Chemotherapy in adult germ cell tumors

Clinicopathological Features, Prognostic Factors, Survival Trends, and Treatment of Malignant Ovarian Germ Cell Tumors: A SEER Database Analysis

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the clinicopathological prognostic factors of malignant ovarian germ cell tumors (MOGCT) and evaluate the survival trends of MOGCT by histotype.

METHODS

We extracted data on 1,963 MOGCT cases diagnosed between 2000 and 2014 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and the histological classification of MOGCT, including 5 categories: dysgerminoma, embryonal carcinoma (EC), yolk sac tumor, malignant teratoma, and mixed germ cell tumor. We examined overall and disease-specific survival of the 5 histological types. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate survival curves and prognostic factors. We also estimated survival curves of MOGCT according to different treatments.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference in prognosis among different histological classifications. Age, histotype, grade, SEER stage, and surgery were independent prognostic factors for survival of patients with MOGCT. For all histotypes, 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rate estimates were >85%, except for EC, which had the worst outcomes at 1 year (55.6%), 3 years (44.4%), and 5 years (33.3%). In the distant SEER stage, both chemotherapy and surgery were associated with improved survival outcomes compared with surgery- and chemotherapy-only groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Dysgerminoma patients had the most favorable outcomes, whereas EC patients had the worst survival. A young age, low grade, and surgery were all significant predictors for improved survival. In contrast, a distant SEER stage was a risk factor for poor survival. Chemotherapy combined with surgery contributed to longer survival times of patients with MOGCT in the distant SEER stage.

Comprehensive staging allows for excellent outcome in patients with localized malignant germ cell tumor of the ovary

BACKGROUND

The management of malignant germ cell tumors of the ovary (OMGCT) requires multidisciplinary expertise. We analyze the surgical and medical outcomes of a cohort of patients treated for OMGCT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data concerning diagnosis, surgery, and medical decisions were reviewed for all patients seen for postoperative management of OMGCT at the Centre Léon Bérard in Lyon and the Institut Curie in Paris between 1985 and 2003. Sixty patients aged 0.4 to 27.9 years (mean 12.8 years) at diagnosis were included.

RESULTS

Twenty (53%) of 38 the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I tumors were staged Ix. All stage Ix tumors had been operated by a nongynecologic surgeon. Relapses occurred in 8 of 24 stage I tumors that were observed (0/8 stage Ia; 5/13 stage Ix (P = 0.044) and 3/3 stage Ic) versus 0/14 stage I treated by adjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.0015). The risk of relapse was significantly increased if patients underwent postsurgical observation ((HR) = 4.5 (95% CI, 1.5 to 13.3)), and when the tumor contained yolk sac tumor (HR = 7.3 (95% CI, 2.3 to 22.7)). There was no significant prognostic value for age, stage, level of tumor markers at diagnosis, type of surgery, and type of chemotherapy. Five-year overall survival was 96.7%, and event free survival was 83.3%.

CONCLUSION

Comprehensive staging after removal of localized OMGCT is crucial. It allows a safe observation strategy in stage Ia tumors. Patients with stages Ix and Ic tumors may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.

Chemotherapy in patients with teratoma with malignant transformation

OBJECTIVE

Germ-cell tumours (GCTs) with a non-GCT malignant component are a unique and rare phenomenon called teratoma with malignant transformation (TMT). The only published series of patients with TMT treated with chemotherapy comprised 10 patients. We report here our experience in treating 14 patients with TMT.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sarcoma was identified in 10 of 14 patients, with rhabdomyosarcoma ranking first (n=4). Other histological types included adenocarcinoma (n=3) and bronchoalveolar carcinoma (n=1). Immunohistochemistry was performed to help in identifying the malignant non-GCT component.

