Phase I study of epirubicin plus vinorelbine with or without G-CSF in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

[Management of chemotherapy-induced emesis: what is the standard after 20 years of clinical research]

BACKGROUND

The knowledge of the importance, the physiopathological mechanisms, and the management of the chemotherapy-induced emesis has increased exponentially during the last 20 years. High-dosage metoclopramide (MCP) therapy has been introduced in the eighties and serotonine type-3 receptor antagonists (5-HT(3) antagonists) have been used since the late eighties and early nineties. Due to both classes of substances the results of the antiemetic therapies have improved drastically. After 20 years of intensive clinical research it seems to be appropriate to come to an intermediate conclusion.

METHOD

With the aid of an overview and a new analysis of the literature published on this topic so far, the current state of research is shown (including the fields in which further improvement will be necessary), and suggestions are made, wherever it seemed possible, to attain the "gold standard" in antiemetic therapy.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

In connection with all highly or very highly emetogenic chemotherapies, an antiemetic prophylaxis should be initiated on the day of therapy, especially when using platinum or most of the cyclophosphamide-based regimes for cancer treatment. The recommended prophylaxis consists of a combination of 5-HT(3) antagonists with a corticosteroid. To combat the so-called delayed emesis on the days following therapy, all patients should undergo an oral corticoid therapy, possibly in combination with MCP (especially platinum-therapy patients), less frequently with 5-HT(3) antagonists. With these means of prophylaxis emesis can be prevented/avoided completely in most patients, and nausea can at least be reduced. It is sufficient to administer a single dose of 5-HT(3) antagonists prior to chemotherapy. For ondansetron and granisetron, the best documented substances within this class of drugs, 8 mg (ondansteron) and 3 mg (granisetron) are considered standard dosages. Among the corticoids, most data have been accumulated for dexamethasone. A standard dose of 10 to 20 mg can be administered prior to chemotherapy. Right after and especially on the days following chemotherapy higher dosages seem to be indicated.

PROSPECT

Further therapy improvements, especially concerning emesis and nausea on the days following chemotherapy, are necessary and are currently object of clinical research.

Clinical and pharmacokinetic phase II study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and vinorelbine in heavily pretreated recurrent ovarian carcinoma

BACKGROUND

This multicenter phase II study evaluated feasibility, clinical efficacy, toxicity and pharmacokinetics of the combination of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) and vinorelbine (VNR) in patients with platinum-paclitaxel pretreated recurrent ovarian cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All patients received prior treatment with platinum and paclitaxel. Thirty-two heavily pretreated (median number of chemotherapy regimens two, range one to six) ovarian cancer patients received treatment with PLD 30 mg/m(2) and VNR 30 mg/m(2) every three weeks for six cycles. Ten patients entered the pharmacokinetic study, five receiving the PLD-VNR and five the VNR-PLD sequence.

RESULTS

In 30 patients evaluated for response and toxicity, the overall response rate was 37% and 10% of patients achieved stable disease. Median time to progression and overall survival were 5.5 months (range 1-10) and 9 months (range 2-16), respectively. Toxicity was generally mild and reversible. VNR AUC(tot) and plasma levels were considerably higher in the PLD-VNR sequence.

CONCLUSIONS

The PLD-VNR regimen exhibits significant activity in heavily pretreated patients, is well tolerated and is associated with encouraging survival. Preliminary pharmacokinetic results suggest the PLD-VNR sequence for further clinical applications. This regimen should be considered as a treatment option in patients with chemotherapy-resistant ovarian cancer.

Survival outcome of inoperable non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving conventional dose epirubicin and Paclitaxel as first-line treatment

OBJECTIVE

High-dose epirubicin was shown to be effective in the treatment of inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Paclitaxel is synergistic to a conventional dose of anthracyclines in the treatment of advanced cancer. A phase II study was designed to test the effectiveness of combining paclitaxel with a conventional dose of epirubicin in inoperable NSCLC patients.

METHODS

Eligibility criteria included inoperable stage IIIB or IV NSCLC patients, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, measurable or evaluable disease and adequate organ function. Epirubicin 70 mg/m2 intravenous infusion for 15 min was given on day 1. Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 intravenous infusion for 3 h was given on day 2. Cycles were repeated every 21 days. Tumor response was evaluated every two cycles. Patients received treatment until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or stable disease after cycle 6.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients received a total of 185 cycles (median 6 cycles). Seventeen patients responded to treatment (response rate 44.7%). Twenty-six (68%) patients received second-line chemotherapy. All patients were followed until their death. Median survival was 11.9 months (95% confidence interval 9.0-14.9 months). Median time-to-treatment-failure was 4.6 months.

