The present state of the art in chemotherapy for soft tissue sarcomas in adults: the EORTC point of view

Correlation between overall survival and growth modulation index in pre-treated sarcoma patients: a study from the French Sarcoma Group

BACKGROUND

Growth modulation index (GMI), the ratio of two times to progression measured in patients receiving two successive treatments (GMI = TTP2/TTP1), has been proposed as a criterion of phase II clinical trials. Nevertheless, its use has been limited until now.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We carried out a retrospective multicentre study in soft tissue sarcoma patients receiving a second-line treatment after doxorubicin-based regimens to evaluate the link between overall survival and GMI. Second-line treatments were classified as 'active' according to the EORTC-STBSG criteria (3-month progression-free rate >40% or 6-month PFR >14%). Comparisons used chi-squared and log-rank tests.

RESULTS

The population consisted in 106 men and 121 women, 110 patients (48%) received 'active drugs'. Median OS from the second-line start was 317 days. Sixty-nine patients experienced GMI >1.33 (30.4%). Treatments with 'active drug' were not associated with OS improvement: 490 versus 407 days (P = 0.524). Median OS was highly correlated with GMI: 324, 302 and 710 days with GMI <1, GMI = [1.00-1.33], and GMI >1.33, respectively (P < 0.0001). In logistic regression analysis, the sole predictive factor was the number of doxorubicin-based chemotherapy cycles.

CONCLUSION

GMI seems to be an interesting end point that provides additional information compared with classical criteria. GMI >1.33 is associated with significant OS improvement.

New drugs and combinations for the treatment of soft-tissue sarcoma: a review

Sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of solid tumors arising from either soft tissues or bone, accounting for approximately 1% of all cancers in adults. Management of these diseases has changed little over the past 10 years, with the exception of treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Reasons for this stagnation include multiple histologies commonly grouped together in clinical trials limiting the understanding of benefit of treatment and limited investigation of molecular targeted therapies. More recently, advances in molecular pathogenesis, the advent of novel and targeted therapeutics, and increasing collaborations between sarcoma investigators has helped move the field forward in the right direction. Here, we review the recent data on novel agents tested for the management of adult soft-tissue sarcomas, excluding gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

High-dose chemotherapy consolidation for chemosensitive advanced soft tissue sarcoma patients: an open-label, randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS) prognosis remains poor and few cytotoxic agents offer proven efficacy. This randomized open phase III study examines whether high-dose (HD) chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) could improve overall survival (OS) of chemosensitive patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Advanced STS patients aged 18-65 years received four courses of standard mesna, adryamycin, ifosfamide and dacarbazine (MAID) treatment. Chemotherapy-responding patients and patients with at least stable disease amenable to complete surgical resection were randomized to receive standard dose (SD) with two successive MAID cycles or HD treatments of one MAID then MICE intensification: mesna (3.6 g/m(2), day 1-5), ifosfamide (2.5 g/m(2), day 1-4), carboplatin [area under the curve (AUC) 5/day 2-4] and etoposide (300 mg/m(2), day 1-4) with PBSC reinjection at day 7.

RESULTS

From 2000 to 2008, 207 patients received four cycles of MAID and 87 assessable patients were randomly assigned to receive the following: 46 SD, 41 HD, with 45 and 38 maintained for analyses after secondary centralized histological review. Futility analyses led to study closure in November 2008. Three-year OS was 49.4% for the SD group versus 32.7% for HD arm, hazard ratio= 1.26, 95% confidence interval 0.70-2.29; progression-free survival was 32.4% and 14.0%, respectively. HD treatment led to higher grades 3-4 toxicity.

CONCLUSION

This study failed to show an OS advantage for advanced STS patients treated with dose-intensified chemotherapy with PBSC.

Epirubicin is not Superior to Doxorubicin in the Treatment of Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcomas.The Experience of the EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group

Purpose. Doxorubicin (dox) still appears to be one of the most active drugs in the treatment of soft tissue sarcomas. However, treatment duration is limited due to cumulative cardiotoxicity. A number of small studies from single institutions have suggested activity of other analogues. In two studies the EORTC STBSG tested whether epirubicin (epi) is an alternative to standard dose dox in the treatment of chemonaive patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma. The present report gives the final results of these studies.

Patients/Methods. In the first study 210 patients were randomized to receive either dox or epi both at a dose of 75 mg/m² given as bolus injection at 3-week intervals. In the second study 334 patients were randomized to dox 75 mg/m², epi 150 mg/m² or epi 50 mg/m² days 1–3, all given as bolus injection at 3-week intervals.