RESULTS

Primary treatment consisted of surgery alone in 4 patients. The remaining 10 patients received first-line cisplatin-based chemotherapy with resection of residual masses (n=5): 4 patients had a complete response and 5 had a partial response. Overall, 9 patients developed a relapse with a median time of 84 mo (range: 6-168). At relapse, 8 patients received a chemotherapy regimen directed to the non-GCT component. Four of these patients achieved a partial response. With a median follow-up of 59 mo (range: 3-180), 4 of 14 patients are alive, including 3 who are disease-free.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is by far the largest reported European series of chemotherapy in TMT. Although TMT has a poor prognosis compared to GCT, its management may be improved by adapted chemotherapy associated with surgical resection of residual masses.

The risk of thrombo-embolic events is increased in patients with germ-cell tumours and can be predicted by serum lactate dehydrogenase and body surface area

The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of thrombo-embolic events (TEE) in patients with germ-cell tumours (GCT) who receive cisplatin-based chemotherapy, to compare this risk to that of a matched control group of non-GCT cancer patients, and to identify risk factors of TEE. The rate of TEE during the 6 months following the initiation of chemotherapy was assessed in 100 consecutive patients with GCT and in 100 controls with various neoplasms who were matched on sex and age, and who received first-line cisplatin-based chemotherapy during the same period of time at Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France. Data were subsequently tested on a validation group of 77 GCT patients treated in Lyon, France. A total of 19 patients (19%) (95% confidence interval (CI): 13–28) and six patients (6%) (95% CI: 3–13) had a TEE in the GCT group and the non-GCT control group, respectively (relative risk (RR): 3.4; P<0.01). Three patients from the GCT group died of pulmonary embolism. In multivariate analysis, two factors had independent predictive value for TEE: a high body surface area (>1.9 m²) (RR: 5 (1.8–13.9)) and an elevated serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (RR: 6.4 (2.3–18.2)). Patients with no risk factor (n=26) and those with at least one risk factor (n=71) had a probability of having a TEE of 4% (95% CI: 1–19) and 26% (95% CI: 17–37), respectively. In the GCT validation set, 10 (13%) patients had a TEE; patients with no risk factor and those with at least one risk factor had a probability of having a TEE of 0 and 17% (95% CI: 10–29), respectively. Patients with GCT are at a higher risk for TEE than patients with non-GCT cancer while on cisplatin-based chemotherapy. This risk can be accurately predicted by serum LDH and body surface area. This predictive index may help to study prospectively the impact of thromboprophylaxis in GCT patients.

New prospects for the treatment of germ-cell tumours

Germ-cell tumours are rare tumours of testicular, ovarian and extra-gonadal origins. Most are curable by cisplatin-based chemotherapy regimens and surgery. Treatment strategy is based on risk factor assessment. The standard cytotoxic drugs used for the treatment of this disease are: etoposide, cisplatin, bleomycin and ifosfamide. More than 80% of patients are cured by standard treatment. There is a dose-response relationship for cisplatin, up to standard 33 mg/m2/week/dose-intensity. However, further dose escalation has failed to demonstrate an increased response. Carboplatin has been shown to be less active than cisplatin. Activity has been demonstrated with nitrogen mustard, actinomycin, mithramycin, vinblastine, methotrexate and recently with paclitaxel and gemcitabine. Activity is questionable with carboplatin, oxaliplatin, lobaplatin, mitomycin and anthracyclins. No activity has been reported with vindesine, vinorelbine, mitoxantrone, AMSA and topotecan. New treatment strategies are developed in poor-risk group patients and in patients who fail to achieve complete remission status or whom experience recurrent disease. Intensification of chemotherapy is one of the tested strategies. Consolidation high-dose chemotherapy with haematopoietic stem-cell support is under evaluation. Until now, no trial has proven its superiority over standard chemotherapy regimens. Other studies concern the role of repeated cycles of high-dose chemotherapy with haematological support. Innovative strategies consist of introducing new drugs or new schedules: paclitaxel in combination with either ifosfamide and cisplatin or epirubicin, short, recycled chemotherapy regimens, use of cisplatin non-cross-resistant drugs and different time infusion administration of drugs. The aim of these studies is to decrease the residual proportion of treatment failures in this highly curable disease, which constitutes a good model for clinical research in cancer chemotherapy.

