Mechanisms of growth inhibition by antiestrogens and progestins in human breast and endometrial cancer cells

Progestins in the menopause in healthy women and breast cancer patients

At present, more than 200 progestin compounds are synthetized, but their biological effects are different: this is function of their structure, receptor affinity, metabolic transformations, the target tissues considered, dose. The action of progestins in breast cancer is controversial; some studies indicate an increase in breast cancer incidence, others show no differences, and yet others indicate a decrease. Many studies agree that treatment with progestins plus estrogens at a low dose and during a limited period (less than 5 years) can have beneficial effects in peri- and post-menopausal women. It was demonstrated that various progestins (e.g. nomegestrol acetate, medrogestone, promegestone), as well as tibolone and its metabolites, can block the enzymes involved in estradiol bioformation (sulfatase, 17beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase) in breast cancer. Progesterone is converted into various metabolic products: in normal breast tissue the transformation is mainly to 4-ene derivatives, whereas in the tumor tissue 5alpha-pregane derivatives are predominant. Aromatase activity is the last step in the formation of estrogens by the conversion of androgens. In recent studies it was shown that 20alpha-dihydroprogesterone, a metabolite found mainly in normal breast tissue and having anti-proliferative properties, can act as an anti-aromatase agent. The data suggest the possible utilization of this compound in breast cancer prevention. In conclusion, in order to clarify and better understand the response of progestins in breast cancer (incidence and mortality), as well as in hormone replacement therapy or in endocrine dysfunction, new clinical trials are necessary using other progestins in function of the dose and period of treatment.

Risk of breast cancer with progestins: critical assessment of current data

Whether progestins protect against the risk of breast cancer or enhance that risk has been a major area of controversy over the past several years. Observational studies have reported conflicting results and experimental studies examining whether progestins exert mitogenic or anti-mitogenic actions on breast tissue report divergent results. Based upon a wide range of animal, epidemiologic and clinical data, most investigators agree that estrogens contribute to the development of breast neoplasms. However, the additional effect of progestins on this risk has been the subject of substantial discussion and controversy. A variety of experiments have been carried out using human breast cancer cells grown in vitro and as xenografts in nude mice. These studies demonstrated both mitogenic and anti-mitogenic effects depending upon the precise experimental conditions. Two potential reasons for these differences include differential metabolism of progestins into inhibitory pregnenes or stimulatory 5-alpha-reduced pregnanes or the presence of a protein (GPR 30) which allows the anti-mitogenic effects of progestins to be manifest. Based upon the conflicting nature of the results in experimental studies, we believe that only data in patients provide substantial insight into the actions of progestins on the intact human breast. Studies have now demonstrated that cell proliferation and breast density is higher during the luteal than during the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle. In postmenopausal women, long-term exposure to estrogen plus a progestin results in a marked enhancement of proliferation of the terminal duct lobular units as well as in breast density. These data, taken together, provide substantial evidence that progestins are mitogenic on the human breast when given long term to postmenopausal women. To critically evaluate the observational studies regarding breast cancer risk from progestins, we developed a set of stringent criteria for acceptance of individual studies. Four of the five studies meeting these criteria reported a greater risk of breast cancer with combination estrogen/progestin regimens than with estrogen alone. More importantly, the first randomized, prospective, controlled trial of the risk of breast cancer with an estrogen/progestin combination (the Women's Health Initiative Study) has now been published. This study reported a 26% increased relative risk of breast cancer with the estrogen/progestin combination. Based upon these data, we believe that progestins do add to the risk of breast cancer over and above that imparted by estrogen alone. The attributable risk during use for 5 years or less is small but increases logarithmically during long-term use. The majority of data regarding progestins are derived from regimens using MPA. However, we conclude from our analysis that the burden of proof regarding progestins has now shifted. One must now prove that an estrogen/progestin combination is safe with respect to breast cancer rather than having to prove it harmful.

Mismatch repair genes and microsatellite instability as molecular markers for gynecological cancer detection

Due to major developments in genetics over the past decade, molecular biology tests are serving promising tools in early diagnosis and follow-up of cancer patients. Recent epidemiological studies revealed that the risk for each individual to develop cancer is closely linked to his/her own genetic potentialities. Some populations that are defective in DNA repair processes, for example in Xeroderma pigmentosum or in the Lynch syndrome, are particularly prone to cancer due to the accumulation of mutations within the genome. Such populations would benefit from the development of tests aimed at identifying people who are particularly at risk. Here, we review some data suggesting that the inactivation of mismatch repair is often found in endometrial cancer and we discuss molecular-based strategies that would help to identify the affected individuals in families with cases of glandular malignancies.

