RETRACTED: Does aprotinin influence endothelial-associated coagulation in cardiac surgery?

Topical application of aprotinin in cardiac surgery

The aim of our study was to compare a systemic and a local aprotinin application in patients during coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. The advantage of a topical aprotinin application is seen in the fact that this may not lead to systemic side effects. A prospective, randomized study comprising 97 patients was conducted. A dose of 5 106 KIU aprotinin was given systemically to 49 patients and four doses of 1.25 106 KIU aprotinin were applied topically to 48 patients by spraying the substance on the target area (A. mammaria interna region and pericardium). We determined markers for the inflammatory response, coagulation system, standard haematological markers and postoperative complications. Exclusion criteria were defined as surgical bleeding, redo operations, neurological, haematological, liver and kidney disorders. Sex, age, perfusion times, mortality, renal failure and strokes were identical in both groups. Biochemical markers and clinical outcome demonstrated no significant differences between the systemic and local applications. Interleukin 6 and elastase were tendentially higher ( p= 0.1) in the local group, but with a high standard deviation in each patient. Our results suggest that there is no difference between the perioperative application of 5 106 KIU systemically given aprotinin and 1.25 106 KIU locally applied aprotinin.

Anti-fibrinolytic use for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion

BACKGROUND

Concerns regarding the safety of transfused blood have led to the development of a range of interventions to minimise blood loss during major surgery. Anti-fibrinolytic drugs are widely used, particularly in cardiac surgery, and previous reviews have found them to be effective in reducing blood loss, the need for transfusion, and the need for re-operation due to continued or recurrent bleeding. In the last few years questions have been raised regarding the comparative performance of the drugs. The safety of the most popular agent, aprotinin, has been challenged, and it was withdrawn from world markets in May 2008 because of concerns that it increased the risk of cardiovascular complications and death.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the comparative effects of the anti-fibrinolytic drugs aprotinin, tranexamic acid (TXA), and epsilon aminocaproic acid (EACA) on blood loss during surgery, the need for red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, and adverse events, particularly vascular occlusion, renal dysfunction, and death.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched: the Cochrane Injuries Group's Specialised Register (July 2010), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 3), MEDLINE (Ovid SP) 1950 to July 2010, EMBASE (Ovid SP) 1980 to July 2010. References in identified trials and review articles were checked and trial authors were contacted to identify any additional studies. The searches were last updated in July 2010.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of anti-fibrinolytic drugs in adults scheduled for non-urgent surgery. Eligible trials compared anti-fibrinolytic drugs with placebo (or no treatment), or with each other.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. This version of the review includes a sensitivity analysis excluding trials authored by Prof. Joachim Boldt.

MAIN RESULTS

This review summarises data from 252 RCTs that recruited over 25,000 participants. Data from the head-to-head trials suggest an advantage of aprotinin over the lysine analogues TXA and EACA in terms of reducing perioperative blood loss, but the differences were small. Compared to control, aprotinin reduced the probability of requiring RBC transfusion by a relative 34% (relative risk [RR] 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60 to 0.72). The RR for RBC transfusion with TXA was 0.61 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.70) and was 0.81 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.99) with EACA. When the pooled estimates from the head-to-head trials of the two lysine analogues were combined and compared to aprotinin alone, aprotinin appeared more effective in reducing the need for RBC transfusion (RR 0.90; 95% CI 0.81 to 0.99).Aprotinin reduced the need for re-operation due to bleeding by a relative 54% (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.62). This translates into an absolute risk reduction of 2% and a number needed-to-treat (NNT) of 50 (95% CI 33 to 100). A similar trend was seen with EACA (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.99) but not TXA (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.17). The blood transfusion data were heterogeneous and funnel plots indicate that trials of aprotinin and the lysine analogues may be subject to publication bias.When compared with no treatment aprotinin did not increase the risk of myocardial infarction (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.11), stroke (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.52), renal dysfunction (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.54) or overall mortality (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.06). Similar trends were seen with the lysine analogues, but data were sparse. These data conflict with the results of recently published non-randomised studies, which found increased risk of cardiovascular complications and death with aprotinin. There are concerns about the adequacy of reporting of uncommon events in the small clinical trials included in this review.When aprotinin was compared directly with either, or both, of the two lysine analogues it resulted in a significant increase in the risk of death (RR 1.39, 95% CI 1.02, 1.89), and a non-significant increase in the risk of myocardial infarction (RR 1.11 95% CI 0.82, 1.50). Most of the data contributing to this added risk came from a single study - the BART trial (2008).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Anti-fibrinolytic drugs provide worthwhile reductions in blood loss and the receipt of allogeneic red cell transfusion. Aprotinin appears to be slightly more effective than the lysine analogues in reducing blood loss and the receipt of blood transfusion. However, head to head comparisons show a lower risk of death with lysine analogues when compared with aprotinin. The lysine analogues are effective in reducing blood loss during and after surgery, and appear to be free of serious adverse effects.

