The follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphomas--II. Prognostic factors: what do they mean?

Past, present and future of prognostic scores in follicular lymphoma

Although most follicular lymphoma (FL) patients have prolonged survival, the identification of those at risk of early progression, multiple relapses or histological transformation is essential for the improvement of long-term outcomes. In this sense, a plethora of prognostic indexes have been developed in the last decades. However, determining which one is more accurate and clinically meaningful remains a challenge. Key factors for the external validity of available indexes include characteristics of the study population, treatment intervention, and design of the study. While initial risk scores were composed of clinical, biochemical, and hematological variables, genomic and imaging data have been incorporated in recent years. Despite an obvious step forward in the knowledge of the natural history and biology of FL, predictions remain inaccurate. Further research will likely incorporate information from circulating tumor DNA and artificial intelligence models to refine the prognostic classification of the heterogeneous FL population.

Outcome of patients with early-stage follicular lymphoma staged with 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) and treated with radiotherapy alone

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

To evaluate the impact of positron emission tomography (PET) staging on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with early-stage (stages I and II) follicular lymphoma (ESFL) treated with radiation therapy alone.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Eighty-five patients with ESFL treated with curative-intent radiation therapy (RT) between December 2000 and May 2011 were identified. Of those, 13 who had no PET staging and 25 who received additional systemic therapy were excluded from the analysis. Thus, we analyzed 47 patients with PET-staged ESFL treated with definitive radiation therapy alone (dose > 23Gy). Tumour features, pre-treatment computed tomography (CT) and PET stage, dose fractionation, and radiation therapy field extent were recorded. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the OS and PFS. Patterns of failure were assessed as cumulative incidences assuming competing risks.

RESULTS

Median age was 57 years (range 24-83); 43% were females. Most were PET stage 1 (76.6%). Median maximum nodal diameter was 3 cm. Median pre-treatment lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) was 327.5 (range 123-607, upper normal limit = 220). Twenty-six patients (55.3%) had infra-diaphragmatic disease. All received 30-36Gy in 15-24 fractions, with 59.6% treated with involved-field radiation therapy (IFRT) techniques. There was no significant difference in PFS between CT stage I and stage II (HR 1.30 95% CI [0.25-6.72], p = 0.75) with a 5-year PFS of 77% and 78% respectively. However, stage I on PET staging had a significantly better PFS than stage II (HR 4.66 95% CI [1.15-18.8], p = 0.038), with 5-year PFS of 84% and 60% respectively. Ten patients had recurrent disease, with distant disease being the first site of failure in seven patients. Seven-year OS was 91% (95% CI 79-100) for the whole cohort.

CONCLUSION

FDG-PET should be considered an essential element in the evaluation of patients with ESFL being considered for RT.

Impact of treatment in long-term survival patients with follicular lymphoma: A Spanish Lymphoma Oncology Group registry

BACKGROUND

Follicular lymphoma is the second most common non-Hodgkin lymphoma in the United States and Europe. However, most of the prospective randomized studies have very little follow-up compared to the long natural history of the disease. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the long-term survival of our series of patients with follicular lymphoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 1074 patients with newly diagnosed FL were enrolled. Patients diagnosed were prospectively enrolled from 1980 to 2013.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 54.9 months and median overall survival is over 20 years in our series. We analyzed the patients who are still alive beyond 10 years from diagnosis in order to fully assess the prognostic factors that condition this group. Out of 166 patients who are still alive after more than 10 years of follow-up, 118 of them (73%) are free of evident clinical disease. Variables significantly associated with survival at 10 years were stage < II (p <0.03), age < 60 years (p <0.0001), low FLIPI (p <0.002), normal β2 microglobulin (p <0.005), no B symptoms upon diagnosis (p <0.02), Performance Status 0-1 (p <0.03) and treatment with anthracyclines and rituximab (p <0.001), or rituximab (p <0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

A longer follow-up and a large series demonstrated a substantial population of patients with follicular lymphoma free of disease for more than 10 years.

