Clinical reversal of the multidrug resistance phenotype: true tumour modulation or pharmacokinetic interaction?

Cytokine-mediated reversal of multidrug resistance

The occurrence of the multidrug resistance phenotype still represents a limiting factor for successful cancer chemotherapy. Numerous efforts have been made to develop strategies for reversal and/or modulation of this major therapy obstacle through targeting at different levels of intervention. The phenomenon of MDR is often associated with overexpression of resistance-associated genes. Since the classical type of MDR in human cancers is mainly mediated by the P-glycoprotein encoded by the multidrug resistance gene 1, mdr1, the majority of reversal approaches target the expression and/or function of the mdr1 gene/P-glycoprotein. Due to the fact that the multidrug phenotype always represents the net effect of a panel of resistance-associated genes/gene products, other resistance genes, e.g. those encoding the multidrug resistance-associated protein MRP or the lung resistance protein LRP, were included in the studies. Cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor alpha and interleukin-2 have been shown to modulate the MDR phenotype in different experimental settings in vitro and in vivo. Several studies have been performed to evaluate their potential as chemosensitizers of tumor cells in the context of a combined application of MDR-associated anticancer drugs like doxorubicin and vincristine with cytokines. Moreover, the capability of cytokines to modulate the expression of MDR-associated genes was demonstrated, either by external addition or by transduction of the respective cytokine gene. Knowledge of the combination effects of cytokines and cytostatics and its link to their MDR-modulating capacity may contribute to a more efficient and to a more individualized immuno-chemotherapy of human malignancies.

Role of xenobiotic efflux transporters in resistance to vincristine

This study characterized interactions between efflux transporters (P-glycoprotein (MDR1) and multidrug resistance associated proteins (MRPs1-3)) and vincristine (VCR), using cell lines with differential transporter expression, and studied effects of P-glycoprotein inhibition on VCR transport and toxicity. Caco2 (express MDR1, MRPs 1-3), LS174T (express MDR1, MRPs 1, 3), and A549 (express MRPs 1-3) cells were used. To study VCR transport (effective permeability, P(eff)), VCR (1-500 nM) was added to the donor chambers of permeable supports containing Caco2 monolayers, and receiving chamber concentrations were measured. Cytotoxicity experiments were conducted with escalating concentrations of VCR in all cell lines. To determine the contribution of MDR1, experiments were also conducted with LY335979, a specific MDR1 inhibitor. VCR P(eff) was 2 x 10(-6)cm/s in Caco2 cells. LY335979 increased P(eff) in a dose dependent manner (up to 7-fold with 1 microM LY335979) in Caco2 cells. Caco2 and LS174T cell viability decreased significantly when co-incubated with both VCR and LY335979 (1 microM) (P<0.05), however this was not observed in A549 cells. In summary, MDR1 plays an important role in VCR efflux; MDR1 inhibition increased VCR P(eff) in Caco2 cells, and increased VCR cytotoxicity in Caco2 and LS174T cells (both express MDR1), but not A549 cells (minimal MDR1 expression). Inhibition of MDR1 may be a viable strategy to overcome VCR resistance in tumors expressing MDR1, however the presence of other efflux transporters should also be considered, as this will influence the success of such strategies.

Pharmacokinetic Optimisation of Treatment with Oral Etoposide

Etoposide is a derivative of podophyllotoxin widely used in the treatment of several neoplasms, including small cell lung cancer, germ cell tumours and non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. Prolonged administration of etoposide aims for continuous inhibition of topoisomerase II, the intracellular target of etoposide, thus preventing tumour cells from repairing DNA breaks. However, the clinical advantages of extended schedules as compared with conventional short-term infusions remain unclear. Oral administration of etoposide represents the most feasible and economic strategy to maintain effective concentrations of drug for extended times. Nevertheless, the efficacy of oral etoposide therapy is contingent on circumventing pharmacokinetic limitations, mainly low and variable bioavailability. Inhibition of small bowel and hepatic metabolism of etoposide with specific cytochrome P450 inhibitors or inhibition of the intestinal P-glycoprotein efflux pump have been attempted to increase the bioavailability of oral etoposide, but the best results were obtained with daily oral administration of low etoposide doses (50-100 mg/day for 14-21 days). Saturable absorption of etoposide was reported for doses greater than 200 mg/day, whereas lower doses were associated with increased bioavailability, although they were characterised by high inter- and intrapatient variability. Pharmacokinetic parameters such as plasma trough concentration between two oral administrations (C(24,trough)), drug exposure time above a threshold value and area under the plasma concentration-time curve have been correlated with the pharmacodynamic effect of oral etoposide. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships indicate that severe toxicity is avoided when peak plasma concentrations do not exceed 3-5 mg/L and C(24,trough) is under the threshold limit of 0.3 mg/L. To maintain effective etoposide plasma concentrations during prolonged oral administration, pharmacokinetic variability must be monitored in each patient, taking account of factors from many pharmacokinetic studies of etoposide, including absorption, distribution, protein binding, metabolism and elimination. Dosage reduction is generally useful to avoid haematological toxicity in patients with renal dysfunction (creatinine clearance <50 mL/min). The need for dosage adjustment based on liver function in patients with liver dysfunction is not completely defined, but generally is not indicated in patients with minor liver dysfunction. Adaptive dosage adjustment based on individual pharmacokinetic parameters, estimated using limited sampling strategies and population pharmacokinetic models, is more appropriate. This approach has been used with success in different clinical trials to increase the etoposide dosage, without significantly increasing toxicity. Various pharmacodynamic models have been proposed to guide etoposide oral dosage. However, they lack precision and accuracy and need to be refined by considering other predictor variables in order to extend their application in current clinical practice.