Results. In the first study no differences in median survival and duration of response were found. Of 167 evaluable patients the response rate was slightly in favour of dox (23% vs 18%) but at the expense of more toxicity.These data could suggest that increasing the epi dose may lead to a greater antineoplastic effect with acceptable toxicity. In the second study 15% of 314 evaluable patients had an objective tumour response. There were no differences between the three groups with regard to response rate, progression-free and overall survival, but both dose schedules of epi were more myelotoxic than dox.

Conclusion. Regardless of schedule and dose, epi is not superior to dox in the treatment of patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas. In addition, the results illustrate that the data from small studies of single institutions should always be confirmed by large multi-institutional studies before being taken for granted.

Trabectedin in the treatment of metastatic soft tissue sarcoma: cost-effectiveness, cost-utility and value of information

Background: To assess the cost-effectiveness of trabectedin compared with end-stage treatment (EST) after failure with anthracycline and/or ifosfamide in metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (mSTS).

Design: Analysis was carried out using a probabilistic Markov model with trabectedin → EST and EST arms, three health states (stable disease, progressive disease and death) and a lifetime perspective (3% annual discount rate). Finnish resources (drugs, mSTS, adverse events and travelling) and costs (year 2008) were used. Efficacy was based on an indirect comparison of the STS-201 and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer trials. QLQ-C30 scale scores were mapped to 15D, Short Form 6D and EuroQol 5D utilities. The outcome measures were the cost-effectiveness acceptability frontier, incremental cost per life year gained (LYG) and quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained and the expected value of perfect information (EVPI).

Results: Trabectedin → EST was associated with 14.0 (95% confidence interval 9.1–19.2) months longer survival, €36 778 higher costs (€32 816 using hospital price for trabectedin) and €31 590 (€28 192) incremental cost per LYG with an EVPI of €3008 (€3188) compared with EST. With a threshold of €50 000 per LYG, trabectedin → EST had 98.5% (98.2%) probability of being cost-effective. The incremental cost per QALY gained with trabectedin → EST was €42 633–47 735 (€37 992–42 819) compared with EST. The results were relatively insensitive to changes.

Conclusion: Trabectedin is a potentially cost-effective treatment of mSTS patients.

The use of positron emission tomography in soft tissue sarcoma patients under therapy with trabectedin

Background

We used 2-deoxy-2-[¹⁸F] fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) to evaluate the FDG uptake in patients with advanced and/or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS) undergoing therapy with Ecteinascidin-743 (ET-743, Trabectedin, Yondelis™).

Patients and Methods

The pilot study included nine patients with metastatic STS receiving a minimum of one cycle of treatment with trabectedin. Patients were examined using PET prior to onset of therapy and after completion of one or three cycles of trabectedin. Restaging according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) was performed in parallel using computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and served for reference.

Results

Clinical outcome of nine evaluable patients was as follows: one patient with partial remission (PR), three patients with stable disease (SD), and five patients with progressive disease (PD). A more than 40% decrease of the standardized uptake value (SUV) of sequential PET examination could be demonstrated for the responding patient (PR), whereas patients with SD or PD showed a stable SUV, but no increase in SUV.

Conclusion

To our knowledge, this is the first small series of patients being treated with trabectedin and monitored using sequential PET imaging demonstrating SUV stabilization in nearly all monitored patients.

Large institutional experience with dose-intensive chemotherapy and stem cell support in the management of sarcoma patients

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of patients with advanced sarcoma remains poor. Whether high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell support improves the long-term outcome for these patients or not is controversial.

METHODS

We present a large institutional experience of sarcoma patients treated with this therapy option. Thirty-eight patients with bone (n = 17) and soft tissue sarcomas (n = 21) were included. Apart from haematological complications, no WHO grade III-IV complications were observed. One patient died due to cardiac arrest after transplantation.

RESULTS

Following chemotherapy and/or surgery, but prior to high-dose chemotherapy, diagnoses were made of: no evidence of disease (NED; n = 12), partial remission (n = 17), stable disease (n = 3) and progressive disease (PD; n = 6). Six patients died within 8 months due to PD, in 18 patients disease recurred and led to death and 13 patients are alive with/without disease. Median progression-free survival was 19.1 months (range: 0-121) for all patients, and 48.8 months (range: 3-121) for 12 patients with NED.

CONCLUSION

A subgroup of patients with NED before high-dose chemotherapy gained survival benefit. Therefore, we emphasize the value of high-dose chemotherapy as a treatment option for younger patients with a good performance status in partial or complete remission.