Prognostic tools in follicular lymphomas

Despite significant improvements in treatment modalities over the 10 years, the clinical course of patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) remains heterogeneous. Thus, prognostic indexes are still required to direct treatment choices and for the design of clinical trials. Investigators have conducted a variety of studies aimed at integrated assessment of biological and clinical features in order to identify novel prognostic factors and scoring systems. Genetic studies focused on tumor cells and the tumor microenvironment represent a step forward in understanding the biology of FL and are likely to provide new prognostic tools for future clinical use. Several prognostic factors have been identified and are currently used in combination to establish prognostic scores and to support therapeutic decisions. The FL International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) is currently used for defining individual risk of death. More recently, FLIPI2 was developed by the same group that built FLIPI as a new model for prognostic definition of patients with FL. The model was defined using prospectively collected data from patients who also received the monoclonal therapeutic antibody rituximab and stratifies patients into three risk categories for disease progression. Since many biological factors are not yet clinically validated or easily assessable, clinical data still represent the major source of prognostic information. The progressive development of new and more effective therapies for the treatment of FL makes the study of prognosis a dynamic and evolving area of clinical research.

Follicular lymphomas

Follicular lymphomas constitute approximately 30% of all non-Hodgkin lymphomas. These lymphomas are characterized by at least partially follicular growth pattern, but diffuse areas may be present. The proportions of follicular or diffuse areas vary also from case to case, which seems to be associated with prognosis. Follicular lymphomas should not be divided into distinct subtypes, but rather shows a continuous gradation in the number of large cells. On the bases of this grading, three groups have been defined: grades 1-3. There is a consensus that grade 3 follicular lymphomas, namely grade 3b, should be discriminated from lower-grade cases. The cells of follicular lymphomas express surface immunoglobulin, more frequently IgM+/-IgD>IgG>IgA, B-cell-associated antigens, CD10+/-; they are CD5-, CD23-/+, CD43-, and CD11c-. Follicular lymphomas express bcl-2 proteins, which is useful in distinguishing reactive from neoplastic follicles. t(14;18) is present in 70-95% of follicular lymphomas, involving rearrangement of bcl-2 gene. Clinical behavior of follicular lymphomas is heterogeneous and differs according to the histologic grade and extension of disease. Moreover, the evaluation of these malignancies is conditioned by therapeutic decision, which is also determined by main prognostic factors. The International Prognostic Index for aggressive lymphomas is not optimal for follicular lymphomas. Conversely, the Italian Lymphoma Intergroup Index and, more recently, the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI), designed in pre-rituximab era, seem to correlate well with outcome. Several active therapeutic approaches from the "wait and watch" strategy to the allogeneic transplantation are available for management of patients with follicular lymphoma. Therapeutic decision is mostly conditioned by patient's characteristics, stage, histologic grade, tumor burden, and risk-predicting factors.

Clinical and molecular prognostic factors in follicular lymphoma

The observed variability in the clinical course of follicular lymphoma (FL), along with the diverse range of therapeutic options available, necessitates accurate prognostic stratification of the individual patient. A number of clinical, laboratory, and pathologic parameters have been associated with both good and poor risk disease; in some instances these have been incorporated into readily calculable prognostic indices. With new insights into disease biology and the resulting identification of biomarkers that have arisen from the analysis of both the genome and the transcriptome, more accurate individualization of prognosis will be realized. At present the clinical application of such biomarkers, however, remains largely in its infancy. This review examines the clinical and molecular prognostic features that have been identified as of value in FL.

Prognosis of follicular lymphomas

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is as an indolent neoplasia with median survival measured in decades. Nevertheless, some patients have poor progression-free survival and overall survival. Several treatment approaches are proposed for patients with FL, however criteria to rationalize treatment decisions are lacking. Studies have been performed to build up prognostic indices that are useful for defining risk-adapted treatment recommendations. Available indices are based on parameters that have an independent role in predicting patient survival and that are variably correlated with the features of the disease, with the characteristics of the patient and with the effects of treatment. Two new prognostic indices have recently been proposed for FL: the Italian Lymphoma Intergroup (ILI) index and the Follicular Lymphoma International prognostic Index (FLIPI). Both indices are based on large series of patients and exhibit differences in their ability to discriminate between patients with different probabilities of survival. In recent years, with the advent of gene expression profile studies, our knowledge of the biology of FL is changing as novel data become available about the lymphoma cell and about the role of the microenvironment; these studies have already provided novel prognostic tools for identifying patients with more aggressive disease. Further data and large international cooperative studies are needed to translate into clinical practice the novel acquisitions of biology and therapeutics.