Phase I/II trial of the multidrug-resistance modulator valspodar combined with cisplatin and doxorubicin in refractory ovarian cancer

PURPOSE

To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of doxorubicin when given in combination with cisplatin and the multidrug-resistance (MDR) modulator valspodar and the remission rate induced by this combination in patients with platinum- and anthracycline-resistant ovarian cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-nine patients who had failed prior platinum- and anthracycline-based chemotherapy were enrolled. During the dose-finding phase, patients received a loading dose of valspodar (1.5 or 2 mg/kg) via 2-hour intravenous (IV) infusion on day 1 and continuous IV infusion (CIVI) of valspodar (2, 4, or 10 mg/kg/d) over 3 days. Doxorubicin (starting from 20 up to 50 mg/m(2)) and cisplatin (50 mg/m(2)) were administered via 15- to 20-minute IV infusions on day 3. During the efficacy phase, patients received at least two treatment cycles unless toxicity was unacceptable, and responding patients and those with stable disease received four to six cycles.

RESULTS

All patients completed at least one cycle of combined treatment. The MTD of doxorubicin was determined to be 35 mg/m(2) when administered with valspodar at 2 mg/kg loading dose and 10 mg/kg/d CIVI plus 50 mg/m(2) cisplatin. At these doses, valspodar blood concentrations known to reverse MDR in vitro were reached in all patients. Valspodar was well tolerated at all dose levels. Dose-limiting toxicities of the combination were primarily hematologic and included febrile neutropenia and prolonged leucopenia. The addition of valspodar to the treatment did not worsen cisplatin-related toxicity. Among 33 patients treated at the MTD for doxorubicin, one (3%) had a complete response, and four (12%) had a partial response. An additional seven patients experienced a stabilization of their previously progressive disease. The survival rates at 6 and 12 months were 59% and 19%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Valspodar can be safely coadministered with doxorubicin and cisplatin. Although the regimen used in this trial produced renewed responses in patients with heavily pretreated, refractory ovarian cancer, the value of valspodar in reversing resistance mediated by P-glycoprotein remains to be determined.

A bioassay for the activity of PSC 833 in human serum for modulation of P-glycoprotein-mediated multidrug resistance

We established a rapid and sensitive ex vivo bioassay to detect the multidrug resistance (MDR)-inhibitory activity of SDZ PSC 833 ([3'-keto-Bmt1]-[Val2]-cyclosporin (PSC 833)) in two RPMI 8226 human myeloma sublines (parent 8226 and doxorubicin-resistant subline Dox6) in 75% human serum. In vitro sensitivity of the tumor to doxorubicin was determined by 3-h drug exposure growth inhibition assay (MTT assay). PSC 833 in serum restored the IC50 of doxorubicin in the P-glycoprotein (P-gp)-positive resistant subline to the same level as in the sensitive cells at 1 microg/ml, which has been shown to be an achievable concentration in clinical trials. In addition, the cytotoxic effect of doxorubicin was enhanced by PSC 833 in the sera of the patient in whom the blood level was 705.7 ng/ml. However, 10 microg/ml PSC 833 in serum does not cause a complete recovery in the IC90 of doxorubicin in the resistant sublines. This MDR-inhibitory activity was supported by the finding that PSC 833 in serum does not increase accumulation of rhodamine 123 in doxorubicin-resistant cells in an in vitro functional assay. The present study provides evidence that PSC 833 in human serum is effective to modulate P-gp-mediated MDR but insufficient for the reversal of MDR from the clinicopharmacological point of view.