Anti-fibrinolytic use for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion

BACKGROUND

Concerns regarding the safety of transfused blood have led to the development of a range of interventions to minimise blood loss during major surgery. Anti-fibrinolytic drugs are widely used, particularly in cardiac surgery, and previous reviews have found them to be effective in reducing blood loss, the need for transfusion, and the need for re-operation due to continued or recurrent bleeding. In the last few years questions have been raised regarding the comparative performance of the drugs. The safety of the most popular agent, aprotinin, has been challenged, and it was withdrawn from world markets in May 2008 because of concerns that it increased the risk of cardiovascular complications and death.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the comparative effects of the anti-fibrinolytic drugs aprotinin, tranexamic acid (TXA), and epsilon aminocaproic acid (EACA) on blood loss during surgery, the need for red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, and adverse events, particularly vascular occlusion, renal dysfunction, and death.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched: the Cochrane Injuries Group's Specialised Register (July 2010), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 3), MEDLINE (Ovid SP) 1950 to July 2010, EMBASE (Ovid SP) 1980 to July 2010. References in identified trials and review articles were checked and trial authors were contacted to identify any additional studies. The searches were last updated in July 2010.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of anti-fibrinolytic drugs in adults scheduled for non-urgent surgery. Eligible trials compared anti-fibrinolytic drugs with placebo (or no treatment), or with each other.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

This review summarises data from 252 RCTs that recruited over 25,000 participants. Data from the head-to-head trials suggest an advantage of aprotinin over the lysine analogues TXA and EACA in terms of reducing perioperative blood loss, but the differences were small. Compared to control, aprotinin reduced the probability of requiring RBC transfusion by a relative 34% (relative risk [RR] 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.60 to 0.72). The RR for RBC transfusion with TXA was 0.61 (95% CI 0.53 to 0.70) and was 0.81 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.99) with EACA. When the pooled estimates from the head-to-head trials of the two lysine analogues were combined and compared to aprotinin alone, aprotinin appeared more effective in reducing the need for RBC transfusion (RR 0.90; 95% CI 0.81 to 0.99).Aprotinin reduced the need for re-operation due to bleeding by a relative 54% (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.62). This translates into an absolute risk reduction of 2% and a number needed-to-treat (NNT) of 50 (95% CI 33 to 100). A similar trend was seen with EACA (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.11 to 0.99) but not TXA (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.17). The blood transfusion data were heterogeneous and funnel plots indicate that trials of aprotinin and the lysine analogues may be subject to publication bias.When compared with no treatment aprotinin did not increase the risk of myocardial infarction (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.69 to 1.11), stroke (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.52), renal dysfunction (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.54) or overall mortality (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.63 to 1.06). Similar trends were seen with the lysine analogues, but data were sparse. These data conflict with the results of recently published non-randomised studies, which found increased risk of cardiovascular complications and death with aprotinin. There are concerns about the adequacy of reporting of uncommon events in the small clinical trials included in this review.When aprotinin was compared directly with either, or both, of the two lysine analogues it resulted in a significant increase in the risk of death (RR 1.39, 95% CI 1.02, 1.89), and a non-significant increase in the risk of myocardial infarction (RR 1.11 95% CI 0.82, 1.50). Most of the data contributing to this added risk came from a single study - the BART trial (2008).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Anti-fibrinolytic drugs provide worthwhile reductions in blood loss and the receipt of allogeneic red cell transfusion. Aprotinin appears to be slightly more effective than the lysine analogues in reducing blood loss and the receipt of blood transfusion. However, head to head comparisons show a lower risk of death with lysine analogues when compared with aprotinin. The lysine analogues are effective in reducing blood loss during and after surgery, and appear to be free of serious adverse effects.