CONCLUSION

Conventional dose epirubicin plus paclitaxel is effective as a first-line treatment for inoperable NSCLC patients.

Phase I Study of Doxil® and Vinorelbine in Patients with Advanced Malignancies

INTRODUCTION

This study was designed to define the maximum tolerated dose of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Doxil) and multiday vinorelbine (VNB), without and with prophylactic filgrastim, and to identify antineoplastic effect.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with resistant cancers were treated with Doxil 50 mg/m2 every four weeks, and with VNB 15 mg/m2 on the same day. The VNB dose escalations were accomplished in subsequent patient cohorts by adding VNB doses on consecutive days. When the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of VNB with Doxil was defined, prophylactic filgrastim was added to define a second MTD.

RESULTS

Of 29 patients entered, two had early adverse events, and 27 received at least one full cycle with at least one month follow-up. The MTD of VNB, combined with Doxil 50 mg/m2, was 15 mg/m2 on day 1, with neutropenia as the dose-limiting toxicity. With prophylactic filgrastim, the MTD was 15 mg/m2 daily for two days, with neutropenia and stomatitis as dose-limiting toxicities. Palmar plantar erythrodysesthesia occurred frequently, usually after the third cycle. Objective responses were documented in six patients, all of whom received multiday VNB.

CONCLUSION

Doxil 50 mg/m2 on day 1 of a 28-day cycle can be safely combined with VNB 15 mg/m2 day 1, or with VNB 15 mg/m2 days 1 and 2 with filgrastim prophylaxis. Antineoplastic activity was observed in this heavily pretreated population. Future studies of Doxil 35-40 mg/m2 with multiday VNB may be worthwhile, especially in metastatic breast cancer.

An escalating dose finding study of liposomal doxorubicin and vinorelbine for the treatment of refractory or resistant epithelial ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of liposomal doxorubicin (LD)-vinorelbine (V) in patients with refractory or resistant ovarian cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty patients were eligible. Seven levels were studied [LD 25-V20 (three patients enrolled); LD 30-V20 (three); LD 35-V20 (three); LD 20-V25 (three); LD 25-V25 (three); LD 30-V25 (10); LD 35-V25 (five)]. LD was given on day 1, while V was given on days 1 and 8 every 21 days. Cohorts of three patients were enrolled at each level, and another three patients were planned, if one dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was registered.

RESULTS

DLT was observed in four patients: two febrile neutropenia, one grade 4 thrombocytopenia and one grade 3 palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) at level 7 (LD 35-V25). Thus, liposomal doxorubicin 30 mg/m(2) plus vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) was the MTD. The most frequent toxicity was neutropenia. Fifteen patients (50%) experienced grade 3 neutropenia and 10 (33.3%) grade 4 neutropenia. Non-hematological toxicity was mild. Mucositis and PPE were the most frequent toxicities, but in most cases were grade 1. Out of 29 assessable patients, six (20.7%; 95% confidence interval 10%-39%) experienced an objective response, with one complete response.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with refractory or resistant ovarian cancer, the recommended doses for the combination studied are liposomal doxorubicin 30 mg/m(2) (day 1) plus vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) (day 1 and 8). Neutropenia is the most frequent toxicity, while non-hematological toxicity is mild. Substantial activity was recorded and a phase II study is justified.

Epirubicin/vinorelbine as first line therapy in metastatic breast cancer

This study was aimed at investigating the toxicity and activity of the combination epirubicin and vinorelbine in chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic breast cancer. Fifty-one patients with measurable or evaluable metastatic breast cancer entered the study. The regimen consisted of epirubicin 90 mg/m2 as a slow i.v. infusion on day 1, followed by vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 by 30-minute intravenous infusion on days 1 and 8; the courses were repeated every 21 days for a maximum of 8 cycles. All the patients were assessable for toxicity and 47 were evaluable for response according to the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. Objective responses were observed in 33 out of 47 evaluable patients (70.2%; 95% C.I. 55.1%-82.6%) with 4 complete (8.5%) and 29 partial responses (61.7%); 11 patients had stable disease (23.4%) and 3 patients progressed while on treatment. The median time to progression was 10 months (range 1-21) and the median overall survival was 23 months (range 2 - 32+). Neutropenia was the most frequent toxicity: a grade 4 neutropenia (WHO) was reported in 70% of 252 courses with a median duration of 3 days (range 1-6). Seventeen episodes of febrile neutropenia were observed but only 1 patient required hospital admission. Other hematologic toxicities were negligible. One patient experienced a paralytic ileus requiring hospitalization; no peripheral neuropathy such as muscle weakness or paresthesia was observed. No treatment-related cardiotoxicity was reported. The encouraging response rate achieved with epirubicin/vinorelbine, the easily manageable toxicities of the combination, and its feasibility in an outpatient setting make this combination worthy of further comparative trials with standard regimens.