Clinically relevant drug-drug interactions in oncology

Although anticancer agents are one of the most toxic classes of medication prescribed today, there is relatively little information available about clinically relevant drug-drug interactions. Pharmacokinetic drug interactions have been described, including alterations in absorption, catabolism, and excretion. For example, an increased bioavailability of 6-mercaptopurine has been observed when combined with either allopurinol or methotrexate, leading to increased toxicity in some patients. Induction of etoposide or teniposide clearance by anticonvulsants has also been described, resulting in a lower systemic exposure and risk for lower anticancer activity. Alterations in elimination of methotrexate has been observed with probenecid, presumably through competition for renal secretion. There are also several examples of pharmacodynamic interactions. The combination of 5-fluorouracil plus folinic acid results in more efficient inhibition of thymidylate synthase, a finding which is now utilized routinely in the treatment of colorectal cancer. Improvements in the in vitro and early clinical testing now allow a relatively high degree of prediction of potential clinical drug interactions, prior to observations of untoward drug effects. In conclusion, drug interactions among commonly used anticancer agents have been identified. Their clinical significance can have more impact than many other classes of medications due to the narrow therapeutic index of antineoplastic agents and the potential for lethal side-effects. It is only through prospective, preclinical and early clinical evaluation that the presence of clinically significant drug interactions can be identified and the information used to provide better therapy for this significant health problem.

High-dose cyclosporin with etoposide--toxicity and pharmacokinetic interaction in children with solid tumours

The tolerability, anti-tumour activity and pharmacokinetic interaction of high-dose intravenous cyclosporin combined with intravenous etoposide was evaluated in children. Eighteen patients with recurrent or refractory tumours, all of whom had previously received etoposide, were treated with a combination of high-dose cyclosporin and etoposide. In 13, cyclosporin was given as a continuous infusion (15 mg kg(-1) per 24 h for 60 h) and in five a short 3-hour infusion of 30 mg kg(-1) day(-1) on three consecutive days. Pharmacokinetic profiles of etoposide were determined with and without cyclosporin. Cyclosporin levels ranged from 1359 to 4835 ng ml(-1) and cyclosporin increased the median area under the concentration time for etoposide curve from 7.2 to 12.5 mg ml(-1) min. The major toxicity was acute with varying forms of hypersensitivity reactions. In four cases this was severe. Hyperbilirubinaemia was present in 25 of 32 courses but was of short duration. In 14 courses, creatinine and/or urea was elevated, but was also transient. Significant hypertension was seen in six courses. Four of 17 patients evaluable for response obtained a partial response and one showed stable disease. It is concluded that in children given the combination of high-dose cyclosporin and etoposide, the etoposide dose should be halved in order to achieve an area under the drug concentration-time curve similar to that with etoposide alone. A continuous infusion schedule of cyclosporin is better tolerated during the period of administration but is associated with similar hepatic and renal dysfunction to a short schedule. The 24% response rate in children who had previously received etoposide suggests that this may be an effective method of enhancing drug sensitivity and further phase II evaluation is justified.

Modulation of mdr1 expression by cytokines in human colon carcinoma cells: an approach for reversal of multidrug resistance

Reversal of multidrug resistance (MDR) may offer a means of increasing the effectiveness of tumour chemotherapy. A variety of recent evidence indicates that cytokines may be particularly useful in this endeavour. To investigate the molecular mechanism by which cytokines may sensitise multidrug-resistant colon carcinoma cells, HCT15 and HCT116, to treatment with MDR-related drugs, we evaluated the effects of the human cytokines tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF alpha), interleukin 2 (IL-2) and interferon gamma (IFN gamma) on mdr1 gene expression at the mRNA level by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and at the protein level with monoclonal antibodies by immuno flow cytometry. P-glycoprotein function was examined after accumulation of the fluorescent drug, doxorubicin, by flow cytometry. Chemosensitivity to doxorubicin and vincristine was analysed using the XTT assay. All three cytokines were found to modulate the MDR characteristics on mdr1 expression levels, P-glycoprotein function and measured chemosensitivity to MDR-associated anti-cancer drugs. This cytokine-induced reversal of MDR was strongly time dependent, with maximal effects after 48 and 72 h of cytokine treatment. If similar modulation of MDR phenotype can be obtained in in vivo models, it may be possible to verify the time course for modulation by cytokine treatment and to design appropriate clinical trials of this strategy for MDR reversal.