Anti-fibrinolytic use for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion

BACKGROUND

Concerns regarding the safety of transfused blood have led to the development of a range of interventions to minimise blood loss during major surgery. Anti-fibrinolytic drugs are widely used, particularly in cardiac surgery and previous reviews have found them to be effective in reducing blood loss and the need for transfusion. Recently, questions have been raised regarding the comparative performance of the drugs and the safety of the most popular agent, aprotinin.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the comparative effects of the anti-fibrinolytic drugs aprotinin, tranexamic acid (TXA), and epsilon aminocaproic acid (EACA) on blood loss during surgery, the need for red blood (RBC) transfusion, and adverse events, particularly vascular occlusion, renal dysfunction, and death.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the internet. References in identified trials and review articles were checked and trial authors were contacted to identify any additional studies. The searches were last updated in July 2006.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of anti-fibrinolytic drugs in adults scheduled for non-urgent surgery. Eligible trials compared anti-fibrinolytic drugs with placebo (or no treatment), or with each other.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

This review summarises data from 211 RCTs that recruited 20,781 participants. Data from placebo/inactive controlled trials, and from head-to-head trials suggest an advantage of aprotinin over the lysine analogues TXA and EACA in terms of operative blood loss, but the differences were small. Aprotinin reduced the probability of requiring RBC transfusion by a relative 34% (relative risk [RR] 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.61 to 0.71). The RR for RBC transfusion with TXA was 0.61 (95% CI 0.54 to 0.69) and it was 0.75 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.96) with EACA. When the pooled estimates from the head-to-head trials of the two lysine analogues were combined and compared to aprotinin alone, aprotinin appeared superior in reducing the need for RBC transfusion: RR 0.83 (95% CI 0.69 to 0.99). Aprotinin reduced the need for re-operation due to bleeding: RR 0.48 (95% CI 0.35 to 0.68). This translates into an absolute risk reduction of just under 3% and a number needed-to-treat (NNT) of 37 (95% CI 27 to 56). Similar trends were seen with TXA and EACA, but the data were sparse and the differences failed to reach statistical significance. The blood transfusion data were heterogeneous and funnel plots indicate that trials of aprotinin and the lysine analogues may be subject to publication bias. Evidence of publication bias was not observed in trials reporting re-operation rates. Adjustment for these effects reduced the magnitude of estimated benefits but did not negate treatment effects. However, the apparent advantage of aprotinin over the lysine analogues was small and may be explained by publication bias and non-equivalent drug doses. Aprotinin did not increase the risk of myocardial infarction (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.18), stroke (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.64) renal dysfunction (RR 1.16, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.70) or overall mortality (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.20). The analyses of myocardial infarction and death included data from the majority of subjects recruited into the clinical trials of aprotinin. However, under-reporting of renal events could explain the lack of effect seen with aprotinin. Similar trends were seen with the lysine analogues but data were sparse. These results conflict with the results of recently published non-randomised studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Anti-fibrinolytic drugs provide worthwhile reductions in blood loss and the need for allogeneic red cell transfusion. Based on the results of randomised trials their efficacy does not appear to be offset by serious adverse effects. In most circumstances the lysine analogues are probably as effective as aprotinin and are cheaper; the evidence is stronger for tranexamic acid than for aminocaproic acid. In high risk cardiac surgery, where there is a substantial probability of serious blood loss, aprotinin may be preferred over tranexamic acid. Aprotinin does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of vascular occlusion and death, but the data do not exclude an increased risk of renal failure. There is no need for further placebo-controlled trials of aprotinin or lysine analogues in cardiac surgery. The principal need is for large comparative trials to assess the relative efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of anti-fibrinolytic drugs in different surgical procedures.