Early predicted time to normalization of tumor markers predicts outcome in poor-prognosis nonseminomatous germ cell tumors

PURPOSE

The prognostic relevance of the rate of decline of serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) during the first 3 weeks of chemotherapy for nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT) was studied in the context of the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) classification.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data from 653 patients prospectively recruited in clinical trials were studied. Tumor markers were obtained before chemotherapy and 3 weeks later. Decline rates were calculated using a logarithmic formula and expressed as a predicted time to normalization (TTN). A favorable TTN was defined when both AFP and HCG had a favorable decline rate, including cases with normal values.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 50 months (range, 2 to 151 months). Tumor decline rate expressed as a predicted TTN was associated with both progression-free survival (PFS; P <.0001) and overall survival (OS; P <.0001). The 4-year PFS rates were 64% and 38% in patients from the poor-prognosis group who had a favorable and an unfavorable TTN, respectively. The 4-year OS rates were 83% and 58%, respectively. This effect was independent from the initial tumor marker values, the primary tumor site, and the presence of nonpulmonary visceral metastases: tumor marker decline rate remained a strong predictor for both PFS (hazard ratio = 2.5; P =.01) and OS (hazard ratio = 4.6; P =.002) in patients from the IGCCCG poor-prognosis group in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Early predicted time to tumor marker normalization is an independent prognostic factor in patients with poor-prognosis NSGCT and may be a useful tool in the therapeutic management of these patients.

Angiosarcoma masquerading as embryonal carcinoma in the metastasis from a mature testicular teratoma

Sarcoma can arise within a germ cell tumor (GCT) from a malignant transformation of teratomatous elements or as late sequelae to radiation therapy. Angiosarcoma as a malignant component in testicular GCTs has rarely been reported and is often misdiagnosed as embryonal carcinoma. We report the case of a 23-year-old man with mature teratoma of the testis and retroperitoneal metastasis exhibiting components of mature teratoma intermingled with high-grade angiosarcoma. It is important to recognize the presence of a high-grade sarcomatous component within a GCT because of its aggressive clinical behavior and different response to therapy.

Management of clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ-cell testis tumors

Nonseminomatous germ-cell tumors of the testis, the most common cancer in young adult males, are highly curable. Clinical Stage I disease represents almost a third of the patients. Three treatment strategies are currently available: surveillance, postorchiectomy chemotherapy and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. Factors predictive of extratesticular involvement have been described, thus making it possible to tailor treatment to risk. New imaging procedures also permit staging and prediction of outcome. Decision-making is shared between the patient and his oncologist. Economic issues are better understood but should be further studied.

Alternating dose-dense chemotherapy in patients with high volume disseminated non-seminomatous germ cell tumours

Only about half of patients with a poor-prognosis non-seminomatous germ-cell tumours can achieve a cure. The aim of this phase II study was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of a dose-dense alternating chemotherapy regimen in this subset of patients. High volume non-seminomatous germ-cell tumours was defined as follows: at least two sites of non pulmonary metastases, an extragonadal primary tumour, a serum human chorionic gonadotropin level higher than 10 000 mIU x ml(-1), or a alpha-foetoprotein level higher than 2000 mIU ml(-1). Patients who fulfilled these criteria were treated with the so-called BOP-CISCA-POMB-ACE regimen (bleomycin, vincristine, and cisplatin; cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin; cisplatin, vincristine, methotrexate, and bleomycin; etoposide, dactinomycin, and cyclophosphamide) plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. A total of 58 patients were enrolled. Patients were retrospectively classified according to the International Germ-Cell Cancer Consensus Group classification; 38 patients (66%) had poor-prognosis disease and 19 patients (33%) had intermediate-prognosis. Patients received a median of 2.5 courses (range 0.25 to five courses) of the BOP-CISCA-POMB-ACE regimen. Forty-two patients (72.4%) had a complete response to therapy. With a median follow-up time of 31 months, the 3-year progression-free survival rate was 71% (95% confidence interval, 60 to 84%) and the 3-year overall survival rate was 73% (95% confidence interval: 62 to 86%). The 3-year PFS rates were 83% (95% confidence interval: 68 to 100%) in the intermediate-prognosis group and 65% (95% confidence interval: 51 to 82%) in the poor-prognosis group. Early side effects included mainly grade 4 haematologic toxicity (neutropaenia in 79% of patients, thrombocytopaenia in 69%, anaemia in 22%), grade 4 stomatitis (19%), and four early deaths (7% of patients), at least partially related to toxicity. The dose-dense BOP-CISCA-POMB-ACE regimen is highly active in patients with non-seminomatous germ-cell tumours classified as intermediate-prognosis or poor-prognosis according to the International Germ-Cell Cancer Consensus Group. Because outcomes with this regimen compare favourably with outcome after standard therapy, dose-dense chemotherapy should be further investigated in this subset of patients.