The "old drug" dacarbazine as a second/third line chemotherapy in advanced soft tissue sarcomas

The aim of this study was to evaluate retrospectively the response rate, progression-free survival and median duration of response to dacarbazine as second/third-line chemotherapy for refractory soft tissue sarcomas. We studied 40 valuable patients with refractory soft tissue sarcomas and confirmed progressive disease (median age 54 years; range 24-73) treated between May 1997 and October 2005: 30 (75%) with metastases, and 23 (57.5%) with grade 3 disease. Dacarbazine was given as second-line chemotherapy to 29 patients (72.5%) every 21 days using three different schedules: dacarbazine 800 mg/m2 on day 1 (26 patients); dacarbazine 400 mg/m2 on days 1 and 2 (five patients); and dacarbazine 300 mg/m2 on days 1, 2 and 3 (nine patients). There were no complete responses, three (7.5%) partial responses and five (12.5%) cases of stable disease, for an overall disease control rate of 20%. Median progression-free survival was 2 months and median response duration 9 months. The 3- and 6-month progression-free rates were, respectively, 25% (SE 6.85%) and 20% (SE 6.32%). There were no cases of grade 3-4 hematological and non-hematological toxicity. In conclusion, our results suggest that second/third-line therapy with dacarbazine leads to satisfactory disease control in refractory soft tissue sarcomas; its activity seems to be comparable with other treatments, such as high dose ifosfamide or ecteinascidin-743, but it has a better toxicity profile.

Ecteinascidin-743: evidence of activity in advanced, pretreated soft tissue and bone sarcoma patients

Purpose. To evaluate the activity and safety of ecteinascidin (ET-743) in pretreated patients with advanced or metastatic soft tissue and bone sarcoma. Patients or subjects. Eighty-nine patients received ET-743 as a 24-hour continuous infusion at a dose of 900-1500 mug/m(2) every 3 weeks. Results. We observed one complete remission, 5 partial remissions, one minimal response, and 16 patients with a disease stabilization of 6 months or more. The objective response rate was 6.7% and the clinical benefit rate at 3 and 6 months was 37.7% and 23.4%, respectively. Responses were noted in patients with lipo-, leiomyo-, osteo-, and myogenic sarcoma, with a median duration of 9.85 months. Toxicity mainly involved an asymptomatic elevation of transaminases and neutropenia. Estimated 1- and 2-year survival rates were 39.4% and 15.8%. Median overall survival was 8.25 months. Discussion. This retrospective analysis confirms that ET-743 induces objective responses and progression arrest in a clinically relevant proportion of patients.

Novel treatment strategies for soft tissue sarcoma

Soft tissue sarcoma is a heterogeneous group of rare tumours arising predominantly from the embryonic mesoderm. While the prognosis is excellent for patients diagnosed at an early stage and treated by adequate surgery, unresectable or advanced metastatic diseases shrink the overall survival at 5 years dramatically to less than 10%. For metastatic soft tissue sarcoma, the armamentarium of effective chemotherapeutic agents is limited, especially when patients failed anthracycline- and/or ifosfamide-based chemotherapy. Fortunately, progress in the understanding of molecular biology and pathogenesis of soft tissue sarcomas has been made recently and should in the near future translate into molecular tumour characterization and the development of new therapeutic strategies. In this review, we briefly describe the status of current treatment strategies for soft tissue sarcoma. We will focus on the new and emerging compounds including recent developments of targeted therapy and cytotoxics such as antiangiogenic and immunomodulatory drugs, Bcl-2 antisense therapy, raf kinase inhibitors, heat shock protein modulators, anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen (CTLA)-4 monoclonal antibody, proteasome inhibitors, minor groove binders, topoisomerase I inhibitors, and other agents being extensively developed in these solid tumours.

Phase 1 European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer study determining safety of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Caelyx®) in combination with ifosfamide in previously untreated adult patients with advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcomas

This phase I study evaluated the toxicity of first-line combined pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Caelyx) and ifosfamide in patients with advanced and/or metastatic soft tissue sarcomas. Five dose levels (L) were studied: Caelyx 30 mg/m2 (L1-4) or 40 mg/m2 (L5) 1-h infusion d 1 q 3 weeks + ifosfamide and mesna at X g/m2/4 h d 1-3 q 3 weeks at five doses: L1: X = 1.7 g; L2: X = 2 g; L3: X = 2.5 g; L4 and L5: X = 3 g. Cohorts of 3 patients were entered at each level unless a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred. In case of DLT in 1 of 3 patients a new cohort was added. Toxicity was evaluated by Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC). A total of 28 patients was included: 4 at dose L1, 8 at L2, 3 at L3, 6 at L4, and 7 at L5. Median age was 60 years (range 29-69 years). Male/female ratio was 12/16. Seventy-five percent of patients had a performance status of 1.0 and 36% had leiomyosarcomas. No DLT was observed at dose L1-4. Six patients developed a DLT at dose L5, and thus the recommended dose is level 4 (i.e. Caelyx 30 mg/m2/1 h d 1+ifosfamide at 3 g/m2/4 h d 1-3 q 3 weeks). Few haematological and biochemical events were observed and the principal toxicities were granulocytopaenia and leucopaenia. Five patients discontinued therapy because of toxicity, 4 of them at dose level 5. Non-haematological toxicities > grade 2 were also few. Palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) > grade 1 was not seen. Two patients obtained partial response (PR) and 13 stable disease (SD). Median overall survival (OS) was 333 d and median progression-free survival (PFS) 174 d. In conclusion, this seems to be a feasible combination in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas, allowing ifosfamide to be given in a dosage similar to that used when given alone. The recommended dose for future studies is Caelyx 30 mg/m2/1 h d 1+ifosfamide 3 g/m2/4 h d 1-3 q 3 weeks.

Phase I/II study of docetaxel, ifosfamide, and doxorubicin in advanced, recurrent, or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS)

BACKGROUND

Based on reports of the efficacy of docetaxel (T) in STS, we undertook a phase I/II trial to determine the response rate (RR), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of addition of T to doxorubicin (A) and ifosfamide (I) in advanced STS.

METHODS

Patients with advanced, recurrent, or metastatic STS, without prior chemotherapy, were enrolled in a dose escalation trial. Dose levels: I-A 40 mg/m(2); I 4.0 gm/m(2); T 40 mg/m(2), II-A 50; I 5.0; T 50, III-A 60; I 6.0; T 60, and IV-A 75; I 7.5; T 75. MTD was defined as the dose producing DLTs in >or=2 of 3-6 patients treated.

RESULTS

21 patients were accrued. Median age: 55 (28-78) years.

HISTOLOGY

leiomyosarcoma 10, spindle cell sarcoma 3, synovial sarcoma 2, angiosarcoma 1, fibrous histiocytoma 1, epitheliod hemangio-endothelioma 1, and 3 not specified. MTD was level III (A 60, I 6.0, and T 60). DLT was myelosuppression. All grade 4 toxicities were hematologic. Patients received median 2 cycles (range 2-9). Eight patients (38%) achieved partial response (PR). PR occurred after six cycles in 5 patients. 18 patients died. Median overall survival: 17 months (95% CI, 9.1-33.6 months).

CONCLUSIONS

The recommended Phase II dose of this combination is level III: A 60 mg/m(2), I 6.0 g/m(2), T 60 mg/m(2), with mesna and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor. The RR is similar to that of AI in other trials, but the survival is better than anticipated.

La chimiothérapie des sarcomes des tissus mous

Despite they represent an heterogeneous entity, the same protocols were applied to all subtypes of soft-tissue sarcomas until recently. Although doxorubicin and ifosfamide remain the cornerstone of therapy, their association yields enhanced response rates but has no obvious effect on survival. The benefit of adjuvant therapy is still matter of debate; however, it seems to improve relapse-free survival and might of particular interest for patients with high-grade tumours of the extremities. Yet, the major change occurring over the past few years is probably the development of subtype-specific regimens. Whether targeted therapies could provide additional benefit is a major concern but further studies are needed.

Treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumor with imatinib mesylate: a retrospective single-center experience in Heidelberg

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is the most common mesenchymal neoplasm of the gastrointestinal tract. Surgery has been the only effective therapy. However, many patients still eventually die of disease recurrence. Chemotherapy and radiation therapy have been of limited value. Imatinib mesylate (Glivec) is an orally administered competitive inhibitor of tyrosine kinases associated with the KIT, ABL protein, licensed for the treatment of metastatic GIST since 2002 in Germany.

METHODS

We summarized the data of 16 patients with advanced or metastatic GIST treated with imatinib mesylate in palliative and neoadjuvant settings.

RESULTS

Overall response was 81%, with no evidence of disease (NED) in 3/16 (19%), partial response (PR) in 9/16 (56%) and stable disease (SD) in 1/16 (6%), whereas 3/16 patients (19%) suffered from progressive disease (PD). Mean follow-up was 18.6 months [range: 4-30]. Mean progression-free survival (PFS) was 17.6 months [range: 0-30], mean overall survival (OS) from initial diagnosis was 32.3 months [range: 5-122]. Most common side effects were periorbital edema and skin rash.