Meta-analysis comparing the effectiveness and adverse outcomes of antifibrinolytic agents in cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

Since the 1980s, antifibrinolytic therapies have assisted surgical teams in reducing the amount of blood loss. To date, however, serious questions remain regarding the safety and effectiveness of these agents.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We conducted a meta-analysis to compare aprotinin, epsilon-aminocaproic acid, and tranexamic acid with placebo and head to head on 8 clinical outcomes from 138 trials. Published randomized controlled trial data were collected from OVID/PubMed. Outcomes included total blood loss, transfusion of packed red blood cells, reexploration, mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, dialysis-dependent renal failure, and renal dysfunction (0.5-mg/dL increase in creatinine from baseline). All agents were effective in significantly reducing blood loss by 226 to 348 mL and the proportion of patients transfused with packed red blood cells over placebo. Only high-dose aprotinin reduced the rate of reexploration (relative risk, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.73). There were no significant risks or benefits for any agent for mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, or renal failure. However, high-dose aprotinin significantly increased the risk of renal dysfunction (relative risk, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.12 to 1.94), 12.9% versus 8.4%. Compared head to head, high-dose aprotinin demonstrated significant reduction in total blood loss over epsilon-aminocaproic acid (-184 mL; 95% CI, -256 to -112) and tranexamic acid (-195 mL; 95% CI, -286 to -105). There were no significant differences among any agent when compared head to head on other outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

All antifibrinolytic agents were effective in reducing blood loss and transfusion. There were no significant risks or benefits for mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, or renal failure. However, high-dose aprotinin was associated with a statistically significant increased risk of renal dysfunction.

The effects of aprotinin and tranexamic acid on thrombin generation and fibrinolytic response after cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

Thrombin formation during cardiac surgery could result in disordered hemostasis and thrombosis. The aim of the study was to examine the effects of aprotinin and tranexamic acid on thrombin generation and fibrinolytic activity in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

METHODS

Data were collected prospectively from 60 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting using cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). In a randomized sequence, 20 patients received aprotinin, 20 patients received tranexamic acid, and in 20 patients placebo was used.

RESULTS

Significant thrombin activity was found in all the studied patients. Thrombin generation was less in the aprotinin group than in the tranexamic acid and the placebo group (thrombin/anti-thrombin III complexes 33.7 +/- 3.6, 53.6 +/- 7.0 and 44.2 +/- 5.3 microg/l 2 h after CPB and F1 + 2 fragment 1.50 +/- 0.10, 2.37 +/- 0.37 and 2.04 +/- 0.20 nmol/l 6 h after surgery, respectively). The inhibition of fibrinolysis was significant with both anti-fibrinolytic drugs (D-dimers 0.427 +/- 0.032, 0.394 +/- 0.039 and 2.808 +/- 0.037 mg/l 2 h after CPB, respectively). The generation of d-dimers was inhibited until 16 h after CPB in the aprotinin group. The plasminogen activation was significantly less in the aprotinin group (plasmin/anti-plasmin complexes 0.884 +/- 0.095, 2.764 +/- 0.254 and 1.574 +/- 0.185 mg/l 2 h after CPB, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Thrombin formation is inevitable in coronary artery bypass surgery when CPB is used. The suppression of fibrinolytic activity, either with aprotinin or with tranexamic acid interferes with the hemostatic balance as evaluated by biochemical markers. Further investigations are needed to define the role of hemostatic activation in ischemic complications associated with cardiac surgery.

Alterations to haemostasis following cardiopulmonary bypass and the relationship of these changes to neurocognitive morbidity

Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is routinely utilized to provide circulatory support during cardiac surgical procedures. The morbidity of CPB has been significantly reduced since its introduction 50 years ago; however, cerebral injury remains a potentially serious consequence of otherwise successful surgery. The risk of stroke postoperatively is approximately 1-5%. Incidence rates for neurocognitive deficit, however, vary markedly depending on the detection method, although typically it is reported in at least 50% of patients. The aetiology of this cerebral injury remains open to debate, although evidence shows that ischaemia secondary to microembolism may be the principal factor. Emboli originate from bubbles of air, atheroemboli released on aortic manipulation and thromboemboli generated as a result of haemostatic activation. Significant generation of thrombin occurs during CPB resulting in fibrin formation, although the trigger of this activation is not fully understood. Rather than originating from contact activation as previously thought, the primary trigger may be via the activated factor VII/tissue factor pathway of coagulation, with an additional role of contact activation in amplification of coagulation as well as the fibrinolytic response to CPB. Haemostatic activation is inhibited with systemic heparin therapy. The relationship between haemostatic activation and emboli formation during CPB is not known. Interventions to reduce cerebral injury in the context of cardiac surgery depend, in large part, on the minimization of emboli. This review investigates cerebral injury after cardiac surgery and evidence showing that microembolism is the principal causative agent. Fibrin emboli are postulated to be an important source of cerebral embolism. The mechanism of haemostatic activation during CPB is therefore also discussed.

