Clinical evaluation of serum tissue polypeptide-specific antigen (TPS) in non-small cell lung cancer

The Concentrations of Five Tumor Markers in Both Bal Fractions in Lung Cancer Patients in Relation to Cigarette Smoking

Background

Lung cancer is the leading cause of death from cancer. Tobacco is related to the development of this type of tumor due to genetic alterations and to the secretion of certain biological markers. Bronchogenic carcinomas secrete a series of biological substances known as tumor markers. Some of these markers, such as carcinoembryonic antigen, neuron-specific enolase, tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA), tissue polypeptide-specific antigen (TPS) and CYFRA 21.1, possess clear clinical value when analyzed in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) of patients with lung malignancies, particularly when they are analyzed in the two BAL fractions, bronchial (BF) and alveolar (AF), being more increased in the BF. For this reason, we intend to demonstrate that smokers with cancer secrete more biological substances in the BF and that the concentrations of these markers are higher in the BAL of smokers than in that of non-smokers.

Methods

The five aforementioned tumor markers were studied in the two BAL fractions of 52 lung cancer patients (46 smokers and 6 non-smokers). We performed BAL using 150 ml of 0.9% saline solution divided in three aliquots of 50 ml. The fluid obtained from the first 50 ml was the BF. The liquid from the other two aliquots was the AF. The five tumor marker concentrations were calculated in accord with the indications of the laboratory.

Results

The TPA and TPS levels in the BAL of lung cancer patients were more increased in the BF than in the AF, even when the patients were divided into smokers and non-smokers. When we compared smokers with non-smokers, the smokers had higher levels of TPS in the BF and of TPA in the AF.

Conclusions

Thus, we believe that the cellular alterations produced by tobacco are responsible for the secretion of these tumor markers.

Assessment of individual lung cancer risk by the proteomic analysis of exhaled breath condensate

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths. Several diagnostic strategies are available but these are frequently ineffective, either because of their cost and organizational difficulty or because of the involvement of high radiations. As recent data from spiral computerized axial tomography have shown limited sensitivity and limited impact on cancer-related fatality, several options have been proposed in order to identify biological fluid-based biomarkers.

OBJECTIVE

Evaluating whether proteomic analysis of alveolar fluid obtained in the form of exhaled breath condensate (EBC) can be valuable for detecting and effectively diagnosing lung cancer.

METHODS

Careful review of recently published papers on proteomic EBC analysis, together with experience in the authors' laboratory, allows the discussion of benefits, pitfalls and possible future development of this approach.

RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS

The rapid advancements of proteomics are expected to validate EBC protein(s) as lung pathology biomarker(s). Accessibility of an early marker of lung cancer will be a great advantage for potentially early treatment by surgical procedures with limited tissue removal, possibly preceding metastasis development.

Lung tumor markers of cytokeratin origin: an overview

Lung tumor markers fall into several categories including oncofetal proteins, structural proteins and their fragments, enzymes, membrane antigens, peptide and non-peptide hormones. Cytokeratins (CK) are well known structural proteins whose degradation gives rise to soluble fragments, measurable in the blood of patients and capable of cancer marking. Among them, Tissue Polypeptide Antigen (TPA), Tissue Polypeptide-Specific Antigen (TPS) and Cytokeratin-19-Fragments (Cyfra 21-1) are the most studied CK fragments' complexes. This article will review biological characteristics and clinical properties of these substances, emphasizing as their concentration in the peripheral blood might reflect the mass of tumor, the rate of cancer cell lysis, and other potentially unfavorable tumor characteristics. Assaying the concentration of CK fragments in the blood is an easy and effective way to assess lung cancer and monitor its clinical evolution.

Serum tissue polypeptide specific antigen (TPS): a complementary tumor marker to CA 15-3 in the management of breast cancer

The efficacy of CEA and CA15-3 tumor markers in monitoring breast cancer was evaluated in 1365 patients with either benign (n = 534) or malignant (n = 831) breast diseases. Thirty-nine breast cancer patients were monitored before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Three hundred forty-nine patients were monitored during post-surgical follow-up for either a minimum of 5 years or until time of recurrence. Twenty-one patients with metastases were also monitored during chemotherapy. Elevated CA 15-3 and TPS levels were found in 28.6% and 30.0% of patients. CA 15-3 and TPS sensitivities rose to 71.9% and 66.3% in metastatic patients, respectively. The addition of TPS to CA 15-3 increased the sensitivity up to 44.4% in the overall population, and to 87.6% in patients with metastases. During post-surgical follow-up CA 15-3 was elevated in 65.7% and TPS in 61.3% of patients with recurrence. The combination of TPS and CA 15-3 increased the overall sensitivity by 12.7%. Longitudinal monitoring of metastatic patients undergoing chemotherapy demonstrated that, when positive, both CA 15-3 and TPS paralleled response to treatment. TPS monitoring may provide additional value when used in combination with CA15-3 during post-surgical follow-up of breast cancer patients.