CONCLUSION

Imatinib mesylate is well tolerated in a dose of up to 800 mg/day and has significant activity during long- term treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic GIST.

Recurrent retroperitoneal malignant nerve sheath tumor associated with neurofibromatosis type 1 responding to carboplatin and etoposide combined chemotherapy

A 25-year-old man was referred to our hospital with left flank pain, and computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed large retroperitoneal masses. Physical examination revealed many café-au-lait spots and superficial neurofibromas, and a diagnosis of neurofibromatosis type 1 (von Recklinghausen's disease) was made. The tumor was resected, and the pathological diagnosis was malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST). Six months after the operation, lung metastases were detected. Surgical resection was incomplete, as there were too many lesions. He received four courses of chemotherapy with carboplatin and etoposide, and the metastatic lung lesions were markedly decreased. After chemotherapy, complete resection of the remaining lung lesions was performed, and there has been no recurrence to date.

Is there an indication for high-dose chemotherapy in the treatment of bone and soft-tissue sarcoma?

Sarcomas represent a rare and heterogeneous disease, and the prognosis of patients with unresectable or advanced metastatic bone and especially soft-tissue sarcomas remains poor, with a disease-free survival of less than 10% at 5 years. Only few chemotherapeutic agents have been identified to be active, with reported response rates for doxorubicin, epirubicin and ifosfamide above 20%. Although combination therapy with different chemotherapeutic substances results in higher response rates, superiority against single-agent chemotherapy in terms of survival has not been demonstrated yet. Regarding anthracyclines, and ifosfamide in particular, a dose-response relationship has been shown, and high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell support has also been evaluated by several investigators. However, all studies comprised small patient cohorts and included very heterogeneous histological subtypes of soft-tissue sarcoma. Moreover, randomized trials are missing. Nevertheless, higher doses of chemotherapy result in higher response rates possibly correlating with longer survival. Finally, well-designed randomized trials should be performed, preferably in younger patients and in the context of an interdisciplinary treatment approach. In this review, we provide an overview of the literature concerning high-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem cell support in the treatment of bone and soft-tissue sarcomas. On the basis of our own data, we would like to emphasize the importance of high-dose chemotherapy in the treatment of sarcomas.

Emerging treatments for soft tissue sarcoma of adults

Soft tissue sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of malignancies arising from mesenchymal tissues. Patients can present with a localised tumour (primary or local recurrence) at different sites (e.g., extremity, abdomen) or metastatic disease, which may require different treatment strategies. Is the surgical resection of a localised sarcoma enough or is it better to give an additional treatment like adjuvant and/or preoperative radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy? Which chemotherapy should be selected in the first or second line situation? Do new treatment options exist, such as targeted therapies? This review provides answers to some of these questions. To decide on consecutive treatment steps, it is important to know as many relevant factors as possible at first presentation. Therefore, the first part of this review discusses the specific characteristics and prognostic factors of importance for treatment planning. A short summary of current therapy strategies and existing standards is then given. The main body of the review summarises information on new and emerging clinical compounds for patients with soft tissue sarcoma of adults, including recent developments of targeted therapy.

High-dose chemotherapy with autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation for bone and soft-tissue sarcomas

The role of high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) with PBSCT in the treatment of bone and soft-tissue sarcomas is not established. In total, 27 patients (15 female, median age at TPL 30.6 years (range: 13-59)) were analyzed (Ewing sarcoma family n=8, osteosarcoma n=6, MPNST (malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor) n=4, synovial sarcoma n=3, liposarcoma n=2, leiomyosarcoma n=2, rhabdomyosarcoma n=1, meningosarcoma n=1). Following chemotherapy and surgery complete remission (CR) (n=9), partial remission (PR) (n=10), stable disease (SD) (n=2) and progressive disease (PD) (n=6) were reached prior HDCT. Different HDCT conditioning regimens were used. One patient died due to cardiac arrest after HDCT. Except hematologic side effects, no WHO grade III-IV complications were observed. Four patients died within 6 months due to PD, disease recurred in another seven patients and led to death, 15 patients are alive with/without disease. The median progression-free survival (PFS) is 12.0 months (range: 0-58), in nine CR patients median PFS is 25.8 months (range: 3-58). Although the role of HDCT in the treatment of sarcomas is not defined, a subgroup of patients who achieved CR before HDCT could benefit from this therapy.