Hemostatic Abnormalities in Cardiopulmonary Bypass: Pathophysiologic and Transfusion Considerations

Cardiac surgical procedures typically use cardiopulmo nary bypass (CPB), a technique that diverts blood from the heart and lungs, where it is oxygenated and pumped back into the circulation. CPB is associated with significant pathophysiologic changes leading to an increased bleeding risk. Bleeding during CPB occurs for multiple reasons; the primary reason is the expo sure of blood to the material components of the CPB system, with intense systemic coagulation and platelet, fibrinolytic, and endothelial activation. To counteract the coagulation activation, extremely high levels of heparin anticoagulation are required to prevent sys temic thrombosis. Thrombin generation through tissue factor pathway activation is now thought to be the predominant mechanism of coagulation activation in CPB. The stimulus for tissue factor exposure to blood is thought to be a systemic activation of tissue factor on monocytes and endothelial cells caused by comple ment activation by the CPB materials and circulating inflammatory mediators. Despite improvements in the CPB system, surgical techniques, and blood conserva tion methods, the demand for blood in such procedures remains sustantial. Optimal blood use can be achieved by combining blood conservation measures with the transfusion of blood components according to strict guidelines. Blood is a limited resource and must be used wisely and cautiously. The risks and costs associ ated with transfusion are compelling reasons to mini mize unnecessary exposure to blood. However, the bene fits of transfusion are well established, and the risks are reasonably low. New developments in the surfaces of the CPB system, use of established and new protease inhibitors, and new blood conservation measures offer promise in decreasing the bleeding risk associated with CPB.

Anti-fibrinolytic use for minimising perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion

BACKGROUND

Concerns regarding the safety of transfused blood have prompted re-consideration of the use of allogeneic (blood from an unrelated donor) blood transfusion.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of the anti-fibrinolytic drugs aprotinin, tranexamic acid, and epsilon aminocaproic acid, on peri-operative red blood cell (RBC) transfusion.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched MEDLINE (to May 1998), EMBASE (to December 1997), web sites of international health technology assessment agencies (to May 1998). References in identified trials and review articles were checked and authors contacted to identify any additional studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of anti-fibrinolytic drugs in adults scheduled for non-urgent surgery.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

We found 61 trials of aprotinin (7027 participants). Aprotinin reduced the rate of RBC transfusion by a relative 30% (RR=0.70: 95%CI: 0.64 to 0.76). The average absolute risk reduction (ARR) was 20.4% (95%CI: 15.6% to 25.3%). On average, aprotinin use saved 1.1 units of RBC (95%CI: 0.69 to 1.47) in those requiring transfusion. Aprotinin also significantly reduced the need for re-operation due to bleeding (RR=0.40: 95%CI: 0.25 to 0.66). We found 18 trials of tranexamic acid (TXA) (1,342 participants). TXA reduced the rate of RBC transfusion by a relative 34% (RR=0.66: 95%CI: 0.54 to 0.81). This represented an ARR of 17.2% (95%CI: 8.7% to 25.7%). TXA use resulted in a saving of 1.03 units of RBC (95%CI: 0.67 to 1.39) in those requiring transfusion. We found four trials of epsilon aminocaproic acid (EACA) (208 participants). EACA use resulted in a statistically non-significant reduction in RBC transfusion (RR=0.48: 95%CI: 0.19 to 1.19). Comparisons between agents Eight trials made 'head-to-head' comparisons between TXA and aprotinin. There was no significant difference between the two drugs in the rate of RBC transfusion: RR=1.21 (95%CI: 0.83 to 1.76) for TXA compared to aprotinin. Adverse Effects Aprotinin did not seem to be associated with an excess risk of adverse effects, including thrombo-embolic events (thrombosis RR=0.64: 95%CI: 0.31 to 1.31) and renal failure (RR=1.19: 95%CI: 0.79 to 1.79). Fewer data were available for TXA and EACA.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