A 20% dose reduction of the original CISCA/VB regimen allows better tolerance and similar survival rate in disseminated testicular non-seminomatous germ-cell tumors: final results of a phase III randomized trial

BACKGROUND

This prospective randomized clinical trial was designed to compare the efficacy of a low-dose regimen of cisplatin, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide alternated with vinblastine and bleomycin (CISCA/VB) with the original CISCA/VB regimen in patients with disseminated nonseminomatous germ-cell tumors (NSGCT) and a predicted favorable outcome.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred and twenty-five patients with disseminated NSGCT and a predicted favorable outcome according to the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center classification [testicular primary and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) serum level <50000 mIU/ml] were randomized to receive the original CISCA/VB regimen (100% dose) or a low-dose CISCA/VB regimen (80% dose).

RESULTS

Among the 124 eligible patients, there was no significant difference in the number of patients in the two treatment arms who achieved a complete response to therapy: 53 of 65 patients (82%) on the original CISCA/VB regimen and 53 of 59 patients (90%) on the low-dose CISCA/VB regimen (P = 0.29). Overall, the original CISCA/VB regimen resulted in a significantly higher relative dose intensity (P <0.0001). After a median follow-up of 6.8 years (range 0.37 to 12.94 years), there was no significant difference in disease-free survival (P = 0.87) or in overall survival (P = 0.88) between the two treatment arms. The 5-year overall survival rate was 93.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) 88% to 100%] and 94.1% (95% CI 84% to 100%) in the original CISCA/VB arm and the low-dose CISCA/VB arm, respectively. The 5-year overall survival rate for the entire study population was 98% (95% CI 94% to 100%) and 88% (95% CI 76% to 100%) in the good- and intermediate-prognosis groups, respectively, as defined by the International Germ Cell Consensus Classification Group (IGCCCG). The low-dose CISCA/VB regimen resulted in significantly less neutropenic fever (P <0.001), grade 4 thrombocytopenia (P <0.03) and severe mucositis (P <0.01) than the original CISCA/VB regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

CISCA/VB is highly efficient in patients with good or intermediate prognosis NSGCT according to the IGCCCG criteria. Although equivalent antitumor efficacy cannot be claimed, the low-dose CISCA/VB regimen appears to be a better mode of delivery than the original CISCA/VB regimen with respect to toxicity, since survival is comparable.

Advanced testis cancer

Advanced testis tumors are highly curable. The treatment strategy is chemotherapy followed by the surgical exeresis of residual disease. The standard chemotherapy regimen is BEP (bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin); the number of cycles of chemotherapy depends upon prognostic factors, based on the primary site, histology, presence of visceral metastases, and serum tumor marker levels. Patients in the good-risk group receive three cycles of chemotherapy, whereas those in the intermediate- and high-risk groups receive four cycles. Exeresis of all residual disease and systematic postchemotherapy retroperitoneal dissection in bulky disease are mandatory. When complete exeresis of necrotic tissue, teratoma, or active germ-cell cancer has been performed, no further postsurgical treatment is warranted. A multidisciplinary approach, rigorous administration of chemotherapy, and skill in surgery of germ-cell tumors are favored in the treatment of these patients in trained centers.

Multimodality treatment of patients with liver metastases from germ cell tumors: the role of surgery

BACKGROUND

The presence of liver metastases represents an independent poor risk prognostic factor for survival in patients with germ cell tumors.