Imatinib mesylate (STI-571 Glivec, Gleevec) is an active agent for gastrointestinal stromal tumours, but does not yield responses in other soft-tissue sarcomas that are unselected for a molecular target. Results from an EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group phase II study

The aim of this study was to assess the antitumour response and time to progression (TTP) of patients treated with imatinib mesylate (Glivec, Gleevec, formerly STI-571) who had advanced and/or metastatic gastrointestinal stroma tumours (GIST) or other soft tissue sarcomas (STS). Patients with measurable lesions and adequate organ function were entered. They were treated with imatinib mesylate at the dose of 400 mg twice daily (bid). All tumours were subject to a stringent pathological review by an expert panel. Immunohistochemical expression of KIT expression was evaluated. A total of 51 patients (27 GIST, 24 other STS), median age 53 years, median World Health Organization (WHO) performance score 1, were entered. 71% of the patients had received prior chemotherapy. The most frequent side-effects were anaemia (92%), periorbital oedema (84%), skin rash (69%), fatigue (76%), nausea (57%), granulocytopenia (47%) and diarrhoea (47%). Most of these side-effects were mild to moderate and no patient was taken off study due to side-effects. Skin rash and periorbital oedema frequently seem to be self limiting, despite continued treatment. In GIST patients, the current response rates (RRs) are 4% complete remission (CR), 67% partial remission (PR), 18% stable disease (SD) and 11% progression (PD). 73% of GIST patients are free from progression at 1 year. In the other STS group, there were no objective responses. The median time to progression in this subgroup was only 58 days. Imatinib mesylate is well tolerated at a dose of 400 mg bid. This dose is active in patients with KIT-positive GIST, but patients with other STS subtypes unselected for a molecular target are unlikely to benefit.

Results of randomised studies of the EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group (STBSG) with two different ifosfamide regimens in first- and second-line chemotherapy in advanced soft tissue sarcoma patients

The aim of this phase II study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of two regimens of ifosfamide in metastatic soft tissue sarcoma patients given as first- and second-line chemotherapy. Two different schedules of ifosfamide were investigated in a randomised manner: Ifosfamide was given either at a dose of 5 g/m(2) over 24 h (5 g/m(2)/1 day), every 3 weeks or at a dose of 3 g/m(2) per day, administered over 4 h on three consecutive days (3 g/m(2)/3 days), every 3 weeks. Both schedules were given as first-line or second-line chemotherapy. A total of 182 patients was entered, 103 in first- and 79 in second-line, of whom 8 patients were ineligible, 5 in the first- and 3 in the second-line study. Most patients had a leiomyosarcoma, 46 of the 98 in the first-line and 34 of the 76 in the second-line. The two study arms were well balanced in both the first- and second-lines with respect to sex, age and performance status. In first-line treatment, 5 g/m(2)/1 day yielded five partial responses (PR) (Response Rate (RR) 10%), versus 12 PR (RR 25%) for the 3 g/m(2)/3 days. As second-line treatment, the 24-h infusion yielded: one CR and one PR (RR 6%) and the 3-day schedule one CR and two PR (RR 8%). Survival did not differ between the two regimens. The major World Health Organization (WHO) grade 3 and 4 toxicities encountered were: leucopenia in 19% of all courses in the first-line and 32% in the second-line with the 5 g/m(2)/1 day, while for the 3 g/m(2)/3 days schedule the rates were 57 and 63% respectively. Grade 3 or 4 infections were seen in 4% of patients treated with 5 g/m(2)/1 day first-line and 10% of patients given 3 g/m(2)/3 days, both as first- and second-lines. No such infections were seen in patients receiving 5 g/m(2)/1 day as second line treatment. In advanced soft-tissue sarcomas in the first-line, ifosfamide 3 g/m(2), given over 4 h on three consecutive days, is an active regimen with acceptable toxicity while the 5 g/m(2) over 24 hours schedule resulted in a disappointing response rate.

Gemcitabine in advanced adult soft-tissue sarcomas. A phase II study of the EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group

Gemcitabine (2'-deoxy-2'-difluorocytidine monohydrochloride) at a dose of 1250 mg/m(2) was given as a 30-min intravenous (i.v.) infusion on days 1 and 8 in a 3-weekly schedule to 32 patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) failing first-line chemotherapy. One patient was ineligible due to a delay between the previous chemotherapy and the start of treatment. Of the eligible patients, median age was 53 years (range 23-73 years). The predominant histological subtype was leiomyosarcoma in 12 patients (38%). The median number of cycles was three (range 1-8 cycles) with a median total dose of gemcitabine of 6.25 g/m(2) (range 1.25-19.97 g/m(2)). The relative dose intensity of gemcitabine was 96% (range 50-103%). Treatment was tolerated very well with non-complicated haematological toxicity as the most frequently observed side-effect. Only one partial tumour response was documented, giving a response rate of 3.23% (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.08-16.2%). The median overall survival was 268 days (95% CI: 129-377) and the median time to progression was 45 days (95% CI: 41-79). These results indicate that gemcitabine given at this dose and schedule is not active as second-line therapy in advanced STS.