From this review it appears that aprotinin reduces the need for red cell transfusion, and the need for re-operation due to bleeding, without serious adverse effects. However, there was significant heterogeneity in trial outcomes, and some evidence of publication bias. Similar trends were seen with TXA and EACA, although the data were rather sparse. The poor evaluation of these latter drugs is unfortunate as results suggest they may be equally as effective as aprotinin, but are significantly cheaper. The evidence reviewed here supports the use of aprotinin in cardiac surgery. Further small trials of this drug are not warranted. Future trials should be large enough to compare the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of aprotinin with that of TXA and EACA.

Is epsilon-aminocaproic acid as effective as aprotinin in reducing bleeding with cardiac surgery?: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Although aprotinin is known to be effective in reducing postoperative hemorrhage after cardiac surgery, epsilon-aminocaproic acid, an alternative antifibrinolytic, is considerably less expensive. Because the results of 3 small randomized clinical trials comparing these 2 agents directly were inconclusive, we performed a meta-analysis to compare the relative effectiveness and adverse-effect profile of these 2 agents against placebo.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Data from 52 randomized clinical trials published between 1985 and 1998 involving the use of epsilon-aminocaproic acid (n=9) or aprotinin (n=46) in patients undergoing cardiac surgery were abstracted. Our primary outcomes were total blood loss, red blood cell transfusion rates and amounts, reexploration, stroke, myocardial infarction, and mortality. The meta-analysis revealed substantial reductions in total blood loss with epsilon-aminocaproic acid and low-dose aprotinin (each with a 35% reduction versus placebo, P<0.001) and high-dose aprotinin (53% reduction, P<0.001). There were identical reductions in total postoperative transfusions with epsilon-aminocaproic acid (61% reduction versus placebo, P<0. 010) and high-dose aprotinin (62% reduction, P<0.001). The proportion of patients transfused was similarly reduced with epsilon-aminocaproic acid (OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.15 to 0.69) and high-dose aprotinin (OR, 0.28; 0.22 to 0.37). Although both drugs reduced rates of reexploration to similar degrees, this effect was statistically significant only with high-dose aprotinin (OR, 0.39; 0. 24 to 0.61). epsilon-Aminocaproic acid and aprotinin had no effect on risks of postoperative myocardial infarction or overall mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Because the 2 antifibrinolytic agents appear to have similar efficacies, the considerably less-expensive epsilon-aminocaproic acid may be preferred over aprotinin for reducing hemorrhage with cardiac surgery.

Aprotinin versus epsilon-aminocaproic acid for aortic surgery using deep hypothermic circulatory arrest

OBJECTIVE

To compare the relative efficacy of aprotinin and epsilon-aminocaproic acid (EACA) in decreasing blood loss and transfusion requirements after aortic surgery involving deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA).

DESIGN

A retrospective chart review.

SETTING

A university medical center.

PARTICIPANTS

Forty-nine patients who had undergone thoracic aortic surgery with the use of circulatory arrest.

INTERVENTIONS

Charts were examined for variables believed to influence postoperative blood loss, including the use of medications, and for the amount of postoperative chest tube drainage and perioperative transfusion.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Median chest tube output (CTO) at 6 and 12 hours postoperatively was nearly identical in patients treated with aprotinin or EACA (660 and 1,015 v 700 and 950 mL for aprotinin and EACA at 6 and 12 hours, respectively), as were total perioperative blood transfusions. Complications were not significantly different between groups with the exception of a trend toward increased incidence of renal failure in the group receiving EACA.

CONCLUSION

Aprotinin and EACA appear to be equally efficacious in reducing perioperative blood loss and transfusion requirements in patients undergoing aortic surgery involving DHCA. Questions of safety remain about the use of EACA in this setting that could not be addressed by this small retrospective study. A prospective, placebo-controlled study is warranted to confirm the absolute efficacy of these agents and to better define safety issues.