Tumour markers in serum, bronchoalveolar lavage and biopsy cytosol in lung carcinoma: what environment lends the optimum diagnostic yield?

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic yield of the tumour markers carbohydrate antigen (CA 125), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC) and specific tissue polypeptide antigen (TPS) in serum, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) and biopsy cytosol in a group of patients with bronchogenic carcinoma.

METHODS

Serum, BAL and biopsy cytosol samples were collected in a group of 85 patients with benign or malignant pulmonary diseases. After appropriate processing, tumour markers were determined by enzyme immunoassay. The diagnostic yields (sensitivity, specificity and accuracy) in each environment (serum, BAL or biopsy) were obtained by using "ROC" curves.

RESULTS

Determined individually, CA 125, NSE and SCC show the greatest diagnostic accuracy in cytosol. CEA and TPS do so in BAL. CEA is the most relevant marker in serum and BAL, and CA 125 in cytosol. When the different tumour markers are associated, they offer better overall yields for all except TPS.

CONCLUSIONS

For the factors evaluated in this study, determination of CEA in BAL was clinically the most useful marker in comparison with serum and cytosol determinations, although the latter may also be helpful in certain situations. Although there is no specific tumour marker for lung cancer, the combination of several can be used to monitor most patients with lung cancer.

Tissue polypeptide-specific antigen and carcinoembryonic antigen for early prediction of recurrence in lung adenocarcinoma

Fifty patients with lung adenocarcinoma, including 20 cases with recurrence and 30 cases without recurrence 1 year after operation, were enrolled in this study. The serial serum levels of tissue polypeptide-specific antigen (TPS) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) were measured before operation and at 1 week, and at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after operation for early detection of recurrence. The results revealed that: 1) mean serum values of TPS were significantly higher at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after operation in 20 patients with recurrent adenocarcinoma, when compared with 30 patients without recurrent adenocarcinoma; 2) mean serum values of CEA were significantly higher at 9 months and 12 months after operation in 20 patients with recurrent adenocarcinoma, when compared with 30 patients without recurrent adenocarcinoma. We conclude that TPS is a better marker than CEA for early prediction of adenocarcinoma recurrence in lung within 1 year after operation. However, a longer follow-up study should be encouraged.

Prognostic evaluation of primary non-small cell lung carcinoma patients using biological fluid variables. A systematic review

We have systematically reviewed the biomedical literature to try to establish whether laboratory variables might give any additional prognostic information in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients independently of the usual radioclinical parameters. In each study, we acknowledged the independent prognostic value of a biological fluid variable if it had been demonstrated through a multivariate statistical analysis in which at least the following had been included: patient's weight loss, age, gender, performance status, histology, stage and extent of the disease. The clearest conclusion that can be derived from the 42 studies we reviewed is that it remains to be clearly demonstrated whether or not the "new" tests (tumour markers, p53 antibodies, etc.) are superior to the "old" tests (serum LDH, calcium, albumin or other proteins, blood cell counts, etc.), even though a number of studies did suggest that serum cyfra 21-1 has a pre-therapeutic prognostic significance in NSCLC. From the four studies in which the same powerful statistical methodologies were used (i.e. Cox models in association with RECPAM analysis), it could be derived that serum calcium and perhaps the blood neutrophil and lymphocyte counts might have independent pre-therapeutic prognostic significance in advanced NSCLC. Further studies are needed to demonstrate whether repeated measurements during therapeutic follow-up can bring any independent prognostic information. Provided that both laboratory and statistical expertise is clearly guaranteed in future primary studies published in this particular biomedical field, it might perhaps become possible to propose laboratory variables as additional prognostic parameters in NSCLC.

Tumor markers in lung cancer: does the method of obtaining the cut-off point and reference population influence diagnostic yield?

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical usefulness of the tumor markers CA125, CEA, NSE, SCC, and TPS in a group of patients with lung cancer. We estimated the influence of the method for choosing the cut-off point and of considering as a reference population either healthy controls or patients with some form of non-neoplastic pulmonary disease (NNPD).

DESIGN AND METHODS

The tumor markers were determined using enzyme immunoassay techniques, and their diagnostic yield was evaluated using ROC curves and their correlation with the percentages between false and true positives. The diagnostic parameters of the tumor markers are presented in 116 patients with lung cancer and compared with a group of 25 healthy controls and another group of 80 patients with some form of NNPD. We determined on the one hand the cut-off points resulting from the best sensitivity-specificity balance in the ROC curves and on the other those resulting from considering a specificity of 95%. With the two cut-offs we studied the different diagnostic parameters: sensitivity, specificity and accuracy or area below the ROC curve.

