1
|
A systematic review of survival following anti-cancer treatment for small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2020; 141:44-55. [PMID: 31955000 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2019.12.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2019] [Revised: 12/13/2019] [Accepted: 12/24/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of survival following treatment recommended by the European Society of Medical Oncology for SCLC in order to determine a benchmark for novel therapies to be compared with. MATERIALS AND METHODS Randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting overall survival following chemotherapy for SCLC were included. We calculated survival at 30 and 90-days along with 1-year, 2-year and median. RESULTS We identified 160 for inclusion. There were minimal 30-day deaths. Survival was 99 % (95 %CI 98.0-99.0 %, I233.9 %, n = 77) and 90 % (95 %CI 89.0-92.0 %, I279.5 %, n = 73) at 90 days for limited (LD-SCLC) and extensive stage (ED-SCLC) respectively. The median survival for LD-SCLC was 18.1 months (95 %CI 17.0-19.1 %, I277.3 %, n = 110) and early thoracic radiotherapy (thoracic radiotherapy 18.4 months (95 %CI 17.3-19.5, I278.4 %, n = 100)) vs no radiotherapy 11.7 months (95 %CI 9.1-14.3, n = 10), prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI 19.7 months vs No PCI 13.0 months (95 %CI 18.5-21.0, I275.7 %, n = 78 and 95 %CI 10.5-16.6, I281.1 %, n = 15 respectively)) and better performance status (PS0-1 22.5 months vs PS0-4 15.3 months (95 %CI 18.7-26.1, I272.4 %, n = 11 and 95 %CI 11.5-19.1 I277.9 %, n = 13)) augmented this. For ED-SCLC the median survival was 9.6 months (95 %CI 8.9-10.3 %, I295.2 %, n = 103) and this improved when irinotecan + cisplatin was used, however studies that used this combination were mostly conducted in Asian populations where survival was better. Survival was not improved with the addition of thoracic radiotherapy or PCI. Survival for both stages of cancer was better in modern studies and Asian cohorts. It was poorer for studies administering carboplatin + etoposide but this regimen was used in studies that had fewer patient selection criteria. CONCLUSION Early thoracic radiotherapy and PCI should be offered to people with LD-SCLC in accordance with guideline recommendations. The benefit of the aforementioned therapies to treat ED-SCLC and the use of chemotherapy in people with poor PS is less clear.
Collapse
|
2
|
Hermes A, Bergman B, Bremnes R, Ek L, Fluge S, Sederholm C, Sundstrøm S, Thaning L, Vilsvik J, Aasebø U, Sörenson S. Irinotecan Plus Carboplatin Versus Oral Etoposide Plus Carboplatin in Extensive Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Randomized Phase III Trial. J Clin Oncol 2008; 26:4261-7. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2007.15.7545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 124] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose A Japanese randomized trial showed superior survival for patients with extensive-disease (ED) small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) receiving irinotecan plus cisplatin compared with etoposide plus cisplatin. The present trial evaluated the efficacy of irinotecan plus carboplatin (IC) compared with oral etoposide plus carboplatin (EC). Patients and Methods Patients with ED SCLC were randomly assigned to receive either IC, which consisted of carboplatin (area under the curve = 4; Chatelut formula) and irinotecan (175 mg/m2) intravenously both on day 1, or EC, which consisted of carboplatin as in IC and etoposide (120 mg/m2/d) orally on days 1 through 5. Courses were repeated every 3 weeks with four cycles planned. Doses were reduced by one third in patients with a WHO performance status (PS) of 3 to 4 and/or age older than 70 years. Primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points were quality of life (QOL) and complete response (CR) rate. Results Of 220 randomly assigned patients, 209 were eligible for analysis (IC, n = 105; EC, n = 104). Thirty-five percent were older than 70 years, and 47% had a PS of 2 to 4. The groups were well balanced with respect to prognostic factors. OS was inferior in the EC group (hazard ratio = 1.41; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.87; P = .02). Median survival time was 8.5 months for IC compared with 7.1 months for EC. One-year survival rate was 34% for IC and 24% for EC. CR was seen in 18 IC patients compared with seven EC patients (P = .02). There were no statistically significant differences in hematologic grade 3 or 4 toxicity. Grade 3 or 4 diarrhea was more common in the IC group. QOL differences were small, with a trend toward prolonged palliation with the IC regimen. Conclusion IC prolongs survival in ED SCLC with slightly better scores for QOL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Hermes
- From the Department of Pulmonary Oncology, Grosshansdorf Hospital, Grosshansdorf, Germany; Department of Chest Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø, Tromsø; Department of Medicine, Haugesund Hospital, Haugesund; Departments of Oncology and Medicine, University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway; Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg; Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Heart
| | - Bengt Bergman
- From the Department of Pulmonary Oncology, Grosshansdorf Hospital, Grosshansdorf, Germany; Department of Chest Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø, Tromsø; Department of Medicine, Haugesund Hospital, Haugesund; Departments of Oncology and Medicine, University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway; Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg; Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Heart
| | - Roy Bremnes
- From the Department of Pulmonary Oncology, Grosshansdorf Hospital, Grosshansdorf, Germany; Department of Chest Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø, Tromsø; Department of Medicine, Haugesund Hospital, Haugesund; Departments of Oncology and Medicine, University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway; Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg; Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Heart
| | - Lars Ek