Fibrinolysis-adjusted perioperative low-dose aprotinin reduces blood loss in bypass operations

BACKGROUND

Postoperative bleeding still remains a serious problem in bypass surgery. This study evaluated fibrinolysis and perioperative low-dose antifibrinolytic regimens adjusted to the time course of fibrinolysis.

METHODS

In a prospective, randomized study of 42 patients undergoing bypass grafting, patients received low-dose aprotinin (group A; n = 14) or low-dose tranexamic acid (group TA; n = 14) intraoperatively and postoperatively, respectively, with no antifibrinolytics for comparison (group C; n = 14). Parameters of procoagulation, fibrinolysis, and activated factor VII were measured preoperatively, intraoperatively, and postoperatively. Blood loss was determined up to 24 hours.

RESULTS

The level of thrombin-antithrombin III complex was significantly decreased postoperatively in the treatment groups (group A and TA versus C: 25 +/- 14 and 19 +/- 10 microg/L, respectively, versus 40 +/- 21 microg/L; p < 0.05). Levels of plasmin-antiplasmin complexes were significantly decreased postoperatively in group A (607 +/- 231 microg/L) versus group C (825 +/- 225 microg/L) (p < 0.05) but were increased in group TA (1,145 +/- 394 microg/L) versus group C (p < 0.05). At all times intraoperatively and postoperatively, levels of D-dimers were significantly decreased in group A and group TA versus control (p < 0.001), indicating that fibrinolysis persists after the operation. Intraoperatively, the factor VIIa level decreased significantly in group A (20 +/- 8 mU/mL) versus group C (31 +/- 15 mU/mL) (p < 0.05), but not in group TA (32 +/- 15 mU/mL). Blood loss was significantly lower in group A (135 +/- 37 mL) and group TA (155 +/- 71 mL) versus group C (354 +/- 170 mL) (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This low-dose aprotinin regimen adjusted to perioperative fibrinolysis reduces blood loss significantly in coronary bypass grafting. For further progress in this subject, clinical investigations of individual fibrinolysis-adjusted antifibrinolytic treatment seems warranted.

Predictors of blood loss after coronary artery bypass grafting

OBJECTIVE

To assess the predictive value of variables possibly associated with blood loss after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

DESIGN

A prospective study.

SETTING

A university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Eighty-nine patients scheduled for elective CABG.

INTERVENTIONS

Blood samples were drawn before and after surgery. Chest tube drainage was measured hourly until removal of drains.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Activation of coagulation and fibrinolysis, routine clotting tests, and expression of platelet surface antigens were analyzed using flow cytometry. A significant correlation was found among blood loss and activated partial thromboplastin time, fibrinogen, prothrombin fragment 1 + 2, D-dimers, platelet count, GPIb and P-selectin expression on platelets, use of internal thoracic artery, cross-clamp time, and thrombin-antithrombin III complex. In a multiple regression model, glycoprotein (GP) Ib expression on platelets, platelet count, use of internal thoracic artery, and D-dimers were significantly associated with blood loss. Logistic regression analysis showed that GPIb and D-dimers predicted an increased blood loss with a positive predictive value of 73% and a negative predictive value of 91%.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative D-dimers and GPIb expression may be useful to exclude nonsurgical causes in bleeding patients after CABG.

Intrinsic Anticoagulation: Protein C, Protein S, and Thrombomodulin

The protein C anticoagulant system provides important control over the blood coagulation cascade. Any alteration in this pathway, either hereditary, iatrogenic, or otherwise, may interfere with normal coagulation. In this review, current concepts and understanding of surface-dependent hemostatis are reviewed, effects of deficiencies in the intrinsic anticoagulant system are described, and potentially useful therapeutic strategies are proposed. The importance of protein C, protein S, and thrombomodulin in patients undergoing cardiac surgery is specifically addressed. Further work is required before complex interactions of individual components of the intrinsic anticoagulation pathway are fully understood.