LightCyclerR-based quantitative real-time PCR monitoring of patients with follicular lymphoma receiving rituximab in combination with conventional or high-dose cytotoxic chemotherapy

OBJECTIVES

Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) is a suitable method to measure residual disease in hematological malignancies. Our objective was to assess a LightCycler-based qPCR for t(14;18)(q32;q21)(IgH/bcl-2)-positive cells quantification in the context of clinical and morphopathological characteristics of patients with follicular lymphoma treated with rituximab (R) in combination with conventional or high-dose chemotherapy.

METHODS

A total of 270 bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB) samples collected from 52 patients with follicular lymphoma at diagnosis or at relapse before or sequentially during therapy were examined by qPCR and nested-PCR.

RESULTS

A greater amount of t(14;18)-positive cells was observed in BM in comparison with PB in 76% of paired samples. The presence and number of t(14;18)-positive cells in BM and PB correlated with lymphoma activity. Significantly higher numbers of lymphoma cells were found in patients under non-remission compared with patients in clinical remission. During non-remission, 10-fold higher numbers were measured at relapse than at diagnosis. During remission, significantly higher levels were found in partial compared with complete remission. During first-line therapy, R/cyclophosphamide/adriamycin/vincristine/prednisone (CHOP) had higher in vivo purging ability than R/fludarabine/mitoxantrone (FM). After R/high-dose cytosine-arabinoside and mitoxantrone (HAM) or R/carmustine/etoposide/cytarabine/melphalan (BEAM), the level of t(14;18)-positive cells dropped below the detection limit in 80% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

LightCycler qPCR is a reliable method for quantitative molecular monitoring of t(14;18)-positive cells in BM and PB of patients with follicular lymphoma. It reflects the clinical characteristics of patients and allows assessment of response to different treatment regimens on a molecular level.

Follicular lymphomas--a review of treatment modalities

Follicular lymphoma is the most common low-grade non Hodgkin's lymphoma and represent an homogeneous entity as defined by pathological, molecular and clinical data. This indolent disease is characterised by a slow growth pattern with possible spontaneous regression, is often disseminated but remains incurable with available treatments when disseminated. For localised stages, involved field radiotherapy remains the standard choice but other approaches remain to be investigated. In advanced disease, chemotherapy has been demonstrated to produce high response rates but recent trials with new treatment strategies including interferon and monoclonal antibodies may improve the current situation. In this article, we will review treatment of follicular lymphomas, specially emphasising published phase III trials.

Is there any place for a wait-and-see policy in stage I0 follicular lymphoma? A study of 43 consecutive patients in a single center

BACKGROUND

A wait-and-see policy (WS) does not appear to modify the long-term prognosis of advanced-stage follicular lymphomas (FL), while irradiation of limited stages sometimes causes complications and does not avert distant relapses. Consequently, we decided to test WS in a selected subset of the localized FL, i.e., patients in complete remission (CR) after the initial lymph node biopsy (stage I0).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-three previously untreated patients were diagnosed with stage I0 FL and 26 of them were included in the WS. Their median age was 60.3 years; 19 were male and 24 female. All histological slides were reviewed and confirmed the diagnosis of FL. Median follow-up was 6.3 years (y).

RESULTS

Thirteen of the 26 untreated patients are still relapse-free, while six relapsed locally only (median: 4.2 years after diagnosis), and reattained CR with radiotherapy. Seven patients relapsed at distant sites (median: 1 year after diagnosis). No localized relapses were observed in the treated group, but there were 7 distant relapses.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of WS in stage I0 FL did not appear to modify the prognosis of these patients. Furthermore, we observed two distinct patterns of relapse (local and distant) that are difficult to differentiate at onset.