RESULTS

Optimum diagnostic yield is obtained when we choose the cut-off point determined by the best balance of sensitivity and specificity in the ROC curves and take a healthy population as a reference group. The cut-off values for CA125, CEA, NSE, SCC, and TPS were 24 U/mL, 2.8 ng/mL, 9.8 ng/mL, 1.6 ng/mL, and 67.8 U/L, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that in future studies on tumor markers, a group of healthy subjects should be used as a reference population and ROC curves should be used to obtain the optimum cut-offs.

Neuron-specific enolase, thymidine kinase, and tissue polypeptide-specific antigen in diagnosis and response to chemotherapy of small-cell lung cancer

The clinical usefulness of neuron-specific enolase (NSE), thymidine kinase (TK), and tissue polypeptide-specific antigen (TPS) was investigated in 41 patients (53-80 years old) with recently discovered small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Eleven patients exhibited limited disease (LD) and 30 extensive disease (ED). Serum samples for NSE, TPS (immunoradiometric assay), and TK (radioenzymatic assay) evaluations were drawn from all patients at the time of diagnosis and before each cycle of chemotherapy in the treated patients. Therapy consisted of i.v. carboplatin 300 mg/m2 on the first day and i.v. etoposide 120 mg/m2 from the first to the third day every 3 weeks. Nine patients refused or were not eligible for chemotherapy. Five patients received only one course and showed no response (NR); 9 patients received two courses; 18 patients received three or more courses. In the last group, complete remission (CR) was obtained in 9 cases, partial remission (PR) in 18 cases. The tumor markers studied did not show any significant difference in distinguishing LD from ED. NSE and TPS were significantly more often abnormal than TK, either at the time of diagnosis (p < 0.05) or in PR or NR patients (p < 0.05). In relation to chemotherapy response, NSE and TPS serum patterns were shown to be more reliable than TK in PR (p < 0.05) and NR patients (computed error between 10% and 15%). No significant difference was observed between serum NSE and TPS patterns. Serum NSE and TPS seem to be more useful in the diagnosis and follow-up of SCLC patients undergoing chemotherapy. Further trials are necessary to ascertain whether the associated assessment of NSE and TPS can add useful information to that provided by the assessment of NSE alone.

Markov model and markers of small cell lung cancer: assessing the influence of reversible serum NSE, CYFRA 21-1 and TPS levels on prognosis

High serum NSE and advanced tumour stage are well-known negative prognostic determinants of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) when observed at presentation. However, such variables are reversible disease indicators as they can change during the course of therapy. The relationship between risk of death and marker level and disease state during treatment of SCLC chemotherapy is not known. A total of 52 patients with SCLC were followed during cisplatin-based chemotherapy (the median number of tumour status and marker level assessments was 4). The time-homogeneous Markov model was used in order to analyse separately the prognostic significance of change in the state of the serum marker level (NSE, CYFRA 21-1, TPS) or the change in tumour status. In this model, transition rate intensities were analysed according to three different states: alive with low marker level (state 0), alive with high marker level (state 1) and dead (absorbing state). The model analysing NSE levels showed that the mean time to move out of state 'high marker level' was short (123 days). There was a 44% probability of the opposite reversible state 'low marker level' being reached, which demonstrated the reversible property of the state 'high marker level'. The relative risk of death from this state 'high marker level' was about 2.24 times greater in comparison with that of state 0 'low marker level' (Wald's test; P < 0.01). For patients in state 'high marker level' at time of sampling, the probability of death increased dramatically, a transition explaining the rapid decrease in the probability of remaining stationary at this state. However, a non-nil probability to change from state 1 'high marker level' to the opposite transient level, state 0 'low marker level', was observed suggesting that, however infrequently, patients in state 1 'high marker level' might still return to state 0 'low marker level'. Almost similar conclusions can be drawn regarding the three-state model constructed using the tumour response status. For the two cytokeratin markers, the Markov model suggests the lack of a true reversible property of these variables as there was only a very weak probability of a patient returning to state 'low marker level' once having entered state 'high marker level'. In conclusion, The Markov model suggests that the observation of an increase in serum NSE level or a lack of response of the disease at any time during follow-up (according to the homogeneous assumption) was strongly associated with a worse prognosis but that the reversion to a low mortality risk state remains possible.