Hemostatic Drugs in Prothrombotic or Hypercoagulable States

Certain drug therapies, such as heparin, warfarin, and aspirin, are associated with prothrombotic or hypercoagulable states. If these agents that are administered to prevent thrombosis have been associated with its opposite effect, then agents that are specifically given to inhibit bleeding may produce a deleterious hypocoagulable effect. This article evaluates the risks presented by serine protease inhibitors (ie, aprotinin), lysine analog antifibrinolyics (ie, epsilon aminocaproic acid [Amicar, Wyeth-Ayerst, Philadelphia, PA] and tranexamic acid), and desmopressin acetate (DDAVP, Rhone-Poulenc Rorer, Collegeville, PA). It focuses on their mechanisms of action, particularly their effect on microvascular tone and endothelial function, coagulation factors, platelet function, and the fibrinolytic pathway. It discusses their use in the presence of known thrombin production or fibrinogen conversion and whether certain vascular beds are more prone to drug-related thrombosis.

Endothelial Cell-Blood Interface Actions and the Procoagulant Response

Anesthesiologists and surgeons have focused on the problems of hypocoagulability and resulting hemorrhage after cardiopulmonary bypass. Recent work in endothelial cell biology has demonstrated that the interaction of inflammatory processes and coagulation dysfunction with the endothelium may contribute to either hypocoagulability (bleeding) or hypercoagulability (thrombosis). New work with endothelial cell function and intracellular signaling of procoagulant responses may allow for unique therapeutic interventions in the future.

Endothelial cell injury in cardiovascular surgery: the procoagulant response

The vascular endothelium plays a critical role in the regulation of coagulation through the constitutive expression and release of anticoagulants and the inducible expression of procoagulant substances. Cardiopulmonary bypass dysregulates this process by activating endothelial cells, initially promoting bleeding and then thrombosis. Endothelial cell activation in response to circulating inflammatory mediators leads to the initiation of coagulation when tissue factor is expressed throughout the intravascular space. This results in the widespread consumption of coagulation factors. Additionally, there is a cardiopulmonary bypass-related qualitative platelet defect that is exacerbated by thrombocytopenia as platelets are consumed from the circulation by clot and adherence to the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit. Finally, cardiopulmonary bypass results in the endothelial release of plasminogen activators, which lead to an increase in systemic fibrinolysis. The diffuse generation of thrombin, driven by the inducible intravascular expression of tissue factor, plays a major role in all of these processes. Efforts to understand the critical role of the endothelium in coagulation may lead to novel therapies to prevent bleeding or thrombosis in cardiovascular surgery patients.

Restoration of the normal coagulation process: advances in therapies to antagonize heparin

A number of naturally occurring anticoagulants exist that preserve normal blood fluidity and limit blood clot formation to vascular injury sites, thus acting as regulators of hemostasis. The protein C/protein S pathway is one system that acts to modulate thrombin formation. The activation of protein C by thrombin is accelerated more than 1,000-fold at the endothelial surface by thrombomodulin localized on the endothelial cell. Activated protein C then binds to its co-factor, protein S, and the protein C/protein S complex exerts its antithrombotic function by inactivating the coagulation factors Va and VIIIa. Patients deficient in protein C and protein S may be particularly vulnerable to thrombotic events after cardiac surgery. In addition, several studies suggest that reductions in protein C and protein S concentrations, as well as thrombomodulin, occur during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The possibility of a low anticoagulant potential when heparinization is reversed may be an important factor in the subsequent morbidity associated with thrombotic complications. Aprotinin is a serine protease inhibitor that in vitro binds competitively with the serine protease-activated protein C. However, aprotinin in the clinical setting has not been reported to alter levels of protein C in patients undergoing CPB. Reversal of the heparinization needed for CPB is almost universally performed with protamine. However, protamine has many deleterious effects. Recombinant platelet factor 4 (rPF4) has been proposed as an alternative to protamine. We investigated the effective heparin neutralization dose of rPF4 vs. the standard agent protamine in human blood activated through exposure to the CPB circuit. Activated clotting time (ACT) measurements suggested a 2:1 (w/w) reversal ratio for rPF4 and protamine. The first human open-label phase 1 trial of rPF4 reported no serious side effects and no important hemodynamic effects. Doses of 2.5 and 5.0 mg/kg were uniformly effective in reversing the anticoagulant effect of heparin and reducing the ACT to <200 s by 5 min after administration. Repeated monitoring of the ACT did not detect a rebound effect of heparin.