METHODS

The clinical files of 37 patients who had undergone liver resection for the treatment of disseminated germ cell tumors were reviewed to define the indications for resection of residual liver metastases after chemotherapy in patients with germ cell tumors. The histologic patterns of primary tumor and residual disease were compared. The prognostic factors for survival were studied by univariate analysis.

RESULTS

All but 2 of 37 patients underwent complete resection. One patient died of postoperative complications. Thirteen complications occurred in 10 patients. Twelve patients had active residual tumor, 7 patients had mature teratoma, and 18 patients had only necrosis on histologic examination. Twenty-three of 37 patients (62%) were alive with no evidence of disease after a median follow-up of 66 months (range, 31-134 months). Three prognostic factors were found to be significant in the univariate analysis for unfavorable outcome: the presence of pure embryonal carcinoma in the primary tumor, liver metastases measuring > 30 mm in greatest dimension at the time of surgery, and the presence of viable, active residual disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Because it is impossible to determine the histologic pattern of residual liver masses after chemotherapy with current imaging tools and percutaneous biopsy, patient selection for liver surgery may be undertaken according to the size of residual liver masses. Patients with masses that measure < or = 10 mm in greatest dimension should be considered for close follow-up, because they have a high probability of necrosis and are at low risk for malignant disease. Male patients with masses that measure > or = 30 mm in greatest dimension represent a high-risk group of patients who are not likely to benefit from liver surgery. Only male patients with masses that measure 10-29 mm in greatest dimension and all female patients with masses that measure > 10 mm in greatest dimension should be considered for liver resection.

Viable Malignant Cells After Primary Chemotherapy for Disseminated Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumors: Prognostic Factors and Role of Postsurgery Chemotherapy—Results From an International Study Group

PURPOSE: To assess the value of postsurgery chemotherapy in patients with disseminated nonseminomatous germ-cell tumors (NSGCTs) and viable residual disease after first-line cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: The outcome of 238 patients was reviewed. Tumor markers had normalized in all patients before resection. A multivariate analysis of survival was performed on 146 patients.

RESULTS: The 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 64% and the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 73%. Three factors were independently associated with both PFS and OS: complete resection (P < .001), < 10% of viable malignant cells (P = .001), and a good International Germ Cell Consensus Classification (IGCCC) group (P = .01). Patients were assigned to one of three risk groups: those with no risk factors (favorable group), those with one risk factor (intermediate group), and those with two or three risk factors (poor-risk group). The 5-year OS rate was 100%, 83%, and 51%, respectively (P < .001). The 5-year PFS rate was 69% (95% confidence interval [CI], 62% to 76%) and 52% (95% CI, 40% to 64%) in postoperative chemotherapy recipients and nonrecipients, respectively (P < .001). No significant difference was detected in 5-year OS rates. After adjustment on the three prognostic factors, postoperative chemotherapy was associated with a significantly better PFS (P < .001) but not with better OS. Patients in the favorable risk group had a 100% 5-year OS, with or without postoperative chemotherapy. Postoperative chemotherapy appeared beneficial in both PFS (P < .001) and OS (P = .02) in the intermediate-risk group but was not statistically beneficial in the poor-risk group.

CONCLUSION: A complete resection may be more critical than recourse to postoperative chemotherapy in the setting of postchemotherapy viable malignant NSGCT. Immediate postoperative chemotherapy or surveillance alone with chemotherapy at relapse may be reasonable options depending on the completeness of resection, IGCCC group, and percent of viable cells. Validation is necessary.