Diagnostic value of tissue polypeptide-specific antigen (TPS) in neuroblastoma and Wilms' tumour

Although tissue polypeptide-specific antigen (TPS) has been described as a potentially useful serum marker of tumour activity in adult epithelial tumours, few data are available for childhood malignancies. Neuroblastomas and Wilms' tumours are the commonest types of solid malignancies found in the retroperitoneum of children. At this time, a widely used marker for Wilms' tumour is not available. Using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit, serum TPS levels in 23 children with neuroblastomas, nine with Wilms' tumours and 22 with benign tumours were evaluated to test the usefulness of the marker in identifying malignancies. Compared with healthy children (n = 110), the preoperative least-square means (LSM) of serum TPS were considerably elevated in both neuroblastoma (LSM = 209 U l(-1)) and Wilms' tumour (LSM = 235 U l(-1)), whereas values in benign tumours were only slightly elevated. Although the Wilms' tumours were associated with higher preoperative serum TPS levels, there was no statistically significant difference compared with neuroblastomas. Receiver operating characteristic analysis (ROC curves) showed a high sensitivity and specificity for both malignancies. Successful treatment resulted in decrease in TPS serum values. Serum TPS measurements in children presenting with abdominal masses can help in diagnosing the two commonest extracranial solid malignancies of childhood. Furthermore, TPS could acquire a pivotal role in monitoring therapy.

Predictive factors of tumor response and prognostic factors of survival during lung cancer chemotherapy

The aim of this study was (i) to determine predictive factors of a complete response to chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and predictive factors of an objective response in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and (ii) to determine whether prognostic factors are different with regard to treatment response and survival. Ninety-nine patients with SCLC and two hundred and two patients with NSCLC received chemotherapy. The following variables were recorded prior to treatment: tumor, node, metastasis status, performance status, body weight loss, blood leukocyte count, serum sodium, serum albumin, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), alkaline phosphatase, serum NSE, serum TPS, and serum CYFRA 21-1. Tumor response was analyzed at the 10th week. Analysis of survival were done using the landmark method. Hazard ratios of the significant prognostic variables of survival were calculated using the Cox's model. Odds ratios of the significant predicting factors of response were calculated by stepwise logistic regression. In SCLC, the significant determinants of poor survival were: lack of complete response (HR: 2.04), weight loss (HR: 1.76), high serum LDH level (HR: 1.64), and high serum TPS level (HR: 2.47). A high serum TPS level was the only factor among those studied able to predict lack of achievement of complete response (OR: 0.39). In NSCLC, significant determinants of poor survival were: no objective response (HR: 2.28), poor performance status (HR: 2.52), presence of metastases (HR: 1.51), and high serum CYFRA 21-1 level (HR: 1.84). On the other hand, a high serum TPS level (OR: 0.50), the presence of metastases (OR: 0.45), and a leukocyte blood count over 10,000/microl (OR: 0.43) were independent determinants for a patient not to achieve an objective response. We concluded that the predictive factors of complete response in SCLC remain to be defined. On the other hand, in NSCLC three variables contribute to the prediction of an objective response. Finally, determinants of survival differ from predictive factors of response.

Evaluation of tissue polypeptide specific antigen, CYFRA 21-1, and carcinoembryonic antigen in nonsmall cell lung carcinoma: does the combined use of cytokeratin markers give any additional information?

BACKGROUND

Recently developed tissue polypeptide specific antigen (TPS) and CYFRA 21-1 assays determine the soluble cytokeratin 18 and 19 fragments, respectively, in serum. The authors compared the value of TPS, CYFRA 21-1, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) for the diagnosis, staging, prognosis, and monitoring of patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC).

METHODS

The study included 85 patients with benign lung diseases and 94 patients with NSCLC. TPS, CYFRA 21-1, and CEA serum levels were measured with commercial kits.

RESULTS

The following were demonstrated: 1) CYFRA 21-1 and TPS levels, but not CEA levels, differed significantly between NSCLC patients with operable disease (Stages I-IIIA) and those with inoperable disease (Stages IIIB-IV). 2) The correlation coefficient between CYFRA 21-1 and TPS increased with the progression of NSCLC from Stages I-IIIA (r = 0.41, P = 0.04) to Stages IIIB-IV (r = 0.70, P < 0.001). 3) Multivariate analysis identified TPS and CYFRA 21-1 as significant predictors of survival, with relative risks of 2.57 (P = 0.001) and 2.05 (P = 0.01), respectively. For cases in which both cytokeratin markers were positive, the relative risk was 6.4 (P < 0.0001) compared with cases in which both were negative. 4) For the group with inoperable disease, the combined use of TPS and CYFRA 21-1 allowed for the definition of 3 sets of patients with significantly different median survival times (14.3 months vs. 7.4 months vs. 2.6 months). 5) The percentages of marker evaluations concordant with results of clinical assessments of response to therapy were 75.0%, 72.2%, and 61.1% for CYFRA 21-1, TPS, and CEA, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that, for NSCLC patients, CYFRA 21-1 and TPS are significant prognostic factors and effective monitors of therapy. The combined use of these cytokeratin markers may provide additional information for prognosis.