Biological effects of progestins in breast cancer

The action of progestins is derived from many factors: structure, affinity for the progesterone receptor or for other steroid receptors, the target tissue considered, the biological response, the experimental conditions, the dose and metabolic transformation. The proliferative response to progestins in human breast cancer cells is contradictory: some progestins inhibit, others stimulate, have no effect at all, or have a dual action. For instance, medroxyprogesterone acetate has a stimulatory effect on breast cancer cells after a short period of treatment, but this effect becomes inhibitory when treatment is prolonged. It has been demonstrated that, in hormone-dependent breast cancer cells, various progestins (nomegestrol acetate, medrogestone, promegestone) are potent sulfatase inhibitory agents. The progestins can also involve the inhibition of the mRNA expression of this enzyme. In another series of studies it was also demonstrated that some progestins are very active in inhibiting 17beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase for the conversion of estrone to estradiol. More recently it was observed that the progestins promegestone and medrogestone stimulate sulfotransferase for the formation of estrogen sulfates. Consequently, the action of progestins in blocking estradiol formation via sulfatase, or in stimulating the effect on sulfotransferase activity, can open interesting and new possibilities in clinical applications in breast cancer.

The expression and action of granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor and its interaction with TGF-beta in endometrial carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Previous studies have demonstrated that normal human endometrium expresses granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and GM-CSF receptors. Because GM-CSF is administer to cancer patients following chemotherapy, GM-CSF may directly or through interaction with ovarian steroids and other cytokines alter the behavior of endometrial cancer. The aim of this study was to determine the expression of GM-CSF and receptors in endometrial carcinoma and its direct effect and interaction with transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) on Ishikawa cells, a human endometrial carcinoma cell line.

METHODS

GM-CSF, GM-CSF receptors, TGF-beta1, and TGF-beta type II receptor expression were evaluated using quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (Q-RT-PCR). The effect of GM-CSF on DNA synthesis, cell proliferation, expression of GM-CSF, TGF-beta1, and TGF-beta receptor, and their regulation by ovarian steroids was determined by the rate of [(3)H]thymidine incorporation, MTT assay, Q-RT-PCR, and ELISA, respectively.

RESULTS

Endometrial carcinomas express significantly higher GM-CSF and GM-CSF alpha and beta receptor mRNA compared with normal postmenopausal endometrium. GM-CSF at various doses had no significant effect on the rate of [(3)H]thymidine incorporation or proliferation of Ishikawa cells, whereas TGF-beta1 inhibited [(3)H]thymidine incorporation. GM-CSF and TGF-beta1 regulate their own expression and the expression of TGF-beta type II receptor, which were both upregulated by 17beta-estradiol and medroxyprogesterone acetate treatment and reversed following cotreatment with their respective receptor antagonists.

CONCLUSION

Endometrial carcinoma expresses an elevated level of GM-CSF and GM-CSF receptors. GM-CSF is not a mitogen for the endometrial cancer cell line; however, either alone or through interaction with TGF-beta1, it regulates its own expression and the expression of TGF-beta1 and TGF-beta type II receptor which inhabits endometrial cancer cells. This interaction may represent a regulatory feedback mechanism that could serve to suppress endometrial carcinoma growth.

Expression and function of EGF-related peptides and their receptors in gynecological cancer--from basic science to therapy

EGF-related peptides and their receptors play an important, but not fully understood role, both, in epithelial physiology and pathophysiology but also in human tumor carcinogenesis and tumor behavior, respectively. Overexpression of EGF-related growth factors from normal epithelium to carcinomas has been demonstrated for several human tissues such as breast, endometrium, cervix and ovary. Additionally, the differential overexpression of EGFR or erb B-2 in various malignancies has already proven to be efficacious in stratifying patients with respect to a poor prognosis. These data suggest that EGF-related growth factors, erb B receptors or signaling proteins that function either upstream or downstream from these receptors may represent novel targets for selective tumor therapy. In the future, conventional chemotherapy regimes will ultimately be wedded to more biologically-oriented therapies. One important target for these novel therapeutic approaches in solid tumors will be the EGF-related growth factors and their receptors.

Regulation of estrogen activity by sulfation in human Ishikawa endometrial adenocarcinoma cells