High-dose chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation for advanced soft tissue sarcoma in adults

PURPOSE

Patients with metastatic or locally advanced, unresectable soft tissue sarcoma (ASTS) are seldom curable, with 5-year survival rates of less than 10% in all large series. The role of high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) with hematopoietic stem-cell support in this disease is not established.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1988 and 1994, 30 patients with ASTS who responded to a standard chemotherapy regimen were included in a prospective pilot study of HDCT as consolidation therapy using ifosfamide (12 g/m(2)), etoposide (800 mg/m(2)), and cisplatin (200 mg/m(2)) (VIC).

RESULTS

The median duration of grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia was 14 and 10 days, respectively. Nineteen patients (63%) experienced grade 1 or higher renal toxicity. All eight patients in complete remission (CR) before HDCT were still in CR at day 60. Of the 22 patients in partial remission (PR) or with a minor response to conventional chemotherapy, CR, PR, and stable disease were achieved in four (18%), three (13%), and 12 patients (54%), respectively, by day 60, while three patients (14%) progressed. With a median follow-up of 94 months, overall and progression-free survival rates at 5 years after HDCT were 23% and 21%, respectively. Patients in CR before HDCT had a significantly superior 5-year overall survival rate compared with other patients (75% v 5%; P: =.001).

CONCLUSION

Despite the toxicity of the VIC regimen, a high survival rate was observed in HDCT-treated patients who were in CR after conventional chemotherapy. A phase III randomized trial is required to establish the role of HDCT in ASTS.

Phase II trial of gemcitabine in patients with pretreated advanced soft tissue sarcomas

Because of the low number of active cytotoxic drugs and their limited activity, the evaluation of new anti-cancer agents for their activity in soft tissue sarcomas is a continuing need. The objectives of this prospective phase II trial of gemcitabine were to estimate the response rate and to define the toxicities of prolonged infusions of low-dose gemcitabine in patients with pretreated advanced soft tissue sarcomas. Patients were eligible if they had a histologic diagnosis of unresectable, recurrent or metastatic, progressive soft tissue sarcoma, and if they had been treated with at least one prior chemotherapy consisting of an anthracycline- and/or ifosfamide-containing regimen. Gemcitabine was administered as a 360 min infusion on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28 day cycle. The initial dose of gemcitabine was 200 mg/m2 in all patients. Dose escalation to 250 mg/m2 was allowed in the case of stable disease and good tolerability of the drug. All 18 patients (median age 58 years) who enrolled were treated with gemcitabine, and all were assessable for toxicity, response and survival. Only two of these 18 patients had an objective response to a previous palliative chemotherapy. A median of 3 cycles (range 1-7) of gemcitabicin were administered. Two (11%) of the patients had a partial response lasting 5 and 6 months, respectively. Both of these patients had only lung metastases. Whereas one of these patients had a transient partial response to the foregoing chemotherapy (consisting of ifosfamide and doxorubicin), the other patient has been progressive on these drugs. One additional patient, progressive on ifosfamide and doxorubicin, had an objective response of greater than 50% confined to the lungs and stable local recurrence for 6 months. Six patients had stable disease for 3-6 months and nine patients had disease progression. The median survival was 8 months. Treatment generally was well tolerated with six patients having transient grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity, four having grade 3 neutropenia, and one having grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Gemcitabine, given as a prolonged infusion at a low dose level, has a favorable toxicity profile and displays antitumor activity in patients with intensively pretreated, advanced soft tissue sarcomas.

Randomized phase II study of docetaxel versus doxorubicin in first- and second-line chemotherapy for locally advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcomas in adults: a study of the european organization for research and treatment of cancer soft tissue and bone sarcoma group

PURPOSE

To assess antitumor response and time to progression (TTP) with docetaxel compared with doxorubicin in first-line treatment of advanced and/or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with measurable soft tissue sarcoma lesions and adequate bone marrow, liver, and renal function were entered onto the study. They were randomized to either docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) given as a 1-hour intravenous infusion every 3 weeks or doxorubicin 75 mg/m(2) given as a bolus injection every 3 weeks. A maximum of seven cycles of treatment were scheduled. The study was designed as a randomized phase III study evaluating TTP by log-rank model. There was a clause for premature closure of the trial if fewer than five responses were observed among the first 25 assessable patients in the docetaxel treatment arm.

