Nucleocytoplasmic mRNA transport: a plea for methodological dualism

Novel components of the plant cytoskeleton: a beginning to plant 'cytomics'

The bulk of our knowledge concerning the plant cytoskeleton has come primarily from the use of techniques and probes derived from animal research. However, in comparison with animal tissues, relatively few plant cytoskeleton proteins have been identified. We presume this is not because the plant cytoskeleton is really made up of such few proteins, but rather that only rarely have attempts been made to identify plant-specific cytoskeleton proteins, using plant-specific methods. Here we outline methods that we have developed both for the isolation and identification of novel cytoskeleton proteins as well as for the visualization of novel filamentous structures in plant cells, and we describe several novel cytoskeleton proteins and two novel cytoskeleton structures, 'nanofilaments' and 'nanotubules'. We postulate that use of such approaches will lead to a rapid expansion of our knowledge of the plant cytoskeleton.

Intracellular structure and nucleocytoplasmic transport

Intracellular movement of any solute or particle accords with one of two general schemes: either it takes place predominantly in the solution phase or it occurs by dynamic interactions with solid-state structures. If nucleocytoplasmic exchanges of macromolecules and complexes are predominantly solution-phase processes, i.e., if the former ("diffusionist") perspective applies, then the only significant structures in nucleocytoplasmic transport are the pore complexes. However, if such exchanges accord with the latter ("solid-state") perspective, then the roles of the nucleoskeleton and cytoskeleton in nucleocytoplasmic transport are potentially, at least, as important as that of the pore complexes. The role of the nucleoskeleton in mRNA transport is more difficult to evaluate than that of the cytoskeleton because it is less well characterized, and current evidence does not exclude either perspective. However, the balance of evidence favors a solid-state scheme. It is argued that ribosomal subunits are also more likely to migrate by a solid-state rather than a diffusionist mechanism, though the opposite is true of proteins and tRNAs. Moreover, recent data on the effects of viral proteins on intranuclear RNA processing and migration accord with the solid-state perspective. In view of this balance of evidence, three possible solid-state mechanisms for nucleocytoplasmic mRNA transport are described and evaluated. The explanatory advantage of solid-state models is contrasted with the heuristic advantage of diffusion theory, but it is argued that diffusion theory itself, even aided by modern computational techniques and numerical and graphical approaches, cannot account for data describing the movements of materials within the cell. Therefore, the mechanisms envisaged in a diffusionist perspective cannot be confined to diffusion alone, but must include other processes such as bulk fluid flow.