Sulfation is an important conjugation reaction in the metabolism of steroids. Steroids sulfates do not interact with the appropriate hormone receptors; additionally, the presence of the charged sulfate moiety increases the aqueous solubility and excretion of most steroids. Estrogen sulfotransferase (EST) is the major form of human cytosolic ST involved in the conjugation of estrogens. EST is important in the inactivation of beta-estradiol (E2) during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. EST has a significantly higher affinity for the sulfation of E2 and 17alpha-ethinylestradiol (EE2) than for other potent estrogens such as diethylstilbestrol (DES) and equine estrogens. The ability of EST to sulfate these estrogenic compounds at physiologic concentrations is important in regulating their activation of the ER in estrogen responsive cells. Human Ishikawa endometrial adenocarcinoma (ISH) cells possess an estrogen receptor (ER)-regulated alkaline phosphatase (AlkPhos) which is used to assay ER activation. To study the effects of EST activity on the ER activation of different estrogenic compounds, ISH cells were stably transformed with an EST expression vector. Dose-response curves for the induction of AlkPhos activity by the different estrogenic compounds were generated with EST/ISH and control pcDNA/ISH cells. EST/ISH cells were 200-fold less sensitive to E2 and EE2 than were control cells. No differences were observed in the dose response curves for DES between EST/ISH and pcDNA/ISH cells. EST/ISH cells were approximately 3-10-fold less sensitive to the equine estrogens equilin and 17-equilin as compared to control cells. The ability of EST to decrease the ER activation of an estrogen correlates with the sulfation of these compounds at nanomolar concentrations by EST/ISH and pcDNA/ISH ISH cells. These results indicate that EST is capable of efficiently inactivating E2 and EE2 but is significantly less effective in inhibiting the ER binding of other potent estrogenic compounds.

Progestins and breast cancer

In the last years there has been an extraordinary development in the synthesis of new progestins. These compounds are classified, in agreement with their structure, in various groups which include progesterone, retroprogesterones, 17alpha-hydroxyprogesterones, 19-norprogesterones, 17alpha-hydroxyprogesterone derivatives, androstane and estrane derivatives. The action of progestins is a function of many factors: its structure, affinity to the progesterone receptor or to other steroid receptors, the target tissue considered, the biological response, the experimental conditions, dose, and metabolic transformation. The information on the action of progestins in breast cancer patients is very limited. Positive response with the progestins: medroxyprogesterone acetate and megestrol acetate was obtained in post-menopausal patients with advanced breast cancer. However, extensive information on the effect of progestins was obtained in in vitro studies using hormone-dependent and hormone-independent human mammary cancer cell lines. It was demonstrated that in the hormone-dependent breast cancer cells, various progestins (nomegestrol acetate, tibolone, medrogestone, promegestone) are potent sulfatase inhibitory agents. The progestins can also involve the inhibition of mRNA of this enzyme. In another series of studies it was also demonstrated that various progestins are very active in inhibiting the 17beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase for the conversion of estrone to estradiol. More recently it was observed that the progestins promegestone or medrogestone stimulate the sulfotransferase for the formation of estrogen sulfates. Consequently, the blockage in the formation of estradiol via sulfatase, or the stimulatory effect on sulfotransferase activity, by progestins can open interesting and new possibilities in clinical applications in breast cancer.

Inhibition by nomegestrol acetate and other synthetic progestins on proliferation and progesterone receptor content of T47-D human breast cancer cells

Progesterone receptors (PgR) of human breast cancer T47-D cells grown in an estrogenic environment (presence of phenol red, natural estrogens of foetal calf serum and insulin) were found to be present in considerable amounts (1-3 pmol/mg protein and 20 pmol/mg DNA), and to specifically bind progestins with a high affinity characterized by a Kd around 3 nM for ORG2058, and 4 nM for nomegestrol acetate (NOM; 17 alpha-acetoxy-6-methyl-19-nor-pregna-4,6-diene-3, 20-dione), when measured under equilibrium conditions. Both compounds formed an highly stable ligand-receptor complex with a dissociation constant (k-1) around 1 x 10(-5) s-1. At high pharmacological concentrations, NOM, ORG2058 and other synthetic progestins including promegestone (R5020), medroxy-progesterone acetate and norethindrone acetate (NOR), induced a dose-dependent inhibition of cell proliferation as measured by [3H]thymidine incorporation. Dexamethasone, which did not bind to PgR, did not reproduce this inhibitory effect. NOM, R5020 and NOR treatments of T47-D cells at concentrations around Kd resulted in an 80% decrease in PgR content. Our data on NOM as compared to other progestins are consistent with their antiproliferative effects on human breast cancer cells grown in estrogenic conditions.

William L. McGuire Memorial Symposium. Estrogen and progestin effects in human breast carcinogenesis

The influences of estrogen and progestin on human mammary neoplasia are reviewed with a view to identifying what is known about their effects. Estrogens promote growth of established cancer and pharmacological levels of progestins induce remission. In vivo, highest proliferation of histologically normal mammary epithelium occurs in the progestogenic phase of the menstrual cycle or under the progestogenic influence of oral contraceptives. Little additional hard data exist to indicate whether progestins promote or inhibit human mammary carcinogenesis. Effects on proliferation, steroid receptor content and development are discussed together with interpretation of epidemiological data on risk factors that have hormonal components. Progestins may not be the benign or beneficial agents previously supposed, and there are virtually no data to suggest that they are antiestrogenic. It is hypothesized that carcinogenesis may be accompanied by increased sensitivity to estrogen, which provides a growth advantage to the tumor by maximizing use of the low estrogen concentrations encountered in the postmenopausal state.