Secretion of prostate-specific antigen-suppressing activity by two human prostate carcinoma cell lines

Differences in the expression and effects of interleukin-1 and -2 on androgen-sensitive and -insensitive human prostate cancer cell lines

The presence of interleukin-1 (IL-1) and IL-2 mRNA in five human prostate cancer (PCa) cell lines and their effects on cellular proliferation and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels were examined. IL-1 was found in androgen-unresponsive PC-3 and DU-145 but not in the androgen-responsive LNCaP, MDA-PCA-2a and MDA-PCA-2b cell lines. IL-2 message was absent while that of GAPDH (positive control) was present in all five cell lines. IL-1 decreased while IL-2 increased PSA levels of near-confluent LNCaP cells after 24 h of treatment. IL-1 inhibited whereas IL-2 stimulated the growth of sub-confluent LNCaP cells (72 h). Neither cytokine affected the proliferation of DU-145 or PC-3 cells.

Diagnostic and prognostic markers for human prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

The incidence and mortality of prostate cancer are increasing at alarming rates, partially due to an aging population. Early detection of prostate cancer, using clinically sensitive procedures and/or tumor markers (e.g., prostate-specific antigen [PSA]), is of prime importance. However, the choice of therapeutic interventions for prostate cancer at the time of diagnosis is largely dependent on clinical and pathologic staging and prediction of the degree of aggressiveness of the disease. Clinically applicable prognostic markers are urgently needed to assist in the selection of optimal therapy.

METHODS

Literature review of the potential diagnostic and prognostic markers for human prostate cancer.

RESULTS

Well-established tissue prognostic indicators, including histologic grade, margin positivity, pathologic stage, intraglandular tumor extent, and DNA ploidy, are not reviewed in this paper. Recently, a number of novel markers have been identified. In this paper, we begin with a discussion of a number of well-established as well as investigational diagnostic markers and then focus on evaluation of prognostic markers. Diagnostic markers that have prognostic value and investigational prognostic markers are also discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently, only PSA is utilized for early diagnosis and monitoring of prostate cancer. A number of potential prognostic markers warrant further investigation. Multimarker analysis is implicated.