- From the Department of Pulmonary Oncology, Grosshansdorf Hospital, Grosshansdorf, Germany; Department of Chest Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø, Tromsø; Department of Medicine, Haugesund Hospital, Haugesund; Departments of Oncology and Medicine, University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway; Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg; Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Heart
| | - Sverre Fluge
- From the Department of Pulmonary Oncology, Grosshansdorf Hospital, Grosshansdorf, Germany; Department of Chest Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø, Tromsø; Department of Medicine, Haugesund Hospital, Haugesund; Departments of Oncology and Medicine, University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway; Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg; Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Heart
| | - Christer Sederholm
- From the Department of Pulmonary Oncology, Grosshansdorf Hospital, Grosshansdorf, Germany; Department of Chest Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø, Tromsø; Department of Medicine, Haugesund Hospital, Haugesund; Departments of Oncology and Medicine, University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway; Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg; Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Heart
| | - Stein Sundstrøm
- From the Department of Pulmonary Oncology, Grosshansdorf Hospital, Grosshansdorf, Germany; Department of Chest Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø, Tromsø; Department of Medicine, Haugesund Hospital, Haugesund; Departments of Oncology and Medicine, University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway; Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg; Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Heart
| | - Lars Thaning
- From the Department of Pulmonary Oncology, Grosshansdorf Hospital, Grosshansdorf, Germany; Department of Chest Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø, Tromsø; Department of Medicine, Haugesund Hospital, Haugesund; Departments of Oncology and Medicine, University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway; Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg; Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Heart
| | - Jan Vilsvik
- From the Department of Pulmonary Oncology, Grosshansdorf Hospital, Grosshansdorf, Germany; Department of Chest Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø, Tromsø; Department of Medicine, Haugesund Hospital, Haugesund; Departments of Oncology and Medicine, University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway; Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg; Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Heart
| | - Ulf Aasebø
- From the Department of Pulmonary Oncology, Grosshansdorf Hospital, Grosshansdorf, Germany; Department of Chest Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø, Tromsø; Department of Medicine, Haugesund Hospital, Haugesund; Departments of Oncology and Medicine, University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway; Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg; Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Heart
| | - Sverre Sörenson
- From the Department of Pulmonary Oncology, Grosshansdorf Hospital, Grosshansdorf, Germany; Department of Chest Medicine, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø, Tromsø; Department of Medicine, Haugesund Hospital, Haugesund; Departments of Oncology and Medicine, University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway; Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg; Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Heart
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Reck M, von Pawel J, Macha HN, Kaukel E, Deppermann KM, Bonnet R, Ulm K, Hessler S, Gatzemeier U. Randomized phase III trial of paclitaxel, etoposide, and carboplatin versus carboplatin, etoposide, and vincristine in patients with small-cell lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003; 95:1118-27. [PMID: 12902441 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djg017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Paclitaxel administered in combination with a topoisomerase-II inhibitor (such as etoposide) and carboplatin is an effective and safe first-line treatment for patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). We conducted a randomized phase III multicenter trial to determine whether paclitaxel plus etoposide plus carboplatin improves the outcome of patients with primary SCLC relative to standard chemotherapy (carboplatin, etoposide, and vincristine). METHODS Between January 1998 and December 1999, 614 patients with SCLC stages I-IV were randomly assigned to the standard arm (309 patients) or the experimental arm (305 patients). Treatment courses were repeated every 21 days for a maximum of six courses. All patients were evaluated for response rate, survival, and toxicities every two courses. The primary endpoint was survival. Survival curves were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS A total of 608 patients were evaluable for all endpoints (standard arm 307 patients, experimental arm 301 patients). The hazard ratio [HR] of death for patients receiving the standard treatment was statistically significantly higher than that for patients receiving the experimental treatment (HR = 1.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03 to 1.45; P =.024). Progression-free survival was also statistically significantly shorter for patients in the standard arm relative to that of patients in the experimental arm (HR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.03 to 1.42). There were no differences in the response rates (complete and partial combined) to the treatments (standard arm: 69.4%, 95% CI = 63.9% to 74.5%; experimental arm: 72.1%, 95% CI = 66.7% to 77.1%; difference = 2.7%, 95% CI = 4.5% to 9.9%). Rates of severe grade of anemia, leukocytopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia were lower in the experimental arm than in the standard arm. CONCLUSION Patients with previously untreated SCLC who received paclitaxel, etoposide, and carboplatin showed improved overall and progression-free survival and less frequent hematologic toxicities than those who received the standard therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Reck
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Hospital Grosshansdorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|