Modulation of multidrug resistance by BIBW22BS in blasts of de novo or relapsed or persistent acute myeloid leukemia ex vivo

The phenylpteridine derivative BIBW22BS (BIBW22) is a potent modulator of multidrug resistance (MDR). We investigated BIBW22 in comparison to dexniguldipine and verapamil as modifier of MDR in blasts of de novo, relapsed or persistent acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in vitro. All patients with relapsed or persistent AML had been pretreated with idarubicin and cytosine arabinoside. The degree of MDR was determined by efflux kinetics of rhodamine 123 (R123), daunorubicin, and idarubicin measured by flow cytometry (FACS). A total of 51 patients with AML, 25 de novo and 26 relapsed or persistent, were investigated. While only 6 out of 25 de novo AML blast populations showed moderate efflux of R123 and daunorubicin, 17 out of 26 blast populations of relapsed or persistent AML had an efflux between 20% and 44% within 15 min ex vivo. This efflux could be significantly inhibited by 1 microM BIBW22, 1 microM dexniguldipine, or 10 microM verapamil. For idarubicin we found an effusion of 40+/-9% within 15 min in all blast populations that could not be inhibited by the modulators. Clinically achievable drug concentrations causing only moderate side-effects are in the range of 0.5 microM dexniguldipine and 3 microM verapamil. Up to now, BIBW22 has not been investigated clinically. Thus the potential toxicity of concentrations of 0.5-1 microM BIBW22, sufficient for an optimal efflux inhibition ex vivo, is not known yet. We conclude from our ex vivo investigations in blast populations of de novo, relapsed or persistent AML that BIBW22 is a potent modulator of MDR.

Decreased potency of MDR-modulators under serum conditions determined by a functional assay

A variety of agents are capable of overcoming P-glycoprotein-mediated multidrug resistance (MDR) in vitro. However, the clinical potential of these compounds is often limited due to high plasma protein binding. We compared the efficacy of several MDR-reversing compounds in serum-free culture medium and under serum conditions by means of a functional assay. Using flow cytometry the efflux of the fluorescent dye rhodamine 123 (Rh123) was measured from normal peripheral blood CD8+ T-lymphocytes which express low levels of P-glycoprotein. Inhibition of Rh123 efflux by R-verapamil, dexnigludipine-HCl, cyclosporin A, SDZ PSC833 and the protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitor CGP 41251 was determined in serum-free medium and in serum at concentrations from 0.1 to 50 mumol/l. With the exception of SDZ PSC833 all MDR modulators showed an insufficient or suboptimal modulation of P-glycoprotein under serum conditions at concentrations achievable in vivo. The highest potency under serum conditions demonstrated SDZ PSC833: even at a concentration of 0.5 mumol/l a sufficient inhibitory effect was observed. Subsequently this approach was applied to patients suffering from B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (B-CLL; n = 3) and acute myeloid leukaemia (AML; n = 2) which were positive in the Rh123 efflux assay. As for normal CD8+ T-lymphocytes, much higher drug concentrations were required under serum conditions to effectively inhibit Rh123 efflux from the leukaemic cells. Thus the interpretation of results of clinical 'modulator' trials should consider the decreased bioavailability of MDR-reversing agents.

Absence of the mdr1a P-Glycoprotein in mice affects tissue distribution and pharmacokinetics of dexamethasone, digoxin, and cyclosporin A

We have previously shown that absence of the mouse mdr1a (also called mdr3) P-glycoprotein in mdr1a (-/-) "knockout" mice has a profound effect on the tissue distribution and elimination of vinblastine and ivermectin, and hence on the toxicity of these compounds. We show here that the mouse mdr1a and the human MDR1 P-glycoprotein actively transport ivermectin, dexamethasone, digoxin, and cyclosporin A and, to a lesser extent, morphine across a polarized kidney epithelial cell layer in vitro. Injection of these radio-labeled drugs in mdr1a (-/-) and wild-type mice resulted in markedly (20- to 50-fold) higher levels of radioactivity in mdr1a (-/-) brain for digoxin and cyclosporin A, with more moderate effects for dexamethasone (2- to 3-fold) and morphine (1.7-fold). Digoxin and cyclosporin A were also more slowly eliminated from mdr1a (-/-) mice. Our findings show that P-glycoprotein can be a major determinant for the pharmacology of several medically important drugs other than anti-cancer agents, especially in the blood-brain barrier. These results may explain a range of pharmacological interactions observed between various drugs in patients.

Multidrug resistance and the role of P-glycoprotein knockout mice

Drug resistance, be it intrinsic or acquired, is a major problem in cancer chemotherapy. In vitro, one well characterised form of resistance against many different cytotoxic drugs is caused by the MDR1 P-glycoprotein, a large plasma membrane protein that protects the cell by actively pumping substrate drugs out. Available evidence suggests that this protein may cause drug resistance in at least some clinical tumours. Drugs inhibiting the MDR1 P-glycoprotein activity are, therefore, co-administered during chemotherapy of these tumours. To predict the biological and pharmacological effects of the blocking of this protein, we have generated mice with a genetic disruption of the drug-transporting mdr1a P-glycoprotein. These mice are overall healthy, but they accumulate much higher levels of substrate drugs in the brain, and have markedly slower elimination of these drugs from the circulation. For some drugs, this leads to dramatically increased toxicity, indicating that P-glycoprotein inhibitors should be used with caution in patients.