Phase I study of high-dose epirubicin and vinorelbine in previously untreated non-small-cell lung cancer stage IIIB-IV

The aim of the study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for the combination of high-dose epirubicin and vinorelbine in chemotherapy-naive patients with inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Twenty-one patients with stage IIIB and IV NSCLC were treated in a single-centre study with escalating doses of epirubicin and vinorelbine given on an outpatient basis. The first dose level comprised epirubicin 100 mg m-2 on day 1 and vinorelbine 20 mg m-2 (days 1 and 8) given intravenously every 3 weeks. Escalating doses for epirubicin and vinorelbine were respectively 120 (day 1) and 20 (days 1 and 8), 120 (day 1) and 25 (days 1 and 8) and 135 (day 1) and 25 (days 1 and 8) mg m-2. Inclusion criteria were age < or = 75 years, ECOG performance score < or = 2 and normal renal, hepatic and bone marrow functions. Dose-limiting toxicities were thrombocytopenia grade II and neutropenia grade III on day 8, febrile neutropenia, and neutropenia lasting > 7 days. No dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed at the first dose level; at the 135/25 mg m-2 dose level three out of six patients had a DLT which was considered as unacceptable. The only non-haematological toxicity reaching grade III was nausea/vomiting. One patient showed cardiac toxicity. No neurotoxicity and no treatment-related deaths were seen. The maximum tolerated dose of epirubicin and vinorelbine is 135 mg m-2 (day 1) and 25 mg m-2 (days 1 and 8) respectively, causing mainly haematological toxicity. The recommended dose of epirubicin and vinorelbine for phase II studies is found to be 120 mg m-2 and 20 mg m-2 respectively.

Vinorelbine and epirubicin in metastatic breast cancer. A dose finding study

The aim of the study was to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of vinorelbine given as one or two weekly doses in combination with epirubicin 60 mg/m2 every third week. The MTD was defined as the dose resulting in a WHO grade III or IV leucopenia exceeding 50% of patients. Patients were treated in groups of 10 at escalating doses of vinorelbine. The number of patients at the final dose level was expanded to 20. The dose of epirubicin was kept constant at 60 mg/m2 every third week. At dose level 1, 15 mg/m2 vinorelbine was given on day 1 at level 2, 20 mg/m2 was given on day 1 and at level 3, 20 mg/m2 was given on days 1 and 8. The MTD was reached at dose level 3. WHO haematological toxicity grade IV occurred in 0, 10 and 45% and grade III at 60, 30 and 30% of patients at dose levels 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Despite the common occurrence of grade IV haematological toxicity, only two serious infections were noted. Non-haematological toxicity of vinorelbine included neurotoxicity, manifesting as muscle weakness, constipation and paresthesias in the majority of patients. Neurotoxicity was usually mild and did not require treatment discontinuation. Phlebitis at the injection site was troublesome in many patients. Alopecia and nausea, probably due to epirubicin, occurred in most patients. The response rates were 22% (95% CI (confidence interval) 3-60%), 40% (12-74%) and 60% (36-81%) at levels 1, 2 and 3, respectively (non-significant).

New chemotherapy agents in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: an update including data from the Seventh World Conference on Lung Cancer

Over the past two decades, modest gains have been made in chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer with the addition of cisplatin-based regimens to the therapeutic armamentarium. Over the last decade, several new agents with significant activity have reached the level of Phase II and III testing. This list of new drugs includes: navelbine, the taxanes--taxol and taxotere, gemcitabine, edatrexate and the camptothecins--irinotecan and topotecan. During this period, oral etoposide and epirubicin were re-investigated and biological agents such as the retinoids, interferons and interleukins were also explored as alternatives to traditional chemotherapy. As these new drug investigations proceeded, basic scientists made important discoveries which are now beginning to be applied to therapy. The future promises to combine these active new drugs with therapies directed against targets unique to non-small cell lung cancer cells.