Hormone receptors in malignancy

Functional oestrogen receptor α imaging in endometrial carcinoma using 16α-[¹⁸F]fluoro-17β-oestradiol PET

PURPOSE

To investigate the correlation between uptake of 16α-[(18)F]fluoro-17β-oestradiol (FES) and expression of oestrogen receptors as well as other related immunohistochemistry markers, positron emission tomography (PET) was performed in patients with endometrial carcinoma before surgery.

METHODS

Nineteen patients with endometrioid adenocarcinoma underwent preoperative PET studies with FES and 2-[(18)F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D: -glucose (FDG). Standardized uptake values (SUVs) for each tracer and the regional FDG to FES SUV ratio were calculated using images after coregistration. PET values were compared with postoperative stage, differentiation grade and immunohistochemical scores including oestrogen receptor subtypes (ERα, ERβ), progesterone receptor B (PR-B), Ki-67 and glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1).

RESULTS

FES uptake showed a significantly positive correlation with expression of ERα. The FDG to FES ratio showed a significantly negative correlation with expression of ERα and PR-B. The FES uptake and FDG to FES ratio did not correlate with expression of ERβ, Ki-67 or GLUT1. FDG uptake was not correlated with any of the immunohistochemical scores. The PR-B score was strongly correlated with the ERα score. Well-differentiated carcinoma (grade 1) showed a significantly higher FES uptake and significantly lower FDG to FES ratio than moderately or poorly differentiated carcinoma (grade 2-3). None of the PET parameters were significantly different between advanced-stage carcinoma (≥ stage IB) and early-stage carcinoma (IA) based on the Féderation International de Gynécologie et d'Obstétrique (FIGO) staging classification. Differentiation grade was the most closely correlated parameter to FES uptake and FDG to FES ratio by multivariate analyses.

CONCLUSION

FES PET combined with FDG would be useful for non-invasive evaluation of ERα distribution, as well as ERα function, which reflects differentiation grade in endometrial carcinoma.

Antiestrogens--tamoxifen, SERMs and beyond

Estrogens play a central role in reproductive physiology. The cellular effects of estrogens are mediated by binding to nuclear receptors (ER) which activate transcription of genes involved in cellular growth control. At least two such receptors, designated ERalpha and ERbeta, mediate these effects in conjunction with a number of coactivators. These receptors can directly interact with other members of the steroid receptor superfamily. A complex cross-talk exists between the estrogen-signaling pathways and the downstream signaling events initiated by growth factors, such as epidermal growth factor and insulin-like growth factors. Estrogens are also a causative factor in the pathogenesis of a variety of neoplastic and non-neoplastic diseases, including breast cancer, endometrial cancer, endometriosis, and uterine fibroids, among others. Antiestrogens, such as tamoxifen, are widely used for the treatment of breast cancer. Tamoxifen produces objective tumor shrinkage in advanced breast cancer, reduces the risk of relapse in women treated for invasive breast cancer, and prevents breast cancer in high-risk women. Although, initially developed as an antiestrogen, tamoxifen can also prevent postmenopausal osteoporosis as well as reduce cholesterol, due to its estrogen-agonist effects. Its estrogen-agonist activity, however, can lead to significant side-effects such as endometrial cancer and thromboembolic phenomena. This has led to the concept of "ideal" selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), drugs that would have the desired, tissue selective, estrogen-agonist or -antagonist effects. Raloxifene is a SERM which has the desirable mixed agonist/antagonist effects of tamoxifen but does not cause uterine stimulation. "Pure" antiestrogens may provide very potent estrogen-antagonist drugs, but are likely to be devoid of beneficial effects on bone and lipids. Future drug development efforts should focus on developing superior SERMs that have a greater efficacy against ER-positive tumors and do not cause hot flashes or thromboembolism, and explore combination strategies to simultaneously target hormone-dependent as well as hormone-independent breast cancer.

Alterations in DNA methylation: a fundamental aspect of neoplasia

Neoplastic cells simultaneously harbor widespread genomic hypomethylation, more regional areas of hypermethylation, and increased DNA-methyltransferase (DNA-MTase) activity. Each component of this "methylation imbalance" may fundamentally contribute to tumor progression. The precise role of the hypomethylation is unclear, but this change may well be involved in the widespread chromosomal alterations in tumor cells. A main target of the regional hypermethylation are normally unmethylated CpG islands located in gene promoter regions. This hypermethylation correlates with transcriptional repression that can serve as an alternative to coding region mutations for inactivation of tumor suppressor genes, including p16, p15, VHL, and E-cad. Each gene can be partially reactivated by demethylation, and the selective advantage for loss of gene function is identical to that seen for loss by classic mutations. How abnormal methylation, in general, and hypermethylation, in particular, evolve during tumorigenesis are just beginning to be defined. Normally, unmethylated CpG islands appear protected from dense methylation affecting immediate flanking regions. In neoplastic cells, this protection is lost, possibly by chronic exposure to increased DNA-MTase activity and/or disruption of local protective mechanisms. Hypermethylation of some genes appears to occur only after onset of neoplastic evolution, whereas others, including the estrogen receptor, become hypermethylated in normal cells during aging. This latter change may predispose to neoplasia because tumors frequently are hypermethylated for these same genes. A model is proposed wherein tumor progression results from episodic clonal expansion of heterogeneous cell populations driven by continuous interaction between these methylation abnormalities and classic genetic changes.