Comparative tolerability of chemotherapy regimens for germ cell cancer

Germ cell tumours, even at an advanced stage, represent a unique model of malignant curable disease since >80% of patients are expected to be cured after appropriate therapy: surgery and radiotherapy in early stages, and chemotherapy and surgery in advanced stages. In advanced stages, serum tumour marker levels as well as extrapulmonary (brain, liver and bone) visceral metastases are the most important prognostic factors that affect treatment modalities. 'Gold standard' regimens for germ cell cancer currently include etoposide plus cisplatin with (BEP) or without (EP) bleomycin. In patients with good risk disease (90% cure rate), the optimal regimen of chemotherapy should combine the best efficacy and the least toxicity. As a result of randomised trials, 3 regimens can be currently recommended: (i) 4 cycles of EP; (ii) 4 cycles of BEP (with etoposide 350 mg/m2 per cycle); or (iii) 3 cycles of BEP (with etoposide 500 mg/m2 per cycle). In patients with poor risk disease, 4 cycles of BEP (with etoposide 500 mg/m2 per cycle) allow a disappointing cure rate of 50%. The long term toxicity of these regimens (gonadal toxicity and secondary malignancies) appears to be negligible and clearly does not challenge current standard strategies.

Kinetics of Serum Tumor Marker Concentrations and Usefulness in Clinical Monitoring

Only a few markers have been instrumental in the diagnosis of cancer. In contrast, tumor markers play a critical role in the monitoring of patients. The patient’s clinical status and response to treatment can be evaluated rapidly using the tumor marker half-life (t1/2) and the tumor marker doubling time (DT). This report reviews the interest of determining these kinetic parameters for prostate-specific antigen, human chorionic gonadotropin, α-fetoprotein, carcinoembryonic antigen, cancer antigen (CA) 125, and CA 15-3. A rise in tumor markers (DT) is a yardstick with which benign diseases can be distinguished from metastatic disease, and the DT can be used to assess the efficacy of treatments. A decline in the tumor marker concentration (t1/2) is a predictor of possible residual disease if the timing of blood sampling is soon after therapy. The discrepancies in results obtained by different groups may be attributable to the multiplicity of immunoassays, the intrinsic characteristics of each marker (e.g., antigen specificity, molecular heterogeneity, and associated forms), individual factors (e.g., nonspecific increases and renal and hepatic diseases) and methods used to calculate kinetics (e.g., exponential models and timing of blood sampling). This kinetic approach could be of interest to optimize patient management.

[Does neoadjuvant chemotherapy have a place in treatment with curative intent of local or locoregional stage cancer?]

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is aimed to allow tumor debulking, organ sparing treatment and survival increase. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has proven its ability to perform conservative treatment in breast, head and neck, bladder, oesophageal cancers and osteosarcoma. It has not yet proven its impact on overall survival. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy requires further studies.

High-dose chemotherapy in germ-cell tumors

The majority of patients with advanced-stage germ-cell tumor are curable by cisplatin-based chemotherapy, but about 10% of those in the good-risk and 30%-50% in the poor-risk groups will experience relapse. Patients in first relapse have a 60% chance of entering a second complete remission and a 15%-25% probability that it will be durable. Regimens of high-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem-cell support have been developed specifically for this patient population; they are usually based on combinations of etoposide, cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide and, originally, double-dose cisplatin or, nowadays, high-dose carboplatin. The role of high-dose chemotherapy was studied initially in salvage and later in first-line treatment. Four hundred thirty-six patients who received high-dose salvage chemotherapy have been reported, 96 (22%) of whom have obtained long-term complete remissions. Prognostic factors for outcome were disease status (absolute refractory, refractory or sensitive diseases), primary tumor site, response to prior chemotherapy and serum hCG levels prior to high-dose treatment. Patients with no adverse prognostic factors have a greater than 50% chance of cure after high-dose treatment. Patients with refractory disease did not benefit from high-dose chemotherapy. A randomized European trial is ongoing to evaluate prospectively the role of high-dose chemotherapy in comparison to standard ifosfamide-based salvage treatment. In first-line consolidation treatment of poor-risk non-seminomatous germ-cell tumors, the results of phase II trials with carboplatin-based high-dose therapy are in favor of a survival impact when compared to historical controls. A prospective randomized trial is ongoing in the US to study the role of carboplatin-based high-dose consolidation treatment. The only prospective trial comparing a cisplatin-based high-dose treatment to standard chemotherapy failed to demonstrate any survival advantage for the high-dose procedure in this setting. New developments include the use of repeated cycles of high-dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem-cell support and the introduction of paclitaxel, a new active drug in this disease, and other non-cross-resistant cytotoxic agents in high-dose combination regimes.