The management of malignant gliomas with radiation therapy: Therapeutic results and research strategies

Clinical Results of Unconventional Fractionation Radiotherapy in Central Nervous System Tumors

Malignant brain tumors (primary and metastatic) are apparently resistant to most therapeutic efforts. Several randomized trials have provided evidence supporting the efficacy of radiation therapy. Attempts at improving the results of external beam radiotherapy include altered fractionation, radiation sensitizers and concomitant chemotherapy. In low-grade gliomas, all clinical studies with radiotherapy have employed conventional dose fractionation regimens. In high-grade gliomas, hypofractionation schedules represent effective palliative regimens in poor prognosis subsets of patients; short-term survival in these patients has not allowed to evaluate late toxicity. In tumors arising within the central nervous system, hyperfractionated irradiation exploits the differences in repair capacity between tumour and late responding normal tissues. It may allow for higher total dose and may result in increased tumor cell kill. Accelerated radiotherapy may reduce the repopulation of tumor cells between fractions. It may potentially improve tumor control for a given dose level, provided that there is no increase in late normal tissue injury. In supratentorial malignant gliomas, superiority of accelerated hyperfractionated over conventionally fractionated schedules was observed in a randomized trial; however, the gain in survival was less than 6 months. At present no other randomized trial supports the preferential choice for altered fractionation irradiation. Also in pediatric brainstem tumors there are no data to confirm the routine use of hyperfractionated irradiation, and significant late sequelae have been reported in the few long-term survivors. Shorter treatment courses with accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy may represent a useful alternative to conventional irradiation for the palliation of brain metastases. Different considerations have been proposed to explain this gap between theory and clinical data. Patients included in dose/effect studies are not stratified by prognostic factors and other treatment-related parameters. This observation precludes any definite conclusion about the relative role of conventional and of altered fractionation. New approaches are currently in progress. More prolonged radiation treatments, up to higher total doses, could delay time to tumor progression and improve survival in good prognosis subsets of patients; altered fractionation may be an effective therapeutic tool to achieve this goal.

Prognostic factors and therapeutic options of radiotherapy in pediatric brain stem gliomas

BACKGROUND

A retrospective analysis was made to clarify the relationship between prognosis, radiation dose and survival of brain stem gliomas.

METHODS

From 1983 to 1995, 22 children with brain stem tumors were treated by radiotherapy in the Veterans General Hospital-Taipei. Twelve patients had pathology proof and the remainder were diagnosed by computerized tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging. Seven patients had postoperative radiotherapy. Fifteen patients had radiotherapy as primary management, five of whom had adjuvant chemotherapy. All patients received 4000-7060 cGy, either in conventional daily or hyperfractionated twice daily radiotherapy. Survival from date of diagnosis was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate analyses and multivariate analyses were calculated by the log rank test and the Cox proportional hazard model, respectively.

RESULTS

Most patients showed improvement following treatment. The overall 2-year survival rate was 55.5% with a median survival of 27.1 months. Two-year survival for patients with primary management of operation and radiotherapy (n = 7), radiotherapy alone (n = 10) and radiotherapy with adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 5) were 66.7, 50 and 53.3%, respectively. In univariate analysis, the study revealed that the growth pattern of tumors and the simultaneous presence of cranial neuropathy and long tract sign were significant prognostic factors (P = 0.017 and 0.036). A trend of better outcome with radiation dose > 6600 cGy and the hyperfractionation scheme was also noted in our study (P = 0.0573 and 0.0615). However, only the hyperfractionation scheme was also noted in our study (P = 0.0573 and 0.0615). However, only the hyperfractionation scheme showed significance in multivariate analyses (P = 0.0355). Survival was not significantly affected by age, gender or method of diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Radiotherapy appears to be an effective treatment modality of brain stem tumors. Patients with both cranial neuropathy and long tract signs had a poorer outcome. Hyperfractionated radiotherapy may give better local control and lead to better survival.

Quality-adjusted survival analysis of malignant glioma patients

The goal of therapeutic intervention in oncology patients is to prolong survival without compromising its quality. Definition and measurement of quality are quite difficult. This article discusses the statistical techniques for quantifying quality survival that have been used in brain tumor patients. These techniques assume either that all patients have equivalent baseline quality of life when both disease-related symptoms and toxicities are absent, or that the length of time with a predetermined level of impairment is equivalent to death. These models do not fit the heterogeneous symptoms experienced by patients with malignant brain tumors. We propose a model that incorporates the baseline states with transitions to different levels of severity that indicate improvement and/or declines in physical and cognitive functioning of brain tumor patients. The length of time spent in each state is observed and weighted by using predetermined utilities. The weighted time spent in each state is aggregated over all states into a quality-time of survival metric (QTIME). This QTIME model was applied to a previously published, randomized clinical trial of different radiation doses in malignant brain tumor patients.

The role of nutrition in prevention and healing of pressure ulcers

Among the many risk factors for pressure ulcers, malnutrition is potentially reversible. This article examines the relationship of malnutrition to the prevention and healing of pressure ulcers. Evidence for nutrition in preventing and healing pressure ulcers is presented. Specific nutrients, including some amino acids, vitamins, and minerals, have been evaluated for their effects on wound healing.