RESULTS

Eighty-six patients were entered onto the study; 85 were assessable for toxicity and 83 for response. The rate of severe granulocytopenia was not significantly different between the two arms. Nausea (P =.001), vomiting (P <.001), and stomatitis (P =.005) were more common with doxorubicin therapy, whereas neurotoxicity was more frequent with docetaxel treatment. The response rate to doxorubicin therapy was 30% (95% confidence interval, 17% to 46%), whereas no responses to docetaxel therapy were seen (P <.001). In view of this, the trial was closed prematurely and the phase III study part was not conducted.

CONCLUSION

Docetaxel is inactive in soft tissue sarcomas and cannot be recommended for further use in treatment of this disease.

Effect of high-dose ifosfamide in advanced soft tissue sarcomas. A multicentre phase II study of the EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group

In this phase II study the effect of high-dose ifosfamide (HDI) given as a 3-day continuous infusion at a dose of 12 g/m2 repeated every 4 weeks with adequate mesna protection and hydration was evaluated in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas. A total of 124 patients entered the trial of which 10 were ineligible. HDI was given both as first-line and second-line chemotherapy. Median age was 46 years (19-66 years). Median World Health Organization (WHO) performance status was 1 (0-1). Fifty two per cent of the patients were males. The predominant histology was leiomyosarcoma (33%). A maximum of six cycles was given. At the time of analysis 55 patients have died. The partial response (PR) rate was 16%. The median time to progression was 15 weeks. 8 of the 18 responding patients (44%) had synovial sarcomas, whereas only 5% of the patients having leiomyosarcomas responded. The grade 3 + 4 haematological toxicity encountered was neutrophils in 78% and platelets in 12%. The major grade 3 + 4 non-haematological toxicities encountered were febrile neutropenia in 39%, infection in 20%, and acute renal failure in 4%. In conclusion, it is possible to administer HDI on a multicentre basis, but the toxicity is substantial. HDI given as a continuous infusion at this dose cannot be recommended as the standard treatment of advanced soft tissue sarcomas, even in selected patients.

Temozolomide in adult patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma: a phase II study of the EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group

Temozolomide, an oral imidazotetrazine derivative, was given to 31 patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma. The dose of 750 mg/m2 was divided over 5 consecutive days, and escalated to 1000 mg/m2 over 5 days at cycle 2 if myelosuppression no worse than common toxicity criteria grade 2 was noted in the first 28-day cycle. A total of 99 treatment cycles were given to 31 patients. The drug was well tolerated, with nausea and vomiting as the most common side-effects. Only one partial tumour response was documented, giving a response rate of 3.33%, 95% confidence interval, (CI) 0.1-17.2%. The median time to progression was 8 weeks and the median survival was 27 weeks. These results indicate that temozolomide in this schedule is not active as second-line treatment in advanced soft tissue sarcoma.

High-dose epirubicin is not an alternative to standard-dose doxorubicin in the treatment of advanced soft tissue sarcomas. A study of the EORTC soft tissue and bone sarcoma group

The activity and toxicity of single-agent standard-dose doxorubicin were compared with that of two schedules of high-dose epirubicin. A total of 334 chemonaive patients with histologically confirmed advanced soft-tissue sarcomas received (A) doxorubicin 75 mg m(-2) on day 1 (112 patients), (B) epirubicin 150 mg m(-2) on day 1 (111 patients) or (C) epirubicin 50 mg m(-2) day(-1) on days 1, 2 and 3 (111 patients); all given as bolus injection at 3-week intervals. A median of four treatment cycles was given. Median age was 52 years (19-70 years) and performance score 1 (0-2). Of 314 evaluable patients, 45 (14%) had an objective tumour response (eight complete response, 35 partial response). There were no differences among the three groups. Median time to progression for groups A, B and C was 16, 14 and 12 weeks, and median survival 45, 47 and 45 weeks respectively. Neither progression-free (P = 0.93) nor overall survival (P = 0.89) differed among the three groups. After the first cycle of therapy, two patients died of infection and one owing to cardiovascular disease, all on epirubicin. Both dose schedules of epirubicin were more myelotoxic than doxorubicin. Cardiotoxicity (> or = grade 3) occurred in 1%, 0% and 2% respectively. Regardless of the schedule, high-dose epirubicin is not a preferred alternative to standard-dose doxorubicin in the treatment of patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcomas.