptosis in a variety of human tumor cell types, but its effects on B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (NHL-B) have not been explored. Treatment of Burkitt's lymphoma Mutu I cells with 3 microM 4-HPR is accompanied by growth arrest, induction of apoptosis, and restricted progression of the cell cycle at the G(1)/S checkpoint. We also observed that 4-HPR elicited a reduced expression of bcl-6 in these cells, which supports the proposed role of bcl-6 as an anti-apoptotic gene. While 4-HPR treatment had no effect on total Rb gene expression, it significantly reduced the state of hyperphosphorylation of Rb, resulting in the predominant existence of Rb in the underphosphorylated state.

Models for early chemoprevention trials in breast cancer

Several models are being explored for use in the phase I and phase II evaluation of breast cancer chemoprevention agents. The short-term DCIS/small invasive cancer model is probably best used in late phase I trials in conjunction with agents likely to have activity in the progression phase of neoplastic development in addition to activity in earlier phases. The core biopsy or FNA hyperplasia models may be best used with drugs that are likely to have activity primarily in the promotion phase of neoplastic development and that are suitable for longer duration trials lasting several months to years. Morphology currently is the key surrogate endpoint biomarker for assessing efficacy in phase II trials. Other biomarkers that may undergo modulation will have to be validated, in that modulation will have to be shown to be directly related to decreased cancer risk in subsequent phase III trials. Only then can they be considered as validated surrogate endpoint biomarkers and used as stand-alone efficacy markers in phase II trials. Despite accrual challenges and technologic hurdles, interest in phase I and phase II chemoprevention trials is high.

Growth inhibition of human in vitro and mouse in vitro and in vivo mammary tumor models by retinoids in comparison with tamoxifen and the RU-486 anti-progestagen

Retinoids constitute a very promising class of agents for the chemoprevention or treatment of breast cancer. These retinoids exert their biological activity through two distinct classes of retinoic acid (RA) receptors (R), the RAR isotypes (alpha, beta, and gamma) and the three RXR isotypes (alpha, beta, and gamma) and their numerous isoforms which bind as RXR/RAR heterodimers to the polymorphic cis-acting response elements of RA target genes. With respect to these numerous receptor sub-types, the retinoid-induced effects at the biological level include marked modifications with respect to both cell proliferation and cell death (apoptosis), and also in the induction of differentiation processes. The present study aims to characterize the effect which four retinoids (TTNPB, 9-cis-RA, LGD 1069, 4-HPR) with distinct RAR/RXR binding properties induced on various in vitro and in vivo mouse and human breast cancer models. The experiments with the retinoids were carried out in comparison with the anti-estrogen tamoxifen and the anti-progestagen RU-486 compounds. The results show that the 6 compounds under study were markedly more efficient in terms of growth inhibition in the human T-47D cell line when maintained under anchorage-independent culture conditions than when maintained under anchorage-dependent ones. While RU-486 exhibited a weak statistically significant (p < 0.05) influence on the growth of the T-47D stem cells, tamoxifen had a marked inhibitory influence on the growth of these cells. Of the four retinoids, 4-HPR was the least effective since the lowest doses tested (1 and 0.1 nM) exhibited no statistically (p > 0.05) significant influence on the growth of the stem cells. The most efficient retinoid was TTNPB. It was only at the highest dose (10 microM) that tamoxifen and RU-486 showed a weak inhibitory influence on the growth of the T-47D non-stem cells while all 4 retinoids exerted a significant inhibitory influence on the growth of these non-stem cells, with 4-HPR being the most efficient (P < 0.001) at the highest dose, but ineffective (P > 0.05) at the lowest. Tamoxifen and TTNPB were tested in vivo on hormone-sensitive (HS) and hormone-insensitive (HI) strains of the MXT murine mammary carcinoma. While TTNPB appeared to be equally efficient in terms of growth inhibition in both MXT-HS and MXT-HI models, tamoxifen had only a marginal inhibitory influence on the growth of the MXT-HI strain but did inhibit growth in the case of the MXT-HS one. TTNPB was markedly more efficient than tamoxifen in terms of both inhibiting the cell proliferation level (measured by means of computer-assisted microscopy applied to Feulgen-stained nuclei, a method which enables the percentage of cells in the S phase of the cell cycle to be determined) and triggering cell death (measured by means of the determination of the transglutaminase activity) in both the MXT-HI and MXT-HS models. The very significant TTNPB-induced inhibition of the macroscopic MXT-HS growth rate relates to the triggering of cell death (apoptosis) rather than to an inhibition of cell proliferation. All these results clearly indicate that retinoids are very efficient agents against breast cancer, at least as efficient as tamoxifen.

4-Hydroxyphenylretinamide in the chemoprevention of cancer

It has been suggested that ultimately half of all cancers might be prevented by early interventions (Costa, 1993). 4HPR has been shown to be an effective and safe agent in various in vivo animal trials and well tolerated in human trials. At present multiple clinical trials are assessing its efficacy in preventing a variety of cancers.