Central pathology review in clinical trials for patients with malignant glioma. A Report of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 83-02

BACKGROUND

Confounding biologic factors, including histologic grade, may influence the outcome of adult patients with malignant gliomas more than may modifications in therapeutic approach. Any clinical trial design for malignant gliomas in adults must account for such biologic factors, including the accurate identification of the two histologic subgroups astrocytoma with anaplastic foci (AAF) or glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), which are associated with distinctly different survival outcomes. This paper examines the need for a central pathology review before entry of patients in cooperative group clinical trials stratified by histologic grade.

METHODS

Pathology slides from Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) trial 83-02, a randomized Phase II study of hyperfractionated and accelerated hyperfractionated radiation therapy and carmustine for malignant gliomas, provided 747 analyzable cases, with 680 (91%) available for central pathology review. This review was performed by a single pathologist according to RTOG/Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group histopathologic criteria. The kappa statistic was used to measure agreement between the institutional and central classification of AAF and GBM. The influence of misclassification was examined using computer simulation of varying clinical trial sizes (n = 25, 50, or 200). The effect on the statistical power of trials (n = 200) with varying mixtures of AAF and GBM tumors was investigated using computer simulations.

RESULTS

Of 159 tumors classified as AAF by institutional pathology review, only 66% (105) were classified as AAF (AAF/AAF) by central review, and 54 of these cases (34%) were classified as GBM (GBM/AAF), whereas 96% (501) of 521 institutionally classified as GBM (GBM/GBM) were similarly classified by central review. Computer simulations demonstrated a 59% underestimation in the median survival (1.82 vs. 4.49 years) for trials of patients with institutionally defined AAF compared to patients with centrally defined AAF in studies of 200 patients, resulting from the addition of poor prognosis of GBM in the trial. Misclassification can also substantially reduce the statistical power of a clinical trial. In one of the simulation studies, statistical power was reduced from 65% to 14% if 50% of the patients were to receive an inaccurate histologic classification. Even greater losses in power are possible in many plausible clinical settings.

CONCLUSIONS

This examination of a central versus an institutional pathology review demonstrates a low level of agreement on AAF classification and a high level of concordance on GBM classification. The results indicate the need to adjust sample size for trials of both AAF and GBM tumors to have adequate statistical power. A central pathology review remains essential for trial entry for patients with AAF and could be omitted for trials enrolling patients with GBM only.

Pharmacodynamics of prolonged treatment with L,S-buthionine sulfoximine

PURPOSE

To develop dosing criteria for the use of L-buthionine-S-sulfoximine (active diastereoisomer) as a glutathione depletor in the clinic, using a pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic in vitro-in vivo approach.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In vitro: L-buthionine-S-sulfoximine uptake was determined in human glioblastoma cells (T98G) and NIH-3T3 cells using 35S-labeled drug. Dose response relationships were derived for inhibition of glutathione synthesis in CHO cells, and for depletion of glutathione in exponentially growing T98G and CHO cells, as a function of extracellular L-buthionine-S-sulfoximine concentration. Steady-state glutathione levels for CHO and NIH-3T3 cells were measured using an enzymatic assay, while glutathione synthesis rates in CHO cells were determined using a flow cytometric assay. In vivo: L-buthionine-S-sulfoximine biodistribution was determined in male nude mice carrying human glioblastomas (T98G) intracranially, using 35S-labeled drug infused subcutaneously by osmotic pump. Tissue glutathione levels were measured using an enzymatic assay.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

The observed cellular uptake t1/2 of approximately 55 min, coupled with a previously reported, rapid in vivo clearance of buthionine sulfoximine, suggest that continuous infusion would be preferable to bolus dosing. Effective concentrations of L-buthionine-S-sulfoximine (24 h exposure), required to lower cellular glutathione content to 50% of control (EC50), were under 1 mM for both cell lines. The amount of L-buthionine-S-sulfoximine in tissues (estimated from 35S drug disposition) reached steady state within 8 h and was proportional to the rate of infusion. Brain tumors were depleted to approximately 50% of control glutathione by a infusion rate of 0.25 mumoles/h (25 g mice). At lower infusion rates an increase in glutathione content was noted in certain nude mouse tissues including brain tumor xenografts.

The basis for current treatment recommendations for malignant gliomas

Although primary brain tumors represent an important cause of cancer related mortality in the United States, advances in the treatment of these tumors has been slow and has generally lagged behind that of most systemic tumors. One of the major reasons for this is the paucity of well conducted, prospective radiation and chemotherapy trials. For the brain tumor trials that have been conducted, small patient numbers, heterogeneous patient populations, and non-uniformity of response criteria, have made the current clinical data base difficult to interpret. Data from several prospective, multi-institutional randomized trials have defined a role for radiation therapy in the treatment of malignant gliomas and on-going trials will help define refinements in technique. Although there does appear to be a place for the use of chemotherapy in the treatment of a subgroup of patients with malignant gliomas, its role for the majority of patients remains unclear. Only through better understanding of the biology of these tumors, more effective therapies, and the implementation of better clinical trial design can we hope to make significant progress in the treatment of malignant gliomas.